« What is behind all this hide and seek? | Carol Gee's Blog | Five hundred words about The World Wide Web »
Walter Cronkite -- Congruence
Walter Cronkite passed away on Friday. The voice of the nation for so
many years was 92 years old. From the time he was named the "anchor" of
the CBS evening news program, he began to build a reputation for
honesty and integrity than set a standard for all the major news
anchors who were to follow in his footsteps.
His legacy for me was one of congruence. For decades his reports on so many of the key events here and around the world turned out to be congruent with the eventual meaning we all took to be the core significance of the most important events. In both emotional tone and the facts, his reporting was in agreement and coincided with that of most of the rest of us.
As a kid from the country in Wyoming, I did not experience television until I moved to Texas as a nursing student in 1955. From my first black and white, small screen television viewing I was hooked. And I was always drawn to the hard news. Like millions of others I wanted to know what was happening. I has a curiosity and a need to know, so I always watched the evening news. My choices were NBC and CBS. NBC got on the list because that was the network that would come in on our radio growing up. But CBS quickly became a close second as I listened to Edward R. Murrow, and then watched, his weekly broadcast.
Walter Cronkite succeeded Murrow. The managing editor of his own program, he was trained as a print journalist and comfortable on camera, a dynamite combination. And we soon found that he could tell us what was happening in ways that were congruent, clear, unbiased, simple and believable.
It was Walter Cronkite who told me that John F. Kennedy was dead, and showed his own devastated feelings silently and without shame. He was openly angry when his news crewmen were roughed up on the floor of a Democratic Convention in the searing sixties. He went to Vietnam and said out loud the truth of that awful war. President Lyndon Johnson was convinced of the reality of his lost leadership by that broadcast. Walter Cronkite went to the moon's dusty surface with the astronauts with the rest of us. He gaged it as a most significant event for humankind. But he missed by just a few days the 40th anniversary celebration of the moon landing that will be coming up on Monday. I am moved by the congruence of that. Last night the new NASA administrator, Charles Bolden released a lovely and poetic tribute to Walter Cronkite, noting that it was Walter Cronkite who inspired him to want to become an astronaut so many years ago. And I am moved by the congruence of that, as well.
Walter Cronkite, according to a contemporary, was not happy about having to retire. But he did it without public complaint. Acclaimed by most everyone, he popped up every now and then until he was well up in years. He was a sailor and loved to have the wind at his back and the bow of his craft splitting the waves. He lost his beloved wife, Betsy a few years ago. He was one of a kind and I feel grateful that I was able to find much of my truth from his take on the significance of all those momentous life changing events.
His legacy for me was one of congruence. For decades his reports on so many of the key events here and around the world turned out to be congruent with the eventual meaning we all took to be the core significance of the most important events. In both emotional tone and the facts, his reporting was in agreement and coincided with that of most of the rest of us.
As a kid from the country in Wyoming, I did not experience television until I moved to Texas as a nursing student in 1955. From my first black and white, small screen television viewing I was hooked. And I was always drawn to the hard news. Like millions of others I wanted to know what was happening. I has a curiosity and a need to know, so I always watched the evening news. My choices were NBC and CBS. NBC got on the list because that was the network that would come in on our radio growing up. But CBS quickly became a close second as I listened to Edward R. Murrow, and then watched, his weekly broadcast.
Walter Cronkite succeeded Murrow. The managing editor of his own program, he was trained as a print journalist and comfortable on camera, a dynamite combination. And we soon found that he could tell us what was happening in ways that were congruent, clear, unbiased, simple and believable.
It was Walter Cronkite who told me that John F. Kennedy was dead, and showed his own devastated feelings silently and without shame. He was openly angry when his news crewmen were roughed up on the floor of a Democratic Convention in the searing sixties. He went to Vietnam and said out loud the truth of that awful war. President Lyndon Johnson was convinced of the reality of his lost leadership by that broadcast. Walter Cronkite went to the moon's dusty surface with the astronauts with the rest of us. He gaged it as a most significant event for humankind. But he missed by just a few days the 40th anniversary celebration of the moon landing that will be coming up on Monday. I am moved by the congruence of that. Last night the new NASA administrator, Charles Bolden released a lovely and poetic tribute to Walter Cronkite, noting that it was Walter Cronkite who inspired him to want to become an astronaut so many years ago. And I am moved by the congruence of that, as well.
