« US Economy...should the patient remain on life support ? | cmaukonen's Blog | Obama is NOT FDR »

Gore Vidal's US of Fury


This article and interview in The British paper The Independent
is excellent. Here is just one part which, IMHO sums up our
current political situation quite well.
A Scotch is fetched for him as he is wheeled into the
corner of the bar. "I was like everyone else when Obama
was elected - optimistic. Everything we had been saying
about racial integration was vindicated," he says, "but
he's incompetent. He will be defeated for re-election.
It's a pity because he's the first intellectual president
we've had in many years, but he can't hack it. He's not
up to it. He's overwhelmed. And who wouldn't be? The
United States is a madhouse. The country should be put
away - and we're being told to go away. Nothing makes any
sense." The President "wants to be liked by everybody,
and he thought all he had to do was talk reason. But
remember - the Republican Party is not a political party.
It's a mindset, like Hitler Youth. It's full of hatred.
You're not going to get them aboard. Don't even try. The
only way to handle them is to terrify them. He's too
delicate for that."

Which I completely agree. The republican party is no-longer the
the opposition, but a group of extreme right wing fanatics.

When he compares Obama to his old friend Jack Kennedy, he
shakes his head. "He's twice the intellectual that Jack
was, but Jack knew the great world. Remember he spent a
long time in the navy, losing ships. This kid [Obama] has
never heard a gun fired in anger. He's absolutely bowled
over by generals, who tell him lies and he believes them.
He hasn't done anything. If you were faced with great
problems in chemistry - to find the perfect gas, to gas a
population - you won't know for a long time whether it
works. You have to go by what people tell you. He's like
that. He's not ready for prime time and he's getting a
lot of prime time on his plate at once."
This is so true. JFK was no brain - that was Bobby - but he did
have experience and knew how to get things done. His time
in the navy taught him how not to take any crap from anyone.
Obama lacks the single mindedness necessary to get his
programs passed. He wants or needs to be liked to much.

Sadly I do not see anyone waiting in the wings with the
necessary experience and cajones to be an efective
president. Not even Clinton.

Is there any hope? "Every sign I see is doom. But then
people say" - he adopts a whiny, nasal voice - "'Oh Mr
Vidal, you're so negative, can't you say something nice
about America? It's a wonderful country, everybody wants
to live here.' Oh yes? When was the last time you saw a
Norwegian with a green card who wanted to come here
because of the health service? I'll pay you if you can
find one."

But there is, he says with sudden perkiness, some "good
news. Afghanistan will be terminal for the American
empire, yes. Which is a happy way of looking at it. We'll
be out of the empire game, rapidly. But it's too late for
the country and the constitution." He raises his drink,
and smiles ironically. "To a better republic," he says,
and drinks in one long gulp.
It's quite a long article but well worth the read. I do like Gore Vidal's
style. An erudite intellect that can speak to the average person.

This interview in The Times of London is also quite good.
His voice strengthens. "One thing I have hated
all my life are LIARS [he says that with
bristling anger] and I live in a nation of
them. It was not always the case. I don't
demand honour, that can be lies too. I don't
say there was a golden age, but there was an
age of general intelligence. We had a watchdog,
the media." The media is too supine? "Would
that it was. They're busy preparing us for an
Iranian war." He retains some optimism about
Obama "because he doesn't lie. We know the fool
from Arizona [as he calls John McCain] is a
liar. We never got the real story of how McCain
crashed his plane [in 1967 near Hanoi, North
Vietnam] and was held captive."

Vidal originally became pro-Obama because he
grew up in "a black city" (meaning Washington),
as well as being impressed by Obama's
intelligence. "But he believes the generals.
Even Bush knew the way to win a general was to
give him another star. Obama believes the
Republican Party is a party when in fact it's a
mindset, like Hitler Youth, based on hatred -
religious hatred, racial hatred. When you
foreigners hear the word - conservative' you
think of kindly old men hunting foxes. They're
not, they're fascists."

