« Senator Dodd Wants to Know What YOU Think About Healthcare Reform | Connecticut Man1's Blog | An Interview With Senator Dodd »

Healthcare Twofer - Baucus and Dodd


Throw Baucus Under Healthcare Reform Bus



From itskevin over at dailykos:

Dem Party Leadership May Abandon Baucus Talks

According to The Note over at ABC News, there might be some real meat to the rumors that rank-and-file Senate Democrats and party leadership may throw in the towel on Max Baucus' super-secret, interminable bipartisan talks.

With the health care bill languishing in the Senate and under fire in the House, Democratic leaders are quietly preparing for Plan B.

Under the scenario now being discussed, bi-partisan talks would be aborted and parliamentary maneuvers used to force the bill through with a party-line vote.

And from an inside source:

Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., still has time to try to work out a deal with his Republican counterpart Chuck Grassley, but fellow Democrats are growing restless.

"There's rising disgruntlement with how Baucus has handled this," a senior Democratic aide tells ABC News. "We have to look at other options."

Let's hope this is true. For our part, we might be able to exert real pressure in forcing our leaders to take a stand - and sooner rather than later.

Read the rest of the diary for some action items...

And below the fold:

Senator Dodd Diagnosed With Prostate Cancer




Via the Hartford Courant:

U.S. Senator Christopher Dodd has been diagnosed with early-stage prostate cancer. Dodd is scheduled to undergo surgery during the Senate's August recess and said he expects to be back at work after a "brief recuperation" at home. "It's something that's very common among men my age,'' said Dodd, who is 65 and the father of two young daughters. "In fact, one in six men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer at some point during their life.'' Dodd, a Democrat who is up for re-election in November 2010, said he feels fine. "As you have probably noticed, I'm working some long and hard hours lately,'' he said. "And that will continue."

I am certain that everyone wishes him the best in his treatment and hopes for a speedy recovery. We need his voice to help fight for changes in health insurance and healthcare so that every American can have a chance to receive the kind of treatment he will receive. Via tparty, An email from Sen. Dodd to supporters:

Dear Friend,

I wanted to let you know that I've been diagnosed with an early stage of prostate cancer.

This diagnosis is very common among men my age. In fact, one in six men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer at some point during their life.

Luckily, a routine test allowed my doctor to catch it at a very early stage, and my prognosis is excellent - we expect a full and speedy recovery.

I want to assure you that I'm feeling fine. As you know, we've been working hard to pass health care legislation and reform our nation's financial system to protect consumers, and that hard work will continue.

After the Senate adjourns at the end of next week, I'll have surgery to remove the cancer. After a week or two of recuperation, I expect to be right back to work.

After all, as a Member of Congress, I have great health insurance. I was able to get screened, seek the opinions of highly skilled doctors, consider all the available options, and choose the treatment that was right for me.

And I know you'll agree that every American deserves the same ability.

We have health care legislation to pass - and an election to win. And I can't thank you enough for your support.

Sincerely,

Chris

As per usual, Thanks kindly for reading this. Also, other than reading and stuff around here... You can always find me at my own Blog, drinking liberally in new milford, and at the community Blog ePluribus Media. :)


13 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

It's hard to see how a reform bill could be "forced" through the Senate on a party line vote. To avert a filibuster, 60 votes would be needed, and it appears that at least three or four conservative Democrats would be reluctant to go along.

What parliamentary maneuver could circumvent this obstacle? I'm skeptical that the "reconciliation" process would be usable in this circumstance. Although I'm not an expert on Senate rules, all the expert opinion I've read on reconciliation states that it applies to measures that are mainly budgetary in nature and which are revenue neutral or designed for deficit reduction. Major provisions of reform would be disallowed by the Senate parliamentarian under those circumstances.

I'd be interested to know what the writer of the story had in mind; it was very vaguely described.

user-pic

What happened to the republican threat to use the nuclear option? I say we revive it-that was the way the system was supposed to work.

There is no mention in the constitution of this swarmy parliamentary trick. I'm no constitutal lawyer (obviously) but it is clear to me that this artifcial supermajority requirment unfairly gives the senate effective power over the house. According to the "great compromise" they were supposed to be realitvly equal. With economic bills arising in the house and foreign policy and legislative branch oversight largely going to the senate.

Can someone please tell me why this okay? Frankly, I have serious issues with rural senators from less 1/5 of the country having veto power over the entire legislature. This parliamentary slight of hand has done enough damage, and supermajority requirements neuter democracies' effectiveness (see Budget, California)

user-pic

Reconciliation process. It is a tactic used in the budget process, more typically, I believe. It puts things on the floor for a straight up or down vote and you cannot filibuster.

user-pic

A lot of bad press lately. I have always admired Senator Dodd. He fights the good fight.

I hope he survives this.

user-pic

Early stage prostate cancer has an excellent prognosis. Other than the risks associated with surgery, there should be minimal effect on Chris Dodd's health for years to come. In many cases of this type, there is no recurrence. In others, recurrence may occur years later, but usually after a long interval. Statistically, in cases such as this, most men will eventually die from age-related illnesses unrelated to prostate cancer, and only a minority from the cancer itself.

user-pic

Thanks for the info Fred

user-pic

I am pretty sure, barring any serious complications, he will be back at when Congress gets off of their vacation.

user-pic

Love your bus!

user-pic

Thanks Rowan. I had nothing to write about... So I played with my photoshppy thingies. :)

user-pic

Great picture CMan!

BAUCUS SEVERUS has lost his head!

user-pic

Thank you. :) As per usual: Anyone ca feel free to use it if they want.

user-pic



Well Well . . .

Bill Moyers re-ran his telling interview with Wendell Potter again last night and there's some choice tidbits in the interview related to good ol' Max (who's off spending a tough week up at his Big Sky resort for his yearly get together with the common folks, or those common folks in the industry at least.)

You can catch the links to the Moyer interview at my Cafe blog if it moves ya' ...

Bill Moyers Points to TPM Cafe Over Wendell Potter Interview

And at least go over there and see what Moyer said in his opening remarks.

~OGD~

user-pic

Really good interview. We need more journalists like Moyers.

Leave a comment

Connecticut Man1

user-pic

Following: 26
Followers: 28

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address