<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Desidero&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/desidero/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/desidero/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/desidero//2393</id>
   <updated>2010-09-15T18:56:14Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Blog of the Future</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/09/blog-of-the-future.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/desidero//2393.351664</id>
   
   <published>2010-09-15T18:55:25Z</published>
   <updated>2010-09-15T18:56:14Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Scratch space for exporting blog...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Desidero</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/desidero/">
      Scratch space for exporting blog 
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Taser This, Taser That: Breathing While Upright or In Sight</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/09/taser-this-taser-that-breathin.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/desidero//2393.351507</id>
   
   <published>2010-09-14T20:55:01Z</published>
   <updated>2010-09-14T21:15:20Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I used to be amazed by the rights we gave up just be stepping into a car, to be searched at a whim by a cop whether driving or not (ID check, step out of the car, just a quick...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Desidero</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/desidero/">
      <![CDATA[I used to be amazed by the rights we gave up just be stepping into a car, to be searched at a whim by a cop whether driving or not (ID check, step out of the car, just a quick once-over).<br /><br />But those were my naïve days. Now we have condoned electroshock - multiple times, enough to light up Jack Nicholson like a Christmas tree, Randall Patrick McMurphy might say.<br /><br />You can be a child, an old woman, fallen-down drunk where you can't get up, in the middle of cardiac arrest &amp; unable to speak, entering your own house, in someone else's seat at a ball game or even your own - there's just no end to situations where you can be tasered for your own fun &amp; safety.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_enNmzWn6Y">Welcome to the jungle</a>. Though switched sides from that modern parable - it's the new black* - breathing while upright. Welcome to the jungle baby, watch it bring you to your knees.<br /><br />*Pun - "the new black" originally referred to clothes color - the wardrobe that went anywhere for any occasion. <br />&nbsp;<br /> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>A Farewell to Arms: What I Did In the Peace</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/09/a-farewell-to-arms-what-i-did.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/desidero//2393.351302</id>
   
   <published>2010-09-13T17:40:16Z</published>
   <updated>2010-09-13T17:50:06Z</updated>
   
   <summary>When I was a kid, I wrote a poem about a wounded soldier on a battlefield who had the bad luck to be wounded as peace was declared.Apparently I&apos;m lucky enough to watch my little vignette unfold in Iraq, where...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Desidero</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/desidero/">
      <![CDATA[When I was a kid, I wrote a poem about a wounded soldier on a battlefield who had the bad luck to be wounded as peace was declared.<br /><br />Apparently I'm lucky enough to watch my little vignette unfold in Iraq, where with our pullout declared and our combat adventure finished, a few unfortunates <a href="http://news.antiwar.com/2010/09/12/report-us-troops-involved-in-iraq-combat-again/">finding themselves leading non-combat combat activities. </a><br /><br />Fortunately for them, none seem to be have been killed yet, but we've moved another step in our post-WWII mindset: from undeclared wars in Korea &amp; Vietnam to get us into them, we also undeclare undeclared wars to try to get out. It's curiouser and curiouser to me to try and fathom why Lewis Carroll wasn't a Yank, as only we as a nation seem capable of taking the piss out of logic at every turn.<br /><br />So anyway, at some point some unfortunate mother's son will be the first to die or be injured for the sake of maintaining the Peace, meaning the first to die in the Illusion of Peace, in keeping the War off the front page and out of the elections, in keeping the Bloom off the Rose, in maintaining La Grande Illusion that Renoir so nicely depicted.<br /><br />The only real way to say goodbye to War is to say Farewell to Arms. And that's a business America will never give up. <br /><br />Don't Forget to Vote. Don't Forget to Floss. Keep your chin up and head down.<br /> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Dogs: What If They Threw An Election And Nobody Came?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/09/dogs-what-if-they-threw-an-ele.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/desidero//2393.351190</id>
   
   <published>2010-09-12T15:46:51Z</published>
   <updated>2010-09-12T15:53:53Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Once upon a time I think Bertolt Brecht wrote:&quot;What if they gave a war and nobody came? Why, then, the war would come to you! He who stays home when the fight begins And lets another fight for his cause...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Desidero</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/desidero/">
      <![CDATA[Once upon a time I think Bertolt Brecht wrote:<br /><br /><blockquote>"What if they gave a war and nobody came?<br />
Why, then, the war would come to you!<br />
He who stays home when the fight begins<br />
And lets another fight for his cause <br />
Should take care:<br />
He who does not take part<br />
In the battle will share in the defeat.<br />
Even avoiding battle will not avoid battle.<br />
Since not to fight for your own cause <br />
Really means<br />
Fighting on behalf of your enemy's cause."<br /></blockquote>What if they threw an election and nobody came?&nbsp; You mean "throw" like lose on purpose? Or just hold? Hard to tell these days. Will we be fighting/voting on behalf of our enemy's cause? Will the enemy come to us?<br /><br />I suppose the real question for Mr. Brecht and ourselves is, "what is our cause?" Because if that war held, if that election held is for some other purpose, someone else's agenda, maybe we don't have a dog in that fight.<br /><br />And then the question for ourselves may be, "But *shouldn't* we have a dog in that fight?" Because in the end there's nothing worse than taking care of someone else's dog.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>War 4-evuh! Insulting Muslims in our Time</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/09/war-4-evuh-insulting-muslims-i.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/desidero//2393.351132</id>
   
