<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>DettePol&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/audettef/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/audettef/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/audettef//7632</id>
   <updated>	2008-11-08T14:47:53Z	</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/astral66//2668.243469-comment:3280768</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/astral66/2008/11/185-diebold-touch-screen-votin.php#c3280768" />
		
		    <title>DettePol Commented on 185 Diebold Touch-Screen Voting Machines Impounded by Judge in PA County by astral66</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-08T14:47:53Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-08T14:47:53Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>It's important to remember that all the folks who have been carefully monitoring the situation with electronic voting machines have pointed out repeatedly that "paper trails" are no more trustworthy than the original electronic vote! You have to read the exhaustive reports to understand why exactly...</p>

<p>But I agree with ramboorider...really hard to steal when it's close, but they certainly tried -- chipping away at at least small numbers of Dems in each polling station...</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    



</feed>

