« Sara in 2012 ??????? | cmaukonen's Blog | Of Kennedy, Kosmas and The Blue Dogs...or It Ain't about Health Care »

The painful end of the American Dream.


"They call it the American Dream because you have to be
 asleep to believe it."
George Carlin


This essay by James Howard Kunstler sums it up pretty nicely.
  Within the context of conventional party
politics - the kind that has been baseline
"normal" in the USA for a long time - we see
this playing out in two factions that are
increasingly out-of-touch with reality.  The
Obama government has made itself hostage to a
toxic form of pretense and lying. In order to
sustain the wish for "hope" - if not hope
itself - the President and his White House
advisors along with his cabinet appointments,
are pretending that the historical forces of
compressive contraction are not underway.
They're flat-out lying about the employment
figures issued in the government's name.
They're willfully ignoring the comprehensive
bankruptcy gripping government at all levels.
They refuse to bring the law to bear against
"the malefactors of great wealth." They appear
to not understand the epochal energy scarcity
problem the whole world faces, or its
implications for industrial economies. Most of
all, they persist in promoting the lie that
this economy can return to the prior state of
reckless debt accumulation (a.k.a
"consumerism") that has made us so ridiculous
and unhealthy.

  The trouble with self-delusion, either in a
person or a society, is that reality doesn't
care what anybody believes, or what story they
put out.  Reality doesn't "spin." Reality does
not have a self-image problem.  Reality does
not yield its workings to self-esteem
management. These days, Americans don't like
reality very much because it won't let them
push it around. Reality is an implacable force
and the only question for human beings in the
face of it is: what will you do?  In other
words, it's not really possible to manage
reality, but you can certainly choose to
manage your affairs within reality.  We won't
do that because it's too difficult. This harsh
situation leaves the public increasingly with
little more than bad feelings of
discouragement and persecution. It's
astonishing that all the smart people around
the president don't get this.

  Reality unfolds emergently, and this ought
to interest us.  For instance, I have
maintained for many years that we are
approaching the twilight of the automobile age
- and the implications of this for daily life
in the USA are pretty large. For a long time,
I had assumed that this change of
circumstances would proceed from our problems
with the oil supply.  But reality is sly.  It
has thrown two new plot twists into the story
lately. America's romance with cars may not
founder just on the fuel supply question.  It
now appears that our problems with capital are
so severe that far fewer people will be able
to borrow money from banks to buy cars at the
rate, and in the way, that the system has been
organized to depend on.  Our problems with
capital are also depriving us of the ability
to pay to fix the hypercomplex system of
county roads, interstate highways, and even
city streets that make motoring possible. What
will we do?


  For now, a cashless government gives out
cash-for-clunkers, which is basically a
self-esteem building program designed to make
the government feel better about itself
because it is ostensibly taking
11-miles-per-gallon cars off the road and
replacing them with 27-miles-per-gallon cars,
thus forestalling scary problems with climate
change. It's dumb of course, but the failure
of leadership is comprehensive. Even the elite
environmentalists at the Aspen Institute are
preoccupied with finding new "green" ways to
keep all the cars running.  They put zero
effort into the idea of walkable communities,
or restoring the railroad system, which will
be the reality-based remedies for the
car-dependency problem.

  The Republican right wing is, if anything,
even more childishly delusional. For Glen Beck
and Sarah Palin it comes down to "drill, baby,
drill."  They know nothing about the geology
of oil - they don't even believe that the
earth is more than six-thousand years old,
meaning they don't believe in geology, period
- but they are inflamed with the faith of
eight-year-old children that we must have a
lot more oil in the ground because this is
America and God loves us more than people in
other parts of the planet so it must be there.
As their disappointment mounts, their childish
ideas will turn cruel and sadistic. They'll
seek to punish anybody who believes that the
earth is more than six thousand years old. The
catch is, If they get into power in the
election cycles ahead, they'll be impotent and
ineffectual even at persecuting their
enemies. 

  In the meantime, American life will just
wind down, no matter what we believe.  It
won't wind down to a complete stop.  Its
near-term destination is to lower levels of
complexity and scale than what we've been used
to for a long time.  People will be able to
drive fewer cars fewer miles.  The roads will
get worse.  They'll be worse in some places
than others. There will be fewer jobs to go to
and fewer things sold. People who live in
communities scaled to the energy and capital
realities of the years ahead are liable to be
more comfortable. We're surely going to have
trouble with money. Households will drown in
debt and lose all their savings.  Money could
be scarce or worthless. Credit will be
scarcer.

