<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>dagumpster&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/dagumpster/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/dagumpster/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/dagumpster//3030</id>
   <updated>2008-05-02T17:52:43Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Repeal Gas Tax - Bad Idea</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/05/repeal-gas-tax-bad-idea.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.192702</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-02T17:52:43Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-02T17:52:43Z</updated>
   
   <summary>McClain and Clinton have this idea to repeal the gas tax to give Americans a break. Obama thinks otherwise and says it is an election gimmick. It is more than a gimmick. It makes poor economic sense. If McClain and...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>dagumpster</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/dagumpster/">
      <![CDATA[<p>McClain and Clinton have this idea to repeal the gas tax to give Americans a break. Obama thinks otherwise and says it is an election gimmick. It is more than a gimmick. It makes poor economic sense. If McClain and Clinton think this is such a great idea and they are in earnest they should rush back to the Senate Chambers with this proposal and walk it through the Chambers and the House in order to get it passed. They will not do this because they know their fellow Senators know it is a bad idea and recognize the idea as an election ploy and it makes poor economic sense. <br /><br />It makes poor economic sense because it will&nbsp;not give us taxpayers much of a break. In fact it is more likely to be more costly. People being what they are will think no gas tax is saving them money so they will feel bound to increase their scheduled driving for the summer. There is also no guarantee that the market will view this as favorable. The market, suppliers, and oil companies could think this could be a chance to increase the price of oil for&nbsp;larger profits. The refineries will have to ramp up more so than they are doing at present. The price of oil is rising for a number of reasons and none of the reasons have to do with the gas tax.&nbsp;Also at the end of this gas tax repeal we taxpayers are going to pay even more for a gallon of gas so as to make up for the shortcomings that are sure to befall us with an increase of demand. My concern is at the end of any repeal rather than the price of gas going up 18.6 cents; it may double or triple the amount. Obama, unlike some politicians, is being honest with the voters on this issue. It may not win him many new or undecided voters but it will be better for </p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Dereliction of Duty</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/04/dereliction-of-duty.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.188598</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-12T18:03:33Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-12T18:03:33Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Bush has decided to pass off his responsibilities to Petraeus and Crocker. Only Bush can give a clear vision of his policy in Iraq. Neither Petraeus or Crocker can answer these question. Petraeus can only say what is happening militarily...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>dagumpster</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/dagumpster/">
      <![CDATA[Bush has decided to pass off his responsibilities to Petraeus and Crocker. Only Bush can give a clear vision of his policy in Iraq. Neither Petraeus or Crocker can answer these question. Petraeus can only say what is happening militarily and Crocker can only give an update on Iraqi and US relations. The frustration with many is Bush has never said what he wants to accomplish other than in such abstract words such as victory. He seems to be convinced that Iraqi can only be content with US presence without ever becoming clear what this presence means. Could it be possible that Iraqis could work out their own problems? Even Maliki stated yesterday the Iraqi security forces would be able to function on their own. The only way the US can get victory in Iraq is to start running the government then the Americans will know who their enemies are. They will be all Iraqis. Right now the "enemy is us".<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
