« HOW RELIGION RUINED POLITICS AND POLITICS RUINED RELIGION | Deanie Mills's Blog | "ON BEHALF OF A GRATEFUL NATION" »

"THAT'S A TERRIBLE THING TO SAY."


I'm not proud of this.

But if I want to deal with a difficult issue honestly, I have to tell the truth.

Back in 1972, while I was still in college, and after a series of personal crises had left me rudderless, I was befriended by a group of young people who were active in evangelical Christian circles; two of whom had attended Bob Jones University.  (Yes, THAT Bob Jones.  The one that prohibited inter-racial dating as recently as this decade.)

In my previous post, "How Religion Ruined Politics and Politics Ruined Religion," I wrote about that time in my life, so I'm not going to go into any more detail here, but suffice it to say that I was very lonely, and those friendships met a need at the time.

That spring, I was deeply worried about an old and dear friend with whom I'd had a romantic relationship, off and on, for years (at the time, it was off), because he was a platoon leader with the 101st Airborne Division in Vietnam.  When I found out that he had, indeed, returned safely from his tour, had rotated out of the Army, and was at home before leaving for a new life in West Texas, I traveled to my hometown to visit him.

I can still remember how he looked then, how broad and strong his shoulders were from months spent humping a rucksack through the jungle, how sexy in his cowboy hat.  He was 6'4" tall and I was a foot shorter.  I was visiting with his mom in the living room when he drove up into the driveway in the new, gold, '72 El Camino he'd bought, and I ran out and threw my arms around his neck.  He hoisted me up in one arm and carried me effortlessly into the house.

We visited a while with his mom, and then he had some things to bring in from the truck, so I followed him out, and he handed me a bag to carry.

We were happy and laughing, and I grinned up at him and said, "Who was yo niggah last year?"

That was a cute little saying I'd picked up from some of my new friends.  I'm ashamed to admit that I did not think anything of it at the time.

This, from a young woman who had black friends and who had worked and written about civil rights while in college.  Who'd been outraged at incidents of racism her whole life.

It would be easy to blame my new friends, but they hadn't made the remark.  I had. 

Thoughtlessly, stupidly.

My friend, Kent, stopped what he was doing, stood up to his full height, and in a stern voice I'm sure he normally reserved for clueless privates, he said, "That's not very funny.  It's a terrible thing to say."

And when he turned away, I stood there, dumbstruck at the truth of his words, my own humiliation, and inner self-rage that I had fallen into such a careless, thoughtless remark so easily, when I thought I knew myself better than that.

Later, I learned that in the month before Kent had departed Vietnam for home, they'd pulled him out of the jungle and sent him to a rear area, where one of his tasks had been to quell civil rights unrest among the men.  He did so with the help of a black sergeant who was as big as he was, a man for whom the young lieutenant had felt nothing but respect, admiration, and affection.

I never made that remark--or any other like it--again.

Eventually, I found some new friends.

Two years later, I married Kent, and have remained married to him for a very happy 35 years.

I'm recalling that cheek-burning incident now in order to use myself as a prime example of what I call "hidden hate speech."

Most of us who have any kind of functioning brain cells know how dangerous hate speech can be, whether spewed over the airwaves, blasted onto the Web, or circulated in nasty e-mails.  Especially following the recent presidential campaign and inauguragion of the country's first black president, we've all recoiled in horror at some of the things we've seen and heard.

Most of us who love our president, supported him, and voted for him, worry a great deal about his personal safety.

Newsworthy tragedies like the recent murder of an abortion doctor only reinforce our anxiety about rising hate speech and hate crimes in this country.

Like one Supreme Court justice's definition of pornography, we all know hate speech when we hear it.

But sometimes, we don't know it when we speak it ourselves.

Or worse, we know it when we hear it, but we say nothing.

Understand that I'm not talking about just African Americans here.  Hate speech and hate crimes spread like bloodstains and affect all sorts of minorities--from Latinos who catch the brunt of illegal alien-hate, to gays who are the victims of homophobia, to Muslim-Americans, who must endure the suspicions of a population conditioned by the previous administration to think of all of them as terrorists.

Ever since Barack Obama gained prominence with his eloquence and powerful speaking ability, his opponents and enemies have dismissed some of his most stirring speeches as "just words."

And yet, ask most any American what he or she thinks of, say, the Gettysburg Address, and see them grow misty-eyed.

Ask if they've heard the words, "I have a dream."

Ask if they're familiar with, "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country."

Ask if they've ever studied the words, "All we have to fear, is fear itself."

And ask how they felt when the leader of the free world, when he was questioned about the growing strength of an insurgency in Iraq, famously replied, "Bring it on."

Words matter.

It wasn't until I moved to West Texas and began bringing up my two children, who are 31 and 29 now, that I realized how much words--and the actions behind them--matter.  Most of the prejudice I encountered was directed toward the Mexican-American population because, I suspect, they were a larger minority out here than the African-Americans.

Still, racism seemed to be all around us.  In jokes, for instance.

Or, careless remarks (some not-so-careless) like the one I'd made years ealier.  

When my kids started school, I really had to swim against the current to encourage them to make inter-racial friendships, but I made it clear that any and all of their friends were welcome in our home at any time.  The first time my son, who was six, had a sleepover with a friend away from home, it was with a Hispanic family.

But it wasn't until they got into high school that I began to feel the sting that hidden hate speech and subtle racism can bring.  By that time, many of my son's best friends, for instance, were Hispanic.

And it started to cost US, his parents, friendships with some (I emphasize: SOME) of our white friends.

We didn't realize it at first.  It took a little time.  But gradually, we began to figure it out.

Not that we gave a great big flying damn.

During that time, I had a weekly newspaper column in the local paper called, "Country Life," about bringing up kids in the country, but I wrote about many things.  One time I wrote about gays, about how, basically, they are people too, how they're not pedophiles, and so on, and I talked about my married friends, Steve and Scott.

The next day, I got a two-sentence letter in the snail-mail from my publisher, firing me. 

He said, "Thank you for your promptness," on account of how I'd never missed a deadline in 16 years.  And that, as they say, was that.

Anyway, what I'm trying to say is that it's not easy, in a social setting, to do what my then-future-husband did to me:  Stand up straight and say, in effect, That's a terrible thing to say.

Psychologists say that, from an evolutionary standpoint, just about the greatest fear that men and women have is not the fear of death.

It is the fear of being shunned by society.

This is because, when primitive mankind traveled together from cave to cave in tribes, the worst punishment that could be bestowed upon a tribal member was to be ostracized--shunned--from the tribe, because to be kicked out of the cave was, most likely, to die.

This is one primeval reason that so many people fear public speaking.  The fear of making a fool of one's self, or of being judged as somehow unfit for the tribe, is a deep fear.

In this time of the Internet and polarization, many of us have sort of drifted into one sort of chosen tribe or another, based on our common mutual interests and points of view.

I happen to hang out with a kind of tribe who wouldn't dream of telling a racist joke or making a stupid remark like the one I made back in college in my bonehead days.

So, what happens is, we get lulled into a certain complacency, and by that I mean, we don't tend to encounter prejudice on an overt basis so much in our daily lives, partly because it has been legislated out of the workplace (as one example) and partly because we don't see it in our friends.

But prejudice--and the malevolence behind it--has only gone underground, so to speak.  Into the closet.  It's hidden, but it's there, and if we had any doubts about that (which I never did), we sure saw it during the recent campaign, and here again, with the nomination battle over Judge Sotomayor who, you may remember, is "not too smart," even though she was valedictorian of her high school senior class, won the Pyne Prize for academic excellence at Princeton, and edited the Yale Law Review.

(I don't recall anyone ever saying that John Roberts wasn't too smart, and his credentials were less impressive than hers are now.)

When tragedies like Dr. Tiller's murder happen, we recoil in collective horror, but we should not be surprised, because the truth is that the number of hate groups out there, and the places where hate speech is easily disseminated to an eager audience, has gone up FIFTY PERCENT since 2000.

So...what can we do about it?  How can we fight back against hate speech?  How can we, figuratively if not literally, stand up strong and say, "That's a terrible thing to say"?

For many years now, I have been a supporter of the Southern Poverty Law Center, and I can think of no better place to start rethinking hate speech.

Once, a commenter on one of my posts singled out the SPLC as a "radical left" group.

