I am the Walrus


I am he as you are he as you are me and we are not together (no not atall)
See how they run like pigs from a gun, see how they fly (when we advertise)
I'm crying

Sitting on a cornflake waiting for the van to come
Corporation tee-shirt, stupid bloody voting Tuesday
Man, you been a naughty boy, you let your face grow long
I am the eggman, we are the eggmen, I am the walrus
Goo goo g'joob

Ann Hart Coulter, pornographic priestess
Man, you been a naughty girl, you let your knickers down
I am the eggman, we are the effmen, I am the walrus
Goo goo g'joob

When I wrote this down Laura made me give up drinkin'

No longer a nation of laws


Surely, today's revelations demonstrate that America is no longer a nation of laws, but only of men. The President, unable to get his Attorney General to authorize a program that was almost certainly a violation of the 4th amendment, simply changes the process overnight and has his own lawyer authorize the program. Later, he makes that same lawyer his new Attorney General so that he will never be crossed again. Apparently, wiretapping Americans phones and data mining all of our financial accounts wasn't enough, he authorized an even more questionable program that actually (!) got a rise out of a few Democrats when they learned that they had not been briefed on it (as the law requires). Further, if the intelligence estimate from the CIA doesn't justify spying on your own citizens, just have a political hack in the White House add a paragraph to the report (this enemy will probably attack inside the US again).

No matter how bad it was, our country could recover from all of it if only we had a self-correcting mechanism in place: an opposition party that would stand on the side of truth. Instead, we have a Constitutional law professor as President who is OK with wiretapping Americans as long as their is minimal oversight and who is dead set against any investigations into illegal activity. And that's just fine with Congress. What gives?

Did the Decider wiretap enough phones to get sufficient dirt on everyone that he could pull off history's greatest blackmail scheme? Are the Democrats afraid that they will see jail time themselves as accessories to crimes?

The truth will set you free. Burying your head in the sand and denial never will.

Hillary Clinton as Lady Macbeth


Suggested on a TPM post this AM, the image of Hillary as Lady Macbeth inspired a (slightly altered) recollection of the lines in Macbeth:

Double, double, toil and trouble,
Fire burn and cauldron bubble,
Ere Barak's regal sum,
Something Clinton this way comes.

Dems to Progressives: Thanks for the help. Now get lost!


In a New York Times editorial columnist Paul Krugman notes that the increased corporate giving to the Democratic party is a mixed blessing.

Indeed, one wonders why Democrats seem so hesitant to reduce war funding, end illegal surveilance, and stop porkbarrel spending. Perhaps it's because they have found new sponsors?

It all comes down to whether you believe politicians are in office to do something or in office to be something. Remember that the GOP abandoned it's most cherished conservative principles (fiscal conservatism, individual liberty and freedom from government oversight, avoiding nation building, keeping government small). That's right, everything they professed to stand for got thrown overboard because they believed they had a chance to capture a permanent Republican majority. If not for George Bush, they might have succeeded.

The question now is, will Democrats walk down that same path?

Your thoughts?

A Revolutionary Response to Democratic (Wimps) Party


OK, I am officially pissed off, sick and tired of a Democratic party that professes protect the rule of law, progressive values, and checks and balances in government but then wimps out at every opportunity.

The Senate could filibuster and the Speaker could prevent any legislation from coming to the floor. But they won't. So, after a brief rant I will propose a new response based on withholding political donations that I think could actually force Democrats to act like Democrats.

The latest...after promising to fix the FISA legislation that was so incredibly stupid and passed in a blind rush to get out of town and not interrupt vacations, both the House and the Senate are again preparing to cave. They will give Bush the right to spy on Americans without credibly judicial oversight and they will give a free pass to telecom companies for laws they have already broken! The telecoms already have protection against actions they took that are in "good faith" but apparently it's hard to justify warrantless spying on millions of Americans as good faith, so they need more.

My proposal is this. Let's begin a campaign to cut off all funding to Democratic candidates until they start acting like our representatives. The only thing that worries them, apparently, is getting kicked out of office. They're confident that we won't vote for the GOP, so we're taken for granted. So, let's hit them in the pocketbook until they, reasonably, begin to act like our representatives.

Kos could lead on this one. Let the FISA revision die a natural death and revert back to the 1978 law. Second, only pass supplemental funding needed to keep half the troops in Iraq. Same next year. Force a 50% annual reduction. Don't take this too far--calls for impeachment or passing universal health care. Make it reasonable and continued financial support only starts up again when Democrats act like Democrats. I think it would work.

Looming Crisis in Housing and Banking


[I posted this as a comment to a recent Reed Hundt thread, but wanted to include it as a blog entry, given my strong feelings of impending doom--perhaps because, after 20+ years in the same house, I just bought a new home.]

The New York Times recently ran a front page article on increases in foreclosures, late payments, and looming problems in the subprime market. They assert that this could become a bigger problem than the S&L crisis some years back.

There are many reasons that families default on their mortgages, including job loss and illness. Still, the subprime market encourages bad behavior. For example, take an ARM. The buyer qualifies at the rate of today's payments. In three years, the payments could, of course, more than double as the loan baloons.

Add to that problem the fact that underwriters use the standards provided by the lender rather than, say, some more established national criteria. As a result, buyers can qualify for loans that will require up to 50% of their gross (I said gross, not net) income. That can work with an ARM, as well--meaning that, in a few years they will not have a prayer.

