The Goldman Sachs connection.
Genn Greenwald weaves this tale of intrigue here.
office....conflict of interest ??
As was reported on Bill Moyers a while back.
an understatement of epic proportions.
Nobody does it better. Makes me feel sad for the rest....
C
UPDATE: Several commenters add a crucial point:And with all those alumni now situated in nearly every financial
back in September, the Federal Reserve allowed
Goldman (and a few other surviving institutions) to
convert from an investment bank into a bank holding
company. The Wall St. Journal claimed at the time
that the move meant the firm would "come under the
close supervision of national bank regulators,
subjecting them to new capital requirements,
additional oversight, and far less profitability
than they have historically enjoyed." A mere nine
months later, Goldman boasts of "blowout profits."
So much for "less profitability." As for allegedly
greater regulations and capital restrictions, they
freely admitted from the start: "'We don't believe
we'll have to get out of any businesses,' says
Lucas van Praag, a Goldman spokesman. Adds Morgan
Stanley's Mark Lake, 'There will not be much in
terms of divestitures'."
But what the conversion did allow was access to
lending from the Federal Reserve. Since then, the
Fed has increased its balance sheet by $2 trillion
while steadfastly refusing to disclose the
beneficiaries of that credit. Thus, even aside
from the bailout money it directly received and the
billions in bailout money which it indirectly
received (through AIG), Goldman has had access to
massive amounts of Fed lending in order to fuel its
bulging profits. That unimaginably enormous
(though entirely secret) lending is, in part, what
is behind the Ron Paul-sponsored bill to audit the
Fed -- a bill that is now co-sponsored by a
majority of House members from across the political
spectrum (progressive, conservative and everything
in between), yet which continues to be blocked by
Congressional leaders from receiving a floor vote.
office....conflict of interest ??
As was reported on Bill Moyers a while back.
BLACK: The Bush administration and now the ObamaTo say that Goldman has made out like bandits would be
administration kept secret from us what was being
done with AIG. AIG was being used secretly to bail
out favored banks like UBS and like Goldman Sachs.
Secretary Paulson's firm, that he had come from
being CEO. It got the largest amount of money.
$12.9 billion. And they didn't want us to know
that. And it was only Congressional pressure, and
not Congressional pressure, by the way, on
Geithner, but Congressional pressure on AIG.
Where Congress said, "We will not give you a
single penny more unless we know who received the
money." And, you know, when he was Treasury
Secretary, Paulson created a recommendation group
to tell Treasury what they ought to do with AIG.
And he put Goldman Sachs on it.
MOYERS: Even though Goldman Sachs had a big vested
stake.
BLACK: Massive stake. And even though he had just
been CEO of Goldman Sachs before becoming Treasury
Secretary. Now, in most stages in American history,
that would be a scandal of such proportions that he
wouldn't be allowed in civilized society.
MOYERS: Yeah, like a conflict of interest, it seems.
BLACK: Massive conflict of interests.
MOYERS: So, how did he get away with it?
BLACK: I don't know whether we've lost our
capability of outrage. Or whether the cover up has
been so successful that people just don't have the
facts to react to it.
an understatement of epic proportions.
Nobody does it better. Makes me feel sad for the rest....
C
Advertisement
















Highly rec'd. Makes me feel sad for the rest indeed.
July 14, 2009 4:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
And I didn't even mention their insider stock trading.
C
July 14, 2009 9:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't see what's wrong with the stock sales. Do you view it as illegal?
July 14, 2009 4:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes... highly rec'd. And it makes me feel sad for us. Funny how the much-maligned Ron Paul always faces renewed smears when he tries to something "crazy" - like find out where our money is going, and who's looting it.
Banks still have a massive hole to cover with toxic debt, and obligations to honor the dodgy, shyster "credit default swaps" that swapped treasure for penury. Obviously, this burden will be placed on us overburdened taxpayers by the VIP lounge.
July 14, 2009 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Read Matt Taibbi on Goldman Sachs. Why we're not chasing these people with pitchforks is beyond me.
July 14, 2009 12:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's the problem. In other countries people would be out in the streets right now demanding justice.
Americans are very big on "Lets you and him fight and I'll hold your coat."
Except for the 60s "Anti War" protests (which was as much if not more about saving ones own rear end) there really has not been any mass protesting.
That and the million man march on DC.
C
July 14, 2009 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well the Goldman Sachs types have their public relations team, aka the MSM, cranked up telling people that we can't do anything or it will be our jobs and homes and way of life that will be the only thing at risk. But if enough people lose their jobs anyhow at some point no amount of PR work will help. Obviously we are not to that point yet Bev...
July 14, 2009 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was kind of thinking about that. All those unemployed people. If enough of them get really pissed of things could get interesting.
The Socialists and Communists saw their biggest numbers during the late 20s and early thirties.
C
July 14, 2009 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the official unemployment rate would have to get above 12% which would mean an actual unemployment rate of about 25%, C. But we might get there if Krugman is right...and up to this point on this current economic slump I think he has been right on the money in his analysis...no pun intended. ;-)
Hell we aren't even really talking about communism or socialism here...just a fairer shake for the American worker. The Masters of the Unvierse have hundreds of billions of dollars in net worth but they say that they would be in the bread line themselves if they are 'forced' to pay workers more. I caught their latest propaganda on the News Hour last night will a US Chamber of Commerce shill explaining why EFCA needs to be defeated and thus save thousands of American jobs.
July 14, 2009 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
*just a fairer shake for the American worker*
Goldman-Sachs just set aside $6.65 Billion for salaries, bonuses, and benefits in this quarter, which puts the average Goldman employee on track to earning more than $900,000 this year.
July 14, 2009 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Conflict of interest? Maybe but they no longer hold any Goldman stock. I'd rather have them running the Treasury than some life-long politician
July 14, 2009 2:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Goldamn Suchs. Geithner and Summers should be replaced.
July 14, 2009 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink