<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>califone&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/califone/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/califone/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/califone//1949</id>
   <updated>2008-02-19T01:19:08Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Clinton, Obama and Plagerism</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/02/clinton-obama-and-plagerism.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.179026</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-19T01:19:08Z</published>
   <updated>2008-02-19T01:19:08Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Well, it worked. Now, the &quot;plagiarism story&quot; is being repeated on CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC. Lou Dobbs had an extended talk on the discussion, and stated the story was relevant to Obama&apos;s credibility. Fox News is ripping it up...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>califone</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/califone/">
      <![CDATA[Well, it worked.  Now, the "<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/18/nasty-clintonobama-fight_n_87210.html">plagiarism story"</a> is being repeated on CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC.  Lou Dobbs had an extended talk on the discussion, and stated the story was relevant to Obama's credibility.  Fox News is ripping it up insinuating it that Obama is a fraud, and MSNBC, limited in market reach and availability, simply dismisses the story as a non-sequitur.  <br /><br />Well, like I said, Clinton's campaign made it happen, and all they had to do was rely on the media Vacuum to carry the story.  Too bad Obama didn't have the foresight to cite his sources before his rhetoric, or at least, he could have switched it up a bit.  I won't be surprised if this carries on as a major campaign story until March 4th. (Damn it.)<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Sens. Ron Wyden and Bob Bennett&apos;s Bipartisan Health Care reform.</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/02/sens-ron-wyden-and-bob-bennett.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.178783</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-15T22:37:45Z</published>
   <updated>2008-02-15T22:37:45Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Sen.Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) and Sen. Bob Bennett are creating a health care package that may rival Sen. Clinton's and Sen. Obama's health care proposals.&lt;p&gt;&nbsp; (R-Utah) From The American Prospect:&lt;blockquote&gt;Under the Wyden-Bennett system, health dollars would be controlled by the individual...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>califone</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/califone/">
      <![CDATA[Sen.Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) and Sen. Bob Bennett are creating a health care package that may rival Sen. Clinton's and Sen. Obama's health care proposals.&lt;p&gt;&nbsp; (R-Utah) From <a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=health_cares_odd_couple">The American Prospect</a>:<br />&lt;blockquote&gt;Under the Wyden-Bennett system, health dollars would be controlled by
the individual (a long-time conservative goal) and used within a
restructured, heavily regulated, totally universal, insurance
marketplace (a longtime liberal goal). Each state would create Health
Help Agencies, who would provide easy access to insurance products,
along with information, guidance, and advice on how to choose. Insurers
would have to meet a minimum standard for comprehensiveness (equivalent
to the standard Blue Cross/Blue Shield plan currently offered to
members of Congress), and they could not discriminate based on
pre-existing conditions, occupation, genetic information, gender or
age. Nor could they deny insurance to those who ask for it. In return,
every American would have to buy health insurance, and there would be
hefty subsidies for those further down the income ladder.&lt;p&gt;The plan, to be sure, lacks some liberal priorities, notably a
public insurance option. But it makes up for that by tightly
integrating the system, going much further than Clinton or Obama do to
bring the patchwork American health-care mess under one roof, where
costs would prove more containable (the Lewin Group, a highly respected
health-care consulting firm, estimates that the plan would save $1.4
trillion over 10 years) and future reforms and initiatives would be far
easier. And they have done so along with 10 other senators. It's
conceivable that, by the time the next president is elected, they will
have created a legislative working group that can actually pass health
reform—something we've never had before.&lt;p&gt;The question is whether that legislative working group will actually hang together when the eventual vote is called.&lt;/blockquote&gt; Read the whole article <a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=health_cares_odd_couple">here</a>.<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>10 Ways to Fix Health Care: Opinions from 10 Experts</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/02/10-ways-to-fix-health-care-opi.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.177495</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-07T18:25:02Z</published>
   <updated>2008-02-07T18:25:02Z</updated>
   
   <summary>A compiled list from health care experts explaining how they would fix the US health care system:Mend the medical schoolsSingle-payer insuranceIndividual, not company, plansDivert the dollar to the docPay for the care of populations, not eventsCut costs for med students...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>califone</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/califone/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ondd.org/10-ways-to-fix-health-care-opinions-from-10-experts/">A compiled list from health care experts</a> explaining how they would fix the US health care system:<br /><blockquote><ol><b><strong></strong></b><li><b><strong>Mend the medical schools<br /></strong></b><b><strong></strong></b></li><li><strong>Single-payer insurance<br /></strong><b><strong></strong></b></li><li><strong>Individual, not company, plans<br /></strong><b><strong></strong></b></li><li><strong>Divert the dollar to the doc<br /></strong><b><strong></strong></b></li><li><strong>Pay for the care of populations, not events<br /></strong><b><strong></strong></b></li><li><strong>Cut costs for med students<br /></strong><b><strong></strong></b></li><li><strong> Eliminate insurance altogether<br /></strong><b><strong></strong></b></li><li><strong>More health centers<br /></strong><b><strong></strong></b></li><li><strong>Stimulating positive-sum competition<br /></strong><b><strong></strong></b></li><li><strong> Keep it low-tech</strong><br /></li></ol></blockquote>For further explanation behind the recommendations go <a href="http://www.ondd.org/10-ways-to-fix-health-care-opinions-from-10-experts/">here</a>.<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Hillary Clinton&apos;s Shady Campaign Contributions</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/02/hillary-clintons-shady-campaig.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.176836</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-04T12:01:52Z</published>
   <updated>2008-02-04T12:01:52Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[The New Republic has decided to review all of the questionable contributions to Hillary Clinton's campaign over the years.&nbsp;...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>califone</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/califone/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=076fd56f-4aca-4683-a9d1-3c55d748946e">The New Republic</a> has decided to <a href="http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=076fd56f-4aca-4683-a9d1-3c55d748946e">review </a>all of the questionable contributions to Hillary Clinton's campaign over the years.&nbsp; <br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
