Today's America is a class act

The United States ranks behind every industrial nation except France in the percentage of overall economic activity devoted to manufacturing (...) Manufacturing has long been viewed as an essential pillar of a powerful economy. It generates millions of well-paid jobs for those with only a high school education, a huge segment of the population. New York Times
"It wasn't the US service sector that defeated Japan," notes Robert Dujarric of Temple University in Tokyo. Well-paid blue-collar jobs, he adds, have been a pillar of Japan's postwar social equality. Financial Times
(Meth is) "the only example of a widely consumed illegal narcotic that might be called vocational, as opposed to recreational." It was given to starving Nazi soldiers to keep them in warrior mode on the Russian front. Now it's a preferred stimulant for people working two jobs in low-wage purgatory. "Methland vs. Mythland" Timothy Egan - NYT
Everybody has their own way of thinking: some people think in facts and figures, I think in symbols and metaphors.
I am ever searching for the correct symbol or metaphor, and when I find the one that feels just right, everything else: thinking, talking and writing, comes easily to me, just like ringing a bell.
I love to put some quotes and pictures, like the ones above, together and hear how they resonate like a chord played on a well tuned instrument. For me, much of what we are facing today is resumed, almost like a poem in these snippets
The key visual metaphor is that of the meth addict's transformation from hillbilly beauty into death's head. The key phrase is the one from Robert Dujarric in Tokyo: well paid blue-collar jobs, are the pillar of social equality, followed by the NYT stating that those with only a high school education make up a huge percentage of the US population. That is the present situation in a nutshell.
I was struck by a line in president Barack Obama's much reported NAACP speech, where he, a supposed "lefty", addressed this advice to young African-Americans:
"They might think they've got a pretty jump shot or a pretty good flow," Mr. Obama said, "but our kids can't all aspire to be LeBron or Lil Wayne. I want them aspiring to be scientists and engineers, doctors and teachers, not just ballers and rappers. I want them aspiring to be a Supreme Court justice. I want them aspiring to be president of the United States of America."My first reaction to that paragraph was that aspiring to be a rapper or a professional basketball player was just as realistic as aspiring to be a scientist or engineer and certainly more realistic than aspiring to be a Supreme Court Justice or president of the USA, as between the White House and the Supreme Court there are only ten jobs, whereas to begin with there are 1,696 basketball players in the NBA... (Sorry, but I can't find the number of openings for hip-hop artists).
I immediately thought on reading Obama's words, "what's wrong with aspiring to having a union card and working in a factory at union rates and getting married on that pay, buying a house and raising a family, seeing some of your kids go to college and then retiring on a decent pension and going fishing with your grandchildren?"
What is supposed to happen to people who don't have the natural aptitude or interests to be scientists and engineers, doctors and teachers? Or specialists in derivatives or other such useful types?
In today' America are they fated to end up like the woman in the photographs, fated to taking methamphetamine in order to be able to stand the strain of working 60 plus hour weeks at minimum wage without any unions or medical coverage?
Is there only to be a future in America for knowledge workers?
If so, we as a people are in deep, deep, shit.
Because that is not really in our DNA.
For thousands of years our species has mostly worked with its hands and as a simple matter of natural selection, not everyone who is an able bodied, willing and honest person is interested in reading and studying.
As Italian author Alberto Moravia once said, the number of illiterates is constant, but nowadays the illiterates know how to read.
And this is just as true for white people as for black people in today's America.
In many senses we really are living in a post-racial society.
Today the real question is class and poverty, not race.
Most of the white working poor of today's America would happily trade the pale complexion of their nether parts to be an African-American UAW worker in the 1950s and 60s Detroit.
Today, instead of a society where race inevitably determines status, we live is society of sharp class divisions, where class, except for those with inherited wealth, is based on educational attainment and that educational attainment itself is in great part based on the parent's social class and the income that comes with it.
Within living memory the sons and daughters of the line workers of unionized American manufacturers, who showed aptitude for study, could go to excellent state land grant universities and their brothers and sisters who didn't like school could look forward to the same decent life as their parents had enjoyed... That didn't last very long did it?
In today's America it is very difficult for an American from a poor family of any race, no matter how intelligent he or she might be, to get a first class education or, with parents (or single parent) working at two jobs, the supportive and stable family life to be able to concentrate on their studies and thus escape from poverty.
The heart of the matter is that America's once proud working class, both white and black, is being transformed, has been transformed, into a classic "lumpenproletariat" or "ragged proletariat". Here is how the Encyclopaedia Britannica defines that term:
(German: "rabble proletariat"), according to Karl Marx in The Communist Manifesto, the lowest stratum of the industrial working class, including also such undesirables as tramps and criminals. The members of the Lumpenproletariat--this "social scum," said Marx--are not only disinclined to participate in revolutionary activities with their "rightful brethren," the proletariat, but also tend to act as the "bribed tools of reactionary intrigue."What could be a better description of the working poor followers of Sarah Palin's, or of any populist of the right that may arise in the near future's, than as "bribed tools of reactionary intrigue"?
Are any right wing populists, who go in mostly for creationism, abortion and guns, going to advocate strong labor unions, a higher minimum wage, universal health care and keeping the jobs in the USA? I doubt it very much, don't you?
Will anybody else advocate those things?
Advertisement
















Wonderful blog, David. Yeah, the nobility of work. My Stepdad always amazed me - he was a pipe fitter and welder, strong Union man. He was a champ on laying beads on a 60" steel pipeline - they used to time each other for the hell of it. But when the aerospace industry got underway, the engineers had no idea how to build the stuff on their drawing boards. The tradesmen had to figure it out, and the solutions were creative and sophisticated. Inductive brazing? Invented by welders at Cape Kennedy. Amazing process, feeding thin spooled wires of different metal alloys into a high strength gas weld that would hold against a Titan missile blast.
July 22, 2009 3:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here is another one. Caterpillar folks developed a very long time ago a process to weld the two halves of the drive wheels for their bulldozers together. It was called inertia bond. It took both halves and faced them togther with one locked and one rotating, with the pieces aligned on their centers and through friction caused the material to melt and make a complete bond which was much stronger than any previous welding or bolting technique used before.
In more recent years this same technique has been used to 'weld' the compressor stages of jet engines together. Unlike other techniques the weld goes entirely through the material and is far less prone to deformation or cracks. It works especially well for these parts because they are made in a forging process where the material is of powdered metal that has a very fine grained and highly uniform structure with a very high strength to weight ratio.
Here is a page with a video of the kind of machine typically used in manufacturing.
http://www.mtiwelding.com/inertia-friction-welding-process.cfm
July 22, 2009 5:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here is a picture of a jet engine compressor assembly showing several compressor stages. The stages of this assembly were welded together using the inertia bonding or 'friction weld' technique.
http://www.mtiwelding.com/popUp2.cfm?pic=aircraft_aerospace_rotor-p
July 22, 2009 6:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Any useful work is honorable--and I have a very wide definition of "useful". My personal background is very blue collar...immigrant grandparents, parents proud of high school diplomas, and here I am, doing hopefully useful work on a university campus. Because I'm cross/class myself I prefer to live a life in a neighborhood which is class/diverse. Within three houses of myself live a barber (my barber) a guy who owns a grass cutting service, a custodian, a school teacher, and a retired engineer--all of them great neighbors, and interesting people.
The key is the work ethic, not the place or kind of work one does, but as long as opinion makers disparage hand work, or imply that handwork doesn't require headwork, one cannot expect people, white or black or green, to aspire to handwork. I don't disparage "Joe the Plumber"--I grieve that the left doesn't have a stable of real Joe the Plumbers, Josephine the mechanics, Giuseppe the assembler, and Jose the tradesman to speak with pride about what they do, contribute, and deserve.
I should have said aspiration and work ethic are the keys--and if the way forward is through "yes you can" be whatever the general culture puts at the top of the pile then that I can live with. But until we face classism directly, I don't think suggesting aspiring to be doctors, lawyers, or presidents is such a bad idea. Wanting to be President may be a step on the way to discovering one's true vocation.
July 22, 2009 8:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
It is not a question of if the work has "dignity", but rather if pays a high school graduate enough in a 40 hour work week to have a home and a family and enough time to spend in that home with that family.
July 22, 2009 8:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is another case of yes, but. . . and a place where Department of Labor Statistics can come in handy. The general assumption amongst those of us white of collar is that income and status correlate. To a degree, yes, but to a surprising degree no. A quick example and a quick web reference. I spend part of my time teaching in a historic preservation program which includes a number of adult learners. When one comes by my way I usually ask them why they're returning to school. One of them a few years ago said "to become a historic plumber." To which I replied, "what's the difference?" He answered $75.00 an hour. (Historic plumbers retrofit historic buildings with modern heating/plumbing systems--buildings which have their fabric protected by law). He makes about 30,000.00 more per year than I do (I'll pass $100,000.00 for the first time this year in a 38 year teaching career.) Here's a theoretical: Kid comes home to white collar parents, regardless of race or ethnicity, and says, "Mom, Dad, I've discovered my true life's ambition. I want to be a plumber". Which parent is going to faint first?
