Wanna Cut Health Care Costs? Outlaw Drug Ads!
You
can't turn on the TV anymore without seeing commercials telling you to
ask your doctor about drugs that will make you pee less, shrink your
prostate, lower your cholesterol, cheer you out of your depression and
give you a raging erection. We see commercials for pills that will cut
acid reflux, keep you from getting pregnant, treat that
under-the-toenail fungus, help you sleep and clear out your snotty nose.
These commercials are... to a one of them... unnecessary.
You think your doctor doesn't KNOW enough to prescribe Ambien if you have insomnia, Boniva if you have osteoporosis, Nasonex if you're stuffed up with allergies and Yaz if you're premenstrual? Do you really think your doctor NEEDS you to REMIND him or her that Viagra will treat your erectile dysfunction, or Omnaris will clear your sinuses, or Flowmax will shrink your prostate? And how many times have you seen one of these TV commercials and said to yourself, "Dang! Maybe I should get me some RESTASIS for these dry eyes!"
And how much money do the big pharmaceutical companies spend to create the computer animated bee with Antonio Banderas's voice to remind you how Nasonex will clear your sniffer, or the computer generated soldiers who jam that giant Omnaris nozzle into the even larger woman's nose? How much do they pay to create the twin bathub scenes for the Cialis commercials? Or to record an Elvis impersonator singing "Viva Viagra!" or to animate the little water balloons or plumbing-pipe people you see in the Enablex commercials?
I'll tell you how much they spend. According to a 2008 study... TWICE AS MUCH AS THEY SPEND ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT!!!
The researchers' estimate is based on the systematic collection of data directly from the industry and doctors during 2004, which shows the U.S. pharmaceutical industry spent 24.4% of the sales dollar on promotion, versus 13.4% for research and development, as a percentage of US domestic sales of US$235.4 billion.
Maybe part of any future health care legislation might include a ban on advertising of prescription drugs. Your doctors already KNOW about these drugs, you can't walk into a drug store and buy them, so the only reason I can imagine for SPENDING that kind of money is to get patients to hector their doctors for a specific drug. And doctors -- if they're competent -- will already KNOW what kind of drug to prescribe to you, based on your history and other drugs you have taken in the past.
What a big chunk of savings THAT would be to the overall cost of health care if Big Pharma didn't need to tack on the price for animating a cartoon bee to sell its nasal spray.
















True story: Back when Claritin was prescription-only, and they were running their "gazebo" ads, I knew someone who said, literally, "I want that stuff and I don't know what it does!"
Does anyone think that someone thinking, let alone saying this is a good idea?
October 9, 2009 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
The US and New Zealand are the only two developed countries with TV ads for drugs. (Just some random informational fluff I have in my head.)
Because of patent rules, I'm expecting them to soon advertise the combination pill that shrinks your prostate while giving you an erection and curing your depression and moistening your eyes. Let's hope it doesn't achieve that in the obvious way. :-)
October 9, 2009 1:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
You gotta link for that ProstaGoneHorseWang thing?
Nice product.
October 9, 2009 6:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's just a placebo called Moist-Wang-Ho. It was proven in blind tests to do as well as the rhinocerous horn with st.john's wort and visine.
October 9, 2009 7:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks!! I'll be mixin' up a vat in the basement tonight! Who knows? Maybe sell some to the neighbours. Start up a small business. If things work out, maybe run some ads.
October 9, 2009 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
But then we wouldn't get to see movies of little Snot People riding motorcycles!
I'll just betcha that most docs do presribe those meds if they won't be harmful, at least. "See, doc, here's the checklist i downloaded, and I have all of 'em. I must have this Cranky Ass Syndrome they're talking about. The same can be said for all the docs who prescribed antibiotics for colds, knowing they wouldn't kill viruses. Oopsie, we ended up with MRSA.
I also love the drug companies that say that if you're broke, they'll help underwrite you prescription costs. Hell, it might cost $75 just for an office call...and some TPMer pointed out that if you're poor enough to qualify, you'd also qualify for other gummint programs.
And don't ever forget what Molly Ivins said, "The bidness of America is bidness."
October 9, 2009 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm with you Deep Brain. This is one of my personal bugaboos - they really OFFEND me. I particularly like how they tell you to "tell your doctor if you're on nitrates for...." God damn it, shouldn't my doctor already know what other medications I'm on? Shouldn't my doctor KNOW I have heart disease? We no longer allow cigarettes to be advertised on tv, but these drug pushers can do it? It really pisses me off.
October 10, 2009 10:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Although it may claim otherwise, this website does not offer legal, medical, psychiatric, veterinary, gynecological, archaeological, astronomical, astrological, ontological, paleontological, philosophical, axiological, audiological, bacteriological, mineralogical, criminological, terminological, dermatological, ecclesiastical, campanological, phrenological, phonological, technological, hematological, campanological, neurological, psychobiological, urological, ufological, typological,, mythological, hydrological, xylological, zoological, logical or any other kind of professional advice. Nothing on this website should be construed as professional advice including, but not limited to, the above list.
http://funnyclassnotes.blogspot.com/2007/03/weblog-disclaimer.html
fucking disclaimers....NO MORE DRUG ADS that is what I say.
Lets go back to the time when the drug guys and gals spent their time performing sex acts on doctors.
October 10, 2009 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
"13.4% for research and development,"
I may be wrong, but I would guess that is an inflated amount, because so much of that "research" is actually done at universities and colleges, paid for with tax money. Then, once a promising commercial application appears in the research, it suddenly hits the private research labs. But a lot more of our tax money goes into creating commercial products than they are willing to admit.
October 10, 2009 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink