<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Awesom0&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/awesom0/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/awesom0/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/awesom0//3484</id>
   <updated>2008-09-24T23:44:59Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>A Quick Thought on Today&apos;s Event</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/a-quick-thought-on-todays-even.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.219472</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-24T23:44:59Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-24T23:44:59Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I have only one and I want you all to say it aloud with me:PRESIDENT ELECT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA!...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Awesom0</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/awesom0/">
      <![CDATA[<br />I have only one and I want you all to say it aloud with me:<br /><br />PRESIDENT ELECT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA!<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Proposed TARP Bill Will Give Paulson Fiscal Power of a Major Sovereign Nation</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/proposed-tarp-bill-will-give-p.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.219200</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-24T04:04:27Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-24T04:04:27Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[ &nbsp;Commenter ThatLeftTurnInABQ at Obsidian Wings has a post which should shake everyone to their very core: &lt;i&gt;I just did a little bit of googling, and it turns out that with $700 billion to work with and unlimited Section 8...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Awesom0</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/awesom0/">
      <![CDATA[







<p>&nbsp;Commenter ThatLeftTurnInABQ
at Obsidian Wings has a post which should shake everyone to their very core:<br /></p>



<p>&lt;i&gt;<i>I just did a little bit of googling,
and it turns out that with $700 billion to work with and unlimited Section 8
authority </i>&lt;b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;[this is
the part of the bill making this program free of oversight and not accountable,
or reviewable by any other government agency]&lt;i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; to<i> use it, Hank Paulson would effectively be the fiscal equivalent of the
7th largest sovereign nation on Earth, all by himself:</i></p>

<p><i><a href="http://www.photius.com/rankings/economy/budget_expenditures_2008_0.html">Budget expenditures 2008 Country Ranks</a></i></p>

<p><em>1 United States $2,731,000,000,000 </em><i></i></p>

<p><em>2
Japan $1,575,000,000,000</em><i></i></p>

<p><em>3
</em><em>Germany</em><em> $1,477,000,000,000</em><i></i></p>

<p><em>4
</em><em>France</em><em> $1,372,000,000,000</em><i></i></p>

<p><em>5
United Kingdom $1,237,000,000,000</em><i></i></p>

<p><em>6
</em><em>Italy</em><em> $1,029,000,000,000</em><i></i></p>

<p><em>7 </em><em>China</em><em> $634,600,000,000</em><i></i></p>

<p><i><br />
In the larger context of this chapter of our fiscal soap opera, one of the
problems with this bailout is that it probably isn't big enough…&lt;/i&gt;</i></p><p>http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/obsidian_wings/2008/09/bailout-1.html#comments<br /><i></i></p>

<p>Putting this much
unaccountable power in the hands of one man is nothing short of insanity –
particularly if it’s passed in a state of unthinking panic.&nbsp; We very well may need to swallow the
incredibly bitter bailout pill, but Jesus, Mary and Joseph, this is not the way
to do it!&nbsp; Passed under these
circumstances, the cure could very well be worse than the disease.&nbsp; </p>

<p>Until just a few months ago I was not a very
radical guy, but even I’m starting to think these types actions are the reason
people fight revolutions.&nbsp; </p>

