« Barack Obama's Secret Plan | destor23's Blog | What Do Barack Obama and Hamid Karzai Have In Common? »

Make Federal Employee Plan Available To Everyone


It's not a public plan, it's administered, in fact, by private insurers, but since members of congress and federal employees have access to the federal health insurance options, the rest of the country should too.

It is, indeed, gold plated care.  The government picks up 2/3rds of the premiums and there's a range of choices with various deductibles and co-pays.  The big thing, though is that the government picks up 2/3rds of the premiums.  Self employed workers and employees of small companies would benefit greatly from being able to join the congressional plans.  For poorer people who can't afford to pay 1/3rd premiums, we could have bigger subsidies, including enrolling people for free.

As for employees of larger companies (and some smaller ones) who get a better deal than our congressional reps -- well, they'll keep their current plans.  One added benefit of this is that private insurers will have a tough time cutting services or raising premiums because people will always be able to walk and pick the fed plan.

This isn't ideal. But it's a solution.  If there's no public option at all, we should at least do something to stop members of Congress from taking advantage of a better deal than most people get.

Frankly, I think that with a strong public option we could get better than congressional care to everyone in America. But what congress has now should be considered the absolute minimum in this debate.

8 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

How does this address the problem of insurance companies rescinding policies and refusing persons with preexisting conditions?

user-pic

Excellent question. All I can say is that you don't here about congressional reps having their coverage dropped...

user-pic

Well, I don't think Teddy Kennedy has had his insurance stopped because of his diagnosis. The way to take care of the pre-existing condition issue is to regulate it; and the way to prevent "dumping" is to do the same thing, and also not have insurance pegged to employment.

The repubs want to play hardball. OK, let them give the American populace what THEY have! Great idea!

user-pic

Whether it's modeled on Medicare or the Federal employees plan, there needs to be a public option in order to introduce competition to the healthcare market. I don't know how the Dems propose to accomplish their stated goals, like controlling costs, without this.

user-pic

How does one define: PUBLIC OPTION?

A coop is a public option, non profit corps are public options, medicare and medicaid are public options....

We may see a public option that just does not say public option.

I mean destor, the repubs had a clean air act that was a dirty air act, tax relief for the middle class that was not tax relief for the middle class..

user-pic

A public option covers the nation. You don't have to worry when you go from one state to another or when you lose your job. Like medicare, you go from place to place and you are covered. If you have to move across country, you're covered. You go on vacation, you're covered. Period. The government is the administrator, like Medicare.

I don't really understand what they have in mind for the coops, but regional coops don't sound portable to me. Are you doomed to live in that region forever? Can you go to the grand canyon for vacation and be covered by a coop when you live in upper Michigan? Who knows. The senator are negotiating in secret and haven't even told us how their plan works. My guess is that it doesn't work except in very localized rural areas.

user-pic

To me a public option can really only be called a public option if it allows every American without insurance to sign up and every American with insurance the right to dump their insurer in favor ofthe public plan. The regional co-ops as I understand them won't allow that.

user-pic

A co-op isn't the same as a public option nor is a nonprofit corporation. I think you more accurately should have stated: we may see something completely other than a public option that people try to pretend is the same thing by using misleading semantics.

The term "public option" is a literal description of a specific proposed entity. Semantically construing a completely different entity using the words "public option" as a generalized description is not the same as accomplishing the specific policy referred to by the words "public option".

Leave a comment

destor23

user-pic

Following: 96
Followers: 48

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Website: thosethingswesay.blogspot.com
  • Location New York City
  • Party We've thrown a few
  • Politics social libertarian, economic liberal, foreign policy skeptic.

Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs TPM, Atrios, Swampland, Forbes Trailwatch.
  • Favorite Books The Great Gatsby
  • Favorite Quotes Diamonds are forever and so is Ric Flair.

Bio

Writer, journalist, typist.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address