On Fellowship and Discipleship
I once met a guy in some impoverished country far away, a land without telephones, dirt roads crossing barely passable mountains, heavy if not unbearable poverty. And this guy was a Christian missionary. Rather big and fat with a kind of doltish grin, a true believer, literal interpretation of the Flood and everything. And there the stereotype ends. He was bright - he focused on communications, for local people as well as his organization. He believed in preaching the Word, but foremost was giving people food and education, not as bribery or blackmail, simply as a matter of priority, of love. Practical things first. He was constantly in a good mood despite the rough conditions, patiently confronting corruption and lack of resources with the same equanimity. He had his "toolkit", as he called it. Cheating or taking the easy way out weren't in that toolkit. Service and patience were.
Whenever someone starts insulting fundamentalists, I think of him. One man. One very great man. There are certainly thousands or perhaps millions of hateful hypocrites out there. And I'm not a believer myself. But I'm much more tolerant of believers because of the example of one person. I give them the benefit of the doubt, a benefit that he earned for them.
There's been talk about people being foolish, reacting to Obama based on the words or deeds of his followers. But that's the way the world works. Communism has its roots in great ideas - ideas that blossomed in the focused and heroic conditions of small kibbutzes in Israel, and which stank and turned corrupt in the hands of typical people from East Europe to China. For most who suffered, the face of Communism isn't Lenin - it's the ashen face of the store clerk or the office bureaucrat telling you "No", the bulldog policeman searching your car and confiscating your camera and books, the strict and humorless teacher making you recite the precepts of Socialist Duty or the gleefully superior suckup faces of the young party acolytes giving their 110% for the next party showcase - making wreaths, wearing the scarves and uniforms, waving their flags for the insipidly dull speeches.
It's the human face of any movement that makes it live or die. If you're an Obama believer, it's incumbent on you to display why, in word and deed, if it's significant, if it's not "politics as usual". It's word-of-mouth marketing, it's teaching by example. If Obama is leading a movement beyond himself, and you portray yourself as part of the movement, then you either try to reflect those ideals or you cause others to reject them. That is a basic equation. Others may pull your load, take up your slack - in my friend's case, he made up for thousands of poor examples - but in the end it's better to do your part, willingly and gladly. A monk once chided his followers for being too stern - "a sad monk is a sad monk". Try not to be sad.
Whenever someone starts insulting fundamentalists, I think of him. One man. One very great man. There are certainly thousands or perhaps millions of hateful hypocrites out there. And I'm not a believer myself. But I'm much more tolerant of believers because of the example of one person. I give them the benefit of the doubt, a benefit that he earned for them.
There's been talk about people being foolish, reacting to Obama based on the words or deeds of his followers. But that's the way the world works. Communism has its roots in great ideas - ideas that blossomed in the focused and heroic conditions of small kibbutzes in Israel, and which stank and turned corrupt in the hands of typical people from East Europe to China. For most who suffered, the face of Communism isn't Lenin - it's the ashen face of the store clerk or the office bureaucrat telling you "No", the bulldog policeman searching your car and confiscating your camera and books, the strict and humorless teacher making you recite the precepts of Socialist Duty or the gleefully superior suckup faces of the young party acolytes giving their 110% for the next party showcase - making wreaths, wearing the scarves and uniforms, waving their flags for the insipidly dull speeches.
It's the human face of any movement that makes it live or die. If you're an Obama believer, it's incumbent on you to display why, in word and deed, if it's significant, if it's not "politics as usual". It's word-of-mouth marketing, it's teaching by example. If Obama is leading a movement beyond himself, and you portray yourself as part of the movement, then you either try to reflect those ideals or you cause others to reject them. That is a basic equation. Others may pull your load, take up your slack - in my friend's case, he made up for thousands of poor examples - but in the end it's better to do your part, willingly and gladly. A monk once chided his followers for being too stern - "a sad monk is a sad monk". Try not to be sad.