]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Help Me Stop the Wachovia Goons from Intimidating Obama Supporters in Norther Virginia</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/help-me-stop-the-wachovia-goon.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.218758</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-22T17:16:23Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-22T17:16:23Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Perhaps someone with more legal knowledge than I can help answer this question.I was just out on my lunch break (in Arlington, VA) when I noticed a couple of Obama/DNC people out on the sidewalk attempting to register new voters.The...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Awesom0</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/awesom0/">
      <![CDATA[<br />Perhaps someone with more legal knowledge than I can help answer this question.<br /><br />I was just out on my lunch break (in Arlington, VA) when I noticed a couple of Obama/DNC people out on the sidewalk attempting to register new voters.<br /><br />The sidewalk in question also happens to be next to a branch of Wachovia Securities. No sooner did the Obama supporters show up, then Wachovia sent out their security goons to tell them they weren't allowed out on the sidewalk and that they'd be arrested if they didn't leave. <br /><br />Given that they were physically standing on the sidewalk (next to a Metro bus stop and a good 30 feet away from Wachovia); doesn't that mean they're on public property and cannot be told to leave?&nbsp; <br /><br />I'm not a lawyer, so I'd appreciate it if someone with a knowledge of the law can tell me if this is illegal (and possibly cite the statutues so I can go back out there and tell Wachovia to go to hell)?<br /><br />They now have their goons...I mean guards stationed out there to make sure they don't return.&nbsp; <br /><br />I've called the Obama office in Arlington to bring this to their attention, but I want to personally make sure this kind of intimidation stops.&nbsp; Knowing the law would sure help me out.<br /><br />If someone out there does know this, please contact me at ingvy.mcwawa@gmail.com, or leave a reply in the comments below.<br /><br />Thanks!<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Sen. Richard Shelby on the Fiscal Raping of the Next Generation</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/sen-richard-shelby-on-the-fisc-1.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.218182</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-19T17:42:21Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-19T17:42:21Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Excuse the profanity-laced, semi-incoherent diatribe; I&apos;m just too pissed off right now to make much sense... When asked about the Fed’s proposed trillion dollar bail - and who needs to pay for it - he replied: It’s probably $500 [billion]...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Awesom0</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/awesom0/">
      Excuse the profanity-laced, semi-incoherent diatribe; I&apos;m just too pissed off right now to make much sense...

When asked about the Fed’s proposed trillion dollar bail - and who needs to pay for it - he replied:
It’s probably $500 [billion] to a trillion dollars, and that’s going to visit the taxpayers sooner or later,” he said. “It’s either going to be a debt charged to all of us or to all our children.

http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/19/putting-a-price-on-a-government-bailout/

NO ASSHOLE, “either” is NOT an option here. This gets paid for NOW. End the farm subsidies, reform the Pentagon (we’re spending more now - not including the Iraq and Afghanistan supplemental spending bills - in inflation adjusted dollars than we did at the height of the Cold War) to save hundreds of billions, raise taxes (on everyone); do whatever it takes to not add more debt. In the past 8 years this nation has added over $30 trillion in unfunded liabilities to our budget. $30 GOD DAMNED TRILLION.

We’ve already fucked the next generation to sustain a greedy, consumer-driven lifestyle (everyone is at fault here. America fucked itself); we’re not going to get them involved in a three-way so you can kick the can down the road another 10 years.

As it currently stands, the next generation is going to be the first in American history to be worse off (and possibly in a significant way) than their parents.

As we keep amassing debt, there WILL come a day when the world loses confidence in our currency and our solvency. When that day comes (and it will) and the world moves away from the dollar; our house of cards will come crashing down. Our currency will nosedive big-time. Hyper-inflation will reign supreme. We’ll turn ourselves in Argentina - or worse.

The middle class will be WIPED OUT and America will slip into irrelevance.

We’ve got to get our shit in order ASAP. It starts now. This clusterfuck we’ve created gets paid for TODAY. If Americans are too god damned-greedy and shortsighted to refuse to own-up for our largess, then we deserve what’s coming. Of course, those most responsible won’t pay; their children and grandchildren will.

Damn it, I’m pissed.
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Sen. Richard Shelby on the Fiscal Raping of the Next Generation</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/sen-richard-shelby-on-the-fisc.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.218180</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-19T17:39:44Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-19T17:39:44Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Excuse the profanity-laced, semi-incoherent diatribe; I&apos;m just too pissed off right now to make much sense...When asked about the Fed’s proposed trillion dollar bail - and who needs to pay for it - he replied: It’s probably $500 [billion]...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Awesom0</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/awesom0/">
      <![CDATA[

Excuse the profanity-laced, semi-incoherent diatribe; I'm just too pissed off right now to make much sense...<br /><br />When asked about the Fed’s proposed trillion dollar bail - and who needs to pay for it - he replied:
It’s probably $500 [billion] to a trillion dollars, and that’s going to visit the taxpayers sooner or later,” he said. “It’s either going to be a debt charged to all of us or to all our children.

http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/19/putting-a-price-on-a-government-bailout/

NO ASSHOLE, “either” is NOT an option here.  This gets paid for NOW.  End the farm subsidies, reform the Pentagon (we’re spending more now - not including the Iraq and Afghanistan supplemental spending bills - in inflation adjusted dollars than we did at the height of the Cold War) to save hundreds of billions, raise taxes (on everyone); do whatever it takes to not add more debt.  In the past 8 years this nation has added over $30 trillion in unfunded liabilities to our budget.  $30 GOD DAMNED TRILLION.

We’ve already fucked the next generation to sustain a greedy, consumer-driven lifestyle (everyone is at fault here.  America fucked itself); we’re not going to get them involved in a three-way so you can kick the can down the road another 10 years. 

As it currently stands, the next generation is going to be the first in American history to be worse off (and possibly in a significant way) than their parents. 

As we keep amassing debt, there WILL come a day when the world loses confidence in our currency and our solvency.  When that day comes (and it will) and the world moves away from the dollar; our house of cards will come crashing down.  Our currency will nosedive big-time.  Hyper-inflation will reign supreme.  We’ll turn ourselves in Argentina - or worse. 

The middle class will be WIPED OUT and America will slip into irrelevance. 

We’ve got to get our shit in order ASAP.  It starts now.  This clusterfuck we’ve created gets paid for TODAY.  If Americans are too god damned-greedy and shortsighted to refuse to own-up for our largess, then we deserve what’s coming.  Of course, those most responsible won’t pay; their children and grandchildren will.

Damn it, I’m pissed.
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Side Effects of the Bailout</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/side-effects-of-the-bailout.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.218060</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-19T12:34:35Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-19T12:34:35Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[What's that noise?&nbsp; Oh yeah, it's the sound of universal health care being flushed down the toilet.&nbsp; What's that ugly surprise on your W-4?&nbsp; Oh yeah, it's your taxes going way up to pay for this bailout. America; your consumer...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Awesom0</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/awesom0/">
      <![CDATA[<br />What's that noise?&nbsp; Oh yeah, it's the sound of universal health care being flushed down the toilet.&nbsp; <br /><br />What's that ugly surprise on your W-4?&nbsp; Oh yeah, it's your taxes going way up to pay for this bailout. <br /><br />America; your consumer driven egos (from the average home owner who needed to keep up with Jones, to the investment banker not satisfied with a mere $1 bonus) created this mess.&nbsp; You lived beyond your means for way too long and now the price tag is coming due.&nbsp; <br /><br />Get mad, get really mad, but remember you're largely to blame too.&nbsp; <br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Why They Should Fear Biden&apos;s Speech</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/why-they-should-fear-bidens-sp.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.214346</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-07T06:25:09Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-07T06:25:09Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[ I’ve been trying to put my finger on exactly what it is that gets me so worked up over Biden’s recent speech and I think I’ve finally got it.&nbsp; &nbsp; He sounds like one of the generals of old...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Awesom0</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/awesom0/">
      <![CDATA[



<p>I’ve been
trying to put my finger on exactly what it is that gets me so worked up over
Biden’s recent speech and I think I’ve finally got it.&nbsp; </p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>He sounds
like one of the generals of old riding out in front of his troops in the field
and inspiring his men to march into battle with him.&nbsp; He’s reminding us that we have the better
plan, we have the stronger army and the enemy lashes out so fiercely because it
is weak; it fears us.&nbsp; </p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>Palin is a
ruse designed to lead us into terrain favorable to them where an ambush awaits.
&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>If we stick
to our plans, stick to our strengths, we will be victorious.&nbsp; </p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>Biden
reminds me of all this and makes me feel more confident than ever that we can
win this fucking thing and win it big.&nbsp;
Thanks for helping show us the way.&nbsp;
</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>Now take
this on the road to rally the rest of the troops!&nbsp; </p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>The man
really seems to have found his stride, which means Obama’s got one hell of a
field general out there for him. </p>