Here's a reference: A series the New York Times published a few years ago entitled Class Matters You can find it at http://www.nytimes.com/pages/national/class/ A wonderful book which looks at this is Tracy Kidder's House At the time it was written Jim Locke was a successful builder in a four partner construction company, Apple Corps. His father never came to visit one of his projects, though they were all within a very easy drive of where he lived. Pop was white collar. I've never forgiven his pop.
July 22, 2009 10:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great post, David. This line in particular has me thinking very deeply this morning.
Thanks for this post.
July 22, 2009 8:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Great blog, David.
I would argue one of the reasons for this is the disappearance of vocational/technical tracks in high schools along with wood and metal shop in middle schools.
Recently I went to a local jeweler whose family business has been around for years. He and I got to talking and discovered we attended the same middle school. He lamented our school no longer offers metal shop which was where he found his calling.
College prep has completely supplanted vocational/technical training in the secondary schools where I reside. Education reform has to revitalize those programs.
It's a disservice to kids to force those who have no intention or interest in a college degree through a one-size-fits all high school curriculum that leads to a dead end, if and when they graduate. No wonder they drop out!
Those kids would be better served if curricula were in place to give them marketable hands-on skills. This would provide a huge incentive for them to graduate. It would require high schools to offer two different kinds of diplomas, one for the college-bound and one for the vocationally trained.
I don't fault Obama for encouraging kids to aim high. But once they've come back to earth they need options within the public education system to develop the skills and acquire knowledge in areas where they have the greatest talent and aptitude. This would give the country the work force it needs to meet the myriad challenges it faces.
July 22, 2009 8:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree totally!
July 22, 2009 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
I got my start in vocational training at Job Corps, but remember the myriad of choices in high school to pursue career-building opportunities that didn't include college. You are so right that we simply need to start doing things again that we already used to do once. I suspect that could be applied to a lot of things, as good as some things have become.
July 22, 2009 9:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think the disappearance of hands-on vocational programs from High Schools is a symptom, not the cause.
We make almost nothing in this country anymore. What good does it do for a kid to learn how to run a lathe or build a house when after graduation he won't have anywhere to apply those skills?
I can understand the push to make Americans 'knowledge workers' Why? The global economy. There's another 6+ billion folks out there, many of whom live in the kind of poverty only the absolute worst off in our country ever see.
Until every one of those folks has been lifted up to even 'sustainable' poverty, corporations will have someone willing to perform back-breaking work for almost nothing. It's not a matter of people here not wanting to do the work, or not knowing how. It's a matter of corporations doing it elsewhere - for less money and fewer restrictions.
Think about this for a minute - for just how much of America's history did we have a strong middle class filled with blue-collar workers putting in their 40 (or 50) hour weeks and retiring at 65? Twenty years? Thirty? Before WWII those same people were working on farms or getting shit on by their corporate masters. In the Eighties those corporate masters decided to start moving offshore so they could start shitting on different people.
We have a couple of choices here. We could cling to the nostalgia of the near-post WWII era, shut our doors ala Japan, and live off our own resources. Or we can face reality and find a way to build a sustainable post-industrial society.
Since shutting the doors isn't really at all a possibility, we've got to try and move beyond the 'golden years' of the late 20th century. There's no doubt that it's going to suck...I just hope we can make it through this transition at all.
July 22, 2009 3:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
If any country in the world could possibly "shut its doors and live off its resources" it is the USA... in fact that is what it was all about in the first place.
July 23, 2009 2:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
When she was decorative painting, my wife had some coworkers that are/were meth addicts. When I visited the works in progress, I mentioned that a young woman painter seemed to have an older face. Previous meth addiction was the reason. She had two young children, and my wife started collecting our grandson's hand-me-downs for them. The laid-off father of one of them was recently caught in a drugstore stuffing drugs in a bag, so he's back in jail. Would these people follow Palin? I have no idea.
My Palin-following sibs, on the other hand, are all meth-free, though they do like beer. All of them have jobs and several of them are more prosperous than their college-educated older brother.
Here's a metaphoric language for you:
http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Tamarian_language
July 22, 2009 9:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good points, all.
Being fair to Obama, imagine him trying to argue the value of aspiring to a manufacturing job, given their vanishing act. That would require not just advising young people, but changing the economics of manufacturing, mainly through restorative tariff protection. Not an easy sell, since it always can be portrayed as leading to higher consumer costs.
