« October 19, 2008 - October 25, 2008 | Home | November 2, 2008 - November 8, 2008 »

Week of October 26, 2008 - November 1, 2008

Palin Gets Pranked by Canadian Duo, Thinks She's Talking to French President Sarkozy (with audio and transcript)


SECOND UPDATE: Obama Campaign responds:

SPRINGFIELD, Mo. -- Asked by ABC News if he'd heard the prank call played on Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, Robert Gibbs, a senior adviser to Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., told reporters that he'd heard parts of it.

His response?

"I'm glad we check out our calls before we hand the phone to Barack Obama," Gibbs said.

UPDATE: Palin's campaign responds:

Gov. Palin received a phone call on Saturday from a French Canadian talk show host claiming to be French President Nicholas Sarkozy," emailed spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt. "Gov. Palin was mildly amused to learn that she had joined the ranks of heads of state, including President Sarkozy, and other celebrities in being targeted by these pranksters. C'est la vie."

 This is so embarrassing, I can't even listen to it. Palin Gets Pranked.

"Notorious Quebec comedy duo talks politics in prank call to Sarah Palin."

In the interview, which lasts about six minutes, Palin and the pranksters discuss politics, pundits, and the dangers of hunting with current vice-president Dick Cheney.

The Masked Avengers, who have a regular show on Montreal radio station CKOI, intend to air the full interview on the eve of the U.S. elections.

The well-known duo of Sebastien Trudel and Marc-Antoine Audette have also tricked Rolling Stones singer Mick Jagger, Microsoft founder Bill Gates and French president Jacques Chirac.

The call to Chirac was rated by the BBC as one of the top 30 best moments in radio history of all time.

Are we seeing the most incompetent presidential campaign ever? I mean seriously, how does something like this happen? It must be a complete embarassment to be a Republican right now. This certainly says a lot about national security credentials. 

Following is the transcript of the phone call posted by Jake Tapper at http://abcnews.blogs.com/

transcript:

Read more »

Update: Obama Responds to Aunt Zeituni Onyango Immigration Status Story


Obama says he didn't know aunt's illegal status

CHICAGO - Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Saturday he didn't know that one of his relatives was living in the United States illegally and believes the appropriate laws should be followed.

The Associated Press found that Obama's aunt had been instructed to leave the country four years ago by an immigration judge who rejected her request for asylum from her native Kenya. The woman, Zeituni Onyango (zay-TUHN on-YANG-oh), is living in public housing in Boston and is the half-sister of Obama's late father.

A statement given to the AP by Obama's campaign said, "Senator Obama has no knowledge of her status but obviously believes that any and all appropriate laws be followed."

Onyango is part of Obama's large paternal family, with many related to him by blood whom he barely knows. Obama first met Onyango when he traveled to Africa as an adult -- he referred to her as "Auntie Zeituni" in his memoir.

The campaign said he has seen her a few times since that meeting, beginning with a return trip to Kenya with his wife, Michelle, four years after the first trip. Onyango visited the family in Chicago on a tourist visa at Obama's invitation about nine years ago, the campaign said, stopping to visit friends on the East coast before returning to Kenya.

She attended Obama's swearing-in to the U.S. Senate in 2004, but campaign officials said Obama provided no assistance in getting her a tourist visa and doesn't know the details of her stay. The campaign said he last heard from her about two years ago when she called saying she was in Boston, but he did not see her there.

 

Aunt of Barack Obama, Zeituni Onyango , walks from where she lives in a housing project in a Boston subur

What a strange story. Yesterday, the Times of London reported that Obama's long-lost aunt had been found in Boston:

Zeituni Onyango, the aunt so affectionately described in Mr Obama's best-selling memoir Dreams from My Father, lives in a disabled-access flat on a rundown public housing estate in South Boston.

A second relative believed to be the long-lost "Uncle Omar" described in the book was beaten by armed robbers with a "sawed-off rifle" while working in a corner shop in the Dorchester area of the city. He was later evicted from his one-bedroom flat for failing to pay $2,324.20 (£1,488) arrears, according to the Boston Housing Court.

*****

In his book Mr Obama writes that "Uncle Omar" had gone missing after moving to Boston in the 1960s - a quarter-century before Mr Obama first visited his family in Kenya. Aunt Zeituni is now also living in Boston, and recently made a $260 campaign contribution to her nephew's presidential bid from a work address in the city.

Speaking outside her home in Flaherty Way, South Boston, on Tuesday, Ms Onyango, 56, confirmed she was the "Auntie Zeituni" in Mr Obama's memoir. She declined to answer most other questions about her relationship with the presidential contender until after the November 4 election. "I can't talk about it, I just pray for him, that's all," she said, adding: "After the 4th, I can talk to anyone."

A photograph of Ms Onyango was later shown to George Hussein Onyango, Barack Obama's half-brother in Nairobi, who confirmed that it was their aunt. George Onyango, 26, the youngest child of Barack Obama Sr, said that he had spent weekends with his Aunt Zeituni when he was growing up, and instantly recognised her.

George Onyango said that his aunt had left for the US about eight years ago but sent him e-mails. "She left to find work and I suppose she thought her life would be better there," he said. "She was kind and caring."

And now the story takes an even stranger turn. Just tonight the Associated Press reports, such as this from the Minneapolis-St. Paul Star Tribune

WASHINGTON - Barack Obama's aunt, a Kenyan woman who has been quietly living in public housing in Boston, is in the United States illegally after an immigration judge rejected her request for asylum four years ago, The Associated Press has learned.

Zeituni Onyango, 56, referred to as "Aunti Zeituni" in Obama's memoir, was instructed to leave the United States by a U.S. immigration judge who denied her asylum request, a person familiar with the matter told the AP late Friday. This person spoke on condition of anonymity because no one was authorized to discuss Onyango's case.

******

Onyango's refusal to leave the country would represent an administrative, non-criminal violation of U.S. immigration law, meaning such cases are handled outside the criminal court system. Estimates vary, but many experts believe there are more than 10 million such immigrants in the United States.

The AP could not reach Onyango immediately for comment. No one answered the telephone number listed in her name late Friday. It was unclear why her request for asylum was rejected in 2004.

So what happens now? Illegal immigratin is a hot-button issue, and the wingnuts have been looking for anything they can find to throw at Obama. Since he wasn't even aware that she and his uncle were in Boston, how do they connect this to him, and how can it be made to look bad for him?

The story is up on Drudge Report now, so you know what that means: Drudge -> Fox -> McCain -> repeat ->.

The Boston Herald has an article up now, "Boston Housing Authority 'flabbergastered' Barack Obama's aunt living in Southie":

A Boston Housing Authority director says Barack Obama's aunt, a Kenyan woman who has lived in public housing for five years, is an "exemplary resident" and only recently did anyone know of her connection to the presidential contender.

Obama's campaign spokesman Reid Cherlin confirmed to the Herald yesterday that Zeituni Onyango, 56, who lives on Flaherty Way in South Boston, is Obama's aunt on his father's side.

*****

It wasn't until recently, when a London newspaper started making inquiries about Onyango, that Deputy Director Bill McGonagle learned of the link.

McGonagle said BHA employees were caught off guard.

"We were as surprised as anyone," he said. "We were a little bit flabbergasted."

Onyango has lived in Boston public housing for five years, McGonagle said.

"She has been an exemplary resident," he said.

She received a small stipend over the past year for working six hours a week as a volunteer resident health advocate in her complex, he said.

Little else is known about her.

Onyango had conversations with several BHA employees in recent days about her blood ties to the senator, McGonagle said. She proudly displays photos of Obama, including some that appear as old as 25 years, inside her first-floor apartment, McGonagle said.

A message left at Onyango's apartment was not returned.

McGonagle asked that the media respect Onyango's privacy.

"She is feeling very put upon," he said.

So from this we know that the Obama campaign has been made aware of the story. The legal ramifications of this appear to be somewhat tricky. From the Associated Press:

A spokeswoman for U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, Kelly Nantel, said the government does not comment on an individual's citizenship status or immigration case.

