« Alaska to Count 90,000 Remaining Votes Today, Fate of Sen. Ted Stevens Hangs in the Balance | astral66's Blog | Update: Begich Overtakes Stevens in Alaska Senate Race, a 3 Vote Lead »

Obama on Separation of Church and State - The Just-Published 2004 Falsani Interview on Obama's Religious Beliefs


There has been so much speculation in the media, and there have been so many lies, about Barack Obama's religious beliefs, that it is amazing to me that this interview hasn't been printed in full before now. In 2004, Chicago Sun Times columnist Cathleen Falsani interviewed Obama during his run in Illinois for the US Senate. The full transcript of the interview has just been published for the first time. It's an excellent, lengthy interview and well worth reading in full, as there are a great variety of subjects covered, but one section that jumps out is in regards to the separation of church and state:

Alongside my own deep personal faith, I am a follower, as well, of our civic religion. I am a big believer in the separation of church and state. I am a big believer in our constitutional structure. I mean, I'm a law professor at the University of Chicago teaching constitutional law. I am a great admirer of our founding charter, and its resolve to prevent theocracies from forming, and its resolve to prevent disruptive strains of fundamentalism from taking root ion this country.

As I said before, in my own public policy, I'm very suspicious of religious certainty expressing itself in politics.

Now, that's different form a belief that values have to inform our public policy. I think it's perfectly consistent to say that I want my government to be operating for all faiths and all peoples, including atheists and agnostics, while also insisting that there are values tha tinform my politics that are appropriate to talk about.

A standard line in my stump speech during this campaign is that my politics are informed by a belief that we're all connected. That if there's a child on the South Side of Chicago that can't read, that makes a difference in my life even if it's not my own child. If there's a senior citizen in downstate Illinois that's struggling to pay for their medicine and having to chose between medicine and the rent, that makes my life poorer even if it's not my grandparent. And if there's an Arab American family that's being rounded up by John Ashcroft without the benefit of due process, that threatens my civil liberties.

I can give religious expression to that. I am my brother's keeper, I am my sister's keeper, we are all children of God. Or I can express it in secular terms. But the basic premise remains the same. I think sometimes Democrats have made the mistake of shying away from a conversation about values for fear that they sacrifice the important value of tolerance. And I don't think those two things are mutually exclusive.

All I can say is, wow. Another great quote:

I'm a big believer in tolerance. I think that religion at it's best comes with a big dose of doubt. I'm suspicious of too much certainty in the pursuit of understanding just because I think people are limited in their understanding.

I think that, particularly as somebody who's now in the public realm and is a student of what brings people together and what drives them apart, there's an enormous amount of damage done around the world in the name of religion and certainty.

And one last morsel:

It's interesting particularly now after this election, comes with it a lot of celebrity. And I always think of politics as having two sides. There's a vanity aspect to politics, and then there's a substantive part of politics. Now you need some sizzle with the steak to be effective, but I think it's easy to get swept up in the vanity side of it, the desire to be liked and recognized and important. It's important for me throughout the day to measure and to take stock and to say, now, am I doing this because I think it's advantageous to me politically, or because I think it's the right thing to do? Am I doing this to get my name in the papers or am I doing this because it's necessary to accomplish my motives.

There is much more to ponder, so please go take a look at:

http://blog.beliefnet.com/stevenwaldman/2008/11/obamas-interview-with-cathleen.html

The section on community organizing is also of deep insight, but so are many other passages. How lucky are we to have someone this thoughtful and intelligent about to step into the driver's seat?


27 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Great quotes. Thanks for posting this.

user-pic

The whole interview is a great read. One could do a number of separate post on the various aspects of religion covered in it. I just cherry-picked a few that stood out.

user-pic

Yeah, I just finished it. It's such a relief to have an intelligent, intellectually (and spiritually) curious human being in the White House again.

user-pic

Wow! Talk about a difference from the cretin we have in the White House now.

user-pic

Thanks for the great link, you rock man. Doesn't just make you want to run out in the street and yell Hallelujah!!! Wake up the neighbors and form a conga line! Sing like Janis Joplin! Lay on our backs with our feet in the air!! Do the happy feet thing! Lift up our shirts and show our bras!

user-pic

What I think is more significant about this interview is that our new president-elect has been saying the same thing for years, as opposed to McCain, who constantly changed his message. Or the shrub who promised to be a "compassionate" conservative and was anything but. Or Caribou Barbie whose only consistent message was to be as confusing as possible while saying nothing you could pin her down on.