But it may be too late for returning to blue-collar work. As robotics improves it gets cheaper, while the worker gets more expensive.
July 22, 2009 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
BTW, one advantage we had over the Axis was widely available stimulants, i.e. coffee and tobacco.
July 22, 2009 9:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
excellent, thought provoking post - thanks!
it seems to me that in a nation as wealthy as the usa there is absolutely no good reason why any citizen should lack adequate food, clothing, shelter, health care, an excellent education and the opportunity for fairly compensated, honest work.
currently the us government and its allied institutions choose the winners and losers in the economy and its never been more plainly obvious than it is now.
would that we could all be as important as the crooks on wall street whose reward for destroying a great nation's economy is bigger profits, bigger salaries, bigger bonuses and a free insurance policy for same courtesy of "the little people."
July 22, 2009 10:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Talk about Night of the Living Dead. I have seen some of these zombies way up here. I know you are going for the metaphor here but geeeeeeeeeeeeez
When the unions have not been totally destroyed under repub administrations, they have weakened themselves by catering to the older workers and screwing the newbies.
The dems have been lost on this issue for decades.
Good post.........Pictures really stick in my mind David.
July 22, 2009 10:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
A thought-provoking post indeed, in my view, reminiscent of:
July 22, 2009 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
This reminded me of an article I read as a reprint in The American Conservative of all places: An unsentimental education. It's (believe it or not) conservative praise for Obama's call to invest $12bn in community colleges, which was mentioned without specifics in the NAACP speech.
I just don't understand why they're OK with training people to do necessary manual labor jobs and then abandoning them to $8/hr, no bennies, with a stern admonishment of, "Go chase profits, not pensions!"
July 22, 2009 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's commendable, but kids have to get through high school before they can get into community college. Some simply aren't wired for the typical high school curriculum.
Other options should be available for them so they don't fall through the cracks, i.e. culinary, auto mechanics, welding, medical tech, cosmetology, plumbing/electrical, etc. so they're either job-ready upon graduation or eligible for internships, apprenticeships, or fast-tracked for continuing education at a partnering community college or vocational school.
July 22, 2009 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought we were all supposed to crank out Symbolic Analysts.
July 22, 2009 1:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Better we crank out individuals adept at innovation and problem-solving whatever their chosen discipline.
July 22, 2009 5:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Amconmag is not neocon, it is conservative-conservative with a heavy Catholic input, which often leans toward Christian-Democrat attitudes which have a strong social vertebration content.
July 22, 2009 2:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I immediately thought on reading Obama's words, "what's wrong with aspiring to having a union card and working in a factory at union rates and getting married on that pay, buying a house and raising a family, seeing some of your kids go to college and then retiring on a decent pension and going fishing with your grandchildren?""
The problem is that since reduction in transportation costs has meant that foreign low skill workers can compete with their domestic "brothers in the class struggle", manufacturing employment is coming closer to international parity in wages. Unions are not able to bargain effectively, because they can be replaced by imports.
This is a good thing; it makes everything we buy cheaper and disproportionately benefits the poor. There were never nearly as many "good paying jobs" as many people imagine.
There are still decent paying jobs out there that don't require a four year college degree. But they require skills. Unskilled labor is cheap, and expecting it to get expensive again is like investing in buggy whips.
July 22, 2009 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
You describe globalization very neatly, but I think that globalization is going to break down on the impoverishment of "ordinary" Americans.
America has traditionally been very protectionist and things generally went very well for America like that.
There have always been cheap foreign products and people who wanted to import them and there have always been tensions between protectionism and free market.. until very recently.
But, this too will pass.
Before WWI we already had a more "globalized" world than today... then all hell broke loose.
July 22, 2009 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think that globalization is going to break down on the impoverishment of "ordinary" Americans.
---------------------------------------------------
I think globalization will break down before the impoverishment of ordinary Americans. It will break on our trade deficits with no one wanting our dollars anymore. Sooner or later America is going to have to produce some real goods to sell for all those dollars we've used to buy all that cheap consumer crap and oil. Sooner or later other nations are going to ask why the hell they want those pieces of green paper.
July 22, 2009 6:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
(But what about the metaphor?)
One can hardly fault a transient who, finding the back door of a five star restaurant to be unlocked, sets to eating and drinking until nauseous and even unconscious. Nor should one be surprised if the transient forgets to mutter his litany of discontents that normally accompany his daily search for food and instead sing the praises of god and the saints and the joy of being alive. And one must expect that the rightful owner of the restaurant will likely have to resort to force of violence to eject the interloper.
