« "Cheney, Nuremberg and Aggressive War: The Day the Smirking Stopped" | astral66's Blog | Obama and Congress Are Right to Block Release of Photos That Major General Taguba Now Confirms Show Rape and Sexual Abuse »

Xe/Blackwater Denies Issuing Weapons to Contractors that Killed Civilians in Afghanistan


How is it with all of the incidents involving employees of Xe/Blackwater shooting civilians, that this company still receives its millions of dollars and is allowed to continue causing more harm than good? Last I heard, Iraq expelled the company from its borders (anyone know if that's correct?), so why are we still allowing these thugs to represent US interests at all?

Here's the latest from the Independent:

Four US contractors for the company formerly known as Blackwater were not authorised to carry weapons when they were involved in a deadly shooting in Afghanistan this month, the US military said today.

The men - accused of opening fire on a vehicle in the capital (Kabul) on 5 May - have charged that their employer, now called Xe, issued them guns in breach of the company's contract with the military. One Afghan was killed in the shooting, and two others wounded.

Xe has said its employees are not generally banned from carrying weapons in Afghanistan, though the authorization depends on the duties of the contractors. Anne Tyrrell, a spokeswoman for Moycock, N.C.-based Xe, declined to comment on the terms of this specific contract or say if the company issued guns to the men.

But the military told The Associated Press that the contract did not allow the men to keep guns on them.

The four American contractors claim they are being scapegoated by Xe, claiming that Xe issued them the guns. It surely wouldn't be surprising to anyone to find out that this was true, but still, opening fire on unarmed citizens after being involved in an accident is a hard one to explain away.

"While stopped for the vehicle accident, the contractors were approached by a vehicle in a manner the contractors felt threatening" and opened fire, the statement said.

Callahan -- the attorney who also represented the families of four Blackwater employees killed in Iraq in 2004 who sued the security company -- said the contractors were traveling in two vehicles when a car hit the first one. They had gotten out to give first aid when another car made a U-turn and drove toward them, he said.

"These four men drew their guns and shot," Callahan said.

The brother of one of the wounded Afghans has said the car was full of shopkeepers heading home from work who misinterpreted one of the Americans hitting the car as an order to move. Bullets started hitting the back of the Toyota Corolla as it drove off. A passenger was hit in the stomach and died two days later, said Shah Agha, whose brother Farid was driving the car. Farid was shot in the hand and another person was injured outside the vehicle, Agha said.

One would have a hard time arguing that Xe/Blackwater was responsible for these men using unauthorized weapons to kill a civilian. But the overall picture is still the same, employees of Xe/Blackwater have again found themselves in another incident of needless killing. Is it lack of training? Lack of accountability? Lack of any real oversight?

Isn't it time that we stopped this practice of hiring private contractors to do the jobs that our military has traditionally done? Wasn't the whole argument put forward by Donald Rumsfeld that private contractors were more efficient and cost-effective? Where is the evidence of this? 


14 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Deep thought: Is "Xe" short for "Xenophobe"?

user-pic

I think it's pronounced "Christe".

user-pic

More harm than good? Who do you think provides protection for all of your congressional delegates all the way to the top of the U.S. government whenever they visit a war zone? This company has NEVER lost a client. Many, many contractors have lost their lives whilst protecting the clients, but not once has a client been killed while receiving protection services from this company.

Shooting at a vehicle following a traffic accident. Perhaps you haven't read the same news releases as I have. Perhaps you know nothing of VBIED delivery tactics. Perhaps you should take the time to learn these things before offering an opinion about something you obviously know very little about.

user-pic

What I don't understand is why they would be shooting at the back of a car that was driving away from them. Or why they had weapons when they weren't supposed to be carrying them. Or why the company won't back them up on this incident. Or why we hear more reports about Xe/Blackwater-related civilian shootings than any other contractor.

user-pic

What I do not appreciate about the contractors is that our soldiers could perform those same functions and as GI's we could have a much greater hold on what they are doing and investigating what they have done. Instead, we have these "employees" who will be protected by their corporation at the expense of our national reputation. The Afghanis do not know the difference between a soldier and a hired gun. Nor do our soldiers at times. The two are not equal in any way, shape or form. I would much prefer these tasks were being performed by the American military.

user-pic

but not once has a client been killed while receiving protection services from this company.

And how about the US service personnel who have later been killed by the relatives of innocent civilians killed by mercenaries?
Do you honestly believe that the brothers and fathers and cousins and sons of each victim have chosen to turn the other cheek?
(Trick question - that cannot be honestly believed.)

user-pic

Today's Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/20/world/asia/20ammo.html?_r=1&hp

Arms, falling into Taliban hands. Some kind of leak where arms meant for Afghanistan go astray.

user-pic

Thanks for the link, Thera. I've seen so many articles on the problem of corruption in Afghanistan, particularly in relation to the government we're supporting there.

user-pic

No one has ever succeed in winning a war there! Ever!

user-pic

Do you remember when the Taliban blew up the Giant Buddha at Bamiyan in the Spring of 2001? That was a teachable moment that I presented to one of my classes. It was only six months later that Al Qaeda hijackers that had been given safe haven for training in Afghanistan flew those planes into the World Trade Center.

So going into Afghanistan to take down the Taliban and Al Qaeda, and beginning the process of putting power back in the hands of the Afghan people has always been the right thing to do. Unfortunately, Bush blew it, and instead of helping Afghanistan build a strong government, he let it slide and took us on a fool's mission into Iraq.

The problem now is this: do we let the reurgent Taliban re-establih power, and let them offer safe-haven to radical terrorist groups again? This moderately liberal/liberal moderate can see both sides of that argument. It's a tough one.

user-pic

"resurgent"

user-pic

This reminds me of that intercepted shipment of arms by Blackwater that was found aboard a cargo plane surrounded by packages of dog food. The arms were being smuggled directly to recipients to evade the US government's regulations related to whom armaments could be delivered.

Makes one wonder why Xe/Blackwater still has any contracts at all with us. Obviously they do not respect the regulations we have created to ensure only the right people receive weaponry.

user-pic

No. No. Nooo. Farming out these operations to private contractors was never meant to provide 'more efficient and cost effective" services. It was designed as a PR move to limit US soldier casualties by shifting them to the private sector, as well as passing off some public funds to private enterprise.

user-pic

Does anyone have a body count on contractors killed in Iraq or Afghanistan? I think it is negligible. We're putting our GIs in the front and the contractors are much safer, relative to risks the GIs face.

That they are passing off public money to private interests seems like the only reason we have private contractors. No offense, but it was a way to get more pigs to the trough.

Leave a comment

astral66

user-pic

Following: 55
Followers: 57

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address