Wanted: Legitimate Reasons to Bail Out Fannie and Freddie Stockholders
Okay, we all know the argument for bailing out Fannie and Freddie bondholders. If we didn't , then homeowners would be paying much higher interest rates on mortgages for many years to come. But, why are we bailing out the stockholders? After all, aren't stockholders supposed to lose their shirts when they invest in a bankrupt company?
I've heard members of Congress say that the stockholders have already lost 80 percent of their investment. So what? Losing 80 percent is better than losing 100 percent. Furthermore, not all stockholders bought their shares last year. Some bought their shares last month, just before the Fed, Treasury, and Congress came to the rescue.
So, what's the deal? I don't want to think bad things about our political leaders, so what legitimate reason could they have for putting Fannie and Freddie stockholders ahead of children needing child care and health care or seniors who can't afford to pay for heating oil this winter?
Come on TPMers, be creative!