The industrial revolution was a happy accident for homo sapiens in that it provided a moment of largess beyond the capacity of ordinary nature to provide. Of course this “revolution” consumes everything – community, resources and people themselves- and does so in a way that is so hopelessly unsustainable that the metaphor of the unlocked restaurant has its merit – a once in a lifetime experience for a wandering man that will never again be repeated except in myth and dreams. And as we can not fault the transient for his excess we should not be too hard on ourselves if we are intoxicated by our easy good fortune. But wait. I think I hear the footsteps of the restaurant owner. Shall I prepare to fight or flee?
July 22, 2009 2:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
July 22, 2009 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ah yes. The Red and the Black.
July 22, 2009 3:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
You could always offer to pay for your meal.
Not an option that comes up often in TPMCafe, but it's not entirely beyond the pale.
July 22, 2009 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tell that to Goldman-Sachs.
July 22, 2009 3:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
How dearly I would love to!
August 4, 2009 2:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just to interject here that we are looking at a very classic Marxist scenario, with the pauperization of the proletariat due to the "reserve army of labor", etc, etc. All jargon aside it seems that the recipe for a happy, stable, society with good jobs that gave enough time to spend with the family (helping kids with homework etc) has been lost. America is based on the idea of endless growth. A "Japanese decade" would devastate America's self-image. Demagogues will surely arise.
July 22, 2009 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Translated, the amount of work per person is reduced through a combination of "increased" workforce from elimination of valueless jobs (the financial sector etc.) and technological and other improvements.
Ultimately, Marx' dream was that every person would eventually be able to actualise themselves through some form of art* rather than be stuck performing a menial "cog" function, usually at the dictates of others.
(Ironic, considering what the "communists" running the USSR, China and so on ended up doing.)
* In the widest possible sense of the word.
July 22, 2009 7:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is something very important to read:
July 22, 2009 3:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good post, David. Wall St. is the perfect symbol for capitalism (especially now). A complete overhaul is needed but foxes run the hen house. I think that the kind of stress she's referring to from job insecurity can also cause one to age like the meth addict pictured.
Oh, and you're right the odds are very long on becoming a basketball player in the NFL.
July 22, 2009 7:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, it is hard for a poor family of any race to acieve the fading American Dream. But it's still harder if you are a minority. So yes, the "question" is more about class than it has been recently, but it is still very much about race.
Why do I say that? 2 quick examples:
More than 60% of the people in prison are racial and ethnic minorities.
http://www.sentencingproject.org/template/page.cfm?id=122
and
“According to the Fed, for every dollar of wealth held by the typical white family, the African American family has only one dime. In 2004, it had 12 cents."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/22/AR2009032201506.html
Let's not overlook reality just because we are feeling collegial with those who are suffering from poverty, violence, and the injustices of a skewed system at much higher rates than white folks like you and me.
July 22, 2009 4:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Certainly in a system like America's any disadvantage will be magnified and race is just one more. The main thing is social class. As to:
There are not enough African-Americans with fortunes like Bill Gates to tip that percentage. But down at the bottom their isn't much difference in the suffering of po whites and po blacks.Here is a something very important to read:
This is a moment to stop and look around and see clearly.
July 22, 2009 4:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
whereas to begin with there are 1,696 basketball players in the NFL...
He wrote NFL when he meant NBA.
July 22, 2009 5:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
I stand corrected. Thank you.
July 23, 2009 1:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Working 60 hours week in two jobs is what GWBush would refer to as being uniquely American. Yes, not many countries where a person can swirl in the bowl for ten year before they are flushed away in our disposable society.
The unions have completely abandoned their original efforts. It was workers of the world, unite. Well, even in the US, the unions have abandoned each other, much less bringing their foreign counterparts an organizational structure. So they foreign workers are paid such abyssmal wages, even though there are thousands of miles to transport the good they create, they can still arrive for less then they could if they were made here. Workers of the world, you are on you own. Oh, and PAYCO, you were too, in case you didn't notice. The pilots flew, the flight attendants attendend, the baggage handlers handled, and the system ran like nothing happened. The world changed then. Organized labor divided and was conquered. It was no more complicated then that.
July 23, 2009 1:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
oops. PAYCO = PATCO
But y'all probably figured that our already.
July 23, 2009 1:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
As this rolls off the scroll into TPM purgatory, I just want to thank all of you for your timely and informative comments.
July 23, 2009 2:03 AM | Reply | Permalink