« Under the heading of Republicans | Carol Gee's Blog | Obama administration - national security and secrecy: reference links »

A bit of perspective on Iran --



Today's post is a compilation of news items from mostly foreign sources covering the Iranian government's presidential election crisis. It begins with how things were before Iran's world turned upside down. I conclude with a bit of perspective on U.S. national security, that reminds us of how lucky we are to have our solid new president around, when the Middle East's beset by chaos.

How fast things changed after the election -- On June 15th, Russia's Ria Novosti reported that "the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency said on Monday he welcomed the U.S. initiative to begin direct talks with Iran without any preconditions and on the basis of mutual respect."

Violence escalates -- This rare information is from The Washington Note, "Guest Blog: Dispatches from Tehran," (6/22/09). Steve Clemons introduces the blogger: "An anonymous student in Tehran who has been writing and speaking in the media under the name, "Shane M." has just sent in some more dispatches." The BBC News of 6/22/09 says that details are emerging about how "hi-tech helped Iranian monitoring" of its citizens during the protests, with the help of Nokia Siemens. The world was galvanized on 6/23/09: Memeorandum headlined, "Family, friends mourn Iranian woman whose death was caught on video," taken from Borzou Daragahi of the LA Times In summary: "Neda Agha-Soltan, 26, 'was a beam of light' and not an activist, friends say. The video footage of her bleeding to death on the street has turned her into an international symbol of the protest movement." Next "Fresh street clashes in Tehran" outside of parliament were examined by the Financial Times on 6/24/09.

World leaders responded -- The 6/23/09 BBC News reports that the United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon was "urging Iran to end the violence." Summarizing: "United Nations chief Ban Ki-moon expressed his "dismay" at the use of force against civilians in the wake of Iran's disputed election." The Financial Times of London is of the opinion that President Obama "toughened his stance on Iran" after Monday, June 22. The BBC News (6/23/09) says that President Obama strongly condemned "unjust" violence of Iran clamping down on election protests, saying he respects Iran's sovereignty and that it was "patently false" of Iran to say the West was fomenting the unrest.

Calming worries -- President Obama's handling of the Iranian crisis has been right on point, in my opinion. His "heart broke" along with ours as young women, students and others who want freedom were murdered, beaten and imprisoned. But the deep unrest that might indicate a growing instability in the country is just that. It does not mean we confront a nuclear cloud as might have been the case in a Bush administration. David Morrison, who writes CQ Behind the Lines (6/25/09) said, to quote:
In pondering a nuclear-armed Iran, "no plausible scenarios come to mind where terrorism comes into play, or where Tehran ever would have any reason to share nuclear capability with a terrorist client," an ex-CIA analyst writes in National Journal.

References -- from Tom Head who writes the About.com Civil Liberties Guide:


My all-in-one Home Page of websites where I post regularly: Carol Gee - Online Universe

Technorati tags: news news and politics Iran foreign policy war and conflict Obama


3 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Carol, since you start with the IAEA story and refer to others on the nuke issue, in case you missed it, this one that is the summary of an interview might interest you:

June 18, 2009
U.N. Atomic Energy Chief Says Iran Wants Bomb Technology
By ALAN COWELL
PARIS — Mohamed ElBaradei, the chief of the United Nations nuclear watchdog agency, said it was his “gut feeling” that Iran’s leaders wanted the technology to build nuclear weapons “to send a message to their neighbors, to the rest of the world: ‘Don’t mess with us.’....

user-pic

I read your helpful link to the NYT article, artappraiser. Mr. ElBaradei has been in the business a long time, and I tend to trust his "gut feelings, don't you? We will have to keep a close watch on Israel now that the regime in Iran is turning so hard-line. Tough dilemmas.
Thanks.

user-pic

Well I certainly trust ElBaradei's gut on this a lot more than I trust a lot of bloviators on the net on it. And I am getting pretty sure from all I've read that Obama feels pretty much the same way as ElBaradei, matter of fact, not a single thing has shown me otherwise. And yeah, it's going to be real tough for him, because the way it looks like it's going, he is going to be accused of pandering to Israel, when that's not going to be the reason he does what he does at all.

Leave a comment

Carol Gee

user-pic

Following: 22
Followers: 28

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs The Washington Note, Glenn Greenwald at Salon, emptywheel and TPM Muckraker.
  • Favorite Books The Soul's Code, political biographies, women's history

Bio

A retired clinical social worker, I live in the Southwest. I like politics and poetry, dreams and reality.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address