<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>davidv&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/davidv/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/davidv/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/davidv//2152</id>
   <updated>2008-03-06T20:41:23Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Survey USA with tossups</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/03/survey-usa-with-tossups.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.181909</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-06T20:41:23Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-06T20:41:23Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Survey USA has a new set of polls out (see this posting on TPM Election Central). The straightforward calculation of electoral votes gives the following scores:Obama - McCain 280-258Clinton - McCain 276 - 262But Survey USA attributes electoral wins even...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>davidv</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/davidv/">
      <![CDATA[Survey USA has a new set of polls out (see <a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/03/surveyusa_hillary_and_obama_wi.php">this posting</a> on TPM Election Central). <br />The straightforward calculation of electoral votes gives the following scores:<br />Obama - McCain 280-258<br />Clinton - McCain 276 - 262<br /><br />But Survey USA attributes electoral wins even when the difference is too small to interpret in any direction. For example, in New Jersey, Obama and McCain have 43% each but McCain gets the win; similarly, in Michigan: Clinton and McCain have 44% percent each, but Clinton gets the win.<br /><br />That's why I did the following analysis, which I believe does a better job at capturing the image of the general election.<br /><br /><b>Case A:</b><br /><br />If we consider states where the difference is at most <b>5%</b> to be
tossups and we keep only victories of 6% or more, then the scores are:

<p>Obama 238 McCain 122 (<b>116</b> difference) with 170 up for grabs</p>

<p>Clinton 229 McCain 177 (<b>52</b> difference) with 132 up for grabs</p><b>Case B:<br /></b><p>If instead we consider states where the difference is at most <b>3%</b> to
be tossups and we keep only victories of 4% or more, then the scores
are:</p>

<p>Obama 246 McCain 174 (<b>72</b> difference) with 118 up for grabs</p>

<p>Clinton 250 McCain 223 (<b>27</b> difference) with 65 up for grabs</p><br /><br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