Onyango's case - coming to light just days before the presidential election - led to an unusual nationwide directive within Immigrations and Customs Enforcement requiring any deportations prior to Tuesday's election to be approved at least at the level of ICE regional directors, the U.S. law enforcement official told the AP.

The unusual directive suggests that the Bush administration is sensitive to the political implications of Onyango's case coming to light so close to the election.

It seems that the most important element in this story is that as the AP reports, "This person spoke on condition of anonymity because no one was authorized to discuss Onyango's case." If no one will go on the record, no legitimate news source will (or should) touch this. There was obviously some leak of the information to the AP through the Bush administration or McCain campaign, but since it was illegal to release, no one can legally make any kinds of accusations. At least that's how I read it.

A poster atDaily Kos added the following observation:

Technically she is not here illegally. Once a deportation order is issued by the immigration judge then it is THE FEDERAL AGENCY who is responsible for deporting the person.  The person is not compelled to get on a freakin plane.  Whoever fed this story to Fournier (and it looks like some immigration custom agent) does NOT know how deportation works.  Long story short, the only reason the half-sister of Obama's dad is still in this country is because the federal government has let her stay here. 

 

 

John the Working Class Hero


Obama Shows Irritation With Press Over Halloween Family Time


The press is describing it as "anger" and "testy", but really, just let the guy have a few minutes with his kids, okay?

Photo

CHICAGO (Reuters) - It wasn't quite a Halloween nightmare on Obama street, but journalists on Friday drew a rare flash of anger from the normally unflappable Democratic presidential nominee.

Barack Obama had taken a break from the campaign trail for a few hours of Halloween fun at home with his family four days before the election, but ended up visibly annoyed when news crews dogged their footsteps in their Chicago neighborhood.

"That's enough. You've got a shot. Leave us alone," Obama told reporters as he walked down the block with his 7-year-old daughter Sasha in her costume on the way to a party at a neighbor's home.

Obama, usually cool in public during a campaign that has turned him into the frontrunner for the White House, did not disguise his irritation when his surprise walk caused news photographers and camera crews to scramble for position on the sidewalk.

He grew especially testy when a Polish television cameraman tried to approach them.

"Come on guys, get back on the bus," he pleaded with journalists, many of whom had accompanied him from the airport to Chicago's Hyde Park neighborhood.

Read the entire article here:

Rare flash of anger from Obama on Halloween night

Boehner Calls Obama 'Present' Votes "Chicken S#!t"


Yikes! The GOPies are really starting to lose it. From Ben Smith at Politico.com:

House minority leader John Boehner's spokesman confirms the accuracy of this quote, from an Ohio student newspaper:

"Now, listen, I've voted 'present' two or three times in my entire 25-year political career, where there might have been a conflict of interest and I didn't feel like I should vote," Boehner said. "In Congress, we have a red button, a green button and a yellow button, alright. Green means 'yes,' red means 'no,' and yellow means you're a chicken s***.

"And the last thing we need in the White House, in the oval office, behind that big desk, is some chicken who wants to push this yellow button."

 UPDATE: Boehner spokesman Don Seymour, er, clarifies: "Boehner's point was that Barack Obama consistently avoided making tough decisions and taking tough votes, and voters need to know that. You can't take a pass on a tough issue when you're President of the United States."

It has been mentioned many places, including on Fox News, that in the Illinois State Legislature, members can vote "Present" in order to send legislation back to committee for revisions. Makes sense to me.

Obama Can Win in Arizona!


Look at these poll numbers from today's Daily Kos poll. No wonder McCain is now running scared in Arizona!

Research 2000 for Daily Kos. 10/28-30. Likely voters. MoE 4% (No trend lines)

McCain (R) 48
Obama (D) 47

Early voters  (17 percent of sample)

McCain (R) 42
Obama (D) 54

I can't believe we may actually win Arizona. And I have a bonus treat for you guys:

If the 2010 election for U.S. Senate were held today for whom would you vote for if the choices were between Janet Napolitano the Democrat and John McCain the Republican?