Oh for heaven's sake.  That's hogwash.  Utter nonsense.

Begun back in the '70's as a civil rights law firm by Morris Dees and Joe Levin, the SPLC branched out in the '80's by taking on the foundational hate-group of all time, the KKK.  When years of criminal prosecutions had resulted in few--if any--verdicts and/or sentences against KKK members who'd participated in assassinations, lynchings, beatings, kidnappings, and murders, the SPLC began to bring lawsuits against individuals and groups in CIVIL court.  The resulting cash settlements have broken the back of many of the largest, most powerful hate-groups in existence in this country, by simply bankrupting them.

Consequently, they began a serious effort to monitor and catalogue hate groups and hate crimes nation-wide, and their data base grew to be so impressive that the FBI began to consult them, which it continues to do so, to this day.

Their quarterly Intelligence Report puts together a comprehensive study of many of those crimes, the crime trends, successful prosecutions, and progress made in combating hate crimes, and is subscribed to by hundreds of law enforcement agencies in the country.  I get mine in the mail, but you can read it online anytime.

To my way of thinking, nothing the SPLC has done in its distinguished history can touch the work they've done through schools all over the country, with their free Teaching Tolerance classroom materials.  Through grants, multi-media kits, handbooks, and their monthly magazine, Teaching Tolerance provides useful classroom materials that enable teachers to enhance their students' understanding of the cultural history and accomplishments of many minority groups and to increase their sensitivity to forms of bigotry such as homophobia.

Located next to the SPLC center in Montgomery, Alabama (which has been bombed once, by the way, and Morris Dees deals with daily threats on his life), is the Civil Rights Memorial, designed by Vietnam memorial artist Maya Lin, and contains the names of those who fought and died for civil rights.  Water flows over the names 24 hours a day, and the site is open to all for quiet contemplation.

Also located at the SPLC headquarters is a 20-by-40 foot Wall of Tolerance, in which the names of thousands of supporters who have pledged to take a stand against hate, injustice, and intolerance and to work for justice, equality, and human rights are available on an Interactive display.  If you should ever get a chance to visit that wall in Montgomery, do me a favor and check it out.  You'll find my name among the number, and I may not get the chance in this lifetime to see it for myself.

In the meantime, there is another way you can stand strong against hate.  You can go to the SPLC "Stand Strong Against Hate" interactive map, which designates pinpoints in two colors.  The red dots indicate hate groups located in this country.

The green dots and squares represent men and women like you and me who have pledged to stand up whenever we see or hear acts of hate in our area.  When I entered my name and zip code for my own little green dot, up popped my home state of Texas, which, according to the site, hosts 66 hate groups.

And lots and lots of green. 

Another thing you can do is visit the SPLC homepage, (link provided above) and if you've got a few bucks to spare, I strongly encourage you to make a donation, because right now, there are more hate groups and hate crimes in this country than at any other time, and our president received more threats against his life in the days following his inauguration than any other president, according to the Secret Service.

If you haven't got any money to donate, that's fine.  All you have to do is speak out.  Words are free.

Words matter in this world.  Violent acts of hatred do not need to be confronted with further violent acts of hatred.

Violent words--no matter how well-meaning or couched in a joke--do not need to be confronted with violence, either.

Sometimes all it takes is a simple, "That's a terrible thing to say."

 

 


25 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Deanie, thanks for another amazing, thought-provoking post.

Interestingly enough, there is one group left that it is still PC to bash, and that is Christians. As a group we have probably brought some of it upon ourselves. But we are being terribly stereotyped, and many who would never in a million years make fun of a black or a latino or a gay or lesbian, or a Jew or a Muslim, or a disfigured person, have no problem trashing Christians.

I look forward to a day when we just stop trashing each other, period.

It is one thing to disagree with someone, and debate is good and healthy. Ridicule is not.

user-pic

Stilli, I have never questioned your practise of faith. I believe it is honest; an attempt to walk the proper path. There is no doubt that some Evangelicals are being stimatised by the actions of other Evangelicals. You know that I grew up in an Evangelical sect. That sect believes that "Thou Shalt Not Kill" is literal and absolute. It is that belief that provided me with the opportunity to serve as an unarmed medic. It also provisioned me with the will to do so. Yet it was my tour in Vietnam that led me to a place without the reach of Christian salvation. Leave this lie; it is irreconcilable, my own free choice, and is not for you.

I know the rules, but do not claim the faith. I can judge, Christians cannot. I judge all practise of faith by how it helps lead one to humaneness in their personal lives. I also judge Christians through the lens of the Bible, and believe the first template to apply is Matthew 5. It is proper to call out those claiming to be Christians, who have hollowed out their crosses and filled them with cork in the dead of night. It is proper to call them out, using King James at twenty paces. I have no respect for the poseurs, because they pollute a true practise of faith with their hypocrisy, leading others away from realising their innate humanity.

I urge you caution here, Stilli. Christianity may be the most difficult faith to practise I've ever encountered, in that it promises no benefit in this life; all rewards promised come in the hereafter. In fact, it implies that this life will be one of pain, persecution and suffering. Returning to Matthew 5.

Accept the disdain and persecution of others. It is a blessing; helping to temper your faith:

Matthew 5:10-16

Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.

Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men. Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid. Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house. Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
Do not will ill upon others, and accept the tribulations that they place in front of you. Additionally, fortune in life, both good and bad, is not distributed based upon the propriety of a human's life, but instead upon random distribution:
Matthew 5:38:48

Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloke also. And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain. Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.

Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy. But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust. For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same? And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the publicans so? Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.
It was never promised the path would be easy. It is proper for you to speak out against the distorted generalisations which are applied to all Christians, and it is proper to help others, who believe they are practising true Christian faith, to understand where they have gone wrong. However, is it proper to rail against what is, and will be? Are you not wasting effort and time in this?

Will, and walk in peace, Stilli.

user-pic

Thank you so much for your comments, Ant. You are one of the few who really KNOW where I am coming from, from private conversations. Your concern for me means a lot.

I know that I have not chosen an easy path. But I've lived with God and I've lived w/o Him. My life works better w/ Him...I know my efforts to get the general population to just respectfully accept us is wasted effort. But that's okay. A lot of things near and dear to my heart would be considered wasting time to some.

I'm good where I am. Some days my resolve to live my life completely for Christ is stronger than others. Right now I have a lot of diversions, but I make time to at least check in with Him on a daily basis.

Thanks again for caring, Ant. You mean a lot to me.

user-pic

How ironic is it that the very first comment on her self-reflective and honest post is the typical ME-ME-ME whine claiming the prize in the Oppression Olympics. Of course, as in all oppression olympics contests, the first and loudest claimants are the ones who are dominant - the majority who cannot even understand that as the majority and dominant group in the culture cannot possibly be the oppressed.

I am so sick and tired of Christians who are the majority in this country and who dominate our culture whining about being persecuted. The fact that you are not allowed to force every single person to kiss your butt is not persecution, it's life. I suggest you get one.

user-pic

Yikes!

user-pic

It would be inappropriate for me to respond reflexively to the previous post in this context. It is ironic that Oregon Activist seems to be unaware that this response has only served to give yours validity. It is generalisation applied to all. Oh well, here's another of my favorite templates to test a person's claim of Christian Faith, which seems suited for the moment:

Romans 12:17-21

Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men. If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men. Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord. Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head. Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.
user-pic

When I first moved to the East after living in the San Francisco Bay area for some years, I had the misfortune of working in a place where homophobia was rather rampant. One day, after the third or fourth "gay" joke from the worst offender (the guy behind me) I finally snapped, raised myself to my full 60 inches of height, turned around and said loudly, "some of my best friends are gay, I don't think you're funny, and I'd appreciate it if you could keep your homophobia to yourself."

He made some smartass comment back, I turned red and went back to my work amidst the snickers of our co-workers, but...

He cut it out.

One of my better days.

user-pic

Today, two things happened.

The first was, I got my copy of the SPLC Intelligence Report in the mail.

The second was, I got my periodic fund-raising call from my undergraduate institution (call it Wealthy Southern Alma Mater, or WSAM-U. Disclosure - I could not have afforded to attend WSAM-U without a scholarship that I repaid with five-plus years in the Navy.).

During my undergraduate years WSAM-U, despite being relatively progressive for its location and time, was noted for expelling any students who got excessively uppity to the point of defying authority - most notoriously, some who participated in Martin Luther King's nascent sit-in movement.

Like Deanie, I wince to recollect some of the thoughtless Terrible Things I said during that time - things I really didn't believe, but that were opportune and cheap, which in fact just made them worse.

But back to the WSAM-U fundraiser. She was an earnest undergraduate recruited for the purpose, and maybe some day I will wince to recollect giving her a hard time (but like the late great Mike Royko, I may be wrong but I doubt it). My response was something like this. I do not donate to WSAM-U for several reasons, the main one being that there is no possible contribution that I could afford to make that would make a nickle's worth of difference to the University. Instead I give to causes where I think my modest donations will have an effect, like our local animal shelter, the Southern Poverty Law Center, local libraries and churches, etc.

In my book, Morris Dees and the rest of the SPLC people are heroes - people who have been threatened with death many times by groups that have the means and intentions to do it. The sit-in protestors were also heroes and many paid the price, including my cousin Sam Dodson who was fired from his pastorship of a big Methodist church in WSAM-ville because he saw it as his plain duty to march with the protestors.

Great post, Deanie.

user-pic

Now, that's a terribly courageous post! Thanks for reminding me of all the idiotic, hateful things I've said that I would've been mortified if some of my friends had heard. It's hard to grow up in this country without saying something that makes you sound like a bigot. (At least it was hard in my youth, though in the age of Obama, things are changing fast.) Just because the shoe fits doesn't mean you have to keep wearing it. We all could use reminders of that, no matter who we are.
-A longtime member of SPLC

user-pic

Deanie this is an excellent piece of writing. I think that you hit the bulls eye with people's fear of rejection, but the comments and snorts are as common as air. They are everywhere, and silence presumes a shared ideology of demeaning.

People think of "hate" as something disconnected and carried out by some "crazy" folks. The reality is that it is not disconnected and arises out of the swamp of the every day, taken for granted, often unremarked comments and "humor."

I'm with you about SPLC. They have been doing vital work for a very long time. I have thought a lot about why it is that those who try to fight against inhumanity and for justice are labeled as being "left wing radicals" and "communists" and "unPatriotic" etc. I have thought about what that means about our country, and what is being "protected" by such attempts at silencing. I have thought about it, and it does not create a very positive statement about our nation or our people.

Thank you for this piece.

user-pic

I have used this phrase appropriately many times, and have always smiled in a loving, gentle, yet serious sort of way.

I personally also have been active with supporting Klanwatch and Teaching Tolerance, and have used these SPLC materials to help educate others.

You are quite correct to recognize man's fear of "being the only one who speaks up in the room."
It took me years to become comfortable enough to not only know my principles, but to stand up for them, and know the appropriate ways how to do this effectively when speaking.

Have you ever made new friends, had a great time with them, and then, when all seems safe and warm and fuzzy--they crack a racist joke, make an epithet, revealing the decay and malice inside? It has happened to me over, and over, and over. It has happened so many times, I started to put them into categories, and became myself somewhat racist towards my own race, partly due to my interracial relationship + 3 kids.

But I have learned that not every slight deserves equal justice under the law. A young man I met while working loading trucks for a local company didn't say anything until one day we all shared jokes, and he was the last one. He said it, and it was very racist, against black people. I left the dock, and went to the bathroom. While I was gone, the other workers, who knew me much better, informed him that I was in love with a black woman, and had kids with her. He was mortified. He waited for some rage, or rancor, or discipline that never came. Once he realized, he was sorry, and that was more than most men at age 19, who lived in the country part of my state his whole life. I later became his friend. I initiated it. I thought it was the better part of valor to change him from the inside, than from the outside, so he changed in a part by experiencing my family. To me, had I yelled at him or beat him up, it would have had more to do with my pride--than with helping a young man see right.
Sadly, not many can be so educated, and must be confronted in a more abrupt manner, which sometimes works, and many times doesn't.
i prefer to do so anyway, despite the outcome.
I applaud your sincerity and honesty.
Thanks.

user-pic

My experience was similar. In my almost-all-white New England college in the 60s efforts were being made to "become more diverse", as we say now, but I don't recall if there was a term other than "We should have more Negroes." I don't think "affirmative action" was coined yet.