   <published>2010-09-11T12:08:19Z</published>
   <updated>2010-09-11T12:32:08Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I finally clued in one reason the Mosque debate is incongruous to me.Somehow, I&apos;m told, denying or arguing about a particular mosque/community center in close to Ground Zero is an insult to 1 1/2 billion Muslims worldwide (who people guess...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Desidero</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/desidero/">
      <![CDATA[I finally clued in one reason the Mosque debate is incongruous to me.<br /><br />Somehow, I'm told, denying or arguing about a particular mosque/community center in close to Ground Zero is an insult to 1 1/2 billion Muslims worldwide (who people guess are very worried about this - perhaps someone can provide evidence).<br /><br />But our Nobel Peace President's <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/09/08/obama/index.html">continued defense of Bush's use of the State Secrets Act for secret rendition and torture of Muslim Canadian and British nationals, with our court system's approval</a>? Somehow there's no big protest or scandal about that. Think Muslims don't care? Which Constitutional right do you think they're rather discuss worldwide, the right to not be blindfolded and flown somewhere to be tortured, or the right to build a particular Muslim center a few blocks from the WTC?<br /><br />Drones that indiscriminately kill Muslims because they might be near suspected terrorists? No insult there. A new class of Americans targeted for extra-judicial killings because they might be aiding &amp; abetting terrorists somewhere in the world while being Muslim. No insult there. Placing a 15-year-old Muslim kid in a military tribunal because he may have thrown a grenade in a fire fight during a US military raid on an arms house, and threatening him with rape to get info out of him - no insult there. See, all our Constitutional rights are safe, except that important one of being able to build a Muslim center near Ground Zero. <br /><br />And good thing our Chief Executive and FBI &amp; private citizens will be stepping in to harass our idiot Koran burner, to let him know that while we believe strongly in the inviolability of the Constitution, better not abuse the document by doing something we find distasteful, or we have other ways of getting back at you. It's the American way - find a loophole and run with it.<br /><br />And Empty Wheel notes that our supposedly liberal (har har har) Supreme Court replacement <a href="http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2010/09/10/with-kagan-on-scotus-we-are-still-down-a-justice/">is going to recuse herself from more than half the Supreme Court's cases this year</a>, so we get bupkus, and the effective 8-member court moves further to the right.<br /><br />State of War, 2010-eternity. Our new acting Commander-in-Chief, Petraeus, has told us like Ari Fleischer told us post-9/11, we have to watch what we say. Since we're in a continuing state of war, loose lips sink ships, burnt Korans sink soldiers. Put a sock in it until the effort's over, perhaps about the time of Buck Rogers in the 25th Century. No matter where you go, there you are. Har har har.<br /><br />PS - Do miss my Kipling-esque Kanda-har-har-har poem for Rootie. <br /><br /><br /> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Last Day of Our Acquaintance</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/09/last-day-of-our-acquantance.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/desidero//2393.350985</id>
   
   <published>2010-09-10T10:00:32Z</published>
   <updated>2010-09-10T13:18:47Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Maybe, maybe not, but always nice for a call out from Sinead. Oh ho ho. Make sure to hang on to the bitter end. ====&gt;Or this one. ========&gt;Just hang on.And for your official Bitter End Airsoft Googles, just click ================&gt;here....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Desidero</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/desidero/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Maybe, maybe not, but always nice for <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiWN4KIT4So">a call out from Sinead.<img src="http://i4.ytimg.com/vi/sxIDulVVmQA/default.jpg" /></a> Oh ho ho. Make sure to hang on <a href="http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://media.nj.com/photogallery/photo/6b48261bb30450fff9c2c01a97ae43db_custom_665xauto.jpg&imgrefurl=http://photos.nj.com/photogallery/2009/09/billy_hectors_bitter_end.html&usg=__fdAfllQ3aIzGfPaCuiicWrXDd-c=&h=230&w=330&sz=401&hl=en&start=207&zoom=1&tbnid=JCQ982UNpanYcM:&tbnh=140&tbnw=176&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dbitter%2Bend%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D599%26tbs%3Disch:10%2C5486&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=970&vpy=250&dur=4601&hovh=187&hovw=270&tx=207&ty=84&ei=SAKKTL7DLMbOswbClZTuAQ&oei=R_-JTPOsDcWG4QaJlY2uCg&esq=53&page=12&ndsp=20&ved=1t:429,r:19,s:207&biw=1280&bih=599">to the bitter end. <br />====><img width="330" height="230" src="http://media.nj.com/photogallery/photo/6b48261bb30450fff9c2c01a97ae43db_custom_665xauto.jpg" /></a>Or <a href="http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/12/30/article-1102421-02E8EB4E000005DC-688_468x305.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1102421/Israel-promises-war-bitter-end-Hamas-navy-blasts-Gaza-tanks-mass-border.html&amp;usg=__Kq7ISmecViYSpQZANSDwmyp8U_Y=&amp;h=305&amp;w=468&amp;sz=41&amp;hl=en&amp;start=282&amp;zoom=1&amp;tbnid=xvenNomoS_SinM:&amp;tbnh=129&amp;tbnw=186&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dbitter%2Bend%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DN%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D599%26tbs%3Disch:10%2C7261&amp;um=1&amp;itbs=1&amp;iact=hc&amp;vpx=854&amp;vpy=311&amp;dur=3449&amp;hovh=181&amp;hovw=278&amp;tx=105&amp;ty=107&amp;ei=Yv2JTLrQAsuLswaP65CiAg&amp;oei=Bv2JTMCqH4yV4gb6t8SXCg&amp;esq=20&amp;page=16&amp;ndsp=20&amp;ved=1t:429,r:18,s:282&amp;biw=1280&amp;bih=599">this one. <br />========><img width="330" height="230" src="http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTA2Vs-6EbYxH8qNlkq54tuwP6MVFpqK8xWjTmvcyoTUMbQpD8&t=1&usg=__REozqJNXf5q_b9-ZfiFITajnORY=" /></a><br /><br />Just hang on.<br /><br />And for your official Bitter End Airsoft Googles, just click <a href="http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.st6-airsoft.com/BitterEnd_lower_mask%2520011ar.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.arniesairsoft.co.uk/forums/index.php%3Fshowtopic%3D180547&usg=__1i-COqFxujRpjOmiOI25c07q6bQ=&h=231&w=600&sz=41&hl=en&start=169&zoom=1&tbnid=nSlbDoYkHZRclM:&tbnh=67&tbnw=174&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dbitter%2Bend%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D599%26tbs%3Disch:10%2C4357&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=74&vpy=369&dur=4667&hovh=139&hovw=362&tx=188&ty=94&ei=sACKTPXxNtDOswaFntnQAQ&oei=R_-JTPOsDcWG4QaJlY2uCg&esq=36&page=10&ndsp=20&ved=1t:429,r:14,s:169&biw=1280&bih=599"><img src="http://www.st6-airsoft.com/BitterEnd_lower_mask%20011ar.jpg" />================>here</a>. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> </p>

<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45tNIG8yuoo&amp;feature=related"><img width="660" height="280" src="http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTCB6Xv_h2rWSihIZ5UjHIsWTtVFSEyf6xGMJIntqdqNExkjxk&amp;t=1&amp;usg=__9qfG7Wadbg9GAM1Gs8eyiEzMqo4=" /></a></p>
]]>
      

   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Love One Another</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/09/love-one-another.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/desidero//2393.350305</id>
   
   <published>2010-09-04T18:54:37Z</published>
   <updated>2010-09-04T19:16:19Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Over the course of a few years between election cycles, rise of Teabaggers and all sorts of other excuses for raving against the other, the enemy, I&apos;ve been time and again amazed by the intolerance, the inability to acknowledge any...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Desidero</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/desidero/">
      <![CDATA[Over the course of a few years between election cycles, rise of Teabaggers and all sorts of other excuses for raving against the other, the enemy, I've been time and again amazed by the intolerance, the inability to acknowledge any iota of reasonableness from the opposition by people who often think of themselves as progressive liberals. <br /><br />"If only the other side would behave I could return to having lofty decent values".<br /><br />Bob Somerby at Daily Howler has been tracing Martin Luther King's philosophical evolution lately, <a href="http://www.dailyhowler.com/dh090310.shtml">and it makes for good reading</a>, especially bits of "Stride towards Freedom" that can be found on the Web.<br /><br />Somerby quotes:<br /><blockquote><b>I tried to put myself in the place of the police commissioners. I said to myself these are not bad men. They are misguided.</b>
 They have fine reputations in the community. In their dealings with 
white people they are respectful and gentlemanly. They probably think 
they are right in their methods of dealing with Negroes. <b>They say the things they say about us and treat us as they do because they have been taught these things.</b>
 From the cradle to the grave, it is instilled in them that the Negro is
 inferior. Their parents probably taught them that; the schools they 
attended taught them that; the books they read, even their churches and 
ministers, often taught them that; and above all the very concept of 
segregation teaches them that. The whole cultural traditional under 
which they have grown--a tradition blighted with more than 250 years of 
slavery and more than 90 years of segregation--teaches them that Negroes 
do not deserve certain things. So these men are merely the children of 
their culture. When they seek to preserve segregation they are seeking 
to preserve only what their local folkways have taught them was right.<br /></blockquote>We're all taught a lot of things, much of it not true - it's part of survival, we grasp at pieces of information to get a fingerhold on reality, and hold onto it long past usefulness, long into counterproductiveness.<br /><br />The fight we're seeing carried on is not about any issue. Time and again whether it's a war or an off comment in an interview, the important and trivial get equal time. It's just about fighting. None of it is solving anything without a greater principle. Sure, there are issues that need to be protected in the meantime, but frankly our blogging doesn't change too much of that unless Rahm is lurking in the corner. More important is that the focus on issues misses the focus on shared human values, our ability to understand the other. <br /><br />We've been commenting lately how kids raised by progressive families still get these anti-gay, racist, sexist stereotypes at an early age - just the cultural vibe that generation after generation keeps us mistrusting, mocking, detesting "The Other". Sure, we tolerate difference if it's just a little different, if it's still in cool range. More than that, we reject or attack, liberal or conservative. It's what we do. <br /><br />"I bring you a new commandment - Love One Another". It's not religious - it's political, it's human, it's sanity.&nbsp; From Gandhi and MLK, a powerful tool in our toolchest, one that's easy to neglect. And folly to as well.<br /><br /> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Musing on Amusing #5: Death of a Blogstar</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/09/musing-on-amusing-5-death-of-a.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/desidero//2393.350011</id>
   
   <published>2010-09-02T09:01:02Z</published>
   <updated>2010-09-02T09:18:24Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Somehow I exist here but don't. A back door, to try to glimpse my previous 13 thousand and someteen comments. Except I can't, "An error occurred".Of course it did.My error in judgment, coming back.Like all good bars &amp; cafés, they're...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Desidero</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/desidero/">
      <![CDATA[Somehow I exist here but don't. A back door, to try to glimpse my previous 13 thousand and someteen comments. Except I can't, "An error occurred".<br /><br />Of course it did.<br /><br />My error in judgment, coming back.<br /><br />Like all good bars &amp; cafés, they're trendy for a while and then fall into disarray, lose their vibe, their clientele, their mojo.<br /><br />TPM seems to have had 4 lifetimes - one as a real readers' cafe, one as a sleuthy guerrilla cub reporter site, one as a D-I-Y journal/blogzone mashup, and one as a bang-em-up smash football election site. Since then I guess there's life #5, a kind of Koffie Klatsch atmosphere of kindred and non-kindred spirits passing the breeze, some as political, some as personal, some just a wee bit bizarre but not enough to resound.<br /><br />I don't know what Josh plans for the café, but the bit about the infrastructure is least important - as ArtAppraiser notes, there's lots of software out there to do the trick and tracking is the most important and still missing feature. <br /><br />The biggest problem is that there's no compelling reason to be here, and the continuing software travesty only makes that reality more absurd. Of course there's still quite a bit of traffic, as TPM is on countless blogrolls. But unlike the tabloidy Politico and the gorilla-tuned celebrity site HuffPost, there's no there here. It's not Digby, it doesn't have a real personality, and as the personal blogs go further underground, it's just another "me-too" site, with a bit of "me and a few of my Jewish friends" which hardly scrapes enough serious Israeli or Middle East analysis to fill a serious foreign policy diet.<br /><br />Which despite my annoyance with the site saddens me, because I do think Josh has more horse sense and journalistic sense than this, and at one time TPMMuckraker did a real service.<br /><br />So here's hoping Josh can pull the plane out of a nosedive and stop blaming it on software or readers or traffic, and note that he just hasn't formulated a real blog vision since he turned the site over to the elections a few years ago. Traffic doesn't make a vision - lots of worn out cafés draw visitors long past their shelf life, looking for that long dried-out fame. Just check out karaoke night at the Riviera, the old Debbie Reynolds hangout in Vegas. Still draws a bit of a crowd, madding as it may be.<br /> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>On Human Emotion</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/08/on-human-emotion.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/desidero//2393.348298</id>
   
   <published>2010-08-18T17:08:02Z</published>
   <updated>2010-08-18T17:18:58Z</updated>
   
   <summary>[Based on a response given earlier]Judges grant rights based on emotions all the time. What&apos;s a restraining order? What&apos;s a court award based on actual damages and emotional suffering? What&apos;s an appeal to the judge to show mercy, a character...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Desidero</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/desidero/">
      <![CDATA[<p>[Based on a response given earlier]<br /></p><p>Judges grant rights based on emotions all the time. </p>

<p>What's a restraining order? What's a court award based on actual 
damages and emotional suffering? What's an appeal to the judge to show mercy, a character witness, a pardon based on difficult circumstances?<br /></p>

<p>The arguments for ending slavery were highly emotional.</p>

<p>The arguments for allowing gay marriage are highly emotional.</p>

<p>Should these emotional arguments not be allowed in a courtroom? 
Should plaintiffs have to fax in their briefs so as not to be caught up 
in emotion?</p>

<p>The Constitution is not ahuman, intended for robots. Courts of law 
are in front of live humans, a jury of peers, to allow emotion, common 
sense, human reasoning.</p><p>Without the willful, logical, emotional, physical participation of the populace, the Constitution is nothing.</p><p>Emotion of course is only one part of our being, and reliance on it and it alone is folly. But emotion and our hearts often lead the way when our heads get overwhelmed by brittle facts.</p><p>If the law were just a flow chart, we could have monkeys administer the law. If politics were just about reason, most politicians would be unqualified. We're a nation of passionate people and our laws both follow and guide our passion. The Supreme Court in particular follows the whims and precedents of the populace carefully, and only in rare occurrences jumps past the accepted social norms that we hold sacred over right and wrong.</p><p>That's our system. It's careful to the extreme, which is how slavery lasted 80 years, how Civil Rights got derailed another 100, how women were late getting the vote and property rights, how a variety of antiquated practices survive. And when they go, it's usually due to a rise in passion and emotion and fed-uppedness rather than any great new insight of reason.<br /></p><p></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Muslim Daughter of 9/11 Victim: Build Your Mosque Somewhere Else</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/08/muslim-daughter-of-911-victim.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/desidero//2393.347693</id>
   
   <published>2010-08-12T19:25:06Z</published>
   <updated>2010-08-12T19:40:21Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Pretty simple: Either she's a prejudiced bigot or she has a right to&nbsp;her point of view after a tragic event. Kind of like everyone else. Except she's a victim, and I'm not, so I&nbsp;pay more attention to her opinion. I'm...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Desidero</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/desidero/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Pretty simple:</p>
<p>Either she's a prejudiced bigot or she has a right to&nbsp;her point of view after a tragic event.</p>
<p>Kind of like everyone else. Except she's a victim, and I'm not, so I&nbsp;pay more attention to her opinion. I'm funny like that.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/06/AR2010080603006.html">Build Your Mosque Somewhere Else.</a></p>
<p>Perhaps this well-written letter could finish off the idea that being against a mosque/community center&nbsp;in this sensitive location brands you an irrational racist.</p>
<p>But it probably won't. It looks like the builders of this center are well-meaning, have very ethical community-focused views,&nbsp;but are a bit naïve. But then naïve people are used by the more devious all the time.</p>
<p>In theory this center could work. In practice it probably won't.</p>
<p>In fact, it already isn't. </p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Obama vs. Herbert Hoover: Find the Progressive</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/07/obama-vs-herbert-hoover-find-t.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/desidero//2393.342649</id>
   
   <published>2010-07-05T17:03:17Z</published>
   <updated>2010-07-05T17:31:27Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Thumbing through Wikipedia today:Hoover, a trained engineer, deeply believed in the Efficiency Movement, which held that government and the economy were riddled with inefficiency and waste, and could be improved by experts who could identify the problems and solve them....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Desidero</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/desidero/">
      <![CDATA[Thumbing through Wikipedia today:<br /><br /><blockquote>Hoover, a trained engineer, deeply believed in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efficiency_Movement">Efficiency Movement</a>, which held that 
government and the economy were riddled with inefficiency and waste, and
 could be improved by experts who could identify the problems and solve 
them. When the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street_Crash_of_1929">Wall Street Crash of 1929</a> struck 
less than eight months after he took office, Hoover tried to combat the 
ensuing <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Depression">Great Depression</a> with volunteer efforts, 
none of which produced economic recovery during his term. The consensus 
among historians is that Hoover's defeat in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1932">1932 election</a> was
 caused primarily by failure to end the downward economic spiral. As a 
result of these factors, Hoover is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_United_States_Presidents">ranked somewhat poorly</a> among former US 
Presidents<br />........<br /></blockquote><blockquote><p>Hoover entered office with a plan to reform the nation's regulatory 
system, believing that a federal bureaucracy should have limited 
regulation over a country's economic system.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Hoover#cite_note-26"><span>[</span>27<span>]</span></a>
 A self-described <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressivism">Progressive</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_movement">Reformer</a>, Hoover saw the presidency as a vehicle for 
improving the conditions of all Americans by regulation and by 
encouraging volunteerism. Long before entering politics, he had 
denounced <i><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laissez-faire">laissez-faire</a></i> thinking.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Hoover#cite_note-27"><span>[</span>28<span>]</span></a>
 As Commerce Secretary, he had taken an active pro-regulation stance. As
 President, he helped push tariff and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farm_subsidy">farm subsidy</a> bills through Congress.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Hoover expanded <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_service">civil service</a> coverage of Federal positions, 
canceled private oil leases on government lands, and by instructing the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Justice">Justice Department</a> and 
the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_Revenue_Service">Internal Revenue Service</a> to pursue 
gangsters for tax evasion, he enabled the prosecution of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Capone">Al 
Capone</a>. He appointed a commission that set aside 3 million acres 
(12,000&nbsp;km²) of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_park">national parks</a> and 2.3 million acres 
(9,000&nbsp;km²) of national forests; advocated tax reduction for low-income 
Americans (not enacted); closed certain tax loopholes for the wealthy; 
doubled the number of veterans' hospital facilities; negotiated a treaty
 on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Lawrence_Seaway">St. Lawrence Seaway</a> 
(which failed in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Senate">U.S. Senate</a>); wrote a 
Children's Charter that advocated protection of every child regardless 
of race or gender; created an antitrust division in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Justice">Justice Department</a>; 
required air mail carriers to adopt stricter safety measures and improve
 service; proposed federal loans for urban slum clearances (not 
enacted); organized the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Bureau_of_Prisons">Federal Bureau of Prisons</a>; 
reorganized the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bureau_of_Indian_Affairs">Bureau of Indian Affairs</a>; 
instituted prison reform; proposed a federal <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Education">Department of Education</a>
 (not enacted); advocated $50-per-month pensions for Americans over 65 
(not enacted); chaired <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House">White
 House</a> conferences on child health, protection, homebuilding and 
homeownership; began construction of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulder_Dam">Boulder Dam</a> (later renamed <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoover_Dam">Hoover
 Dam</a>); and signed the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norris-La_Guardia_Act">Norris-La Guardia Act</a>
 that limited judicial intervention in labor disputes.</p><p>On November 19, 1928, Hoover embarked on a seven-week <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodwill_tour">goodwill



 tour</a> of several Latin American nations to outline his economic and 
trade policies to other nations in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Hemisphere">Western Hemisphere</a>.</p></blockquote>One item I didn't realize was:<br /><br /><blockquote>To gain Republican votes in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_United_States">Southern</a> states, Hoover pioneered an 
electoral tactic later known as the "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Strategy">Southern Strategy</a>". Hoover ousted many
 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_American">African American</a> leaders in the Republican party, and 
replaced them with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_American">Whites</a>. Hoover's appeal to White voters 
yielded substantial results, including Republican victories in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennessee">Tennessee</a>,
 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Carolina">North Carolina</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida">Florida</a>,
 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia">Virginia</a>,
 and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas">Texas</a>.
 It marked the first time a Republican candidate for president carried 
Texas. This outraged the Black leadership, which largely broke from the 
Republican Party, and began seeking candidates who supported <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_rights">civil rights</a> within the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_%28United_States%29">Democratic Party</a>.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Hoover#cite_note-20"><span>[</span>21<span>]</span></a><br /></blockquote>But the parallels begin:<br /><blockquote>Calls for greater government assistance increased as the US economy 
continued to decline. Hoover rejected direct federal relief payments to 
individuals, as he believed that a dole would be addictive, and reduce 
the incentive to work. He was also a firm believer in balanced budgets, 
and was unwilling to run a budget deficit to fund welfare programs.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Hoover#cite_note-EB-39"><span>[</span>40<span>]</span></a>
 However, Hoover did pursue many policies in an attempt to pull the 
country out of depression. In 1929, Hoover authorized the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Repatriation">Mexican Repatriation</a> program to combat rampant 
unemployment, the burden on municipal aid services, and remove people 
seen as usurpers of American jobs. The program was largely a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_migration">forced migration</a> of approximately 500,000 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexicans">Mexicans</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Americans">Mexican Americans</a> to Mexico, and 
continued through to 1937.<br /><br /></blockquote><blockquote>Hoover in 1931 urged the major banks in the country to form a consortium
 known as the National Credit Corporation (NCC).<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Hoover#cite_note-43"><span>[</span>44<span>]</span></a>
 The NCC was an example of Hoover's belief in volunteerism as a 
mechanism in aiding the economy. Hoover encouraged NCC member banks to 
provide loans to smaller banks to prevent them from collapsing. The 
banks within the NCC were often reluctant to provide loans, usually 
requiring banks to provide their largest assets as collateral. It 
quickly became apparent that the NCC would be incapable of fixing the 
problems it was designed to solve, and it was replaced by the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconstruction_Finance_Corporation">Reconstruction Finance 
Corporation</a>.<br /></blockquote><br />Though still some subtle differences:<br /><blockquote><br />To pay for these and other government programs and to make up for 
revenue lost due to the Depression, Hoover agreed to roll back previous 
tax cuts his Administration had effected on upper incomes. In one of the
 largest tax increases in American history, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revenue_Act_of_1932">Revenue Act of 1932</a> raised <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_tax">income
 tax</a> on the highest incomes from 25% to 63%. The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estate_tax">estate tax</a> was doubled and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_tax">corporate
 taxes</a> were raised by almost 15%. Also, a "check tax" was included 
that placed a 2-cent tax (over 30 cents in today's dollars) on all bank 
checks. Economists William D. Lastrapes and George Selgin,<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Hoover#cite_note-46"><span>[</span>47<span>]</span></a>
 conclude that the check tax was "an important contributing factor to 
that period's severe monetary contraction." Hoover also encouraged 
Congress to investigate the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Stock_Exchange">New York Stock Exchange</a>, and this pressure 
resulted in various reforms.<br /></blockquote>
 So please vote below - who's more Progressive - Obama or Herbert Hoover?<br /><br /> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Pentagon Pipes In: $10 million not much for a toilet</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/06/pentagon-pipes-in-10-million-n.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/desidero//2393.339578</id>
   
   <published>2010-06-12T11:14:10Z</published>
   <updated>2010-06-12T11:14:59Z</updated>
   
   <summary>After years of suffering abuse and mockery for profligate spending habits that make Paris Hilton blush, Pentagon officials eagerly revealed details Thursday night showing that SEIU union officials &quot;flushing $10 million down the toilet&quot; was no big deal.Revealing the split...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Desidero</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/desidero/">
      <![CDATA[<p>After years of suffering abuse and mockery for profligate spending habits that make Paris Hilton blush, Pentagon officials eagerly revealed details Thursday night showing that SEIU union officials "flushing $10 million down the toilet" was no big deal.</p><p><br />Revealing the split between the Pentagon and the White House might be bigger than the chasm between Obama and progressives, military officials seemed to revel in details of just how little $10 million is ("that's the dry cleaning bill for the White House Lawn Military Band", read one flipchart, while another simply showed the famed $10 million military toilet seat &nbsp;- decked out in gold oak leaves - next to the union one full of soggy cash.</p><p>.<br />Ignoring the several million dollars flushed down the toilet in Massachusetts, Virginia and New Jersey, the White House anonymous leaker tried to put on a brave face by comparing unions' illogical outburst of democratic campaign financing with BP's failed "junk shot" whereby the British oil giant attempted to clog the still spewing tube in the sea with a huge "load" estimated at a fantastically large sum of bills worth 1/10,000th its daily US profits.&nbsp;</p><p><br />Nevertheless, the recent Supreme Court ruling affirming that "companies are people too" seems to have invited a new round of largesse from special corporate interests hoping to influence the political process, even, curiously enough, ones that represent people. (On a stranger side note, producers for the Jerry Springer Show have noted turning down offers of several companies quoting the ruling as reason to be on the show, while Sasha "Borat" Cohen's next movie apparently has him adopting an out-of-work multinational conglomerate).</p><p><br />But for the most part, the Pentagon has largely stayed above the fray, dismissing charges that David Petraeus was running for office as "idle chit-chat from the nattering nabobs of negativity" and noting that they were focused "whole heartedly and mindedly" on the bipartisan surge, which would likely carry them through the next 3-4 campaign cycles anyway. With special supplementals funding the 2 wars running at roughly $15 million per hour, America's warriors could afford to be bemused at the White House's sudden flirtation with frugality. "Yeah, they tried to withhold our last $60 billion, but like a crackhead with pipe shoved against his lips, that lasted all of a New York second" said one retired General famous for speaking at the UN who refused to be named, as he toured this reporter around Washington in one of his fancier red convertibles.</p><p><br />Curiously another politician was lamenting "money flushed down the toilet" this week as former President Bill Clinton found the same candidate he'd helped campaign to victory in Arkansas this past week voting down environmental global warming legislation that his non-profit had championed worldwide in recent years. Presumably with her newly improved standing with the beleaguered oil giant BP and the erstwhile giants of Wall Street who've been the biggest recipients of "money flushed down the toilet" the last two years, the primary victor Blanche Lincoln stands to be in a position to return Mr. Clinton's help in other tangible ways. But whether that happens remains a question - as the song goes, "Nobody knows you when you're flushed down and out".<br /><br /></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Israeli Distraction, and &quot;The Enemy&quot; at the Gates</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/06/israeli-distraction-and-the-en.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/desidero//2393.337906</id>
   
   <published>2010-06-01T10:45:40Z</published>
   <updated>2010-06-01T06:26:21Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The Israeli government will try to distract from recent events by blaming everything on those &quot;Palestinian activists&quot; because they used those terrible weapons like crowbars and beams. Highly provocative under attack, no?Here&apos;s a description of the taking of The Exodus,...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Desidero</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/desidero/">
      <![CDATA[The Israeli government will try to distract from recent events by blaming everything on those "Palestinian activists" because they used those terrible weapons like crowbars and beams. Highly provocative under attack, no?<br /><br />Here's a description of the taking of The Exodus, the Jewish refugee boat the British commandeered in 1947 with 3 dead refugees:<br /><br /><blockquote>Several hours of fighting followed, with the ship's passengers spraying 
fuel oil and throwing smoke bombs, life rafts and whatever else came to 
hand, down on the British sailors trying to board, The Times reported at
 the time. Soon the British opened fire. Two immigrants and a crewman on
 the Exodus were killed; scores more were wounded, many seriously. The 
ship was towed to Haifa, and from there its passengers were deported, 
first to France and eventually to Germany, where they were placed in 
camps near Lübeck.</blockquote><br />Does anyone remember the Exodus as "those activist Jews violently resisting the legal boarding of their ship to preserve the integrity of Palestine"? Thought not. Nor should we. Would it have made any difference if this new ship were in Palestinian (read: Israeli) waters off of Gaza? It shouldn't - just a distraction.<br /><br />Governments make laws and rulings all the time. Half the time they're for the leaders' convenience. Whatever this charade of "Palestinians have all the supplies they need", the charade's over. These are the guys who control the trickle of goods to Gaza. This is the same "compassion" Palestinians see at border crossings and from overhead gunships. David has become Goliath, the Emperor finally is seen naked and bearingless. If there were a contiguous Palestine, we could simply ask the UN to man the borders. Unfortunately, it remains a mess.<br /><br />Bully on the Turks for calling the Israeli bluff, hearts out for their dead on their new Memorial Day. Perhaps the Europeans will understand that the Turks knocking at their door in 2010 are the ones who have the guts to take tough stands for tough issues, and let them in for some fresh blood - The Young Turks have gotten a bad rap. (Consider how Greek Cyprus was let into the EU despite the Turkish Cypriots making all the compromises. Consider the meltdown of the Greek economy. And then think about who's the riskier gamble, Greece or Turkey.)<br /> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Stages of Grief &amp; Drunkard&apos;s Remorse</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/05/stages-of-grief-drunkards-remo.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/desidero//2393.337218</id>
   
   <published>2010-05-26T08:11:51Z</published>
   <updated>2010-05-26T09:05:29Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Someone the other day said something like, &quot;Obama haters wanted the BP oil catastrophe so they could bash Obama some more&quot;.Appalled by the statement, I&apos;m starting to understand it in perspective. But don&apos;t think it&apos;s just about Obama fans or...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Desidero</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/desidero/">
      <![CDATA[Someone the other day said something like, "Obama haters wanted the BP oil catastrophe so they could bash Obama some more".<br /><br />Appalled by the statement, I'm starting to understand it in perspective. But don't think it's just about Obama fans or any particular group - there's a whole lot of reckoning going on right now, and if much of it seems irrational, well, it is and it isn't - much of it is so codified we know it by "stages of grief" or from 12 step programs.<br /><br />1. Shock &amp; Denial<br />2. Pain &amp; Guilt<br />3. Anger &amp; Bargaining<br />4. Depression, Reflection &amp; Loneliness<br />5. The Upward Turn<br />6. Reconstruction &amp; Working Through<br />7. Acceptance &amp; Hope<br /><br />As a logical path from "Dude, Where's My Country?" we might expect that many of us are roiling around in phases #3 &amp; #4 (we've gotten over blaming Nader fans for everything), and the accusation above is a classic drunk's, "You want me to fail, don't you?" Uh, right, I just asked you to take out the garbage that you forgot.<br /><br />But being an evangelical country, even for us atheists this list is spiced up with the 12-step program's God everywhere, "You must accept there's a greater power". Of course there's no greater power - there are just the people who are still sober and cognizant and the rest, whatever inspiration you find in that. But that detail about "hitting bottom" - that's a serious catch - because we never seem to, or at least not the ones who are least sober. So perhaps we're all spread out from stages 1-4, denial, pain, anger, depression.<br /><br />We have 2 failed governments back-to-back, different parties in control, same result. We can blame it on the drinking, on the money, but that's avoiding our personal responsibility. We elected Bush, or let him be elected. We elected Obama, or let him be elected. There were other options out there, we could have called a taxi home from the bar, but we chose someone inexperienced but charismatic in each case to lead us through our plight. Are we all 17 now? It would seem so. As Cyndi Lauper lamented, "Americans just wanna have fun". And have someone else pick up the tab. But it doesn't quite work like that.<br /><br />So as Americans try to face up to their problem, their willingness to be suckered by anyone and everyone, they're going to face a lot of Depression, Reflection, and Loneliness. "Am I really so stupid?" "Yes, you are. But you don't have to be." It won't be as fun any more not running with the cool guys who you let borrow and wreck your car. But maybe it's time for less fun and more focus.<br /><br />While I know there's a lot of insincerity on the tea bagger side of things, there's a lot of sincerity as well, and righteous anger. But that doesn't change the stages of grief - they've lost their country too, for similar and dissimilar reasons, and whether they're in stage 1 or stage 4, eventually they'll have to come in for some reflection to rise out of their addiction and stupidity.<br /><br />Of course the streets and alleys will always be full of professional drunks - this isn't about unrealistic ideals of perfection. It's simply about getting ourselves in order, our own house, our own neighborhood and circle of friends. We have unrealistic expectations of the world, and we're simply abetting the scam through our naïvité. We can always visit the bars on the bad side of town if we want a night out, but we don't have to live there. We can let ourselves go in our enthusiastic fandom of this, that or the other politician and cause, as long as we've secured our wallets and done a reality check on our expectations.<br /><br />And at the end of the night we have to pay the bill; when we wake up in the morning, we have to clean up the mess, take out the garbage. We have to know how much alcohol is fun, and how much will land us in detox.&nbsp; We have to know that when we walk into a late night casino at 2am that the rules always favor the house and the hookers always order overpriced drinks on our tab. [Insert female equivalent Vegas analogy here ______] <br /><br />There is nothing on the landscape that is going to change things significantly, not the actions of Grayson, not the documentaries of Michael Moore, not an uprising in the blogosphere. We have a war of ideals covering up a more fundamental loss of self-control, self-responsibility, world view. On both sides we're a bunch of raving football fans however we're couching our political and social thoughts intellectually. And that fandom is just leading us down dark alleys. Eisenhower warned about the military-industrial complex. I'll warn about the media entertainment-political-financial complex. However we participate in this Web 2.0 gala, we're mostly feeding the power of the beast, not making things better. Your enemy isn't some politician or other blogger somewhere so much as it is the ignorance and non-comprehension and non-cooperation you suffer among your neighbors. And it's not about something that will fit into a piece of legislation or a party platform - it's about how we relate to people day to day. There's poison in the well, and instead of drinking from it day after day, we have to clean it, educate ourselves in ways past normal education, what the Spanish mean by the term having to do more with morals, ethics, basic grounding in life skills.&nbsp; I don't know specifically how, but it's not about "them", it's about us, how we do what we do time and again, how our words and actions are ineffectual and why, how we can get it together, function as an intelligent caring mutually supporting unit, how to gain direction and reach stage #5.<br /><br />I talked to a friend who's recently out of work, got him on his cell phone as he's standing out on a sand bar in the Gulf, cleaning oil, for free. Back to basics - deal with the sludge. A good task for reflection, working it out, the housecleaning and accounting that presages progress and hard work.<br /><br /><br /> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Refighting Vietnam: Lind and the Powell Doctrine</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/05/refighting-vietnam-lind-and-th.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/desidero//2393.336660</id>
   
