I don't know if these exist, but perhaps they should. It seems that every political site or blog I visit lately has some great, well-reasoned comments and some, well, how do I put this?--some comments that make me picture hordes of red-faced individuals hunched over laptops drooling rabidly while spewing hatred and venom.

I guess we should be glad that most of them limit this palaver to their online personas. I guess we should be glad that they're typing instead of re-loading.

But mostly, I'm wondering if we should be talking about Universal MENTAL Health coverage in America . . .

Is anyone else curious about why Iowa claims it must keep its stranglehold on the presidential nominating process? Yeah, well, this won't clear it up.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/19/opinion/19giddins.html?ex=1363665600&en=f7a9f492d9e9f47a&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink

First thing on the Democratic Party agenda in August should be overhauling this process for next time, removing BOTH the superdelegate nonsense AND the Iowa/NewHampshire/SouthCarolina hegemony on the nominating process. It's ridiculous.