« Thoughts on the president-elect | David Seaton's Blog | The great paradox »

Martin Kettle: The challenge ahead - Guardian (a must read)


This is the best analysis of the American elections I've read so far.

Martin Kettle: The challenge ahead - Guardian
Abstract: This election was the Democrats' to lose. As John McCain said in his immensely gracious concession speech in Phoenix, the road for the Republican candidate was a hard one from the outset.

For Obama to have lost the election when the incumbent party had presided over an economic collapse of epochal immensity and over two unsuccessful and unpopular wars, with three quarters of Americans believing their country was heading in the wrong direction and against an opponent who had been nominated by a divided party and who then himself selected a manifestly unqualified and divisive running-mate would have constituted the biggest electoral missed opportunity in generations. It might have persuaded an entire generation that there was absolutely no validity whatever in electoral politics. Millions might have concluded that the only way to get the Republicans out of the White House was by some form of armed insurrection.

(...) Yet, it has to be noted that, if Obama had not won well, that too would have been a shattering blow to the Democratic cause at such a time. In many statewide contests last night, Obama ran behind other Democrats.

One of the most conspicuous of these was in Virginia, where former governor Mark Warner captured the Senate seat formerly held by his Republican namesake John Warner. As the nail-biting nip-and-tuck Obama-McCain battle in Virginia dragged on through the night, Warner was simultaneously coasting to victory on a 60-40 wave of support right through the evening.

There was a similar pattern in North Carolina, where the selfsame voters who comprehensively brought Republican veteran Liddy Dole's senate career to an end, in what was once the seat occupied by Jesse Helms, split right down the middle over the Obama-McCain race.

So, while Obama has a mandate that has been denied to every Democratic president since the days of Martin Luther King, he also has a level of support that he must be careful not to test to destruction. Forty-eight per cent of Americans did not feel the hand of history on their shoulders on Tuesday, in spite of everything.

Yet the election of 2008 feels, in many ways, like the resumption of a progressive project that was mislaid in the convulsions of the 1960s.

But Obama surely knows better than anyone that, if he is to turn this victory into an enduring reshaping of American politics, then the really important election is now the one in 2012, for which the work starts now. (read it all)



7 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

For context, the author really out to note that no Democrat has won Virginia in 44 years. Some of those Democratic losses occurred during very bad years for the Republican brand. Tipping Virginia blue is a historic achievement, margin notwithstanding.

user-pic

Not to mention the fact that Martin Kettle seems to be pretending as if the level of support was actually changing through the night rather than the reality that Democratic strong-holds were reporting their results later (no doubt partly due to longer lines).

My wife was genuinely worried early on that Virginia would go to McCain, but I kept pointing out that Charlottesville hadn't posted its results yet, and that the exit polls were telling a very different story than the mythical 60/40 that Mr. Kettle was imagining had a link to reality.

user-pic

I know I'm supposed to be all happy-unity-love-everybody-and-all-get-along-now.

But I just have to say, David, you are a gigantic horse's ass. I'm glad you live in Spain. America doesn't need you.

user-pic

Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you, David Seaton, a legend in his own mind.

user-pic

It was the Dem's election to lose - and they didn't.

The last eight years were the Rep's chance to succeed - and they didn't.

user-pic

I agree with what you're saying, but it still frustrates me that people seem to discount Obama's victory because he "should" have done better. Putting aside his obvious skin color, and for many people that would have been too hard to do, there was the exotic name, the amazing eloquence (which, trust me, made some people suspicious of him, especially because of his skin color) and then you get all the terrorist, Muslim, arugula-eating, latte-sipping, liberal, elitist smear, coupled with running against a war hero with 26 years of Washington experience, can we please just admit how remarkable Obama's success is? And can we please not begin immediately to crucify him for every compromise he'll have to make in order to get things done? Can we realize that the opposition will do all it can to oppose and denigrate every proposal he makes, just to keep their viability intact for the next campaign? I love Obama and I trust him. Will I be let down at times by his decisions and behavior? Absolutely. But I have three children who I love and would defend with my last breath and, truthfully, sometimes they piss me off and disappoint me, as well.

user-pic

It's just sour grapes.

Leave a comment

David Seaton

user-pic

Following:
Followers: 10

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address