Tax Cuts for Pet Care Expenses
I'm voting for this one!
A bill making the rounds on Capitol Hill marries two feel-good propositions -- tax cuts and pet ownership -- to generate a novel idea: A tax break of up to $3,500 per person for pet care expenses.
The measure is a legislative long shot. But it's been championed by a veteran Hollywood tough guy and by a conservative Michigan congressman, and has drawn the enthusiastic support of animal rights groups eager to promote pet ownership during economic down times.
"We think this is as much a health care bill as any," said Nancy Perry, vice president of government affairs at the Humane Society. "It's a human health issue to ensure that pets are provided with better care because of the role they play in our families."
Hey, if parents get tax cuts for children, even adopted ones, then why can't parents of animals (who take these animals off the street, saving tax payers money to care for them)?
I don't know about you but I spend close to $2400 just on medicines for my dog, not counting checkups, illnesses, vaccinations, etc...Heck people, we offer tax cuts to buy a Humvee, I think my pet is more important than a car.













Just for a dog, Coonsey? You've gotta be kidding.
Now cats are a different story.
(Actually, I like both, but our cats are looking over my shoulder and growling, so I had to write that stuff about dogs)
Seriously, I agree with you that controlled studies have shown the benefits to medical patients of pet companionship, but $3500 may be going too far.
October 13, 2009 7:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cute Fred....I love cats as well, but THEY have attitudes....dogs will usually agree with ya that's why I always keep one nearby.
well $3500 may be a bit too much but I guess it should be a percentage instead, like 5 % of what you've spent on them or something.
October 13, 2009 10:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
MAMMALIAN AFFECTION.
We all need someone to care about.
October 13, 2009 7:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Arf!
October 14, 2009 7:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, but as liberals, we generally don't have a problem with those "someone"s being people, do we?
October 14, 2009 8:43 AM | Reply | Permalink