<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Department of Peace&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/department_of_peace/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/department_of_peace/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/department_of_peace//5913</id>
   <updated>	2008-11-18T18:55:20Z	2008-11-18T18:46:58Z	2008-11-18T16:19:12Z	2008-11-07T00:59:41Z	2008-10-25T16:08:25Z	2008-10-24T18:41:03Z	2008-10-24T18:39:32Z	2008-10-24T17:41:56Z	</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>









	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.244859-comment:3291399</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/reid_vast_majority_of_dem_cauc.php#c3291399" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[Department of Peace Commented on It&apos;s Official: Lieberman Keeps Homeland Security Chairmanship by Greg Sargent]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-18T18:46:58Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-18T18:46:58Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>LOL!!!! I love the anger here.</p>

<p>When will you people ever learn? The Democratic Party fails you over and over and over and over again and yet you blindly keep voting them in. You think Obama is the answer, he's not. This hopefully serves as proof of that (following his comments that he would strongly like to see Lieberman stay). </p>

<p>Applause to bbpdx for taking a stand and changing his registration.</p>

<p>I'm reading the wonderful comment all over the place that "This was a genius move by Obama. Lieberman will now be indebted to him." Uh, no he won't. He can do whatever he wants now. They let him stay. The guy has nothing to lose. If they decide later on to change their minds and let him go they look like idiots for bringing him back in the first place. And frankly, they are. You can't teach an old dog new tricks.</p>

<p>Please wake up and smell the coffee. We saw the hell the Republican Party put us through the last 8 years; and the fun is just beginning for the disappointments the Dems have in store for us.</p>

<p>I wish you folks could think for yourself, take a stand, and vote 3rd party and get rid of all this trash. I hear talk about "Lamont 2012!" Lamont is just another DEM. Is it really so hard to think about a third party candidate who will be immune to this increasingly-obvious corruption? Thank God the people of Vermont elected a good guy in Bernie Sanders.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.244831-comment:3290903</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/reactions_to_secretary_of_stat.php#c3290903" />
		
		    <title>Department of Peace Commented on Secretary Of State Hillary: Some Obama Backers Fret, But Obama Camp Sees Her As Team Player by Greg Sargent</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-18T16:19:12Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-18T16:19:12Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>I can guarantee this was what Obama and Bill talked about when they had the "closed door meeting" in September. Doesn't seem like he has much of a choice to back out now.</p>

<p>The media is trying to spin this as bi-partisanship, Lincoln-esque "working with my enemies," etc...what I call it is pandering.</p>

<p>I was disappointed in the Emmanuel appointment, but then hearing he was going to be keeping Gates, then hearing Lieberman's going to get a free pass, then hearing Summers is coming in, and now this.</p>

<p>What happened to the whole argument of "I voted with my party 90% of the time because they're right?" Same logic applies here--Obama should't have to pander to Repugs or the DLC. HE WON.</p>

<p>It's one thing to be belligerent about your victory like Bush and the GOP were in '04. It's another to listen to the opposing side but politely tell them, "Sorry, you were wrong. Now go away." I don't understand why he can't do the latter and has to cave in to these bickering interests of a political era that people clearly want to be over.</p>

<p>Now I remember why I didn't vote for him. I knew this was going to happen.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    







	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://14.243313-comment:3278716</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/06/rahm_emanuel_is_no_likudnik/#c3278716" />
		
		    <title>Department of Peace Commented on Rahm Emanuel Is No Likudnik by M.J. Rosenberg</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-07T00:59:41Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-07T00:59:41Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Hope youre right about Rahm. I live in Chicago and surprisingly I never paid attention to the guy.</p>

<p>Then again, how often did people talk about Andy Card when he was around for Bush? How often does Josh Bolten get brought up?</p>

<p>Probably this is cuz bush doesn't do anything anyways...hahaha...but at the same time, I am hopeful that this intense focus and overanalyzation on Rahm is just because it's Obama's first decision/appointment as president. Best case scenario would be that he fades to the background on 1/21/09 and starts kicking ass and taking names behind the scenes. </p>