Walter Cronkite, according to a contemporary, was not happy about having to retire. But he did it without public complaint. Acclaimed by most everyone, he popped up every now and then until he was well up in years. He was a sailor and loved to have the wind at his back and the bow of his craft splitting the waves. He lost his beloved wife, Betsy a few years ago. He was one of a kind and I feel grateful that I was able to find much of my truth from his take on the significance of all those momentous life changing events.
Blogs: My general purpose/southwest focus blog is at Southwest Progressive. And Carol Gee - Online Universe is the all-in-one home page for all my websites.
Technorati tags: news walter cronkite obituary
Advertisement
















Now wouldn't it be special to have news that did NOT demand that what you just saw was so special, every gosh-darned time anything happened? I have a suspicion Walter Conkite would not have spent a week mourning Michael Jackson. Sarah Palin would have left the airwaves in November. Howard Dean would not have been scuttled for expresssing excitement. And he would have spent a lot more time covering what exactly happened in Ohio and Florida.
July 18, 2009 6:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
He wouldn't bought the neocon Iraq spin either. I would love to have seen Cronkite interview Cheney and Lieberman.
July 18, 2009 7:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gregor, it is today as if we were subscribed to all the tabloids without our permission. Good points.
July 19, 2009 4:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am so happy you put up this blog Carol.
"His legacy for me was one of congruence"
Congruence is all gone I am afraid. Did you see where monkey face gregory was emailing repubs and telling them not to worry so much about tough questions. ha!!!!!!!
July 18, 2009 7:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gregory should be let go. He is SO not Russert...and Russert was so not Cronkite. Better than Gregory, by all means, but....
Real journalism is gone from television. That's why I throw my fancy HDTV 32" flat screen out the window on a regular basis. In my mind, anyway...
July 18, 2009 7:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks DD. I cannot watch MTP any more. Gregory is just too full of himself. . . not listening, just framing his next question.
July 19, 2009 4:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
I posted this comment on another thread but I feel strongly about Walter Cronkite, so I offer it here, so that younger people are left with a sense of the man, as both public personna and private person.
How fortunate those of us were who grew up with Walter Cronkite and Eric Severeid as our broadcast journalist/role models. What we took for granted about them, then, was that they were not only scrupulous professionals but also persons who cared about the events they reported and the repercussions from those events that might unfold. What we can surmise about them, now, is that either they did not encounter heavy pressure from their corporate minders, or that they cared more about reporting the news and giving their honest opinions than they cared about ratings and internal corporate politics.
As a side note, when I was in my twenties, I once met Walter Cronkite when I drew the lucky straw among my work colleagues (literally) and was seated at his table at a press luncheon. There we were: Walter Cronkite(!); and wwstaebler, a neophyte magazine writer. I was completely tongue-tied, which was apparently obvious. And so, with the courtly courtesy for which he was justly renowned, he engaged me in small talk until I relaxed. And then, smiling encouragingly, asked my opinion about the news event of the day, to which answer he nodded, as if I had said something passably intelligent. And only then did he turn his attention to the serious journalists at the table.
So Rest in Peace, Walter Cronkite: Journalist of Unquestionable Integrity and Man of Consummate Kindness
July 18, 2009 7:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
wwstaebler, I had heard about Cronkite's kindness and even courtliness. Yours is a lovely story, and I appreciate your adding it here.
July 19, 2009 4:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
The journalists who grew up during a real depression and covered first hand a real world war were built from stronger and wiser stuff.
Can you imagine Cronkite dancing with Karl Rove?
July 18, 2009 7:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
bluebell, what a yucky mental image. So true, so true. Thanks.
July 19, 2009 4:11 AM | Reply | Permalink