Another notable Obama mis-step has been on
healthcare reform. "He f***ed it up. I don't
know how because the country wanted it. We'll
never see it happen." As for his wider vision:
"Maybe he doesn't have one, not to imply he is
a fraud. He loves quoting Lincoln and there's a
great Lincoln quote from a letter he wrote to
one of his generals in the South after the
Civil War. - I am President of the United
States. I have full overall power and never
forget it, because I will exercise it'. That's
what Obama needs - a bit of Lincoln's chill."
Has he met Obama? "No," he says quietly, "I've
had my time with presidents." Vidal raises his
fingers to signify a gun and mutters: "Bang
bang." He is referring to the possibility of
Obama being assassinated. "Just a mysterious
lone gunman lurking in the shadows of the
capital," he says in a wry, dreamy way.

Vidal now believes, as he did originally,
Clinton would be the better president. "Hillary
knows more about the world and what to do with
the generals. History has proven when the girls
get involved, they're good at it. Elizabeth I
knew Raleigh would be a good man to give a ship
to."The Republicans will win the next election,
Vidal believes; though for him there is little
difference between the parties. "Remember the
coup d'etat of 2000 when the Supreme Court
fixed the selection, not election, of the
stupidest man in the country, Mr Bush."
Read them both. They are really very good.


C


27 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Hey C, I really like this line:

Which I completely agree. The republican party is no-longer the the opposition, but a group of extreme right wing fanatics.

It is over for me. the repubs are evil. fuckem. that is what i say.

user-pic

Reading what Gore Vidal has to say is always time well spent. What a great American he is!

user-pic

I used to like Vidal, but he has gotten steadily more paranoid and fatalistic over the years.

Calling the entire republican party fascists while giving the democratic party a free pass for being corporate America's velvet glove is more hypocrisy from Vidal than I have ever seen in his numerous books and articles on our government.

Confusing one's political rivals for existential threats indicates the first stages of dementia for a writer of Gore Vidal's caliber.

user-pic

Agreed, Jason. Several years ago, in "The Last Empire," he alleged Roosevelt knew beforehand that Pearl Harbor was a Japanese target and allowed the attack to occur to suck the U.S. into WWII. He also compared Bush to Adolf Hitler. Bush was bad, but on the Hitler scale, even he's low on chart. Vidal has been predicting an American dictatorship for years, and his harsh appraisal of the country has evolved into contempt; he's grown more churlish and nihilistic with age, to the point he'd see the devil hosting the Noggin network. Still, I love reading the guy. His brilliance overcomes his hyperbole.

user-pic

I would agree his brilliance as a writer mostly negates the nihilistic hyperbole he can sometimes fall into.

user-pic

"Confusing one's political rivals for existential threats indicates the first stages of dementia for a writer of Gore Vidal's caliber."

Unlike the past stages of dementia, which generally characterize the caliber of your writing.

user-pic
user-pic

I used to like Vidal, but he has gotten steadily...

For someone who has been watching things closely for the last several decades I don't think the reaction of Vidal is illogical. We have people applauding. Now that is illogical.

user-pic

I guess we still differ on the end of an era or the beginning of something new.

user-pic

Decidedly. When I see republicans depart from what they've been accustomed to doing I'll reconsider.

user-pic

You require the leadership to change, which is the most visible and vocal part of the republican party right now, before according a basic respect and dialogue to conservatives at the grassroots who are looking for new ways to define themselves politically?

That tactic seems counterproductive to the goal of building a more progressive America. The grassroots always need to change first before we see their demands reflected at the national level.

In the case of healing long-standing partisan divides politically, I think it is especially important for normal people to not only get involved in primaries - which they never have - but to also learn a new lexicon for citizen politics.

Seems to me that assuming a change is taking place and acting accordingly loses the democrats nothing in this case.

user-pic

Are Democrats "a velvet glove of corporate America" and Republican "proto-fascist"?

I guess. I definitely prefer the former over the latter. The spectrum of choices is mediocrity versus evil.

Obama is very intelligent and well-meaning, so what I call "mediocrity" is the mediocrity of the establishment. We will make little insufficient steps to address global warming, economy, health care, wars. Bold steps that would truly help are just not available in the realm of possibilities contemplated by our political system (just count how many Congresscritters and Senatecritters would support them? Two? Three?) But these steps can be followed with something better, the supertanker started to make a turn away from the icebergs.

In my private theory, Republicans are not "proto-" anything, instead, they are throwbacks to the set of values of ante-bellum South. You will find intolerance, religiosity, deference to the rich, "small government" and acceptance of mediocrity in leadership (two non-fascist tenets).

user-pic

I guess I find both parties to be opposite halves of the same corporate-controlled coin.

Both parties support deregulation and war and pollution and an array of governmental policies designed to maintain a status quo that has been a downward spiral of living standards for most of the country.

Until Americans of both parties start voting in primary elections, we will continue to get screwed by politicians wearing both red and blue condoms.

user-pic

He's a joy to read, but he has grown more ominous over time. There was a time, in the 60s, where he was a high regarded figure in political circles... and his debate with Buckley is scintillating television. But even then he was calling them (conservatives) proto-fascists.

I have read most of his novels and virtually all of his essays because he is a gifted writer of prose. He is an elegant craftsman.

As far as Bush being as bad as Hitler, it's apples and oranges. Fanaticism has unique cultural signatures. Is there a corporate/military collusion? Yes. Does that collusion determine the behavior of government? Yes. But Bush's veneer of boobery really prevented the country from perceiving the malicious criminal nature of his administration.

I apply a degree of rigidity and ritual to fascism that did not exist under Bush. Bush and his cronies were simply thieves, sadists, and narcissists. There was no unifying philosophy otherwise.

I see him less as Hitler and more like Commodus.

user-pic

"There was no unifying philosophy."

Maybe no unified philosophy across the entire Republican party or the entire Bush administration but: The Straussian philosophy held by the neocons was and is a pretty unified one and it was these policies that caused so much damage to our country. They held sway. The Staussian philosophy, to the extent that I understand it, [or think I do] would naturally also attract many thieves, sadists, and narcissists as hangers-on and it surely did.

user-pic

There were Straussians, and Randroids, and Kristol-Lites... If anything, each of these thinkers advocated the self as the the pinnacle of life. Whether through historical subjectivism, will to pleasure, or the tempering of national consent to barbarism in the name of consumption, there is a perceived unifying theme:

Solipsism

And how can you run an effective government when it is every man for himself and God against all?

user-pic

"And how can you run an effective government when it is every man for himself and God against all?"


Did someone suggest that they ran an effective government?

I have half a mind to agree with you about the solipsism because they were at least half crazy if they thought that their view of reality was valid anywhere except in their own minds.

Actually, though, I just looked up solipsism. I cannot begin to hold my own with you in formal language or understanding of various philosophies. Never the less, I still believe that on the biggest issue of the Bush administration, that of a war of choice and the underlying ideas they had as to why it was a good choice, the group which was most influential in laying the groundwork, telling the lies, and pushing for the action, the ones who made it happen, did have a fairly unified philosophy. The manufacture of consent was a team effort. The A team had common goals based on the same ideas. I certainly might be wrong in which name I apply to that philosophy but Straussian seems to fit.

On other fronts, like the economy and the de-regulation of everything and the idea that the rich deserve to be rich regardless of how they got that way, and that the government must protect the rich and help them stay that way no matter what harm to everyone else, there was probably just a confluence of greed and shallow ideology rather than an overall philosophy.
God being for or against any side does not enter into my theories.

user-pic

I know I am about to go too far afield, and I apologize in advance.

The runup and initial execution of the Iraq invasion were well-coordinated and fantastical. And the PNAC papers certainly lend credence to an overarching Straussian theme.

But the aftermath of the invasion was discordant and bizarre. The choice to ostracise the Baathists while without a formal power structure left a vacuum that could only be filled by violence. Bremer's brief viceroyship of Iraq left a 9 billion dollar gap that has yet to be explained or filled. The behavior of contractors that led to the destruction of Fallujah.

I can't help but believe that the world hegemon blatherings at PNAC were window dressing to cover for venal criminality. I have grown to doubt the neocon faith. I think that neocons are simply a group of aristocrats and lackeys who wanted to loot what they could from the American treasury before the empire collapsed.

So, when I say every man for himself and God against all, I mean that evryone is looting what they can while the getting is good... Because the writing was on the wall.