<p>I'll be happy with that.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.239843-comment:3250465</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/poll_palin_hasnt_done_herself.php#c3250465" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[Department of Peace Commented on Poll: Palin Hasn&apos;t Done Herself Any Favors For 2012 by Eric Kleefeld]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-25T16:08:25Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-25T16:08:25Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>The Republican Obama? Closest bet right now seems Bobby Jindal. iMO if they want to regroup and come out firing in a completely new direction Jindal is their best bet. Young, intelligent, converted to Christianity (appealing to the RR), and a calm leader in the face of disaster (Gustav). Many conservative voices on TV who have condemned Palin have also stated they will sit out this round in the hopes Jindal will rise up in 2012.</p>

<p>Obama vs Jindal 2012 would be a great matchup in terms of history...</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.239664-comment:3249107</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/poll_obama_grabs_lead_in_deep-.php#c3249107" />
		
		    <title>Department of Peace Commented on Poll: Obama Grabs Lead In Deep-Red Georgia by Eric Kleefeld</title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-24T18:41:03Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-24T18:41:03Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Let me be clear - I am well aware of the Vactian's POV towards the death penalty. I applaud it. I also applaud the stance Pope JPII took in '03 against the Iraq War from the start. I was actually trying to compliment the Pope by using him in my argument.</p>

<p>My point in bringing up the Pope was that if someone of international stature like Pope Benedict could speak out against this case - someone who technically has no need to worry about this, is not an American, and arguably has better things to worry about - then the least Obama can do is at least condemn the breakdown of the justice system in Georgia, a state that he needs. He has yet to do so. Why?</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.239664-comment:3249103</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/poll_obama_grabs_lead_in_deep-.php#c3249103" />
		
		    <title>Department of Peace Commented on Poll: Obama Grabs Lead In Deep-Red Georgia by Eric Kleefeld</title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-24T18:39:32Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-24T18:39:32Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Let me be clear - I am well aware of the Vactian's POV towards the death penalty. I applaud it. I also applaud the stance Pope JPII took in '03 against the Iraq War from the start. I was actually trying to compliment the Pope by using him in my argument.</p>

<p>My point in bringing up the Pope was that if someone of international stature like Pope Benedict could speak out against this case - someone who technically has no need to worry about this, is not an American, and arguably has better things to worry about - then the least Obama can do is at least condemn the breakdown of the justice system in Georgia, a state that he needs. He has yet to do so. Why?</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.239664-comment:3248797</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/poll_obama_grabs_lead_in_deep-.php#c3248797" />
		
		    <title>Department of Peace Commented on Poll: Obama Grabs Lead In Deep-Red Georgia by Eric Kleefeld</title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-24T17:41:56Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-24T17:41:56Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>"Approximately 8 percent of black voters have continued to say they are undecided or voting 'other.' This will likely move closer to 95 percent for Obama when all said and done."</p>

<p>Completely disagree - unless Obama grows a pair and decides that he will speak out against the state sponsored murder of Troy Anthony Davis, something that Pope Benedict - the POPE, for crying out loud - has already done, he won't win. This is the most gripping issue in the Georgia courtrooms right now, with an issue that is 10x more important and relevant to us because it involves our justice system. It has gripped the Georgian African American community and multiple times Sen. Obama was contacted by the Davis family to join them in condemning this mentality of "guilty until proven innocent" that has infected the US legal system. He has ignored this request. I think if you look in the numbers that is probably what that 8% of African Americans are concerned with that has left them undecided or voting "other," that this so-called candidate of the people is not standing up against injustice.</p>

<p>I read something that summed it up the best:</p>

<p>"One of the saddest realities of this political season is that Barack Obama or John McCain will become the next president of these United States without being asked a single serious question about their thoughts on the state of America's "justice system."</p>

<p>Pathetic.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    



</feed>