Why do lenders do this? Because they fully expect and intend to package the loans with some first class paper and sell it to bigger institutions. Why do borrowers do this? Some just don't worry about tomorrow. Some expect to pick up much better jobs or win the lottery. And many expect that real estate prices will continue to inflate and that they can resell the house if the payments get too high. In the meantime, it's a great pad, you know!

As soon as the economy turns sour, this is going to explode. Coupled with an explosion in the budget defecit (because we will have less revenue and have to pay more in interest to sell government debt), this is going to make the dot.com crash look like child's play.

Warrantless wiretaps: Where there's smoke, there's illegal activity


Today, the New York Times is running an article concerning the extreme security measures in place for judges ruling on lawsuits related to the NSA's warrantless wiretapping program. These are no ordinary judges, but Federal Appeals judges confirmed by the Senate. One of the judges on the panel, Garr M. King, likened the procedures to something out of Alice in Wonderland.

Plaintiffs have no access to papers filed by the government or classified arguments in the case, which means just about everything. ("Your motion is denied." --On what grounds? "I can't say." --What arguments were used to oppose our motion? "I can't say."). Even zanier, the government is seeking to inspect and scrub the computers which the plaintiffs have used to write their briefs. Judges opinions and rulings are not to be made public, shared with the plaintiffs, and are to be stored in a secure location under custody of the defense (DOJ). There is no assurance that those opinions won't be changed other than the good word of the Bush Administration.

Why? There is only speculation at this point, but I would suggest that the whole dirty scheme can be traced back to John Poindexter's Total Information Awareness program--designed to build a massive database covering every American and virually everything that they do. I would further suggest that the NSA program (warrantless recording of calls) cannot be integrated into the existing FISA structure because PEOPLE are not listening in to the conversations--only computers--parsing for key words, vocal patterns (e.g., young males with Middle Eastern accents), etc. etc.

Finally, I would suggest that the NSA is fully integrated with the government's efforts, documented last year by the Washington Post, to trace the phone calls of all Americans (which numbers call which other numbers) and the efforts to collect data on all financial transactions.

In short, I believe TIA is in full operation at this point and Orwell's 1984 has finally arrived. Fortunately, my government is protecting me from having this knowledge confirmed. And this time, the government is right. The President said, "They attack us because they hate our freedom." If the truth got out, it would help our enemies. They would be thrilled that they had won the war on terror and succeeded in their efforts to eliminate our freedom.

A Bill of Particulars


I was inspired recently by Matthew Yglesias' comments http://www.tpmcafe.com/node/27975 regarding whether George W. Bush was the "worst President ever." After some consideration, I came to the conclusion that he already has won that distinction.


Here is my bill of particulars:

 

1) He has placed the country in a huge financial bind through a combination of ill-timed tax cuts (which did little to stimulate general spending since most of them went to the well off), increased the size of the federal budget more than any previous President, and added an additional future entitlement (drug benefit) which seems to only benefit large drug companies. His policies have led to a federal debt of over 9 trillion dollars ($30,000+ for every person in America). Cap that with a trade deficit that is resulting in foreign ownership of America and you have a financial situation from which we cannot recover without great pain. What will we do if there is another recession? The deficit will balloon and we won't be able to cut taxes again to fix it. What happens if the rest of the world unloads their dollars and t-bills? Kiss your rear goodbye, U.S. economy.

 

2) He abandoned our commitment to the military. We are breaking it by misusing it in another war in which it is impossible to know who to shoot at. As a result, our troops are coming home far more psychologically traumatized than after Vietnam. It Vietnam, there were safe zones where troops could relax, not in Iraq. Recruitment is down...standards are down. He abandoned the Republican commitment to clear mission, clear exit strategy, use of overwhelming force, etc.

 

3) He has violated his oath of office to protect the constitution. He is acting as a dictator, choosing which laws he will and will not obey, spying on Americans without warrant in a huge data-mining operation, and deciding who to incarcerate without access to habeous corpus on his word alone. Monday, U.S. News and World Report will run an article which suggests that he has concluded he may order the FBI to conduct warrantless physical searches in violation of the 4th amendment.

 

4) He has established precedents that will hamper future Presidents from undoing his damage. He has destroyed checks and balances, abandoned any international treaty that he didn't agree with, established the precedent of first strike warfare on shabby evidence. He lied to the American people about wanting to work through the U.N. to resolve the situation and took us to war because Saddam's WMD's were an immediate threat. In so doing, he has established the world climate where every dictator with a tin hat is trying desperately to get a nuke (and North Korea has, on Bush's watch) as a means of securing themselves from American invasion. He is the little boy who cried wolf. What will happen if a real one appears?

 

5) He has set back the cause of Christianity by centuries. If you read the Bible, you will see that Christ avoided political involvement, was only critical of the religious bigots of his day, went about healing the sick and helping the poor, and spent much time telling parables of HUMILITY. Bush has used Bible thumping as a means of getting elected while abandoning the values of Christianity.

 

In conclusion, Bush was the opposite of everything he claimed. He was a divider, not a uniter; he never reached across the political aisle to the democrats, he never envisioned a "humble foreign policy," he never considered cutting CO2 emmisions, he increased the size of government and engaged in rampant nation-building. He is the anti- conservative.

The Decider

user-pic

Following:
Followers: 2

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address