Dubya's bio bears this out. Everything he touched fell apart. All of the Bush kids are swindlers. Dubya was the best.

user-pic

It was refreshing to find this thread, both with a collection of Vidal's wild and challenging thoughts about Obama, and some surprisingly nuanced comments about Vidal by Miller, Curt and Zippergus. It's the kind of thing that keeps dragging me back into this site every time I swear I'm not going to waste my time on it anymore.

No thanks to brewmn61 for trying to drag the conversation down with a personal attack that might start a long tit for tat. You may not be a troll, but there you were doing what trolls do. The only reason you commented is to attack Jason, you added not only zero, zip, but a negative factor.

user-pic

I personally pay very little attention such things as brewmn61 and do not feel any need to defend any of my posts or comments. They are mearly my own thoughts and opinions.

If people disagree or dislike them...so be it.

C

user-pic

Strangely enough, I think two terms as Hillary's VP could have led Barack to two terms as one of America's best presidents, so I have to agree with Vidal on that point.

Obama has to perform at a level just a couple of notches above his actual experience level. I trust the man is a quick study, but we have certainly seen a learning curve in progress.

We do live in interesting times.

user-pic

Well that's an interesting way to think about what Vidal brings up. On the other hand, a vice presidency can also really drag a person's reputation down into nothingness and impotence.....

I know one thing, I found his comments about "girls" like Hillary and Elizabeth I being better able to deal with general kinda people both great fun and stimulating. It's the kind of thing only someone like him can get away with raising without getting p.c. guff. :-) It also gets you rethinking what he's saying about youth and vigor vs. experience.

user-pic

I have long thought that the vice presidency should be the best training for the presidency, but never really has been. Makes me wonder if we are headed back to the age of citizen politicians.

user-pic

people here dont have a clue about Vidal.

try reading his 1000 pages of essays to understand that he doesnt speak from hyperbole.


the fact is I doubt anyone alive has more knowledge of history then Gore and certainly no one sees as clear.

dismiss what you dont understand but realize some day if you ever see clear, that you have been part of the problem.

user-pic

I do know a thing or two about Vidal's ouevre, and have read collections of his essays. His literary criticism is even better than his History.

However, did you read his work regarding Tim McVeigh? Did you perhaps see a certain similiarity of transference between writer and subject that occured with Truman Capote and the criminals behind the Potter murders? Has he been the same writer and thinker since he stepped completely into the dark side of domestic reactionary terror?

I ask you these questions because Gore Vidal is a man, not a God... and a flawed man with occasional flawed thinking. He has grown increasingly acerbic in regards to the American experiment, and it happened during his interviews with and subsequent essaying about McVeigh. I suggest going back and reading that work to see what I mean. He hasn't been the same.

user-pic

Mr. Vidal has long been one of my favorite authors. I re-read "Julian" (my favorite historical novel) every 5 years or so and it deepens with significance each time, as I get older. His historical novels on American history, especially Burr, Lincoln and 1876 are wonderful (tho I think he is too easy on Burr, who was undoubtably a traitor). I try to catch all his TV and print interviews.

I unfortunately concur with his appraisal of Obama. Obama needed more seasoning before becoming Prez; it has all come too easy to him (and now the Nobel!). And he has a serious narcissistic streak that has allowed him to be totally played by the corporatists on Wall Street (the bailout), Big Pharma and Big Insurance (HCR) and also, it appears, by the generals (Afghanistan). It was an easy choice between Obama and "the fool from Arizona", but I agree with Vidal that Clinton would have been a better choice at this moment in history. He is in over his head. Perhaps he always would have been because of his need to be adulated and accepted.

user-pic

It could be true that Obama had/has the potential to become a better leader with more time in government and at the same time be true that he was the best choice available. I think that this is the case.

Leave a comment

cmaukonen

user-pic

Following: 4
Followers: 37

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location Central Florida
  • Party Party ? We don't need no stinking party !
  • Politics Truth, Justice and the Scandinavian way. The American way sux !

Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs TPM, Unknown news, rude pundit, buzflash
  • Favorite Books Alas Babylon, Tolkien, etc.
  • Favorite Quotes There have been three totalitarian forces in our lifetime. The totalitarianism of fascism, of communism, and now of capitalism. - French farmer-activist José Bove

Bio

Not much to tell. Photography, radio-electronics, computers.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address