   <published>2010-05-21T10:50:30Z</published>
   <updated>2010-05-21T11:01:38Z</updated>
   
   <summary>MJ Rosenberg had a screed up about being proud of avoiding Vietnam, and of course the comments were full of yays and hurrahs.Ignoring the real danger and horror of the Communists is pretty de rigeur these days (Domino Theory?* Har...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Desidero</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/desidero/">
      <![CDATA[MJ Rosenberg had a screed up about being proud of avoiding Vietnam, and of course the comments were full of yays and hurrahs.<br /><br />Ignoring the real danger and horror of the Communists is pretty de rigeur these days (Domino Theory?* Har har har. Soviet aggression is reduced to their failure in Afghanistan, which happened to have been abetted by Brzezinski helping the opposition. Angola is forgotten, as is North Korea, as are the atrocities of Ho Chi Minh - tens of thousands executed, many more put in labor camps. Stalin may be bad, Mao is a t-shirt). But what's worse is the camel humps that have replaced.<br /><br />Someone noted that people think of political opinion as being like a Dromedary Camel, one hump in the center sliding a bit back and forth ("the pendulum"), while asserting it's more like a Bactrian - 2 humps, two centers of gravity, one for the left, one for the right. In the case of the Vietnam War, Michael Lind contends, our 2 humps have been feasted on the lessons that (a) (left) we should have never been there in the first place, and (b) (right) once we were here we should have given it all we had. Of course Laos might have disputed how much our hands were tied behind our backs with all those bombs dropped, but when was the last time a Laotian commentator was on a US talk show?<br /><br />Unfortunately I conend this Bactrian camel is behind our modern attitudes towards war, which serves our political feeding frenzy (making lots of commentators rich, since an ingrained untrue attitude about war is almost guaranteed to drag them out forever with no good results, allowing 6-month Friedman units of "the tide is starting to turn" to glide by like ferris wheels).<br /><br />Presumably it should be acknowledged that our containment strategy in Iraq during the 90's worked brilliantly. Okay, it cost a bit of money, and the biggest problem was when we lost our verification abilities, so by the time 9/11 rolled around we didn't really know Hussein's capabilities. But we now know we had successfully put him under house confinement. After the disaster that followed, this should be hailed as one of our great models of engagement. [Tellingly enough, when Milosevic was delivered to The Hague for trial, the Bush Administration downplayed it, both because it was a previous administration's success and it went against the new neocon Realpolitik of "go out and confront thine enemies]. <br /><br />Now obviously Colin Powell never gave away his inspiration for the "Powell Doctrine" - if you go to war, "go in with decisive force". Fortunately having spent a good amount of my early years in academic research, I found some of the early precursors for the policy, especially as you see a military advisor in the background explaining. <br /><br /><i><b>Turn it up to 11.</b></i>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="http://www.welovetheiraqiinformationminister.com/images/spinaltap.jpg"></a><img src="http://www.welovetheiraqiinformationminister.com/images/spinaltap.jpg" /><br /><br />&nbsp;<br /><br />In any case, it seems that Obama like his predecessors is infected with this meme, and it's worth taking a look at <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/l/lind-vietnam.html">Michael Lind's re-assessment of the quandary</a>, which seems to be succinctly, "there was a mid-point to that dial between 11 and Brave Sir Robin Ran Away". (Released in 1999, it nicely presages the mistakes of Iraq II). The problem with this assessment is it means it isn't an easy answer, unlike "fight them in the skies and on the land" or "fuhgiddaboudit". One of the Art of War lines I came across today was, "When they prepare everywhere, they're weak everywhere".&nbsp; Oh boy, are we. <br /><br />It's also easy to see that while the dangers of a few terrorists are real enough, they're nowhere near the threat of the Soviet army and its intrigue abroad during the Cold War. The problem remains that the left still hasn't found a good Bactrian camel hump to sit on. We need to develop an intelligent, reasonably restrained concept of when and how to engage. Whether we're the "policeman of the world" or the "only remaining Superpower" or just a country with a lot of pull, we're the biggest guy on the world's basketball court, and we'll continue to be the guy they toss the ball to first. And instead of just ceding the court or playing by the Republican playbook and leaving the destructive repercussions of the Powell Doctrine, we need to develop a sense of when and how the US should intervene in various types of conflict around the world, which are policy, military, humanitarian disasters, economic and technical, security, and so on. Humorously enough, people wave futile "Free Tibet" flags while few would have helped keep out China's army in 1950. In 1957, 400 South Vietnamese government officials were assassinated by the Viet Minh, along with many more civilians - whether it's the Communists or Al Qaeda doing this, what are reasonable actions to take? Just let it continue? Close the embassy and walk away?<br /><br />From the left-wing, our game is completely reactive - not only aren't we in a full-court press, we're cowering down by our side's goal. What is the left's goal in foreign policy, and what are the tactics and strategies by which it can achieve those? Its hard to relegate the Bush and Powell Doctrines to the rubbish bin of history, seeing as nature abhors a vacuum. While I'm all for pulling troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan, that's for particular reasons involving goals and strategies and expectations and ideas for alternatives, not just wishful thinking that it can't get worse.<br /><br />*[Domino Theory in action:  the Soviets turned East Europe and North Korea communist in the late 1940s to last 40 years. Almost South Korea in early 1950's. Deng Xiao Peng invaded Tibet and Xinjiang in the early1950's &amp; the Sino-Indian border war of 1962 
to cement that occupation (while we were busy dealing with Soviet 
missiles in newly communist Cuba). Millions killed in of the Great Push 
Forward and the Cultural Revolution. Burma went socialist in 1962. Long-term 
communist insurgency in Thailand (finally extinguished after decades). By the end of 1975, Laos, 
Cambodia and Vietnam were communist and Cuba was in Angola. And then the Soviets invaded 
Afghanistan. A pretty rough-and-rumble 30 years.]<br /><br /> 

]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 