  Both factions of American political life
indulge in the fiction of control. History is
reality's big brother.  It is taking us
someplace that we don't want to go, so it will
probably have to drag us there kicking and
screaming. For starters, both reality and
history will probably take us out to some
woodshed of the national soul and beat the
crap out of us.  That could be a salutary
thing, since the crap consists of all the lies
we tell ourselves. Once we're rid of all that,
we may rediscover a few things left inside our
collective identity that are worth regarding
with real self-respect.
And America has been living in this delusional state since
the beginning of the industrial age. It is reality having the
effrontery to make it's self known while we were partying on
in the 1920s that had awakened us to the hard truth of 
the depression of the 1930s and it is reality that is trying
to take charge now - despite the governments best efforts
to prevent it - that is forcing us to experience the cold harsh
economic and ecological situation we have created once again.
Because we refuse to admit to ourselves that there is a problem.

We here in this country, as well as the rest of the world, can
no longer live in this drug induced state and have any chance
of survival. We need to sober up, get straight and face the
the facts that our current economic situation is non sustainable.
Or we will surely succumb to the effects of this delusion.

C

21 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I kinda wish American life was winding down, but I suspect it is actually getting more complicated and frenetic. Daniel Yergin was on some public radio show this weekend, and he was so glad that fracking would release so much additional natural gas to relieve our transportation problems.

Fracking will relieve the transportation problems - of the wealthy. At the same time it will devastate the water supplies of the rural middle class.

user-pic

In researching "fracking" I found this article:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=104565793

Unintended consequences...

user-pic

One fracking problem after another.

user-pic

Facing problems?

Dealing with reality?

Owning up?

Are you asking Americans to actually have some self-discipline? Personally and as a country?

One thing that always struck me was how out of touch with reality the Bush administration was. Everything (and I mean Everything) was a delusion. From policy

("Clear Skies" increased pollution. "GWOT" had to do with bin Laden, nothing at all, ever, with our policies. Iraq was involved with fucking 9/11.)
to language
(words like "freedom" and "patriot" were turned into bullshit)
, to climate change to the environment to social ills to foreign policy--all of it was based on bullshit. Mental illness is based, generally, on the individual's avoidance of reality. Our entire government, during the Bush years, was completely certifiable.

The question is if, now that we have a new administration, if we are going to get back to reality. On some things (climate change, maybe health care) it looks better. But you are arguing for more of the same here and I don't disagree.

user-pic

You seem to forget that the American Dream is there to realize for ten per cent of of our population. That tier has money, power, health care, and put the best face on the myth of the American Dream.

Is the glass a tenth full or 90% empty?

user-pic

The glass is the wrong size.

C

user-pic

All my life, I really thought I was a Liberal Progressive engaged and fully participating in a democracy. It is only recently that I've begun to understand that I was really just a sucker, instead.

user-pic

We all were Sleepin.....we all were.

C

user-pic

The 'duping' was gradual, Jeezus. In terms of the consolidation of wealth upward, it has increased more quickly lately, the only slow-down on the graphs I could find were during the 90s bubble.
We are old enough to remember when political activism did accomplish some things and get some good people elected. It wasn't always such a stacked deck; the decrease in People Power has been accelerating faster and faster. Right now thinking of it, I am picturing the enormous amounts of special interest money influencing opinion on policy, not just electoral politics. The corporations PLUS the churches spend more and more.
And sadly, the Progressive Left can't seem to coalesce around a few key issues. When I think about the potential of the Progressive blogosphere, we have wasted it. That Arianna and Kos (Jane Hamsher occasionally, thank goodness)have become the spokespeople of this world makes me put my head in my hands and weep. That both are former Republicans is a twisted irony.
We could be united in requesting the removal of Geithner and Summers; we could be united to demand a modern Pecora commission and true financial regulations with heavy enforcement, not the Show Shite being proposed. But we can't get it together. What are those Netroot Nations, or whatever, summits about? Are they self-congratulatory, or do the folks talk about a unity push for anything? Net neutrality? Economic justice? Beats me; it seems like too many egos are out there.
Some at TPM castigate us adhering to old-style activism: petitions and street rallies and letters to reps; but I can't hear what they offer as alternatives. Scoffing at 'showdown in Chicago.' Hell, I wish I could have gone!
Betrayal and increased impotence are really hard, and somehow we are going to Get Some Game in the fight. How?

user-pic

James Howard Kunstler -- the Hippie Luddite crying in the wilderness.

user-pic

If that translates as "asshole baying at the moon (and getting big bucks for it)" then... yeah.

user-pic

I take it there are some people who really hate it when somebody disrupts their delusional view of the world.

To to bad. Sorry that we woke up up from your video enhanced, political drug induced stupor.

C

user-pic

Kunstler knows fuck all about energy. It's that simple. That's the basis of what he's been talking about in recent years, and while he may or may not be right on running out of oil, he has no idea how much and how fast we can produce alternative energy, or save energy. Which makes him... a delusional ranter.

Now, on the whole he rants against things I like to rant against, so I tend to enjoy it when he's on a roll, but he's one of these guys that really doesn't want to get down close and look at the ways people might find to make things work. Nope, we're all gonna die - that's basically his message. And before oil it was Y2K, and a couple of years from now it might well be the Mayan Mind Meld.