McCain (R) 45
Napolitano (D) 53

Janet Napolitano is Arizona's governor, currently serving her second term. Her favorability rating of 67-29 is higher than Palin's, which is 65-35 in a poll we'll be releasing in a few hours. Napolitano's job approval rating of 69-21 similarly beats Palin's 61-37. Palin may be giving the Rick Lowrys of the world starbursts, but Napolitano is wowing them with competent governance, and it looks like Arizonans wouldn't mind sending her to Washington instead of McCain.

Update: McCain forced to campaign in Arizona on Monday. I bet he wishes he could spend the evening in Pennsylvania, Ohio, or Florida.

Off the Rails and into the Ditch.


I Wish TPM Had Room on the Front Page for Political Cartoons. Here's a good one:

Ingram Pinn illustration

John McCain's "Idiot Wind" (w/ video)


The Washington Post calls out John McCain for his reprehensible behavior, and offers up a sterling defense of Rashid Khalidi:

WITH THE presidential campaign clock ticking down, Sen. John McCain has suddenly discovered a new boogeyman to link to Sen. Barack Obama: a sometimes controversial but widely respected Middle East scholar named Rashid Khalidi. In the past couple of days, Mr. McCain and his running mate, Gov. Sarah Palin, have likened Mr. Khalidi, the director of a Middle East institute at Columbia University, to neo-Nazis; called him "a PLO spokesman"; and suggested that the Los Angeles Times is hiding something sinister by refusing to release a videotape of a 2003 dinner in honor of Mr. Khalidi at which Mr. Obama spoke. Mr. McCain even threw former Weatherman Bill Ayers into the mix, suggesting that the tape might reveal that Mr. Ayers -- a terrorist-turned-professor who also has been an Obama acquaintance -- was at the dinner.

*****

To suggest, as Mr. McCain has, that there is something reprehensible about associating with Mr. Khalidi is itself condemnable -- especially during a campaign in which Arab ancestry has been the subject of insults. To further argue that the Times, which obtained the tape from a source in exchange for a promise not to publicly release it, is trying to hide something is simply ludicrous, as Mr. McCain surely knows.

Which reminds us: We did ask Mr. Khalidi whether he wanted to respond to the campaign charges against him. He answered, via e-mail, that "I will stick to my policy of letting this idiot wind blow over." That's good advice for anyone still listening to the McCain campaign's increasingly reckless ad hominem attacks. Sadly, that wind is likely to keep blowing for four more days.

Props to Mr. Khalidi for referencing Bob Dylan.

 Ft. Collins, Colorado, 1976.

Invasion of the Robots!


Obama Campaign Theme Song?


Nielsen: 33.6 million watched Obama ad


Obama beats the World Series:

Obama's 30-minute primetime infomercial was seen by 33.6 million viewers across seven networks -- including CBS, NBC, Fox, Univision, MSNBC, BET and TV One.

That's 70% more people than watched the conclusion of the World Series last night on Fox (19.8 million). Clearly, Obama vs. McCain is more compelling to viewers this week than Phillies vs. Rays.

Nielsen estimates that roughly 71% of viewers were white, 17% of viewers were black and 15% were Hispanic.*

http://www.thrfeed.com/2008/10/obama-ad-rating.html

Update: Palin Snubs President of Penn State University, Gets Booed by Baseball Fans in Erie


Update: Another bang-up day for Gov. Palin. You would think that she would learn to saty away from sports references after her puck-dropping debacle in Philly. I guess she thought she would make up for it by praising the Phillies during her Erie, PA, stop later today. Unfortunately for the good Governor, Erie is smack dab in the middle of Pittsburgh Pirates and Cleveland Indians territory. Better luck next time, Guv! Is there anywhere else in PA you would like to stop and insult the locals? Maybe you could stop in Pittsburgh and sing the praises of the Eagles? Please?

*****

As a graduate of dear old Penn State, I take faux offense at this!

A McCain-Palin campaign official snubbed the president of Penn State University who inquired about attending a campus speech Tuesday by Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin, university officials told ABCNews.com.

"He's a big Democrat. Why would he want to meet Palin?" campaign aide Russ Bermel allegedly asked a school employee who was hoping to make arrangements for president Graham B. Spanier to meet Palin, according to Spanier's office.

The McCain-Palin campaign has been working overtime to become competitive in Pennsylvania, where the Obama-Biden campaign has enjoyed a double-digit lead in the polls.

Some might say that makes it an odd time to snub the president of the state's largest university. The school enrolls 40,000 students and counts a quarter-million alumni living in Pennsylvania alone.

"I welcome eminent visitors to our campus everyday, including lots of Republicans, but [the McCain-Palin campaign] didn't want me to greet her or even attend the event," said Spanier.

40,000 studetns and a quarter-million alumni in PA alone. Way to make friends with the locals, Sarah. I guess Graham didn't meet the "pre-conditions"? Not only does State College, PA, stand as one of the largest population centers in PA, it's smack-dab in the middle of the rural part, far from Philly and Pittsburgh. I wonder if Joe Pa was given the cold-shoulder as well.

How Much are the Republicans Paying Joe the Plumber?


It's a good question, and one that has been asked by a blogger at Reuters.com:

It would be difficult for anyone other than the most committed kool-aid drinker to believe that Samuel Wurzelbacher is anything other than a paid Republican shill. I'm sorry, but plumbers from Sarah Palin's "Real" America do not have the welfare of Israel at the top of their hit parade of issues. But "Joe the Plumber" does:

The all-out effort from John McCain's presidential campaign to scare voters into backing the Republican candidate continued apace on Tuesday as McCain surrogate Joe the Plumber agreed that a Barack Obama presidency would mean the "death of Israel" and end democracy in America.

*****

The more the McCain campaign trots this nimrod out to be a symbol of "the real America" (and you'd think they could come up with someone who didn't look like a neo-Nazi skinhead), the more he looks like the soul brother of Ashley Todd and the other Zombies of Endless War for Jesus who populate McCain and Palin rallies these days. Not only isn't this guy a plumber, I'll bet he's never lifted a hammer -- or at least he hasn't had to since Camp Grandpa recruited him -- a guy named "Wurzelbacher" of all things -- to try to scare elderly Jews.

Of course, paying him is one thing, expecting him to show up when called on at a McCain rally, is another. Maybe he really is a plumber after all. 

McCain Crowd Brought in by the Busload


Funny, after hearing the wingnuts try to deride Obama's huge St. Louis crowds by claiming that the 100,000 people had to have been brought in by bus from neighboring Illinois, we now have the story of McCain's most recent crowd being brought to his event, by the busload:

A local school district official confirmed after the event that of the 6,000 people estimated by the fire marshal to be in attendance this morning, more than 4,000 were bused in from schools in the area. The entire 2,500-student Defiance School District was in attendance, the official said, in addition to at least three other schools from neighboring districts, one of which sent 14 buses.

It's not to say that I don't think taking school kids to political rallies is anything but a good thing, and if this is how McCain has to obtain two-thirds of his audience, well, good for him.

Strange Fruit Pt. 2 - Racial Intimidation is the Difference


Hanging a political figure in effigy is a despicable, reprehensible act. Simulating the burning alive of a political figure is a despicable, reprehensible act. The addition of the element of racial intimidation meant to terrorize the minority members of an entire community makes it even worse. I find it strange that no one cared to include the burning figure of John McCain in the previous discussions. I also find it curious that the Palin/McCain effigies are shown in news reports about that incident, but that there are no photos shown of the Obama effigies that have been hung on three separate US campuses now (Indiana, Kentucky, and Oregon). Why is considered acceptable to post photos of the one, not not the others? Is it because in the realm of journalism, there is considered to be a difference between the two?

My Google search for "Obama effigy" only turned up no images. And again, as for the West Hollywood incident, why does no one care to comment on the John McCain figure in the chimney?

A mannequin portraying US Republican vice-presidential nominee Alaska Governor Sarah Palin hangs by a noose as a mannequin portraying US Republican presidential nominee Senator John McCain protrudes from the chimney of a private residence in West Hollywood.

