Did someone say ultraviolence?

Yes, please.

Desi, your stream of consciousness is superb. hahaha

You got me laughing. Yet what you discuss fits right into Sleepin's diatribe.

Moyers, who is my hero in MSM let one slide this week. The bastard 'historian' says that Buckley never believed and never wrote that the Negroid Race was somehow lower in mental faculties but that he believed in State's rights.

No, Buckley wrote that the Negroid Race contained the duller crayons in the box. He changed his mind later on. Moyers does not usually miss these things and I think he felt that the greater good was to let the asshat continue a diatribe against the current repub party.

But for the most part, liberal pundits are looking for a check...they let Joe Scarborough get away with so many lies while Mika underlines how complicated things are and how she is really independent in between vodka shots--although lately she has switched to some better pharmaceuticals.

O'Donnell is pretty good. Pretty sharp crayon. So there are good solid liberal pundits ready to do battle. I just wish there were more of them.

If one group chooses to lie about things like Death Panel and MSM reports the lie and questions if Death Panels in fact exist, then the battle being fought is not just against a political opponent, but against a political opponent and the MSM.

In this type of battle, the Democrat will always appear to be the loser. The viewers expect Republicans to be the opposition, but the tag team bashing coming from the MSM, makes the Democrat appear as the villain. If Death Panels don't exist why is the reporter questioning their existence?

Jon Stewart is the anchor of his show and controls the message. A Democrat appearing on Scarborough has to receive the question from Scarborough, and then wait for Pat Buchanan or Mike Barnacle to chime in echoing Scarborough's point. It's a losing situation.

And then that woman, supposedly a Democrat, likely dug up from the remains of a failed alien close encounter, appears.

You mean Valerie Jarrett, right? She's the one who flubs the follow-up question about whether MSNBC is biased. She's a senior advisor to Obama and Assistant to the President for Intergovernmental Relations and Public Liaison. She has been friends with the Obamas since the early '90s. She's often described as his mentor.

That woman? That supposed Democrat?

That's hilarious, Des.

Yes, she sucks at public relations.

I think the true question is do more people agree with the WH that Fox is biased, or do more agree with much of MSM trying to say that Fox is a valid news organization?

A recent Pew poll finds that 47% view Fox as Conservative, Neutral by 24% and Liberal by an amazing 11%. MSNBC is considered Conservative by 11%, Liberal by 36% and Neutral by 23%. CNN is considered Conservative by 11%, Liberal by 37%, and Neutral by 33%. Fox is considered to be the most biased network. The study found that the view of Fox as Conservative was shared by viewers of all networks. Fox viewers were more likely to view other news networks as Liberal.

http://people-press.org/report/559/

Even a Fox News executives says that most of it's programming isn't news.

http://tpmtv.talkingpointsmemo.com/?id=3782366&ref=mp

Despite the problems with the response to the Fox News question, the public has come to it's own conclusions.

Here's Jarret on This Week today:

Senior White House Adviser Valerie Jarrett said on ABC's This Week this morning that the GOP civil war in the NY-23 special congressional election shows that the Republican Party's leadership has become "more and more extreme, and more and more marginalized."

Yesterday, moderate GOP candidate Dede Scozzafava suspended her campaign after polls showed her trailing both the Democrat and a Conservative Party candidate that many prominent Republicans had declared their support for.

"It's rather telling when the Republican Party forces out a moderate Republican," Jarrett said. "And it says, I think, a great deal about where the Republican Party leadership is right now."

I think it's becoming more and more extreme, and more and more marginalized.

"And if that's the direction they want to go -- fine," Jarrett said.

Democrats are now trying to convince Scozzafava to back Democrat Bill Owens in the NY-23 race. "We would love to, of course, have her support," Jarrett said.

Pushed by George Stephanopoulos about President Obama's promises to get bipartisan backing for many of his policies, Jarrett tried to shift blame back to the GOP.

"What we've seen from the Republicans is really the desire to have the status quo, and George, that's not acceptable anymore."

Obama, she said, has "reached out. He's listened. He's reached across the aisle."

"Ultimately it's up to the Republicans to decide if they want to be a constructive force and come to the table and work with us in a positive way," she said. "The door is always open."

http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/11/jarrett-gop-leaders-more-and-more-extreme-and-more-and-more-marginalized.php?ref=fpa

Was Jarrett's answer to the MSNBC question flubbed? Yes. Is Jarrett totally worthless? No.