Troop talk

More U.S. troops will be deployed to Afghanistan, a total of 17,000 -- a Marine unit this spring and an army one this summer -- but the new regional strategy remains a work in progress. The troops will supplement the current force of 38,000, and their orders could not wait on the strategy, the President said. Members of Congress are calling for planning that will include more non-military interventions, while generally supporting the Commander in Chief. Part of the plan presupposes a successful drawdown of forces in Iraq, leaving thousands in place for support, training, etc., without jeopardizing the gains already in place there.
General David McKiernan, the U.S. commander in Afghanistan, was in Washington yesterday and gave an extended press briefing. He said it will be a "tough year" in Afghanistan, and that at this point the situation in the south is, at best, "stalemated." Officials feel that the current troop increase will handle U.S. needs through the summer election there.
President Obama is visiting Canada, his first official "foreign" trip. In addition to a number of other important issues, talk will surely turn to Canada's considerable contributions to the NATO efforts in Afghanistan, upon which the United States heavily depends. President Obama will not ask them to reconsider their troop withdrawal in 2011.
On the subject of needing more troops -- Memeorandum and the New York Times add an interesting twist to the news. It turns out that the U.S. military will begin to recruit skilled immigrants with temporary visas, offering them a chance to become U.S. citizens in as little as six months.
CQ Behind the Lines is a very fine national security newsletter, by David C. Morrison, (2/18/09) from which I quote:
Over there: An ex-Gitmo detainee who became an al Qaeda field commander after being repatriated has surrendered, Yemeni officials tell AP -- while The New York Times has four Gitmo detainees sent back to Iraq, where they are being interrogated. Pakistani immigrants in New York say Taliban enforcers single out their families for threats and violence, the Times tells.
President Obama faces a very delicate dance
with U.S. armed forces deployment. Drawing down in Iraq without
destabilizing the country's security, and ramping up in Afghanistan
while demanding a significant increase in diplomacy and development,
means that our limited military will need to be very carefully managed.
I like it that former general Jim Jones is the President's National
Security adviser. He is smart and tough, and was NATO's commander not
that long ago. If any group could do this dance on a knife edge, this
new administration has the talent.
See also Behind the Links, for further info on this subject.
(Cross-posted at South by Southwest)
My "creativity and dreaming" post today is at Making Good Mondays.
Technorati tags: news military middle east iraq afghanistan war canada obama









This is so complicated. But, at one time, the key issues during the campaign.
During a swan song interview w actually said that he never wished for these wars. Pitiful just pitiful.
I wish I had wisdom to bring something to the table on this, but I do not.
Good post.
February 19, 2009 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, DD. I think that both Bush and Cheney have seriously flawed thought processes. Add Rumsfeld and Gonzales and you have a combination that turned out to be completely pitiful.
DD, I would love for you to write something. It does not have to be wise. Just write from your atty. part. People of the law have something to bring to the table, for sure.
February 19, 2009 3:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
My minds fuzzy right now. I will think about it tomorrow. But you have to give a hint as to which area you are looking at. Is it lying to Congress to get the declaration of war(s). Is it TheraP's point about torture, or suspending all habeas corpus?
So many actual treaties were broken.
So many actual statutes were broken.
So many provisions in our Constitution were ignored.
If not I will pick one. It will be popular sources or unpopular as the case may be. I was really struck with the NYT 13 page article awhile back that I blogged about--the disclosure of the wire taps. Wow. And that brave agent in the FBI along with other whistleblowers.
February 19, 2009 4:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
DD, I am inclined to suggest that you write about the damage done to the Department of Justice, itself, including the OLC, by its attorneys who had no souls, or lost them in the name of serving the Decider, rather than the People of the USA.
I am inspired by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse's indignation at what Gonzales did to politicize the DoJ. It is an institution Whitehouse loved and revered as a US Attorney and then as a state Attorney General. And I do not think he is through with the issue yet, nor is Senator Leahy.
Anyway, just an idea. I would suggest that you write about what gets your juices going, about what inspires your passion. It will inevitably be better when informed with your own caring.
February 19, 2009 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
you got it. I am copying your note now
February 19, 2009 6:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
What?!?
Are you saying we now have a PLAN in Afghanistan?
This is unrecedented in this millenium!
w nbever wished for these wars? Yeah, the Dickster made him do it! Too much Rummy went to his head and he went a littel Gonzo.
February 19, 2009 4:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
GZ, not a full plan yet, but everybody has their homework assignments from the Prez.
And did you know that only very intelligent people make such bad puns?
Thanks.
February 19, 2009 5:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Aww shucks! Thank you! :-{)>
February 20, 2009 1:32 AM | Reply | Permalink