My freshman year I experienced something that affected me in ways well beyond race issues. A freshman football player was talking in a group of us about his competition for first-string from one of the black players.

"Boy, that n*****r sure can run."
Crickets.
He looked around. "What?"
"You can't call him a n*****r," one of us said.
"Why not? He is."

And I realized- he wasn't being offensive- he was using the only term he knew. He was being descriptive, not insulting. I later learned Jim was the only one on the team who reached out to him, and that they were friends.

My offense was worse. When two black girls were visiting the campus, I tried to put them at ease by telling a race joke. In my mind it spoke of the stupidity of the southern lawman in the joke, but the offense to them only occurred to me as the punch line left my mouth. I still get a little sick to my stomach writing this.

I had always thought I was as non-racist as I could be. I knew a black family and we had Mom and her two kids to supper when I was a kid. Now I realize it was because she was our cleaning lady, but for the time it was remarkable. I recall my mother defending herself with one of our neighbors, and a friend of my dad shunning us.

And our school was totally integrated; he was in all our classes.

I realize it wasn't that we were so tolerant- there wasn't anything to be tolerant of. Like Jim the football player, we were naive.

As a teacher and student of history, these realizations have been valuable. It has helped me step behind the words I read to consider the source of them. (Lenny Bruce defended LBJ for not being able to say "Negro" without making it sound like "niggro." Same point, I think.)

To echo Joe Wood's last paragraph, I don't think these were hanging offenses.

But in a nasty confirmation hearing both Jim and I might not be confirmed.

user-pic

WE all stumble.
I too have a problem with Self Control, I’m working on it though.

(James 3:2-6) 2 For we all stumble many times. If anyone does not stumble in word, this one is a perfect man, able to bridle also [his] whole body. 3 If we put bridles in the mouths of horses for them to obey us, we manage also their whole body. 4 Look! Even boats, although they are so big and are driven by hard winds, are steered by a very small rudder to where the inclination of the man at the helm wishes. 5 So, too, the tongue is a little member and yet makes great brags. Look! How little a fire it takes to set so great a woodland on fire! 6 Well, the tongue is a fire. The tongue is constituted a world of unrighteousness among our members, for it spots up all the body and sets the wheel of natural life aflame . . .

(Romans 3:23) . . .For ALL have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. . .
(Ephesians 4:2) . . .with complete lowliness of mind and mildness, with long-suffering,

Putting up with one another in love,

user-pic

First, I want to thank all the commenters who, as usual, are wise, insightful, interesting, and open to other points of view. I love the dialogue you guys get going.

I wanted to comment especially on something Joe Wood said. Reaching out from his position of being in an inter-relational relationship to the young man who, after all, had meant no harm but maybe needed his horizons expanded was one of the classiest things I've seen in a long time.

And it made me think about how, sometimes, good people say bad things in order to fit in when they feel social anxiety, and how, ultimately, we should all be judged on our actions as well as our words.

It puts me in mind of LBJ, a crude, country good ole boy who spouted racial epithets and told gaudy jokes with the best of the Southern Democratic caucus...but who single-handedly did more to advance civil rights and voting rights in this country than any other human being of his generation other than Martin Luther King. What LBJ did took tremendous political courage, because it pretty much wound up costing the Democratic congress the South which, as we all know, is now solidly Red. (Good riddance, as they say.)

But still, this all took place 40 years ago, and it took an uncommonly hard head to pull it off, but it was the signature issue, domestically speaking, of his presidency.

So Joe Wood has it right--we can let people know that a joke or comment is offensive, but reach out to them in ways that might cause them to see...hey, I can learn something here.

user-pic

And let's be blunt! As Paul Krugman points out in his book CONSCIENCE OF A LIBERAL, many elements of the Republican Party having feeding off of racism since the 1964 Civil Rights Act was passed, through Nixon's Southern strategy, through Reagan's start of
his 1980 campaign in Philadelphia, Mississippi (site of the murder of three civil rights workers in 1964), through the Willie Horton ad, right up to the outcries about Judge Sotomayor's nonexistent racism.

user-pic

Absolutely, tlees2.

user-pic

Thank you, Deanie, for this national call to conscience. Every American, wherever he or she was born or currently lives, can make a first step difference simply by increasing SPLC's numbers in green. And by making a donation. And by "walking the walk as well as talking the talk."

user-pic

Wonderful to see so many rec'ds, Deanie.

My comment is at your blog. :)

user-pic

Thanks, TheraP!

Yeah guys--you can always find me over at http://deaniemills.com, where I cross-post.

I get e-mails sometimes from shy folk who are a bit intimidated at commenting over here, so I send 'em to Blue Inkblots.

I hang out both places, and have a lot of fun here and there, so whichever's fine with me.

Or both!

user-pic

This was by far and away the best post I've ever read on this site. I literally cannot add anything to that other than to say thanks.

user-pic

"Once, a commenter on one of my posts singled out the SPLC as a "radical left" group.

"Oh for heaven's sake. That's hogwash. Utter nonsense."

What that person meant is that the rule of law, and especially the enforcement of it, is "radical left" -- which that person definitely is not. Doubtless of the crowd who rejects the rule of law in order to "defend" the Constitution/rule of law.

They aren't all nuts. But those who aren't nuts don't tend to be thinkers, let alone great thinkers. Thus, for them, "leftist" and "liberal" mean EDUCATED.

user-pic
Most of us who love our president, supported him, and voted for him, worry a great deal about his personal safety.

Especially when some are actively threatening Obama on Fox Radio. Frankly, I think we all need to occasionally think about what we say and think. Most people aren't that good at self evaluation, and it's easy to spout stereotypes. It's also easy to create ones when you are part of a group like TPM. (how many times do we say disparaging things that lump all conservatives--heck I do it all of the time!)

Thanks for the reminder Deanie, of a simple phrase that works.

user-pic

A good essay and I have given to Morris Dees, but after reading this Alexander Cockburn piece on Dees, I'm switiching to this Stephen Bright of the Southern Center for Human Rights. He pays himself $11,000.

The merchant of hate himself, Mr. Dees, was paid an annual $273,132 as chief trial counsel, and the SPLC’s president and CEO, Richard Cohen, $290,193. Total revenue in 2007 was $44,727,257 and program expenses $20,804,536. In other words, the Southern Poverty Law Center was raising twice as much as it was spending on its proclaimed mission. Fund-raising and administrative expenses accounted for $9 million, leaving $14 million to be put in the center’s vast asset portfolio.

http://www.counterpunch.org/cockburn05152009.html

user-pic

Nonprofits are required to count grant income in the year it is awarded, whether it is received or not. Say they get a 3 year grant of 15 million from Eisenhower Foundation or some such - They have to report the whole 15 million in 07, but 10 million might be coming in 08 and 09. This is the way the IRS requires revenue be reported and so many organizations have boom and bust years on their financials depending on grant cycles. They don't have the information to support their conclusion at all. Moreover, it's important for organizations to put money into reserves to weather bad years. Look at all the groups cutting back now - when they need to give the most - because they spent during good times and didn't save for lean times.

I suggest the better measurement is effectiveness - not the lowest salary. I don't like a lot of things about SPLC myself, but this measurement if bogus.

user-pic

Don't be so quick to judge the numbers, FeralCat. There are several things to consider, here. The combined salaries listed in this piece (if they are accurate)--amount to ONE-SEVENTY-NINTH of the income brought in largely by Dees and his staff through their high-profile cases.

In other words, they make nearly EIGHTY TIMES what they pay themselves for their very hard legal work, which is most likely a tiny fraction of what a regular civil attorney makes.

Secondly, you have no idea how much personal security these men must have in their private lives, while in court, and at the Center. Bomb-sniffing dogs, personal bodyguards, and bullet-resistant automobiles manned by defensive drivers do not come cheap, and the threats against them are only too real. Their last trial was so scary that they even had to hire snipers to line the top of the courthouse; the threats were that serious.

These things are not provided by the govt. or by the courts.

I'm not advocating that you NOT donate to the Southern Center for Human Rights, by any means. I'm merely saying that you can look at numbers and see something that, once you do the math, does not add up.

Leave a comment

Deanie Mills

user-pic

Following:
Followers: 46

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address