« Rule of Law Issues Explored | Carol Gee's Blog | Bloggers deserve kudos for their good work »

What's to like about these legislators?


With a Democrat in the White House and majorities in Congress, the political stakes are particularly high for Congress because of its lower approval ratings. I am not one of those who consistently rates Congress low, though I am often mad at them for one thing or another. I like Congress and I have my favorites, about whom I post today.

(Image: Wordle.net)
Senator Ted Kennedy (D-Mass) may see the results of his decades of work on health care reform for millions of uninsured Americans. According to Politico's feature , Kennedy almost single-handedly kept the idea of universal health care alive for 40 years, working with 7 presidents. To quote:

Exactly 40 years ago, Sen. Ted Kennedy popularized the idea of universal health care, saying the country needed a program "capable of bringing the same amount and high quality of health care to every man, woman and child in the United States."

. . . Despite a legislative portfolio bulging with accomplishments that position him as the father of the modern health care safety net, the one that matters most to Kennedy -- guaranteed health coverage for every American -- has remained stubbornly out of reach.

. . . Now, his own yearlong battle with brain cancer is lending a dose of urgency to finally finish what he started decades ago, when personal and family health crises compelled him to embrace the cause.

Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee. This summer Senator Leahy will shepherd the Supreme Court nomination to replace Justice Souter through his committee and then on the Senate floor. Senator Leahy has advocated for a non-judge to be the next Supreme Court justice. The Ranking Republican member of the committee, until recently, was Senator Arlen Specter, now a Democrat. Republicans named far right wing Senator Jeff Sessions as Ranking Member until the next Congress, and then it will be Senator Chuck Grassley, one of my favorite Twitterers. Leahy's fine intellect, patience and even-handedness will be sorely tested as Sessions carries the water of opposition to anyone the President nominates. To quote CQ Politics: ". . . it will also be interesting to see not only how Sessions handles the media attention but how he gets along with the strong-willed chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Democrat Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont." Rep. John Conyers, (D-Mich) is Leahy's counterpart in the House. A fierce fighter for justice and protector of the underdog, Rep. Conyers recently oversaw his Judiciary Committee's proposed expansion of the hate crimes law. It is also reported that Rep. Conyers will hold hearings on the torture memos.

Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill), Durbin makes an excellent Whip and probably helps the beleaguered Majority Leader, Harry Reid who is not included in my favorites. I am still not quite sure to make of Senator Durbin relinquishing his chairmanship of the Crime and Drugs subcommittee to Senator Arlen Specter.  We do know that Judiciary Committee Chairman Leahy was upset by it.  Also I like both Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif) and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (DMD), who have their hands full handling the House's Blue Dog Democrats, fiscal conservatives. There are also several of my favorite senators who are relatively new: Senator Jim Webb (D-VA), Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI).

Representative David Obey (D-WI) chairs the House Appropriations Committee. He takes his role very seriously and is willing to buck President Obama on basic issues. Politico gives a good example, the conflicts in Afghanistan and Pakistan, which brings Vietnam to mind for this irascible "old bull" of the House. To quote:

Chairman Dave Obey said he was "very dubious" about the chances of success in the region and wants a "fish or cut bait" assessment in a year's time that will determine how long the U.S. continues on this path.

"It gives the president one year to demonstrate what he can do," said the Wisconsin Democrat. "It gives him ample resources."

. . . "The president feels obligated to give it a shot, and we'll help him give it a shot for a year," Obey said. "At the end of the year, I want to have a hard-nosed, realistic evaluation based on the performance standards we're talking about."

. . . Five standards are listed, including the performance of Pakistani forces with respect to counterinsurgency operations and the ability of the government to control the territory within its borders -- where the Taliban has already made significant inroads.

Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif) took over the Energy and Commerce Committee last fall from its former chairman, John Dingle of Michigan. Ambitious and feisty, Waxman is pursuing an ambitious climate change bill, according to Politico. But it is an uphill battle with lots of opposition because of his strong support for a cap and trade program that would require utilities to produce more power from renewable energy sources. And people from the South need to include hydroelectric power and nuclear energy, about the only reliable sources in the region. This will require Waxman to work hard for the compromise necessary to pass the legislation, as well as make it palatable to the Senate. To quote:

Waxman and Massachusetts Rep. Ed Markey delayed the start of a much-anticipated markup last week so they could have more time to iron out major concerns with the legislation among Democrats on the subcommittee considering it.