]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Biden Proves His Mettle!!!</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/biden-proves-his-mettle-1.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.214120</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-06T00:20:40Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-06T00:20:40Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[I'm not all too worried about the hoopla surrounding Palin; she's a poor man's Icarus and her wings will melt soon enough.&nbsp; Still though, it still really gets under my skin; that is at least until I watch clips like...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Awesom0</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/awesom0/">
      <![CDATA[I'm not all too worried about the hoopla surrounding Palin; she's a poor man's Icarus and her wings will melt soon enough.&nbsp; Still though, it still really gets under my skin; that is at least until I watch clips like this.&nbsp; Now I remember why I love Joe Biden so much.&nbsp; He's gonna eat her for breakfast!!!<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=955Y3NJTRIE<br /><br />It's nice ending Friday on a good note!<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Biden Proves His Mettle!!!</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/biden-proves-his-mettle.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.214115</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-06T00:09:38Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-06T00:09:38Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[I'm not all too worried about the hoopla surrounding Palin; she's a poor man's Icarus and her wings will melt soon enough.&nbsp; Still though, it still really gets under my skin; that is at least until I watch clips like...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Awesom0</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/awesom0/">
      <![CDATA[I'm not all too worried about the hoopla surrounding Palin; she's a poor man's Icarus and her wings will melt soon enough.&nbsp; Still though, it still really gets under my skin; that is at least until I watch clips like this.&nbsp; Now I remember why I love Joe Biden so much.&nbsp; He's gonna eat her for breakfast!!!<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=955Y3NJTRIE<br /><br />It's nice ending Friday on a good note!<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>John McCain: He&apos;ll give you a swirly at lunch if you don&apos;t vote for him</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/08/john-mccain-hell-give-you-a-sw.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.208999</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-18T22:21:25Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-18T22:21:25Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[I don't have time to comment on this, but I hope somebody reads this and does.&nbsp; Seriously; is McCain running for President of the United States, or Senior Class President?&nbsp; This is one of the most pathetic things I've read...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Awesom0</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/awesom0/">
      <![CDATA[I don't have time to comment on this, but I hope somebody reads this and does.&nbsp; <br /><br />Seriously; is McCain running for President of the United States, or Senior Class President?&nbsp; This is one of the most pathetic things I've read in a while and it comes directly from his web site: http://www.johnmccain.com/McCainReport/Read.aspx?guid=181471d0-5456-4434-9f78-2f30ffc39459<br /><br />&lt;blockquote&gt;<br />
                                            In the <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/17/122230/161/239/569299">least credible and most vicious</a>
corner of the internet, liberal bloggers at the Daily Kos are accusing
John McCain of plagiarizing from Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. The story
Solzhenitsyn told was of a prisoner who drew a cross in the dirt in a
Soviet Gulag. McCain's story is of a guard who drew a cross in the dirt
in a Vietnamese prisoner of war camp.<p>
The only similarity between the two stories is a cross in the dirt, but
it is hardly an unlikely coincidence that there were practicing
Christians in both Russia and Vietnam, or that in the prisons of those
two Communist countries the only crosses to be found were etched in the
dirt, as easily disappeared as the Christians who drew them.</p><p>
But those desperate to discredit Senator McCain's record will have to
impugn his fellow prisoners as well. Orson Swindle, who was held as a
prisoner of war along with McCain, tells the McCain Report that he
heard this particular story from McCain "when we first moved in
together." That was in the summer of 1971, Swindle said, though "time
blurred" and he couldn't be sure. He said it was some time around then
that the Vietnamese moved all "36 troublemakers" into the same
quarters, where they "talked about everything under the sun."</p>
&lt;i&gt;It may be typical of the pro-Obama Dungeons &amp; Dragons crowd to
disparage a fellow countryman's memory of war from the comfort of mom's
basement, but most Americans have the humility and gratitude to respect
and learn from the memories of men who suffered on behalf of others.
John McCain has often said he witnessed a thousand acts of bravery
while he was imprisoned, and though not every one has been submitted
into the public record, they are remembered by the men who were there
(one such only <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120951606847454685.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries">recently reported</a>
by Karl Rove though it escaped mention in any of Senator McCain's
books). But as Swindle said, this is a "desperate group of people
trying to make something out of nothing." &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;<br />
											
											]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Things to Consider Before Voting for McCain This Fall</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/06/things-to-consider-before-voti.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.199246</id>
   
   <published>2008-06-08T02:55:42Z</published>
   <updated>2008-06-08T02:55:42Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Let me start off by saying that I’m not here to excoriate die hard Clinton supporters. It was a tough and brutal campaign, chalked full of enormous symbolism for so many Clinton and Obama supporters and I understand why...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Awesom0</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/awesom0/">
      <![CDATA[

<p>Let me start off by saying that I’m not here to excoriate
die hard Clinton supporters. It was
a tough and brutal campaign, chalked full of enormous symbolism for so many Clinton
and Obama supporters and I understand why some people feel as passionately as
they do.&nbsp; </p>



<p>That said, I was really troubled by a quote I read in
Slate.com today where a few (and I stress the word ‘few’) Hillary supporters
attending her concession rally today.&nbsp;
When asked about Obama and their professed support of John McCain:</p>



<p>&lt;blockquote&gt;“He’s [Obama] a do-nothing.” But would she
really prefer a McCain administration? “It bothers me a lot, but at least we
can unelect him in four years.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;</p>



<p>For those Clinton
supporters who share this sentiment; I beg of you to think through the
consequences of a McCain presidency. &nbsp;</p>



<p>First, don’t be confident you can easily ‘un-elect’ McCain
in 2012.&nbsp; Defeating an incumbent
president is extremely difficult.&nbsp; In
2004, a large portion of the country clearly understood Bush was a moron; yet
he got reelected.&nbsp; Whether we Democrats
like to admit it or not; Bill Clinton would have never been elected in 1992
without a major assist from Ross Perot.&nbsp; When
he won, he did it with only 43% of the popular vote.&nbsp; If ever there were a president in a weak
position coming into office, it was Clinton.&nbsp; Once in office, he lost control of Congress,
saw his major initiative (healthcare) fail spectacularly and was beset by
scandal.&nbsp; Despite all this; he was
overwhelmingly reelected in 1996.</p>



<p>But let’s set this all aside and assume McCain is defeated
in 2012; the four years between now and then could see him cause considerable
damage to the values we hold dear.&nbsp; Here
are just a few examples:</p>



<p>1) IRAQ,
IRAN &amp; GAS PRICES</p>



<p>Let’s be realistic; withdrawal from Iraq is going to be
difficult regardless of who is our next president, but McCain has repeatedly
stated that he is committed to STAY in Iraq come hell or high water.&nbsp; He may be unelected in 4 years, but how many
more of our soldiers will have to die during this time?&nbsp; How many families will be shattered?&nbsp; How many children will grow up without a
mother or father?&nbsp; How many more innocent
Iraqis will meet the same fate?&nbsp; How many
of our young people will return with horrible physical and mental scars which
will never heal?&nbsp; </p>



<p>Worse yet; McCain has given every indication he has no
qualms starting another war with Iran.&nbsp; Do I even need to explain why this isn’t a
good idea?&nbsp; Even if it were limited to
air strikes and somehow avoided any type of ground war; has it occurred to
anybody how this would like result in a full-blown Shia uprising next door in Iraq?&nbsp; The place would explode and we’d be force to
either flee with our tails between our legs, or reinstitute a draft and send
500,000 troops over there to brutally crush any type of uprising. &nbsp;I think it’s safe to say that this option is –
rightfully – unthinkable.&nbsp; </p>



<p>We can’t ‘unelect’ this.</p>



<p>Wanna know part of the reason oil prices are so high?&nbsp; Oil is traded based on ‘futures’, i.e.
contracts to purchase and sell oil based on what analysts think oil will be
going for at a set time in the future.&nbsp;
When the Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, recently stated he felt an
attack on Iran
was unavoidable in the near future; energy analysts speculated that this would
result in a massive disruption of future oil supplies in the near future, so
the price of oil continues to rise.&nbsp; If Iran’s
oil goes offline for whatever reason; HELLO $300 a barrel oil!&nbsp; Hello $11 gas!&nbsp; Hello working families who cannot afford to
drive their cars to get to work!&nbsp; Hello
families in the Northeastern United States who cannot
afford to heat their homes because heating oil has become prohibitively
expensive!&nbsp; Hello higher food prices (which
hit struggling families the hardest) because distributors pass increased
transportation costs onto consumers!&nbsp; </p>



<p>You can’t ‘unelect’ this.</p>



<p>2) HEALTH CARE</p>



<p>&nbsp;McCain has no plan to provide universal healthcare to
Americans.&nbsp; Can we really wait another 4
years (when the political climate may not be nearly as favorable as it is now)
to do this?&nbsp; How many families between
now and 2012 will lose everything because they are uninsured but find
themselves dealing with a major illness/injury?&nbsp;
How many single mothers will continue to work dead-end jobs and be
unable to improve their family’s lot because they cannot risk losing
insurance?&nbsp; How many of these same single
mothers will be forced to choose between paying the rent and taking a sick
child to the doctor’s office?&nbsp; </p>



<p>You can’t ‘unelect’ this.</p>



<p>3) THE SUPREME COURT</p>









<p>The Court is already 5-4 in favor of conservative
justices.&nbsp; Add another 2 or 3 and you can
kiss positive rulings for progressive causes (including a woman’s right to
choose) away for the next 30 years.&nbsp; Our
gay and lesbian friends may want to consider this when they ponder the future
of any rulings vis-à-vis gay marriage.&nbsp;<br /><br />You can’t ‘unelect’ this either.&nbsp; </p>



<p>I could continue this list all night and still barely
scratch the surface (one of which is legislation supporting equal pay for
women, which McCain has regularly come out against), but I think you see where
I’m coming from.</p>



<p>You don’t have to like Obama – or many of his supporters for
that matter – but I hope you will consider the true impacts of a McCain
presidency.&nbsp; I hope you will consider its
affects on ordinary Americans and you will not support him – even if this means
holding your nose and voting for Obama.&nbsp;
You may loathe him now, but he will fight to make sure we never have answer
all the rhetorical questions listed above.&nbsp;
&nbsp;</p>



<p>Had just a few things during this primary turned out
differently and Obama were the one giving the concession speech today; you
would have found me pulling that lever for Hillary this November.&nbsp; The stakes are just too high to give the
Republicans another 4 years in the White House.&nbsp;
</p>

]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>My Backhanded Compliment to Bill</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/06/my-backhanded-compliment-to-bi.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.199008</id>
   
   <published>2008-06-06T02:00:33Z</published>
   <updated>2008-06-06T02:00:33Z</updated>
   
   <summary> I was about to get all up in arms and scream “nooooooooooo” at the prospect of Bill Clinton campaigning for him. Bill is a huge liability and I personally think he acted like a complete and utter douche during...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Awesom0</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/awesom0/">
      <![CDATA[

<p>I was about to get all up in arms and scream “nooooooooooo”
at the prospect of Bill Clinton campaigning for him. </p>



<p>Bill is a huge liability and I personally think he acted
like a complete and utter douche during this campaign, but there is one thing
you cannot deny: He is still hugely popular among many of the people who
supported Hillary.&nbsp; I'll also bet Bill
does do some campaigning for Obama. It allows him to remain relevant and
indulges his penchant to be an attention whore.&nbsp;
Allowing him to do so, will make sure the Clintons
remain friendly.</p>



<p>We may not like it, but having the Clintons
for allies makes Obama’s path to the Whitehouse much easier.&nbsp; Just sayin…</p>What do you all think?<br /><p></p><br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Montana &amp; S. Dakota to Throw a Wrench in the Electoral Gears Tonight?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/06/montana-s-dakota-to-throw-a-wr.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.198399</id>
   
   <published>2008-06-03T18:07:21Z</published>
   <updated>2008-06-03T18:07:21Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[ I fear we (read: The Democratic Party) could face a nightmare scenario tonight. &nbsp;It appears that there are few reliable polls from both Montana and South Dakota, and the polling conducted so far is all over the place. &nbsp;Some...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Awesom0</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/awesom0/">
      <![CDATA[

<p>I fear we (read: The Democratic Party) could face a
nightmare scenario tonight. &nbsp;It appears
that there are few reliable polls from both Montana
and South Dakota,
and the polling conducted so far is all over the place. &nbsp;Some have Obama up handily in both states,
while the recent ARG has Clinton blowing him out
in S. Dakota and barely ahead in Montana.
&nbsp;With so few polls available, it’s hard
to tell if it’s an outlier or not.</p>

<p><br />
Should Clinton blow out Obama in S. Dakota (the
demographics of the state heavily favor her) and wins in Montana, my gut tells
me that this thing is going all the way to the convention and we’re in a for an
all out party civil war between now and August. &nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>This is my theory as to why Hillary is backing off her
campaign’s earlier statements that she will concede tonight. &nbsp;If she pulls off wins in both states, then she’ll
make the case (whether or not it really has merit is a different story) that
she’s on a roll, the country has buyer’s remorse and is therefore more
electable. &nbsp;If she does lose both states,
she can 'suspend' her campaign and she won't technically have conceded.&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>I hope I’m incredibly wrong about all this…</p>

]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
