Obama To Be Sworn In On Lincoln Bible

Check out the nice slide show here:
http://www.pic2009.org/blog/entry/president-elect_barack_obama_to_be_sworn_in_using_lincolns_bible/
With all of the allusions Obama has made to Lincoln, I was expecting this little bit of symbolism, and I'm glad to see that it will now happen. From Huffington Post:
President-elect Barack Obama will take the oath of office using the same Bible upon which President Lincoln was sworn in at his first inauguration. Obama will be the first President sworn in using the Lincoln Bible since its initial use in 1861.
"President-elect Obama is deeply honored that the Library of Congress has made the Lincoln Bible available for use during his swearing-in," said Presidential Inaugural Committee Executive Director Emmett Beliveau. "The President-elect is committed to holding an Inauguration that celebrates America's unity, and the use of this historic Bible will provide a powerful connection to our common past and common heritage."
The Bible was originally purchased by William Thomas Carroll, Clerk of the Supreme Court, for use during Lincoln's swearing-in ceremony on March 4, 1861. The Lincoln family Bible, which is also in the Library of Congress's collection, was unavailable for the ceremony because it was packed away with the First Family's belongings, still en route from Springfield, IL, to their new home at the White House.
Maybe it would be nice to see an in-coming president swear their oath to uphold the Constitution on a copy of the Constitution itself, but I doubt that the country is ready to dispense of the symbolism of swearing on the Bible. I've always thought it odd that non-Christians were supposed to take this seriously, in court room settings and such. And as for the wingnuts, I'm sure it won't be long before we're hearing the "he's a secret-Muslim anyway, so his oath on the Bible is meaningless and insincere", or some such clap-trap like that.
For me, though, the symbolism of swearing on the same tome as the last Great Uniter is good enough for me. It's an historic volume, and it's nice to see it trotted out for the first time since 1861.
It is interesting to revisit the final words of Lincoln's inaugural address:
I am loth to close. We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stre[t]ching from every battle-field, and patriot grave, to every living heart and hearthstone, all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.
Anyone want to place a bet on these words appearing somewhere in Obama's address?
Some interesting inauguration history:
WASHINGTON (CNS) -- As Ryan Johnson explains it, George Washington's inauguration ceremony was painstakingly planned down to the tiniest detail about seating arrangements -- with just one exception.
As the first president of the United States arrived at New York's City Hall by horse-drawn carriage and prepared to step onto the open balcony that April 30 in 1789, it belatedly occurred to organizers that there ought to be a Bible on which Washington could take the oath of office.
One of the men at hand, parade marshal Jacob Morton, also happened to be master of the St. John's Lodge No. 1 of the Masons and offered to provide one from the lodge, located nearby at the corner of Water and Wall streets. The organization's 1767 King James Version was rushed to the hall and opened to Genesis, at the end of Chapter 49 and the beginning of Chapter 50, where Washington placed his hand for the ceremony.
As he completed the oath written for the occasion, Washington added the unscripted words, "I swear, so help me God," and bowed to kiss the Bible.
Thus was born a tradition followed by almost every one of the 42 presidents inaugurated since then, including some who have used the very same Bible.
It's an informative article, and includes this interesting nugget:
Records kept by the Architect of the Capitol suggest only one president in the 216 years since Washington was inaugurated did not take the oath of office with one hand on a Bible. Franklin Pierce, the 14th president, "affirmed"-- but did not "swear" -- his oath with one hand on a law book, instead of a Bible. Some historical records say Pierce did so because of a crisis of faith after his only remaining child, an 11-year-old boy, was killed in a train accident a few weeks before the inauguration.
I doubt that any president-elect could get away with that today.





I just found out on Daily Beast. I am a sucker for symbolism sometimes. Frederick Douglas might even be looking down and smiling. The first African-American to enter the White House as an invitee who was not employed there as a butler or as maid or as kitchen help or as a coachman.
December 23, 2008 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Me, too. As much as I believe in separation of church and state, I have no problem with someone taking an oath on the text that means the most to them. If it were me, I don't know what I would swear on. Hmm...Action Comics #1(the 1939 first appearance of Superman)? The Egyptian Book of the Dead, since it's the world's oldest religious text? A good Vietnamese cookbook?
December 23, 2008 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here's the requirement, from Article II, section 1 of the Constitution:
"Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.""
In other words, there's no requirement to swear in on a Bible or to include the words, "So help me God". It's entirely Obama's choice. The Constitution does, however, apparently require that the person being sworn in be a man.
December 23, 2008 11:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh noez! Well, that will be an argument for the future, when Caroline Kennedy wins in 2016. Ha!
December 23, 2008 11:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
By the way, as far as I know, swearing on the Bible is a NON-Christian practice. The words of Jesus, from the book of Matthew:
The "evil one" referred to here is, of course, Dick Cheney.
December 23, 2008 11:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
:)
December 23, 2008 12:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cat Hare, that should win "Funniest Comment of the Day", if there were such an award.
December 23, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
As a believer in the absolute literal translation of the Bible, I take this statement to mean that that the number "one" is evil, and thus all mathematics is sinful. God hates numbers!
December 23, 2008 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
What about the 7th day then?
December 23, 2008 1:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, you're not supposed to point out the contradictions in the Bible! :-)
December 23, 2008 2:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
There goes that subject then!
December 23, 2008 2:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm a bit stunned that this will be the first time this Bible has been used for a swearing-in since 1861. I know it has particularly acute symbolism for the President-elect, but considering how many have invoked Lincoln's name and how often they've done it, you'd think someone would have chosen to be sworn-in on Lincoln's bible.
December 23, 2008 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder if there is a list somewhere of what Bible's have been used in the past. Off to Google...
December 23, 2008 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
...updated above.
December 23, 2008 3:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually LINCOLN didn't swear in on the Family Bible because it was being shipped to Washington. Not Obama, I think you read that one wrong bro.
December 23, 2008 4:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Noted and corrected. Love the "edit" function we have now.
December 23, 2008 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
You Libs keep tellin Holiday Fairy tales to yourselves.
When O! shows up with the Holy Qu'ran, CJ Roberts will break the news....NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN
December 23, 2008 7:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, I've been wondering how their going to put the fake Bible cover on Osama's personal copy of the Koran, but hey, if they can fool Fitz's investigation, shouldn't be too hard to slip this one by.
(this is what happens when one takes the occasional look at wingnut comments)
December 23, 2008 8:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guess I'm in the minority here, but I'm actually getting tired of the Lincoln theme to Obama's politicas. I am a great admirer of Lincoln, but it seems Obama is being a bit obsessive with emulating Lincoln's ideas.
December 24, 2008 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think that Lincoln hisself would be pleased that the first AA Prez was using his Bible.
I understand your fatigue, but this is a NICE thing, I think.
December 24, 2008 10:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, I do think Lincoln would be honored. I just hope Obama is truly doing this out of respect and not to put Lincoln's name and his own together in the headlines.
December 24, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink