« January 25, 2009 - January 31, 2009 | Home | February 8, 2009 - February 14, 2009 »

Week of February 1, 2009 - February 7, 2009

No More TARP $ To Wall St.


I know you're all political junkies so you might have missed this morning's report from Oppenheimer & Co analyst Meredith Whitney, who had just spoken with Michael Cavanaugh, the chief financial officer of JP Morgan.  During his interview with Whitney, Cavanaugh flat out admitted that TARP money will not get JP Morgan to spend more.

This is Whitney's assessment:

"The industry is pulling in its horns, and JPM is no exception with respect to its diminished risk appetite. Cavanaugh noted that no amount of capital provided by the government would change JPM's tolerance for lending risk, and that JPM does not feel capital constrained regarding lending opportunities for its customer base."

JP Morgan is one of the strongest banks out there but it has still taken public money.  The folks at Morgan are not interested in lending more than they already are.  They are not interested in taking risks, even with taxpayer dollars.

The message is clear: If we cut them checks, they will hoard the cash.

Cavanaugh also addresses the "bad bank" issue and again, his take is not good.  It might loosen up credit at "peer banks," Whitney reports.  Notice that he doesn't say it would loosen up credit from JP Morgan.  If you take Cavanaugh at his word, the only thing that will do that is an end to the recession.

If a "Bad Bank" and taxpayer money won't get JP Morgan lending, we have no reason to believe it will get any of Morgan's competitors lending either.  It's time to rethink TARP.

Tom Daschle's Tax Problem


I think I actually don't have a problem with Tom Daschle's tax problem.

Instead, I have a problem with the IRS and the taxation of barter income.

Tom Daschle had to pay in excess of $100,000 in back taxes because he used a car and driver employed by a friend of his.  The way the IRS sees it, Daschle got a service worth over $300,000 for free and thus has to pay taxes on it.

You can give away money or services to people tax free but only if it's worth less than $15,000. Now there are all sorts of good reasons for this -- since money is really a means to get goods and services, some people could find a way to live uber-wealthy lives by not accepting cash payments for their services.  The gift tax limits also keep people from avoiding estate taxes just by giving large assets to their heirs before they die.

But we can still accomplish those goals without having a tax code that creates absurd situations like what happened to Daschle.  For one thing, taxes have already been paid for the car and driver.  The driver's employer pays certain taxes to employ the driver and the driver pays taxes on his income.  Those taxes are paid no matter who the driver is driving around.

The IRS sees this as Daschle getting something for nothing and so he should have to pay taxes on it.  Okay, but is that truly necessary?  $100,000 is a lot of money.  If Daschle's friend offered me the unlimited use of his car and driver, does the IRS believe that I should have to turn him down because I can't afford to pay taxes on the service?  That's patently absurd since the service is not a liquid security.  The only way to monetize the service would be to take the gift and then charge other people to use the driver i have access to.  But if I did that, I'd pay taxes on the income I made in that scheme.

Daschle really didn't do anything wrong and the Treasury should send him his money back with an apology. The IRS shouldn't tax barter arrangements unless somebody is living a lavish lifestyle that's more than 3/4s funded by barter or there's good reason to think that a wealth transfer or estate planning issue is involved (ie, I give away an operating business to somebody).

Every time these tax issues creep up we wag our fingers at the politicians.  But maybe, sometimes, the tax code is at fault.

 
« January 25, 2009 - January 31, 2009 | Home | February 8, 2009 - February 14, 2009 »

destor23

user-pic

Following: 96
Followers: 49

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Website: thosethingswesay.blogspot.com
  • Location New York City
  • Party We've thrown a few
  • Politics social libertarian, economic liberal, foreign policy skeptic.

Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs TPM, Atrios, Swampland, Forbes Trailwatch.
  • Favorite Books The Great Gatsby
  • Favorite Quotes Diamonds are forever and so is Ric Flair.

Bio

Writer, journalist, typist.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address