« Annus horribilis: I can get it for you wholesale | David Seaton's Blog | Against the genocide of Gaza, in Madrid »

Naomi Klein advocates boycotting Israel - Guardian





After viewing the video clip from the BBC read this snippet from Naomi Klein's article in the Guardian.
It's time. Long past time. The best strategy to end the increasingly bloody occupation is for Israel to become the target of the kind of global movement that put an end to apartheid in South Africa. In July 2005 a huge coalition of Palestinian groups laid out plans to do just that. They called on "people of conscience all over the world to impose broad boycotts and implement divestment initiatives against Israel similar to those applied to South Africa in the apartheid era". The campaign Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions was born.

Every day that Israel pounds Gaza brings more converts to the BDS cause - even among Israeli Jews. In the midst of the assault roughly 500 Israelis, dozens of them well-known artists and scholars, sent a letter to foreign ambassadors in Israel. It calls for "the adoption of immediate restrictive measures and sanctions" and draws a clear parallel with the anti-apartheid struggle. "The boycott on South Africa was effective, but Israel is handled with kid gloves ... This international backing must stop."

Yet even in the face of these clear calls, many of us still can't go there. The reasons are complex, emotional and understandable. But they simply aren't good enough. Economic sanctions are the most effective tool in the non-violent arsenal: surrendering them verges on active complicity.(...) The world has tried what used to be called "constructive engagement". It has failed utterly. Since 2006 Israel has been steadily escalating its criminality: expanding settlements, launching an outrageous war against Lebanon, and imposing collective punishment on Gaza through the brutal blockade. Despite this escalation, Israel has not faced punitive measures - quite the opposite. The weapons and $3bn in annual aid the US sends Israel are only the beginning. Throughout this key period, Israel has enjoyed a dramatic improvement in its diplomatic, cultural and trade relations with a variety of other allies. For instance, in 2007 Israel became the first country outside Latin America to sign a free-trade deal with the Mercosur bloc. In the first nine months of 2008, Israeli exports to Canada went up 45%. A new deal with the EU is set to double Israel's exports of processed food. And in December European ministers "upgraded" the EU-Israel association agreement, a reward long sought by Jerusalem.

It is in this context that Israeli leaders started their latest war: confident they would face no meaningful costs. It is remarkable that over seven days of wartime trading, the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange's flagship index actually went up 10.7%. When carrots don't work, sticks are needed.
This is an idea whose time has certainly come.
http://seaton-newslinks.blogspot.com/

6 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

It's another tactic. And if USA (and other) leaders continue to act like co-dependent enablers of Israeli excesses, it's clearly something for individuals to try.

user-pic

have you noticed that the pro-Islamic side has any number of prominent Jewish intellectuals and artists willing to go against their people and proclaim that Israel is acting badly?

where, on the other side, are those moderate Muslims who correspond to these Jews? where are the Muslims who feel that it is Hamas who is acting badly? surely they don't all believe that all Jews everywhere should be murdered, do they, especially since, as we are constantly told, "Islam is a religion of peace"?

Naomi Klein and others of her ilk are typical of the American academy in the 21st century. on the university campus where I work, pro-Palestinian rallies are common, and Juan Cole has an appointment in one of our colleges. we built footbaths for our Muslim students, even though people who have traveled to Arab countries (as I have) report that they're nowhere to be seen there in public places.

a boycott of Israel ala the South African one will never work. one of the many reasons is that the anti-apartheid movement in S. Africa had moral righteousness on its side. Hamas doesn't.

user-pic

Here Klein is practicing a bit of shock and awe politics. Boycotting Israel is a non-starter politically for the US. Klein presents a solution which is no solution, it isn't going to be accepted, and which if worked for would be extremely divisive in this country. The upshot of such a movement is not to help Palestine but rather to bring more turmoil to the US. The problem over the last 8 years is that the Bush administration has given Israel the green light consistently to go to war. What is required is not some unthought of solution but rather to really press on all levels, for the only solution which is going to work, for 8 or better yet the next 16 years, which is an economically viable Palestinian state.

user-pic

The anti-apartheid movement and the boycotts that eventually happened started at the grassroots level, from those on the Left who were attempting to end an oppressive regime. Aside from all of the complexities that come with this conflict, as long as Hamas chooses to take a path of violent resistance, a grassroot movement here is this country will not gain any traction because to oppose Isreal would, rightly or wrongly, be seen as support for Hamas and their agenda.

user-pic

In some ways, Acamus is right. Boycotting Israel would be seen by some as supporting Hamas, a "terrorist" organization. But those who see the boycott this way would be wrong.

They would be wrong because there aren't just two sides to the conflict, Israel and the Palestinians (though it is in the interests of extremists on both sides to portray the conflict this way.)

There are vast differences of opinion within the Palestinian community, between Hamas and Fatah, between religious and secular Palestinians, between Moslems and Christians, and between the political left and the right. What unites these groups is opposition to the Israeli occupation, and it is this opposition that a boycott would bolster.

A booycott of Israel would not be a boycott in support of Hamas. It would be a boycott in opposition to the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory. It would not be a boycott in support of anti-Israeli violence. On the contrary, a boycott is a peaceful alternative to such violence.

Boycotts helped avoid additional violence in bringing down apartheid. A boycott of Israel would help reduce further violence in ending the Israeli occupation of Palestine.

user-pic

I'm glad to see Naomi speaking out on Israel so strongly. The U.S. seems to be the only country whose opinion Israel cares about. An American boycott might make them think twice before dropping 2000 pound bombs to kill one person surrounded by thousands of innocents.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address