« Obama Will Set VP's Role, Biden is not Cheney | brbuchwal's Blog | Powerful Pro-Israel Sentiments »

Obama: Don't Let the Mandate Stale


Have you ever noticed how bread does not last long enough? You'll buy a loaf, use four slices immediately, and then let it sit on the shelf for two weeks. By the time you try to use the remaining slices, its stale, or even worse, moldy. Well this loaf is a lot like Barack Obama's political capital if it is not used quickly and correctly. In his first 100 days, President Obama could make delicious tuna and PB&J sandwiches. But recently it looks like he'll let the bread mold grasping for bi-partisanship.

It's clear that Obama's economic stimulus plan doesn't cut the mustard. By trying to get 80 votes in the Senate, he risks losing too much trying to appease Republicans. Obama doesn't have to do this. The stimulus plan will pass easily with the 59 Democrats and a handful of moderate Republican Senators who support it.

But Obama is making good on the promise to be the President for everyone, not just liberals. While this is a laudable goal, Obama risks wasting his mandate even before his first term begins. When you have political capital, use it to make big advances on important issues, not to grab 15 unnecessary votes that will only weaken a desperately needed economic stimulus plan.

Obama's popularity complex worries John Judas, too. He is concerned that "the president elect is underestimating the problem he and the country faces." Judis calls for a much more extensive stimulus plan that includes funds to increase high speed public transportation. The closest equivalent we have to Europe's impressive example is Amtrak's Acela line, which is limited largely to the northeast corner of the country and is very expensive. But the extension of high speed transit would require a massive investment, which Congress has not even come close to supporting. 

Judas continues:

Investing in high-speed rails would be very expensive, but unlike tax cuts--the benefits of which can be siphoned off in the purchase of imported goods--the money spent would go directly to reviving American industry and improving the country's trade balance. That doesn't just mean jobs creating dedicated tracks or new rail stations: Though the U.S. abandoned train manufacturing decades ago to the French, Germans, Canadians, and Japanese, this kind of production could be undertaken by our ailing auto companies or aircraft companies--if the federal and state governments were to place orders. And building trains that would run on electricity would be a paradigmatic example of the "green jobs" that Obama often touts.

In short, its worth the investment. Krugman agrees. $800 Billion is a lot of money, but if it funds an incomplete and insufficient plan, then it is wasted. I'd rather see a more expensive stimulus plan that serves as the final word and gets us back on track. We can kill two birds with one giant, expensive stone. Build a much-need U.S. high-speed transit system and stimulate the economy. This is possible without pandering to Senate Republicans.

Congressional Democrats are rightly frustrated by Obama's concessions, and they are not afraid to show it. The stimulus issue was the final and most important disappointment in a week of Democratic division which included the Blago/Burris Illinios scandal, the Panetta/Fienstein miscommunication, and the choice of TV star Sanjay Gupta as Surgeon General. 

Obama is the President of all Americans, red, blue, and purple. But he won a huge mandate in November's election, supported by large majorities in the House and Senate. Obama needs to use that advantage to pass a working stimulus plan, even if it squeaks by with 61 votes.

Otherwise, he's wasting perfectly good bread. 


Read more: threestepsforward.wordpress.com


3 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I'm with you, but Obama might feel uneasy following this advice after running as a uniter.

Other senators might push him to accomodate Republicans, too. For example, Dick Durbin said recently: "Democrats understand that the Republicans have to be involved in anything they do" and
"Mitch McConnell and Harry Reid both know that we can't pass the economic recovery plan that this nation desperately needs without bipartisan cooperation": http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-01-04-hoyer-stimulus_N.htm

user-pic

If you try to please everyone you will quickly end up pleasing no one. We have monumental problems left by a criminal regime. If Obama fixes the problems (we are not talking about partisanship here. that seems to me to be his major focus), he and the Dems will have a strong future; if he caters to Repugs and fails (and he is halfway there already) he will be screwed (as will we) no matter how bipartisan he tries to be. And his successor will be even a harder right than the one we just dispatched. Maybe he can begin to focus on the problems we face not his WSJ ratings?

user-pic

Loaf of bread metaphor is really apropos.

But Pelosi is really moving. Passed a couple civil rights amendments yesterday, lickety split.
Stood up there at the podium and ran the whole vote.
Fun to watch. She was saying, here I am, in control ready to go.

Senate is scary. We need Colorado, Delaware and NY.
Minnesota would be nice. But 'catering' only needs to be accomplished with three or five reps. And there is posturing going on here from both sides.
They all wish to 'look' good.

We shall see.

Good post. as always.

Leave a comment

Ben Buchwalter

user-pic

Following:
Followers: 8

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address