China Now Has World's 3 Largest Banks
Cross Posted From The End of the American Century
China now has the three largest banks in the world, measured by market capitalization. This is a stunning change, and yet another indicator of China's rapid emergence as a global economic power. According to a New York Times article, three years ago, China did not have a single bank among the world's top 20. Now it has the top three and four of the top ten.
The United States, due in part to the banking and financial crisis, has dropped considerably in global banking. In 2006, the U.S. had 7 of the top 20 banks, including the top 2. Now it has just 3 of the top 20 and the largest, Morgan Stanley, is rated fifth.
If banking is so crucial to market economies--as Americans are constantly being reminded that it is--then the decline of US banks, in combination with the rise of Chinese ones, provides another example of the relative decline of the United States.
Furthermore, it seems that the Chinese economy, and its banking system, is in position to weather the storm of the global financial and economic meltdown. Most of the big banks in the West lost 20% or more of market value in the first two months of 2009. In China, the top two banks lost only 3% and 8% in value, respectively and the third largest, the Bank of China, actually increased by 5%.
As the New York Times notes, while most of the world is in financial collapse, "China's economy has suddenly become too big--and too healthy, expected to grow by at least 6.3 percent this year--for the rest of the world to ignore."
Kenneth Lieberthal, a Brookings Institution scholar who oversaw White House Asia policy from 1998 to 2000, sees China as one of the first countries to emerge from the current crisis and one of the very few countries that will emerge from it "without having high levels of government debt."
















Yeah, but the USA has 98 of the 100 highest paid finance and investment banking executives in the world...!
It shows we have the greatest finance professionals on earth!
Where else is it legal to rob banks, the Treasury, the taxpayer, main street and pension funds and then get taxpayers to pick up the tab for your next bonus?
US banks may be going under, but the executives leading them into bankruptcy are the highest paid and most competent at fraudulently siphoning off money to line their own pockets of any finance professionals in the world!
April 6, 2009 11:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree completely, NCD. In my book, and on my site, I have written often about how out-of-line CEO salaries in the US are, compared to other countries and compared to past decades in the U.S. And the financial industry, including the bankers, have been among the worst culprits.
See my blog on "CEO Pay and the Bailout"--from last fall--even before all the s*** hit the fan.
http://endoftheamericancentury.blogspot.com/2008/09/ceo-pay-and-bailout.html
April 7, 2009 8:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
BAC current market capitalization is at 80.5 billion with share value 12.5. It's at 1/4 of it's historic highs. The date you picked for your share price was their 5 year low, since which time they've tripled in value. It's very reasonable to expect it to make it back into the 20s or 30s within the next year when they've repaid the TARP and are distributing dividends, at which point it will be again the worlds largest bank in terms of market capitalization.
June 24, 2009 12:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your premise seems to be, bigger is better, rather questionable given our recent fiscal fiasco. Moreover, the China banks you mention are owned by the government of China which does not let its currency float against other curriencies, making their capital claims artificial at best. The Chinese government has pushed money into those banks and directed specific lending (Were they watching the Clinton era?). You might recognize that much of America's capital is in the thousands of "small" banks and credit unions around the USA. The most recent list of the safest banks around the globe includes no banks in China.
October 13, 2009 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink