Ok, that was just to get your attention. Blago is not innocent. But in the case of the Senate seat sale, he may not be all that guilty after all.

I posted this this guy's blog entry  (http://daily44.wordpress.com/2008/12/14/blagoobama-why-this-matters-and-doesnt/) a few days ago and got a lot of flack for it. Now I think the New York Times is wondering whether Fitzgerald's case is really all that air-tight! Was Blago just exercising his First Amendemen rights? What was he doing that other politicians don't do on a regular basis without getting in trouble for it?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/16/us/politics/16legal.html?_r=1

Before you proclaim Rod Blagojevich guilty, read this...

http://daily44.wordpress.com