Honor. Intelligence. Consistency. THAT's what America voted for on election day.

user-pic

What I think is more significant about this interview is that our new president-elect has been saying the same thing for years, as opposed to McCain, who constantly changed his message. Or the shrub who promised to be a "compassionate" conservative and was anything but. Or Caribou Barbie whose only consistent message was to be as confusing as possible while saying nothing you could pin her down on.

Honor. Intelligence. Consistency. THAT's what America voted for on election day.

user-pic

What amazes me the most is that the more we learn about this man, the more we respect and admire him.
I have such a good feeling about what we are all going to be able to accomplish with him at the helm.

user-pic

He truly is an exceptional leader. I am grateful that the majority of Americans are able to see that.

user-pic

Astral...looks like Josh picked up your post on the main page...congrats!

user-pic

Thanks, I just saw that. Very cool. Thanks to Josh, too!

user-pic

Here's a lighter-side political angle quote:

"I'm always stuck by how much common sense the American people have. They get confused sometimes, watch FoxNews or listen to talk radio. "

user-pic

On election day, Articleman posted this over at Dagblog:
"One day I went with two friends to hear the President of the (Harvard) Law Review, this Obama guy, speak outside the Harkness Commons, on campus, about minority hiring. We talked about him running for President someday. To us, being the first black President of the Harvard Law Review seemed a perfectly natural launching pad to the Presidency. ... I remember thinking that he was a great speaker, and just liking the guy. In your gut, you knew he was too good not to Be Something. Something Big."
That was 18 years ago. It's amazing how many other people recall meeting a 20 or 30-year-old Barack Obama and thinking: "Future president."
Destiny sometimes is manifest.
Wish him luck in the role he was so clearly born for.

user-pic

"It's amazing how many other people recall meeting a 20 or 30-year-old Barack Obama and thinking: "Future president.

Two comments. First, I suspect there is an amazing number of people about whom that was said (and not just at Harvard). Second, perhaps more interesting, the story suggests that it's possible that Obama has been preparing himself for this job for a long time. Most folks, when they hear the "you could run for office" line, cringe, I think. Not this man.

But I don't believe he's ever been ambitious for power. He seems to me to be someone who sought office because it irked him to have the government controlled by people to whom he knew he was superior. That's also why I think he remains so committed to his family: he's really a private citizen at heart, who's chosen to take on a huge job.

user-pic

Falsani used Obama's selection of spiritual leaders in that article as well: Rev. Wright, Father Pfleger and Rev. Meeks. As to Rev. Meeks Sen. Obama said that Rev. Meeks was another person he sought out for spiritual counsel. In fact, Obama said that the day after he won the Illinois Democratic senatorial primary on March 16, 2004, he "stopped by Salem for Wednesday-night Bible study."

So who is Rev. Meeks?


"A spring 2007 newsletter of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) included Reverend Meeks, who is also an Illinois State Senator, in a list of "10 leading black religious voices in the anti-gay movement." According to their report:

"As a stalwart anti-gay activist, Meeks has used his House of Hope mega-church to launch petition drives for the Illinois Family Institute, a major state-level 'family values' pressure group that lauded him last year for leading African Americans in 'clearly understanding the threat of gay marriage.'"

"Last year (2006) he ran for governor as a virtual single-issue candidate, drawing national support from Christian fundamentalists by boldly vowing to fight marriage equality at every turn. Meeks eventually dropped out of the race."

"Meeks and the IFI are partnered with Focus on the Family, the Family Research Council and the Alliance Defense Fund, major anti-gay organizations of the Christian Right."


So Obama talks one way, walks another.

user-pic

I don't agree. I think the President-elect is someone who learns from a wide variety of people, including those he might not agree with. I like the fact that he is open to receiving counsel from Rev. Meeks, even though there might be parts of the Reverend's life that President-elect Obama disagrees with.

I think the time for guilt-by-association is past. This past election has shown that those tactics don't work.

user-pic

AJM, the only thing your statement tells me is that you ignored the content of the entire interview and instead looked for one minute detail to pick apart and base your perceptions on. As chicagobama points out, the guilt-by-association tactic is bogus, and you refuse to see the trees for the forest. Go back, re-read and look for this quote:

I'm a big believer in tolerance. I think that religion at it's best comes with a big dose of doubt. I'm suspicious of too much certainty in the pursuit of understanding just because I think people are limited in their understanding.

I think that, particularly as somebody who's now in the public realm and is a student of what brings people together and what drives them apart, there's an enormous amount of damage done around the world in the name of religion and certainty.

Of course, if you insist only in seeing what you want to see, there's not much any of us can do to help.

user-pic

Obama confronts African-American crowd on gay rights:
http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/obama_confronts_african_american_crowd_o

The "safe" thing to do would be to avoid challenging unreceptive audiences on their homophobia. And to drop "gay and straight" from his standard litany of the different kinds of Americans that can be united.

Instead Obama has offered "clear support and understanding of gay people and willingness to support our dignity at times and in places where others have not," as Andrew Sullivan says in the link.

user-pic

I understand what you are implying, but that is just black and white thinking.

Just because Obama is inspired by someone doesn't mean he agrees with him 100% of the time. He also isn't a sheep or a follower.

Obama also befriended the people in the Federalist Society, while at Harvard. When he became President of the Law Review, many of them had positions on the Review, much to the dismay of African-Americans and Liberals.

You ought to know by now, that Obama is intellectually curious, seeks consensus and doesn't demonize anyone as "the other". This duality just doesn't exist for him. This if further illustrated in the interview - he tries to always be true to himself and act with his better nature.

user-pic

WHat strikes me about this interview is the way Obama's spirituality is a dynamic process, always moving forward, considering things from another angle. There are moments where he describes being in conversation with God or feeling a higher power when he's doing/saying the right thing. I can imagine some people jumping on that, claiming Obama thinks he's some sort of prophet. But he always moves from that to uncertainty, caution about dogmatism, and openness to other views and traditions. In short, Obama's faith is deep and serious, but also thoughtful and reflective. Anyone who thinks that right and wrong mean something, whatever language they use to express that, should be able to respect his approach.

user-pic

I think he expressed himself very well. Faith is a journey, not a destination. Obama certainly is very consciencious of that journey and his aim to be true to it.

user-pic

Prepare for FoxNews, et. al. to question the timing of the release of the full interview, and Obama's statements re: Wright, and to a lesser extent, Pfleger (they will ignore Meeks). Hannity: "If he is in the pews every Sunday at 11, how can he say he missed the GD America sermon?"
Here we go.

user-pic

Let em rip. Too late, we won. While I have heard more hate and crap from the opposition then I remember hearing from the Clinton years it is way too late. They are addicted to their hate and it will be a while before they stop or rather tone it down. Actually, I shouldn't say they are addicted to hate, that is small minded of me. Most of them have gotten paid to spew that kind of stuff and get paid to continue. Only when viewership falls off will it stop. In six months they will be weak voices far off in the distance.

user-pic

You're exactly right, ched. The comment thread in the beliefnet article is laced with "We should have known this months ago. How come we didn't know this?" As if those people had never heard of Jay Sekulow, Bill Keller, or any of the others are. As if those people never clicked on the 750,000 links on Google to the phrase "Obama is not a Christian."

That's quite the luxury of not only always being right about these things, but also never being wrong. How are these poor people going to deal with themselves as the world and its sinners keep testing their unchanging faith?

Nevertheless, the article is a fascinating read, though.


user-pic

Another good retrospective can be found in William Finnegan's May 31, 2004 New Yorker magazine profile of (then) State Senator Barack Obama, when he was running for US Senate but before he made that speech at the Boston Democratic National Convention.

There's a great anecdote related by Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky. She was at the White House, and Bush noticed her "obama" button and "almost jumped back, literally."

She said: "I knew what he was thinking."

She points out that it was Obama with a "b", and explains who he is.

Bush says, "Well, I don't know him."

And Jan Schakowsky replied: "You will."

user-pic

That's a great story! And if bin Laden really is still alive and out there, maybe Obama will actually catch him and bring him to justice. Wouldn't that be nice.

user-pic

Just for a moment, compare and contrast Obama's introspection with Bush's lack thereof.

Leave a comment

astral66

user-pic

Following: 34
Followers: 38

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address