This Medium Is The Message
Does it strike anyone else how strange it is that at the end of every day this site and every other progressive site is grousing about the same thing.
"Can you believe that with all we have to deal with that the media is obsessed with Obama's race and birthers". The subtext is "We don't buy that crap but some stupid people might."
Obama would not be President if most people bought that crap. In fact most people haven't been buying that crap since they tried to railroad Clinton. In between elections it is too easy to forget that and that is what that media is counting on.
That hierarchical media is the message. That media will always protect "the villagers" of Washington and the Masters of Wall Street from outsiders and any threat to the status quo. That media is dying. It is a feeble old lion, striking out and lying with every last breath to deny its inevitable demise. Journalism will survive on the web but it is our job to make sure it doesn't survive in its present corrupt form.
This interactive media is the message. This media is the people. The people are the message.
When will this media stop obsessing with that media and focus on putting pressure directly on our representatives?
When will this media, TPM, Huffpo, Salon etc, produce its own evening interactive summation of the days news instead of letting that media set the narratives and the priorities for us.
















Well it gets eclectic around here. There are ebbs and flows. I think I hit it once but I blog everyday.
And those posts about this subject are getting at the tactics of the repubs.
Every single day we have posts on health care, calling for emails, faxes and monies to help people get to a certain rally.
Torture, Cheney, war crimes...
One of my friends here hit Honduras real hard, several blogs and threw up his hands because of a lack of interest. Then when he threatened to quit he got more than 50 comments cheering him on.
A lot of different subjects up today.
I don't know, I always stay pretty interested.
July 24, 2009 1:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree, this is one of the best places on the web to get involved directly.
But the home page here and on other sites almost always takes its cues from the MSM.
I just think it is time for someone to step forward and put some resources into producing an interactive evening summation and discussion of the news that competes directly with MSNBC, CNN, Fox and network news. And yes, entertainment in the form of Daily Show type snark. It doesn't have to be video-centric, it does need to be interactive.
The web is still letting the MSM set the agenda. It is time for this media to become the message.
July 24, 2009 9:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agree absolutely.
July 24, 2009 9:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think the TPM post about the New Jersey mayors and rabbis was much more detailed than anything I heard on network news or saw anywhere else. Unfortunately, it got pushed off the page.
July 24, 2009 8:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Right. A good beginning would be to build in a preference for web based reporting over re-reporting of what the MSM has done. That doesn't mean we stop calling out MSM lies and distortions.
Obviously this is an 8 to 5 shop in terms of having paid reporters on the job. I did notice that one of the new positions that Josh advertised was an after hours and weekend editor. That is a start.
But when that reporting ends at 5pm then those who come home from work turn to the cable nets. They end up setting the priorities and writing the narratives for the next day and you can see it on every progressive home page the nest morning.
We need to start setting our own agenda.
July 24, 2009 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
May I add a plug for citing sources? And banning Wikipedia as someone's sole source?
July 24, 2009 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
I support that one thousand percent banning Wiki as sole source. Any source that can be changed at will is the definition of "revisionist."
I like the idea of presenting an alternative to all the media news being presented for consumption. I regularly watch RT, Russia Today, and appreciate the contrast between how the news is presented there looking at America from outside and I watch TV5 to get a feeling of European ideas.
I rarely watch American news, including MSNBC, because what's going to be covered is predictable based on what's occurred during the day.
November 11, 2009 9:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
I support that one thousand percent banning Wiki as sole source. Any source that can be changed at will is the definition of "revisionist."
I like the idea of presenting an alternative to all the media news being presented for consumption. I regularly watch RT, Russia Today, and appreciate the contrast between how the news is presented there looking at America from outside and I watch TV5 to get a feeling of European ideas.
I rarely watch American news, including MSNBC, because what's going to be covered is predictable based on what's occurred during the day.
November 11, 2009 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink