« Obama on Instinct and Gut Decisions - The Joe Klein Interview | astral66's Blog | You Know It's Bad When the Russians are Mocking Palin on YouTube »

US Media Still Hasn't Picked Up on Iran's Support for Obama


Yesterday I noticed on the Al Jazeera website that the speaker of Iran's parliament, Ali Larijani, had said, "We are leaning more in favour of Barack Obama because he is more flexible and rational [than rival John McCain], even though we know American policy will not change that much," an endorsement that would most likely end up in the same category as the Hamas and al-Qaida "endorsements" of Obama and McCain. You can see my post on it here:

Next Spin Cycle: Iran 'Prefers' Obama Presidency

I've been watching the story with interest, primarily because I wanted to see how long it would take for it to enter into the campaign. The US press still hasn't picked up on it, as far as I can tell, but it has hit the British press now, and there is currently a story up at the UK's top online news site, The Guardian:

A top Iranian official has said Barack Obama is the favoured candidate of Tehran, calling him more "rational" than John McCain in remarks that could be used against the Democratic US presidential hopeful.

Ali Larijani, the speaker of the Iranian parliament, told reporters yesterday his government was "leaning more in favour of Barack Obama because he is more flexible and rational, even though we know American policy [towards Iran] will not change that much".

Larijani, an ally of Ayatollah Ali Khameini, the supreme Iranian leader, served until last year as his country's chief negotiator in talks to dismantle Tehran's nuclear programme. With the Iranian election looming next year, he is considered a potential opponent of the president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

The author goes on to point out the potential attack line for the McCain campaign:

Larijani's remarks could provide ammunition for the McCain campaign to attack Obama before Americans go to the polls on November 4.

Republicans often condemn Obama for signalling he would conduct diplomacy with Iran without setting conditions in advance. The notion that Tehran prefers the Democrat could bolster McCain's case for tough talk against the regime.

One counterpoint that can be made, though, is that Bush, McCain and the Republicans have singled out Ahmadinejad as the embodiment of evil, and that this line endorsing Obama was made by Ahmadinejad's rival in parliament.

It will be interesting to see where this goes, if it goes anywhere at all.

Here's a photo of Larijani, the possible replacement for Ahmadinejad in next year's elections:

Ali Larijani, speaker of Iranian parliament  


3 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

This, like the supposed al Qaeda "endorsement" of McCain and the Hamas "endorsement" of Obama isn't much of a story in its own right. It's really not important who the enemies and "non-friends" of America say they think should be president. If nothing else, these endorsements can't be trusted because they could be bluffing or even double-bluffing.

If endorsements count for anything at all, they can only count if they're from people (or organizations) that you trust and respect.

If there is a story here, it's only to show how foolish the Republicans were when they jumped all over the Hamas "endorsement." After the initial flutter, it turned out nobody really cared. And they shouldn't care about this, either.

user-pic

I've seen recent polling that indicates the preference of American voters is for talking to Iran so it may not be as useful as one might imagine except for firing up the usual suspects. But, it's worth watching to see if there's any movement to this "endorsement" story. The Guardian has a poll up on whether or not it could damage Obama.

The Kuwait News Agency (via Imra) has also mentioned Larijani's remarks in an article that mentioned far more interesting (to me) news about Iran's efforts to mend fences with her Gulf neighbors. These initiatives, if they bear fruit, will have enormous impact on our dealings in the region. Neither of the articles you mentioned noted the context of Larijani's remarks.

http://www.imra.org.il/story.php3?id=41077

user-pic

Thanks for the link, I hadn't seen that part of the story.

Leave a comment

astral66

user-pic

Following: 34
Followers: 38

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address