Today's McCain Campaign Smear: Obama Called for Redistribution of Wealth in 2001 Radio Interview
How is it possible that Bush/McCain regime can be so wrong, on so many things, so much of the time?
The Drudge Report has it's main headline today blaring the following: 2001 OBAMA: TRAGEDY THAT 'REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH' NOT PURSUED BY SUPREME COURT
This is based on a radio interview that Obama did in 2001 in which Obama went into extensive detail to explain why the courts should not get into that business of 'redistributing' wealth. (emphasis mine). The McCain campaign, with an assist from Drudge, is claiming the exact opposite of what Obama actually said.
Jake Tapper at http://abcnews.blogs.com/ has the best coverage of this so far:
On September 6, 2001, then-state senator Barack Obama appeared on a public radio chat show to discuss "Slavery and the Constitution." You can listen to the whole show HERE. In that show -- WBEZ-FM's "Odyssey" -- Obama discussed the role of the courts in civil rights. Today, aides say, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., will seize on some of those remarks, as hyped by Mr. Drudge.
Tapper includes a transcript of part of the interview:
Obama in that interview said, "If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement, and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples, so that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at a lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I'd be okay."
"But," Obama said, "The Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent as radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, as least as it's been interpreted, and Warren Court interpreted in the same way that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties, says what the states can't do to you, says what the federal government can't do to you, but it doesn't say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf. And that hasn't shifted."
Obama said "one of the, I think, the tragedies of the civil rights movement, was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change, and in some ways we still stuffer from that."
A caller, "Karen," asked if it's "too late for that kind of reparative work economically?" And she asked if that work should be done through the courts or through legislation.
"Maybe I'm showing my bias here as a legislator as well as a law professor," Obama said. "I'm not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts. The institution just isn't structured that way."
There will be a coordinated effort of the part of McCain, Drudge Report, Fox News, and other conservative blogs to twist Obama's words.
Bill Burton of the Obama Campaign has responded:
"In this interview back in 2001, Obama was talking about the civil rights movement - and the kind of work that has to be done on the ground to make sure that everyone can live out the promise of equality," Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton says. "Make no mistake, this has nothing to do with Obama's economic plan or his plan to give the middle class a tax cut. It's just another distraction from an increasingly desperate McCain campaign."
Burton continues: "In the interview, Obama went into extensive detail to explain why the courts should not get into that business of 'redistributing' wealth. Obama's point - and what he called a tragedy - was that legal victories in the Civil Rights led too many people to rely on the courts to change society for the better. That view is shared by conservative judges and legal scholars across the country.
"As Obama has said before and written about, he believes that change comes from the bottom up - not from the corridors of Washington," Burton says. "He worked in struggling communities to improve the economic situation of people on the South Side of Chicago, who lost their jobs when the steel plants closed. And he's worked as a legislator to provide tax relief and health care to middle-class families. And so Obama's point was simply that if we want to improve economic conditions for people in this country, we should do so by bringing people together at the community level and getting everyone involved in our democratic process."
With eight days left, the McCain smear machine is going full-throttle, and there is nothing they won't lie about to try to save their campaign. Appalling and pathetic.












Does he imply he will seek redristribution by means other than the supreme court?
October 27, 2008 5:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I woulod say Yes! Hard work and education on the part of the African-American people!
October 27, 2008 6:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Truthseeker,
If you are not going to allow comments on your posts, then stop commenting on mine. To do so, is to be a hypocrite, wouldn't you agree?
October 27, 2008 11:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Check out the second video here:
http://www.watchusexplode.com/?p=867
It's McCain doing Hardball at Michigan State. Don't know the date, but it's not that recent. Unreal! McCain the socialist!
October 28, 2008 12:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Who creates the headlines here? !
its not a smear. did you actually listen to the broadcast or only repeat what Burton says. Before you know it, we'll have two of the glibbest liars EVER in the WH. They make Bubba look like a 2nd grader !!
October 28, 2008 12:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
I heard the audio of Obama saying that he was for the transfer of wealth. It was Obama that was talking and it is Communist thinking. This is not a McCain smear, but merely letting the American public hear what he said. This country is in trouble if Obama is elected.
October 28, 2008 2:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Listen to the whole program. Note that the first mention of the issue is discussing how the federal courts have been reluctant to get into redistribution in connection with school funding issues, but state courts have gotten into this. That's about whether taxation and funding systems that create wealthy school districts and poor school districts are truly providing equal opportunity. It's not a radical socialits concept, it's something that many states are having serious issues with, being dealt with both in the courts and in the legislatures. Yes, it's a form of redistribution of wealth, but well within the U.S. political mainstream.
Even the folks over at the Volokh Conspiracy, who haven't really been Obama fans in my experience, say Obama really shows his intellectual chops in this program. I listed to several of those old WEBZ programs and it was really interesting stuff.
October 28, 2008 8:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Once I built a railroad, I made it run, made it race against time.
Once I built a railroad; now it's done. Brother, can you spare a dime?
Once I built a tower, up to the sun, brick, and rivet, and lime;
Once I built a tower, now it's done. Brother, can you spare a dime?
October 28, 2008 9:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks to DancingBear for pointing out that if you listen to the whole program, it puts everything in context.
http://www.entertonement.com/collections/6246/Obama-on-Distribution-of-Wealth
October 28, 2008 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink