« Obama is 52, not 48 according to his own Whitehouse.gov account! | davidfarrar's Blog | Quick! What's three times bigger than TARP? »
The Hannity tapes you'll never see exposing Obama's radicalism
Segment 1. College years
Segment 2. Community Organizer
Segment 3. William Ayres
Segment 4. Jeremiah Wright
Segment 5. Israel
Segment 6. History of Radicalism
ex animo
davidfarrar
Advertisement
I won't disturb you after this because you are disturbed already.
August 18, 2009 9:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
An ad hominem attack in response to the testimony presented, very good.
If I may point out, uncontested testimony is the closest we can get to the truth here in this medium. I thank you for your support; sir.
ex animo
davidfarrar
August 18, 2009 9:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
His ad hominem attack on you is only a tiiinnyyyy step away from the actual intent of Hannity's tapes.
Even if all of his facts are true (and I have no reason to doubt them), they are completely useless, because he's using them for the same purpose Ripper used his words in his comment to your post.
The money question is what do you dislike more, Obama the person or his policies?
If you're buying into Hannity's tapes because of your dislike of Obama's policies, then I'm sorry - this is the most idiotic way to go about it.
Because it seems that besides stuff like this you have nothing else to say, even though Obama's actual actions give plenty of opportunity to any Obama critic.
August 18, 2009 10:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
His disseat.
ex animo
davidfarrar
August 19, 2009 7:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Disseat? You want datseat, instead?
August 20, 2009 8:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, that's it...pass deseat.
ex animo
davidfarrar
August 20, 2009 6:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Damn and I just sprayed for pests.
August 18, 2009 10:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.oxy.edu/x7992.xml
August 18, 2009 10:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Farrar, take your BS elsewhere if you're going to go on with your points 2 through 6.
He's our President whether you like it or not, and we're all getting tired of your routine.
August 18, 2009 10:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hannity!? The last time this guy said anything remotely honest was . . .
Oh wait there hasn't been a time.
August 18, 2009 10:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hannity belongs behind bars. He crops video and audio of the president to make it appear that he says things he has never said.
His main jolly in life is manipulating idiots like you into believing his sick, twisted story of the world so that you will not be out in the world thinking for yourself.
You've been Hannitized!
August 19, 2009 12:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
And as you admitted in your other blog, you've also been Limbaughtomized... which really explains everything:)
August 19, 2009 2:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
And before you offer me your homina, homina, homina response... here's some info on the proper use of 'ad hominem'
http://plover.net/~bonds/adhominem.html
August 19, 2009 2:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think you all will notice, no one addressed the veracity of the material itself. All employed some argumentum ad hominem tactic to avoid confronting the fact that what you see in Obama is nothing be a smokescreen to hide his true political ambition.
ex animo
davidfarrar
August 19, 2009 7:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
You still are misusing 'ad hominem'as a defense against reality. See my link above.
And the material is so ridiculous that it is a joke which is exactly why no one 'needs' to address it's veracity. It's veracity is non-existent.
You, sir, are allowing yourself to be used by people who want you to believe lies and distortions and spread them around in public because it serves their purposes. You are being played a fool by these people and every blog is received as the 'joke' that it is. A joke on you, sir. Wake up!
August 19, 2009 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
If you think them lies, show me Barack's Harvard record. If you think them lies, show me a copy of his senior year thesis at Columbia on Soviet Nuclear Disarmament. At that time the U.S. was pursuing disarmament through strength. What was Obama's view of this ultimately successful strategy with the Soviet Union? Or would you simply prefer to mount yet another argumentum ad hominem against the messager?
ex animo
davidfarrar
August 19, 2009 3:41 PM | Reply | Permalink