« UPDATE: Obama: Change Your Tune and Fast | coonsey's Blog | Obama: Time To Take the Gloves Off »

Obama: Write a Letter to Khamenei and Ahmadinejad and Leak It


WASHINGTON - The political unrest in Iran presents the Obama administration with a dilemma: keep quiet to pursue a nuclear deal with Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the country's supreme leader, or heed calls to respond more supportively to the protesters there -- and risk alienating the Shiite cleric.

President Obama and his advisers have struggled to strike the right tone, carefully calibrating positive messages about the protests in an effort to avoid giving the government in Tehran an excuse to portray the demonstrators as pro-American. Nevertheless, the Iranian Foreign Ministry yesterday summoned the Swiss ambassador, who represents American interests in Tehran, to complain of "interventionist" comments by U.S. officials, the official Islamic Republic News Agency reported.

 

 

Perhaps President Obama should do to Ahmadinejad what he did to President Bush and what Ayatollah Ali Khamenei did to the USSR leader Gorbachev - write a letter to them.

 

He should preface his remarks by mentioning that he was an American professor of the U.S. Constitution.

 

He should then mention the words from Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's letter to U.S. President George Bush sent on May 7, 2006:

 

 "You must know that there is only one way to solve the problems of the world - and that is turning to the truth."

 

Obama should explain to Khamenei what a true Republic is.  It's a state or country that is not led by a monarch, in which the people have an impact on its government.  The people rule the land, not one man or woman.  We (leaders), are but representatives of our nation's people.

 

 

Then he should go into subject of what he hopes happens in Iran for the sake of all Iranians and their current leadership.

 

He should say something like; because the people of Iran are showing their distrust in the government of Iran and because of that unrest, perhaps Khamenei should, in the interest of justice and fairness, offer to hold a new election with U.N. representatives watching over the election at various voting booths.

 

President Obama could then admit that he and the American people were not involved in the election process so he doesn't know the facts of whether or not anything was done illegally or not; but the people of Iran seem to think the election was a sham, so for the sake of the nation as a whole, perhaps it's time to listen to the people.  Obama could than quote something Ahmadinejad' said to President Bush in a letter in 2006:

 

""The Almighty God sent His prophets with miracles and clear signs to guide the people and show them divine signs and purify them from sins and pollutions. And He sent the Book and the balance so that the people display justice and avoid the rebellious..."

 

While this quote may be taken out of context, it could also be used during this crisis in Iran don't you think sir?

 

Obama can then say something like; meanwhile, I anxiously am waiting to have meaningful and productive discussions with whomever wins the support of the Iranian people as their leader.

 

The Obama administration would then LEAK the letter to the press.

 

That way the administration can prove they are speaking out against any illegal actions, standing by the people of Iran, and yet ready and willing to start up negotiations with the Iranian leadership.


8 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

No. No, he should do no such thing. Can you imagine how well Khamenei would receive a lecture on, well, anything from the West? They don't need a lecture on what a republic is. Remember we overthrew their last democratically elected leader and installed a corrupt theocratic oligarchy against which they were forced to revolt. Ya think they're gonna listen to us preach about what good government looks like?

ANY hint that we have a dog in this fight will bring ruin to the side we support. The one sure way for the US to destroy the uprising is to support it.

user-pic

Would the purpose of such a letter be to encourage positive change in Iran, and improve the prospects for US-Iranian dialogue? Or is the purpose just to assuage Obama's US critics?

Given that Khamenei is likely to survive this crisis, subjecting him to a humiliating and condescending public lecture from the US president on the nature of a true republic seems like a surefire way to scuttle a diplomatic opening, and to put the reformers at greater risk by defining them as an America-backed movement.

When Ahmadinejad sent his open letter to Bush, did you notice the letter having any positive effect on the US-Iranian relationship? Seems to me the effect was just the opposite.

user-pic

Hands-off is by far a better policy. I think being seen as interfering in Iranian internal affairs would not be useful, and likewise not help those who are protesting the election.

It's a no-win situation for both the US and the Iranian "moderates" if we get actively involved.

There is a long and sorry history of US meddling in internal Iranian affairs, and while Americans in general are well-regarded by the Iranian people they have good historical reason to distrust any American government.

user-pic

Problem is, Iran is already accusing us of meddling, so why not try to send a message to both Iranians and Americans at the same time.

user-pic

Because taking a hand in it - or even trying - will taint whoever we seemingly back. The 1953 overthrow of (democratically elected) Mossadegh? We did that. And then, after reinstalling the Shah and backing him, and his SAVAK thugs, for decades, we sheltered him after the revolution.

People in that part of the world have long memories and would not be receptive to any efforts on our part. Cheerleading - which is all we can realistically hope to do in any instance - will not help, and will far more likely harm, anything people there are involved in.

user-pic

Iran is accusing us of meddling, but the world by and large doesn't believe it. Once Obama starts writing letters to the Ayatollah, though, it becomes that much harder to claim that we're not meddling in another country's internal affairs.

user-pic

This makes no sense. Write a personal letter in order to leak it, all the while talking about transparency hope and change? Perhaps Ahmi actually had a point in the line that you quoted from his letter.

The only way to determine what to do is to decide what's more important to the US, democracy in Iran or their upcoming nukes.

user-pic

Why would Iran react with anything but contempt for any advice we would give?

Leave a comment

coonsey

user-pic

Following:
Followers: 24

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location Illinois
  • Politics Independent

Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address