As for him knowing fuck all about energy, look at this very essay, in which he begins to try to move off the hook he's hung himself from -

For a long time, I had assumed that this change of circumstances would proceed from our problems with the oil supply. But reality is sly. It has thrown two new plot twists into the story lately. America's romance with cars may not founder just on the fuel supply question. It now appears that our problems with capital are so severe that far fewer people will be able to borrow money from banks to buy cars at the rate, and in the way, that the system has been organized to depend on. Our problems with capital are also depriving us of the ability to pay to fix the hypercomplex system of county roads, interstate highways, and even city streets that make motoring possible. What will we do?

I donno, maybe he's learning some economics. That'd be a good idea.

user-pic

Nope, we're all gonna die - that's basically his message. And before oil it was Y2K....

and before that, as a 20-something, I recall every economist telling us we had option of high unemployment or high inflation or both but that it was impossible to have neither, and that there were too many boomers for all to us to be able to have jobs, and before that there was Pau l Ehrlich who had all the stats to prove the horrors coming soon, and that most of us would die soon.

Come to think of it, before that there were many magazine ads that told my father that he could have a good lifelong business if he learned to repair radios, and before that they told my grandfather as a boy that man could never fly and children needed to work or families would starve, and that women often died in childbirth and not all babies made it, that's just the way it is....

It's always personal, you're always affected in your view by your own situation and that of those you know, but overall, the economic attitude still doesn't seem as bad as the late 70's or early 80's to me. Really seemed to me that a lot of people of all classes--except for Texas oil people--were really depressed about our future, like it was the end of the U.S. then--Japan and Germany were kings, they were going to buy us all up and we were going to work for "them" (they were still making movies on the latter theme as late as 1986.) Well, that globalization thing happened but not the way we expected....

user-pic

Also too this guy!

user-pic

An adorable Chicken Little! (courtesy of Disney)

user-pic

There was a documentary made in Argentina about using parts of Naomi Klein's book, The Shock Doctrine, to illustrate what was going on some years after Naomi discussed how Friedman's free market ideology was let loose on the country and drove it to it's financial knees.

Towards the end of the documentary, Naomi was handed a note in the airport that said the following:

We are the mirror to look into.

The mistake to avoid.

Argentina is the waste that remains of a globalized country.

We are the where the rest of the world is going.

Kunslter is hinting implicitly at what the note says explicitly.

user-pic

Perhaps capitalist "guru" Warren Buffett's purchase of the Burlington Northern RR will attract serious attention to the cost and fuel consumption benefits of rail for transportation, whether or product or people?:
http://www.charlierose.com/guest/view/402
Buffett may be one of the few who can afford to play Monopoly in real life. But, as anyone who has played the board game knows, a reliable, if unexciting winning strategy IS to own the railroads, utilities and at least two sets of diagonally-positioned, developed properties.
Good advice: never buy Boardwalk and Park Place. And, as my dad used to say, "ship by rail."

user-pic

It's all migratory.

We first started with carrying loads by hand, to using beasts of burden, then wagons, then trains, then 18-wheelers.

Seems the 18-wheeler was the peak and we're falling back to railsystems simply because it takes less energy to move large amounts. Of course, time will be lost jockeying for position to get a load on the rail and off, and there'll still need to be truckers to move freight locally, but the energy expense will be very small when compared to using exclusive road freight trafficking.

By the way, it won't be too long before your next trip to Europe will be luxury liner - the cost of air travel will be too expense.

user-pic

The United States has followed the progression typical of the family business:

Acquistion - from its founding until about 1850 the United States agressively acquired new territory by conquest and purchase.

Exploitation - from 1850 to 1945 the US expanded its agriculture and industries throughout its geography. First came the Robber Barons and then the great industrial complexes that provided weapons and supplies for WW I and II.

Dissapation - from 1945 we used up many of our natural resources, such as Minnesota iron ore and Texas oil, spending beyond our means to go from the world's largest creditor nation to the world's largest debtor nation.

In a business, the next stage usually requires a change of control and new, strong hands to reform the business. This has not happened yet because Congress is filled with elderly men and women who are psychologically wedded to the idea of American exceptionalism and unable to face reality.

Leave a comment

cmaukonen

user-pic

Following: 4
Followers: 38

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location Central Florida
  • Party Party ? We don't need no stinking party !
  • Politics Truth, Justice and the Scandinavian way. The American way sux !

Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs TPM, Unknown news, rude pundit, buzflash
  • Favorite Books Alas Babylon, Tolkien, etc.
  • Favorite Quotes There have been three totalitarian forces in our lifetime. The totalitarianism of fascism, of communism, and now of capitalism. - French farmer-activist José Bove

Bio

Not much to tell. Photography, radio-electronics, computers.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address