Moderate Democrats from the Rust Belt, coal states and the South have lined up to make changes to the legislation before Waxman and Markey unveil it. Many of these moderates -- tapped by Waxman's predecessor as chairman, Michigan Rep. John Dingell -- sit on the subcommittee drafting the bill.

. . . Waxman got a boost Thursday when Ways and Means Chairman Charles Rangel, whose panel could claim jurisdiction over the bill, agreed to work with whatever product the Energy and Commerce Committee passes.

. . . Democratic leaders in the Senate acknowledged earlier this year that they don't have the votes to move a so-called cap-and-trade measure, but the White House still seems committed to moving something -- if only as a negotiating tool for the next round of negotiations over a global treaty.
What's to like about these legislators? The senators and members of Congress spotlighted today have certain traits in common: dedication, resiliency, intellect, a capacity to be bipartisan, a clear view of fiscal responsibility, respect for the rule of law, and liberal values regarding "the least among us." These are public servants upon whom you can usually count.


See also Behind the Links, for further info on this subject.

Carol Gee - Online Universe is the all-in-one home page for all my websites.

Technorati tags:


28 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Nice post Carol. I agree. These guys have always represented the best we can expect from our legislators. I thought about who I might add to your list--although they might be effective and dedicated public servants, they are also partisans. I also struggled to think of some Rs. Unfortunately, the great statesmen from the Republican party that were around 20-30 years ago are nowhere to be found these days. For example, 20 years ago I easily would have put Amo Houghton on your list.

user-pic

Thanks for trying to think about others. It would be good if my list were longer. I'll do a follow-up post sometime to see if we missed anybody.

user-pic

So many forces at work here. Really interesting.

I mean it is so interesting to see the forces in MY PARTY move toward their aims. Obey--If I cannot trust him, I trust no one. Leahy--If I cannot trust him--the same result.

Ted Kennedy--history.

Instead of being all ascared as they say.

No, I am excited. SOMETHINGS GOTTA GIVE.

A power struggle between those I trust.

I find this fascinating.

Great post, as always CarolG. Just singing your praises in our little chatroom this week! HA

user-pic

"I mean it is so interesting to see the forces in MY PARTY move toward their aims. Obey--If I cannot trust him, I trust no one. Leahy--If I cannot trust him--the same result. . . A power struggle between those I trust."
DD, I like your way of measuring. It makes sense.
Thanks for your always kind words. I've never visited the chatroom, BTW.

user-pic

As always, such useful stuff Carol! Thanks. I always appreciate more info on the congressional powerplayers, their roles and positions on things.

user-pic

Obey, despite my trepidation about wishing for this, it would be good for Congress to return to its "coequal branch of government" status. But that existed so many decades ago. Does anybody remember when?
Thanks.

user-pic

I remember. I worked for a congressional agency in the 1980s-early 1990s. I'd say there was coequal status in the 1980s, despite Reagan's popularity. In the 1990s, especially after 1994, it just became a battleground between the Executive and Legislative Branches--purely partisan. Then, in the 2000s, we had the Imperial Presidency with a totally subservient Congress. I would like Congress to be coequal, but we need smarter people in both Chambers, especially the House, for that to be something we actually want to happen.

user-pic

Kate, I had that thought as I made my brash proposal re "coequal." Several things have made the talent pool diminish: need for fundraising makes lots of the good ones retire in disgust; the self-marginalization of the Republican party towards religiosity, regionalism, and reactionary views; and jerry-mandered congressional districts that happened after the last census. Last, and I hate to say this, because I have always liked Bill Clinton, he gave the Republicans far too many excuses for partisanship with his personal foibles.
I still think the only answer is public financing of campaigns. The money has such a corrupting influence.
Thanks for such a thoughtful comment. You nudged my ideas towards another post, I think. :-)

user-pic

Oh goody. Sometimes I feel like a dinosaur--I've lived and worked in DC for a LONG time (health and science policy). It helps to run things against someone who has a sense of history. So, please write that new blog. Although I am a lifelong Democrat, I very much miss the days when there were smart, honest Republicans in Congress, to provide a balance. I firmly believe in balance of power and it is a bit sad that the Republicans don't understand that that means responsible and informed leadership. We need to get away from the politics of personal vendetta. I worked for the Clinton Administration, and have said many times on this site that I was personally hurt by his personal lapses. It undercut all the good things we were trying to do. You just can't give your enemies that ammunition. I am hopeful that Obama realizes that. In fact, I am sure he does. So, here's to the best of all branches of government. We sure as hell deserve it! There are good people in government trying to do good things. Thanks for acknowledging that.

user-pic

Kate, thanks for your kind words of encouragement. I would like to link to your comments in my follow-up post. You will be my "co-blogger" for this one. :-)

user-pic

I'm glad you posted this Carol. It's smarter than a more pessimistic and cynical post I had been thinking about crafting--"Would you hire a politician?" For most, the answer is no, but you've listed some exemplary exceptions.

user-pic

gary - thanks. And I realize from subsequent comments that I left out some of my very favorites. I guess they were not in the recent news enough to make it into my head.

user-pic

Excellent! You continue to compile such useful documentation on so many topics!

user-pic

TheraP, you remember my tendency towards obsessiveness. I try to cover each of the major areas in which I am interested at least once a week. Otherwise I get overwhelmed with TMI (too much info). Thanks for your nice words.

user-pic

Russ Feingold would have been at the top of my list along with Senator Kennedy for all the reasons listed in his wiki profile.

user-pic

FDRdog - I cannot imagine how I forgot Senator Feingold, often the last one standing between ruination of the rule of law and the constitution. Thanks for adding his name and seconding Kennedy's.

user-pic

FDR - you are soooo right! Of course he must be added to the list.

user-pic

Feingold would be my addition as well.

user-pic

I'd be prone to add Senators Reed and Whitehouse from Little Rhody to the list. Whitehouse is going to make a historical mark for himself. You heard it here first. :-)

user-pic

amike, you're absolutely on target with those two. Reed has perhaps the best military mind, outside of Webb, and Whitehouse is my favorite of all the 100, (or 99). Thanks for the scoop. :-)

user-pic

Carol, excellent blog as always. I think I would add Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) to your list. Time listed him as one of the 10 best Senators in 2006, although that might not mean too much as they had Arlen Specter and John McCain on that list, also. :-) But he was one of the few that voted 'no' on sending troops to Iraq and he was relentless on holding hearings on Bush officials wrong-doings, like Feith's involvement with the OSP in the Pentagon.

user-pic

Barney FRANK!!

user-pic

Of course. One of the 17 socialists in Congress has to be to be on our list. :-)

user-pic

I'm glad you haven't forgotten how to cluck, Bwak. You made an outstanding addition. Frank has a way with words that reveals a very fine mind and a fair disposition. Between he and Waxman we are seeing some outstanding relatively new talent. Thanks.

user-pic

I agree, seashell.

user-pic

seashell, how could I have forgotten Carl Levin?! I agree and feel he has done an outstanding job with the Armed Services Committee, one of the toughest. Through the wit and acumen of all you commenters, we're going to a first rate list! Thanks, as always, seashell.

user-pic

Well done Carol. I'm really hoping that Sen. Kennedy makes it to see significant movement on health care this year. He deserves it. And regardless, the name of the act should bear his name alone for the years he fought so hard to keep things moving despite overwhelming odds against him.

Have to disagree on the Speaker however. I think she's mostly a liability and the news that she has likely been lying to us about her knowledge of the torture program, possibly explaining her resistence to any investigation into illegal activities of the previous investigation, is troubling to say the least. I also blame her for the near disaster in the stimulus bill that the Senate and President Obama were forced to spend extra time cleaning up.

I recognize that may not be a popular sentiment around here, but my gut tells me she'll be more of a problem for Obama than the hapless Republicans for the next few years.

And PS, me too on Barney Frank. I wish politics were less of a blood sport, but as long as it is, it's good to have a bare-knuckle brawler on your side.

user-pic

Derek, I am sad to say that your arguments against Speaker Pelosi may carry more weight as time passes. It does not look good for her right now. BTW, your sentiments are not required to be popular here, just as fairly and well stated as you have done. Thanks!

Leave a comment

Carol Gee

user-pic

Following: 22
Followers: 28

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs The Washington Note, Glenn Greenwald at Salon, emptywheel and TPM Muckraker.
  • Favorite Books The Soul's Code, political biographies, women's history

Bio

A retired clinical social worker, I live in the Southwest. I like politics and poetry, dreams and reality.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address