<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>ChronoSpark&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/chronospark/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/chronospark/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/chronospark//2934</id>
   <updated>		2008-11-29T23:51:23Z			2008-11-29T23:44:42Z	2008-11-29T23:42:29Z	2008-11-29T23:35:40Z	2008-11-29T23:25:57Z	2008-11-29T23:15:34Z	2008-11-29T23:14:21Z	2008-11-29T23:10:28Z		2008-11-29T23:05:18Z				2008-11-29T23:02:45Z			2008-11-29T23:01:21Z	2008-11-29T23:00:00Z		2008-11-29T22:56:32Z		2008-11-29T22:46:26Z	2008-11-29T22:41:02Z		2008-11-29T22:39:22Z	</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/desidero//2393.246154-comment:3301587</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/desidero/2008/11/message-from-dad-obamas-okay.php#c3301587" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[Nathan Donarum Commented on Message from Dad: Obama&apos;s Okay by Desidero]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-29T20:53:07Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-29T20:53:07Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that would certainly be nice.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    




	
	<entry>
		
	<title><![CDATA[Nathan Donarum recommended Is it me or are Republicans trying to take claim for any future success of Barack Obama&apos;s administration? by theone718]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/theone718/2008/11/is-it-me-or-are-republicans-tr.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/theone718//3800.246156</id>
  <published>2008-11-29T13:54:17Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-29T14:04:43Z</updated>
	</entry>
	




	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/theone718//3800.246156-comment:3301473</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/theone718/2008/11/is-it-me-or-are-republicans-tr.php#c3301473" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[Nathan Donarum Commented on Is it me or are Republicans trying to take claim for any future success of Barack Obama&apos;s administration? by theone718]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-29T17:19:45Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-29T17:19:45Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Hit the nail on the head. The very fact that I now see Democrats, Liberals and Progressives alike actually believing such crap and repeating it themselves is pretty sad, and slightly depressing.</p>

<p>Then we have all this speculation as to what Obama is going to do once he's in office. ...He has, what? 50 days before he's inaugurated? Perhaps it's inevitable, with Bush being the lamest duck ever, that any action, or any presence by Obama in this time leads people to look to him rather than our own President. But it doesn't excuse such an irrational line of thinking.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/desidero//2393.246154-comment:3301467</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/desidero/2008/11/message-from-dad-obamas-okay.php#c3301467" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[Nathan Donarum Commented on Message from Dad: Obama&apos;s Okay by Desidero]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-29T17:06:46Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-29T17:06:46Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Co-Sign.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    




	
	<entry>
		
	<title>Nathan Donarum recommended A Little Help From My Friends by Nathan Donarum</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/chronospark/2008/11/a-little-help-from-my-friends.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/chronospark//2934.246149</id>
  <published>2008-11-29T00:07:40Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-29T00:22:51Z</updated>
	</entry>
	






	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/jpieterick//8109.246064-comment:3301249</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/jpieterick/2008/11/impeachment-bush-expects-free.php#c3301249" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[Nathan Donarum Commented on &quot;Thank You Very Much, But I&apos;ll Take My Constitution With Me!&quot; by SleepinJeezus]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-28T20:32:56Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-28T20:32:56Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>They should have have gotten those rights in WWII. There's a reason there are specific points concerning POWs and the rights they receive in the Geneva Conventions.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    




	
	<entry>
		
	<title><![CDATA[Nathan Donarum recommended &quot;Thank You Very Much, But I&apos;ll Take My Constitution With Me!&quot; by SleepinJeezus]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/jpieterick/2008/11/impeachment-bush-expects-free.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/jpieterick//8109.246064</id>
  <published>2008-11-28T03:58:43Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-28T05:09:20Z</updated>
	</entry>
	




	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/jpieterick//8109.246064-comment:3301211</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/jpieterick/2008/11/impeachment-bush-expects-free.php#c3301211" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[Nathan Donarum Commented on &quot;Thank You Very Much, But I&apos;ll Take My Constitution With Me!&quot; by SleepinJeezus]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-28T18:38:57Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-28T18:38:57Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Rec'd. Very nicely written.</p>

<p>Though I have to say, I think part of the reason Congress didn't act wasn't necessarily just about "we just exercised our powers of impeachment and we can't do it again... for now" (though I think that was certainly part of it). </p>

<p>I also believe it had to do with a genuine belief that, if the Democrats did try to exercise such power, they would be <i>driven</i> from power. The Republican party had never been as partisan as they were for Bush. There was no opposition to Bush. If the Democrats had <i>tried</i> to impeach Bush, they never would have succeeded. And the Republicans would have played it off as partisan politics and a distraction from "real" issues. Whether they would have been right is besides the point.</p>

<p>I simply think the Democrats were scared for their political lives. Try to impeach Bush, fail, get thrown out of office in the next election. Is this the way things WOULD have happened? Maybe. Maybe not. I just don't think the Democratic leadership, to put it bluntly, had the balls to do what's right.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    




	
	<entry>
		
	<title>Nathan Donarum recommended Keeping Gates Signals Change by FlyOnTneWall</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/flyontnewall/2008/11/the-standard-critique-of-the.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/flyontnewall//2060.245877</id>
  <published>2008-11-26T15:35:43Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-26T15:44:41Z</updated>
	</entry>
	






	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.245946-comment:3300148</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/obama_creating_a_vision_of_cha.php#c3300148" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[Nathan Donarum Commented on Obama: The &quot;Vision&quot; Buck Stops Here by Greg Sargent]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-26T16:22:47Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-26T16:22:47Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<blockquote>Apologies for repeating this yet again, but it's something of a fool's errand to try to try to concluded too much in advance about the ideological cast of this presidency merely by looking at his appointments. It makes a heck of a lot more sense to let his actual policies do the talking.</blockquote>

<p>Don't apologize. Unfortunately, there are too many not-too-rational people out there who just don't get it. I'm glad that you actually DO get it, Greg.</p>

<p>Thanks much for the injection of reality and rationality.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    







	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/truthseeker77//2352.245744-comment:3299036</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/truthseeker77/2008/11/mccain-secretly-advising-obama.php#c3299036" />
		
		    <title>Nathan Donarum Commented on McCain secretly advising Obama on new administration hirings (report) by truthseeker77</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-25T17:38:16Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-25T17:38:16Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>It's more than a TAD misleading. Here's what the report says:</p>

<blockquote>"...the McCain and Obama camps began to work secretly behind the scenes..."</blockquote>

<p>Here's what truthseeker is saying:</p>

<blockquote>"...Senator McCain began to advise Obama secretly..."</blockquote>

<p>Um... No. This report suggests that they worked TOGETHER, not that one was advising another. Pathetic headline if I ever saw one. Sounds like something Drudge would put.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/astral66//2668.245683-comment:3298671</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/astral66/2008/11/lamest-duck-ever.php#c3298671" />
		
		    <title>Nathan Donarum Commented on Lamest. Duck. Ever. by astral66</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-25T04:22:46Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-25T04:22:46Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Ok. DEAL! ...Haha!</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    







	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/astral66//2668.245683-comment:3298570</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/astral66/2008/11/lamest-duck-ever.php#c3298570" />
		
		    <title>Nathan Donarum Commented on Lamest. Duck. Ever. by astral66</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-25T01:28:54Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-25T01:28:54Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>;D</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    






	
	<entry>
		
	<title>Nathan Donarum recommended Lamest. Duck. Ever. by astral66</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/astral66/2008/11/lamest-duck-ever.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/astral66//2668.245683</id>
  <published>2008-11-24T20:52:34Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-25T01:44:39Z</updated>
	</entry>
	




	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/astral66//2668.245683-comment:3298424</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/astral66/2008/11/lamest-duck-ever.php#c3298424" />
		
		    <title>Nathan Donarum Commented on Lamest. Duck. Ever. by astral66</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-24T23:28:45Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-24T23:28:45Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Lamest. Duck. EVER!</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.245699-comment:3298325</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/franken_camp_claims_race_still.php#c3298325" />
		
		    <title>Nathan Donarum Commented on Franken Camp Claims Race Still Narrowing, Accuses Coleman Of Recount Shenanigans by Eric Kleefeld</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-24T22:43:38Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-24T22:43:38Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>I'm going to side with Franken here. Franken's argument sounds exactly like what Nate Silver was describing when he predicted a final win by Franken by 27 votes.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/11/projection-franken-to-win-recount-by-27.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/11/projection-franken-to-win-recount-by-27.html</a></p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    




	
	<entry>
		
	<title>Nathan Donarum recommended Will the media regress to 1992? by CT  Voter</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/ct_voter/2008/11/will-the-media-regress-to-1992.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/ct_voter//1533.245544</id>
  <published>2008-11-23T19:10:01Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-23T19:30:07Z</updated>
	</entry>
	




	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/eastside93//3016.245325-comment:3296888</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/eastside93/2008/11/five-reasons-why-secretary-cli.php#c3296888" />
		
		    <title>Nathan Donarum Commented on Five Reasons Why Secretary Clinton Is Change We Can Believe In by Boyd Reed</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-23T01:23:48Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-23T01:23:48Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<blockquote>
Your problem is that any time someone brings up negatives or legitimate concerns you are quick to label them as a "hater".

<p>I've said far worse things about McCain and Bush on this board and no one has yet called me a "McCain-hater" or "Bush-hater".</p></blockquote>

<p>Sometimes I want to hug you for your rationality, CT.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    











	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/eastside93//3016.245325-comment:3296190</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/eastside93/2008/11/five-reasons-why-secretary-cli.php#c3296190" />
		
		    <title>Nathan Donarum Commented on Five Reasons Why Secretary Clinton Is Change We Can Believe In by Boyd Reed</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-22T01:05:32Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-22T01:05:32Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>I think you're absolutely on target. Hillary Clinton is not my #1 choice for SoS. But Biden wasn't my #1 choice for VP, and I, after a short time, grew to realize how wonderful a choice he was. Why should this be any different?</p>

<p>Honestly, time and time again, Obama makes decisions and choices, or says or does something that gets everyone up in arms; bitching, moaning, saying things are over, saying Obama's completely screwed up... But every single time, he has it under control. He knows what he's doing.</p>

<p>Why should I doubt his choice for SoS? He has a specific reason for why he wants Hillary. There's a reason and logic behind everything Barack does. Until I see some true proof that the choice of Hillary is a mistake, I'm going to trust that Barack knows what he's doing here, as he has with practically everything he did in his campaign.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    




	
	<entry>
		
	<title>Nathan Donarum recommended Five Reasons Why Secretary Clinton Is Change We Can Believe In by Boyd Reed</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/eastside93/2008/11/five-reasons-why-secretary-cli.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/eastside93//3016.245325</id>
  <published>2008-11-21T04:12:15Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-21T05:48:02Z</updated>
	</entry>
	




	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.245423-comment:3295692</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/report_hillary_to_accept_secre.php#c3295692" />
		
		    <title>Nathan Donarum Commented on Report: Hillary To Accept Secretary Of State Gig by Greg Sargent</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-21T20:01:23Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-21T20:01:23Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Absolutely agreed.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/november_5//6504.245238-comment:3295651</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/november_5/2008/11/hillary-silliness.php#c3295651" />
		
		    <title>Nathan Donarum Commented on Hillary Silliness by November 5</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-21T19:48:06Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-21T19:48:06Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>There's no way to maturely or adequately respond to such a juvenile and immature comment. Calling me an ass, and stupid, etc.? Wow. Want someone to take you seriously? Grow up. :D</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    



</feed>

