« Joe the Plumber repeats the bogus frame | cuchulain's Blog | IOKIYAAR: Remember the Dixie Chicks? »
It may be better for the right to have Obama in office.
I'm still ecstatic that Obama defeated Palin and McCain. If they had gotten into power, America would have been lost. I don't think we could have handled four to eight more years of GOP rule. It would have sunk us as a nation.
That said, I think many of us are beginning to see there may be some downside to Obama being in power. We, as progressives, run the risk of losing steam, focus, justified anger and commitment to fighting the right and the status quo . . . because, in a sense, we won. Sort of. And we don't have Bush to focus our attention on.
The other part of the risk is that we fear being too critical of Obama and the Dems, lest we help their enemies. That actually lets them off the hook to a certain extent. Because we fully realize that the alternative is a thousand times worse, we don't want to help the right in its crazed and irrational blitzkrieg against his administration. Crazed and irrational, for a thousand reasons. But, perhaps the biggest one being:
Obama is a moderate. The Dems in power are moderates. They are governing in a basically moderate, pro-corporate, pro-establishment manner, when we need something more radical. We need them to govern in a pro-worker, pro-environment, green fashion, that puts the needs of the vast majority of us above the desires of the Ruling Elite. They just aren't even remotely what all too many righties think they are. They just aren't even remotely thinking of doing the things that strike fear in the hearts of all too many low-information righties.
Many on the right have been blinded by so much low-rent propaganda, they really can't see how little they have to fear from Obama and the Dems. I, like most progressives, wish Obama and the Dems really would be oppositional to the corporate and military-industrial status quo, to the Ruling Elite, and instead for the vast majority of Americans. If only they really were as far to the left as all too many righties incorrectly believe.
There are signs that the right is mounting a somewhat successful challenge to even the oh so modest changes Obama wants to bring to America. There are also signs that dangerous fanatics, spurred on by despicable and irresponsible public figures like Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, Bachmann, et al, are flipping out and killing people based on right wing lies and distortions about Obama and liberals in general.
This is no time for complacency. Obviously. Obama's victory will be short-lived and this moment in time wasted if we don't focus our energies and passion against a new rise of the right. I have a terrible feeling that the "conservative" movement will be even more powerful, in some ways, out of official power. Sometimes winning means losing, and losing means winning. Sometimes, people fight harder to get somewhere, something, and ease up once they attain what they think their goals are. My guess is that the right is mobilizing, big time. We on the left have to do the same and never let up.
That said, I think many of us are beginning to see there may be some downside to Obama being in power. We, as progressives, run the risk of losing steam, focus, justified anger and commitment to fighting the right and the status quo . . . because, in a sense, we won. Sort of. And we don't have Bush to focus our attention on.
The other part of the risk is that we fear being too critical of Obama and the Dems, lest we help their enemies. That actually lets them off the hook to a certain extent. Because we fully realize that the alternative is a thousand times worse, we don't want to help the right in its crazed and irrational blitzkrieg against his administration. Crazed and irrational, for a thousand reasons. But, perhaps the biggest one being:
Obama is a moderate. The Dems in power are moderates. They are governing in a basically moderate, pro-corporate, pro-establishment manner, when we need something more radical. We need them to govern in a pro-worker, pro-environment, green fashion, that puts the needs of the vast majority of us above the desires of the Ruling Elite. They just aren't even remotely what all too many righties think they are. They just aren't even remotely thinking of doing the things that strike fear in the hearts of all too many low-information righties.
Many on the right have been blinded by so much low-rent propaganda, they really can't see how little they have to fear from Obama and the Dems. I, like most progressives, wish Obama and the Dems really would be oppositional to the corporate and military-industrial status quo, to the Ruling Elite, and instead for the vast majority of Americans. If only they really were as far to the left as all too many righties incorrectly believe.
There are signs that the right is mounting a somewhat successful challenge to even the oh so modest changes Obama wants to bring to America. There are also signs that dangerous fanatics, spurred on by despicable and irresponsible public figures like Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, Bachmann, et al, are flipping out and killing people based on right wing lies and distortions about Obama and liberals in general.
This is no time for complacency. Obviously. Obama's victory will be short-lived and this moment in time wasted if we don't focus our energies and passion against a new rise of the right. I have a terrible feeling that the "conservative" movement will be even more powerful, in some ways, out of official power. Sometimes winning means losing, and losing means winning. Sometimes, people fight harder to get somewhere, something, and ease up once they attain what they think their goals are. My guess is that the right is mobilizing, big time. We on the left have to do the same and never let up.
Advertisement
















"...we fully realize that the alternative is a thousand times worse..."
I believed that a few months ago. Now I figure the alternative is about two times worse.
April 6, 2009 9:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's interesting. I still think, on balance, it's far better to have Obama in the White House. He's already overturned several terrible executive orders by Bush. Stem Cells will get a decent chance. Planned Parenthood around the world won't be shut out. Just those two things alone will impact millions of lives in a positive way. It wouldn't have happened under McCain/Palin, and a Palin presidency (given McCain's age, it was a likely scenario) would have been even worse. A victory for the religious right going beyond their victories under Bush.
Obama is also actually welcomed by the world. I don't think McCain and Palin would have been.
And taxes? McCain and Palin would have been reckless about that, cut taxes more, and our deficits would have been far worse than they are now . . . with nothing to show for it.
Obama has not been good on the economy, IMO. Primarily because he chose the wrong people to surround himself with. It should have been people like Krugman, Stiglitz, Baker, Galbraith, etc. He should be talking to Matt Taibbi a lot. But, McCain had Phil Gramm and Carly Fiorina, and they make Summers and company look like saints in comparison. So there's that.
Oh, well. I wish we could actually have a true progressive who governed confidently as a progressive. May never happen. But it's what this country needs.
April 6, 2009 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/horseraceblog/2009/04/obamas_polarized_america.html
April 6, 2009 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
But are you "concerned" about Obama?
Are you "worried" about Obama?
Are you "disappointed"?
Do you feel "anxious" about Obama?
Are you feeling a little "uneasy" or perhaps "queasy," if not completely overtaken by waves of "nausea"?
Are you breaking out in "cold sweats"? "Hot flashes?"
Do you find yourself needing to talk about Obama in social settings, but then feeling "paralyzed" by "panic" and "doubt?"
If you answered yes, to any of these questions or if you answered no to any of these questions, you should speak with your doctor right away. You could be suffering from an undiagnosed case of "advancing progressive liberal polititis," a contagious psychological disorder that can strike without warning. There is no cure for the disorder which seems to come in 4 year epidemics, but symptoms subside for about 2 to 3 years before returning with a vengence during the third and fourth years. Sufferers are advised to spend a few hours daily in natural sunlight, and reduce their contact and reliance on all electronic equipments, such as computers, Blackberries, cell phones, televisions, radios, newspapers and magazines. Over-indulgence in alcoholic beverages, although not recommended, does provide temporary relief of some symptoms.
April 6, 2009 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Aaah, well played. According to you, folks need to see doctors no matter what they say to your questions. Are you in the medical profession?
:>)
Regardless, a big issue for me is that the "accepted" political spectrum is tilted and narrow. I see it as being highly truncated on the left, with much too much room on the right. People in power and those in the media are allowed to tilt pretty far to the right, but anything beyond center-left is verboten. That's bad for the country and for democracy in general.
We should at least be able to counter the reach of the right . . . We should at least be able to extend ourselves to the left of center-left, as the right has done with center-right . . . as far as government policy, dialogue and the media go.
Oh, well. Perhaps a beverage of choice is a pretty good suggestion. That, and long walks, lotsa exercise, etc. etc.
:>)
April 6, 2009 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Dems in power are not moderates. They are conservatives. At best, they are moderately conservative. Remember Nancy Reagan supports stem cell. It's the economic and military issues that are killing us, us meaning the American middle class. The social issues are just the distractions used in the bipartisan con game. Throw the progressives a bone on stem cell, but don't life a finger to pass EFCA.
April 6, 2009 6:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
You make some good points. At the very least, even if they are moderates, they seem to wimp out and let conservatives call the shots in too many areas.
You're right.
I really don't like either party, to be honest. But I think the Dems are closer to being correct on more issues. Between our two choices. Our two often lousy choices. Actually, though, I can't think of a single issue the GOP has the right answer for. The Dems at least get some things right.
But the Dems are far to the right of where they need to be, IMO. EFCA is a good example.
It's a lot easier, I suppose, to be in the GOP these days. Just be batshit crazy, do everything you can to support Big Corporations, the war machine, the religious right, etc. Dems have a much more complex situation, and it must be like herding cats to try to organize them.
They do have Labor as a constituency. And Environmentalists. But that is countered by Corporate America and especially the Financial Sector, which has exploded in size and power and seems to have knocked Labor and the Environment right out of the box.
I wish we had a strong third party that put progressives ideas, ideals, and policy first. Green, clean, lean . . . Civil Rights and Privacy Rights high on the list. Workers Rights, Consumer protection, and a dismantling of the American Empire. Focus on making this country the best it can be. The healthiest, safest, best educated, most peaceful nation on earth. I'd support a party that pushed hard for that.
April 6, 2009 7:10 PM | Reply | Permalink