According to the coverge of the West Hollywood incident, (and again, why is McCain left out of the title?):

Palin incident
Secret Service agents recently visited a California home where a mannequin of Sarah Palin hangs from a noose.

Deputy Special Agent in Charge Wayne Williams says so far that incident seems to be a harmless, though unusual, Halloween display.

He tells The Associated Press they are not treating it as a threat.

But local officials aren't quite as accepting of the display, which also features John McCain surrounded by fake flames coming out of the bungalow's chimney.

West Hollywood Mayor Jeffrey Prang has urged resident Chad Morrisette to remove the mannequins, and Los Angeles County Supervisor Mike Antonovich is calling for an investigation into whether the effigy constitutes a hate crime because it targeted the candidates based on their political affiliation.

Is there a difference between a political statement, and a hate crime? Does the indifference of the neighborhood to such a display make a difference? What is the difference between free speech and an intimidating threat? More from the West Hollywood coverage:

Hate crime or free speech
County Counsel Ray Fortner said he would discuss the matter with the district attorney and report back to Antonovich with a legal opinion.

Prang said Morrisette had the right to create the display, but "I strongly oppose political speech that references violence -- real or perceived. I urge these residents to take down their display and find more constructive ways to express their opinion."

Morrisette said he has no plans to take down the effigy before Halloween. He said he and his partner, Mito Aviles, created it about three weeks ago but didn't expect to cause such a stir.

"If it's a political statement, it's that (McCain's and Palin's) politics are scary to us," Morrisette told The Los Angeles Times. "This is our palette and this is our venue of expression."

Neighbors didn't mind at first, but the media's fascination with the display has neighbors concerned about negative coverage reflecting poorly on the neighborhood, they said.

"We don't want to make enemies with anyone

As a final note, let me repeat, I  am not attempting to defend any of these acts, all of which I find detestable and reprehensible, showing poor judgement and bad taste. But when you add the element of racial intimidation, yes there is a difference. Let me also add that I have a difficult time finding a sexist, anti-woman aspect to the West Hollywood effigies, since there are both male and female figures. Maybe one could argue that it is anti-heterosexual, since the two men who made the display are a gay couple, but I think that would be a stretch as well.

Who is alan2300 and why is it allowed to spam us with video game solicitations?


Seriously, where's the hall monitor?

Feeling Confidant About an Obama Win?


Here's the map from Nov. 1, 2004:

2004map

Here's today's map from 538.com:

Please Read and Recommend the ACORN Communications Post


ACORN has done a lot of great work over the years. They deserve our support here.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/acorn_communications/2008/10/enough-is-enough.php

John and Cindy McCain on Fox: Disgusting


One of the features I like about Pollster.com is the "recent headlines" box on their main page. Here's the most recent entry, full of the kind of stuff one can only get from the "fair and balanced" world of Faux News:

McCain on Fox: I'm "particularly worried" about Ohio Appearing with his wife Cindy on Fox News Channel's Hannity and Colmes, Sen. John McCain made the following comments on the state of the race and his reported rift with Gov. Sarah Palin:


On the state of the race:


"The level of this excitement I have not seen matched. Now how that translates into votes and victory, I can't totally predict."

"I think that more than one candidate has read the polls at the time and not the trends. I guarantee you one thing - we'll be up late on election night."

On whether he is worried about how ACORN and other controversies will affect voting:
"Sure I am, sure I'm worried about those controversies and I'm particularly worried in Ohio."

On whether Obama's plans are truly socialist:
"Certainly it's part of the socialist creed. The philosophy is to share the wealth - now if Obama is a 'socialist' or not, that's something I'll let the theoreticians decide."

On the reported rift between McCain and his running mate:

"There's differences between myself and Sarah Palin - we're very close, we're both mavericks, there are a couple things we disagree on...but look, do you expect two mavericks to agree on every single thing? I'm so proud of her...I couldn't be more proud of her and the job she's done."

Asked about her comments on Sen. Obama's failure to live according to her husband's honorable code of conduct, Cindy McCain made the following comments:
"Well, what I meant by that was that my husband truly has lived his life by the code of conduct - he really has put his country first...that was really not a criticism of Sen. Obama in any respect."

"They're both good men."

ps - gotta love the attention to detail at Fox! Has John been cast out of his party? (via The Jed Report)

McCain, D-AZ

What Is Up With This McCain "Internal Polling Memo" in The WSJ?


Is it just me, or does this read like pure propaganda? Are they so desperate for good news, that they are placing it themselves in the Wall Street Journal?

TO: McCain Strategy Team
FROM: Bill McInturff, Lead Pollster, McCain-Palin 2008; Partner, Public Opinion Strategies
RE: State of the Race and Ballot Position
DATE: October 28, 2008

First, let's be clear: This is a hard election to "predict."

The historic nature of the candidates on both tickets, the huge influx of unregulated money by the Obama campaign, the dour public mood, and the unique level of voter interest all suggest an historic level of turn-out, not witnessed in over 40 years.

Our models/understanding of what is coming is therefore necessarily projective, but, here is what we know for sure:

The McCain campaign has made impressive strides over the last week of tracking.

The campaign is functionally tied across the battleground states ... with our numbers IMPROVING sharply over the last four tracks.

The key number in our mind is Senator Obama's level of support and the margin difference between the two candidates.

As other public polls begin to show Senator Obama dropping below 50% and the margin over McCain beginning to approach margin of error with a week left, all signs say we are headed to an election that may easily be too close to call by next Tuesday.

Read more »

Circular Lying Squad


A picture is worth a thousand words, indeed.

The Axis Of Weasel

 

An alternate take, courtesy of Kos:

Video of McCain Supporters, Pottsville, PA, Oct. 27, 2008


Jeffrey Feldman has a post up on Huffington Post that examines the negative impact that videos of McCain/Palin supporters have had on their campaign. Another gift that keeps on giving, one could say:

The panic whipped up by the McCain campaign in PA sounds horrific because of the ugliness and hate that it pours into the election, but the real threat it poses to our ability to get things done. If John McCain were to win the election by kicking up enough anti-Muslim, anti-African-American, anti-Liberal, conspiracy theory rage--he would have transformed the country into utter chaos in the process. Such a campaign--if victorious--would push our civic culture beyond the point where it was able to recover and function. And under such conditions, McCain would ultimately preside over a nation capable of little more than pitchforks and torches.

More and more it seems that John McCain has bet the farm on winning Pennsylvania at by turning the race as ugly as possible, which means abandoning all pretense of healthy civic exchange. The results are disquieting. In recent days, a Republican group circulated an email claiming that a vote for Obama was tantamount to enabling the rise of Hitler and would lead to a 'second Holocaust.' Can it get worse than that? Apparently, it can. At a rally in Pottsville, McCain supporters gather in a threatening mob shouting 'Terrorist!' 'Communist!' 'Child Killer!' and openly call for the death of Sen. McCain's opponent. As high profile Republicans endorse Obama and reject the politics of bigotry and violence, McCain continues to stoke the rage in Pennsylvania in some vain hope that the destruction of democratic culture in one state will win him the chance to lead the country.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-feldman/mccains-panic-in-pa-more_b_138504.html

Is John McCain a Self-Loathing Socialist? McCain/Drudge/Fox "Redistribution" Smear Shot Down by Washington Post


I guess the McCain camp is operating on a "tell the lies faster than they can be debunked" end of campaign strategy. There are so many lies flying out of the McCain HQ that it really is hard to keep up with them.

Yesterday's news focused in a large part on the recording of a radio interview that Obama did in 2001 in which he discussed various aspects of the civil rights movement. In a now-familiar pattern, the McCain camp released the tape and their highly-skewed interpretation of it to the Drudge Report, then pointed to the Drudge Report coverage to then push it to Fox News, which then ran with the story all day.

Today the Washington Post completely shoots down all of the McCain/Drudge/Fox blather in one succint statement in its article Obama's Redistribution 'Bombshell':

In other words, Obama says pretty much the opposite of what the McCain camp says he said. Contrary to the spin put on his remarks by McCain economics adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin, he does not express "regret" that the Supreme Court has not been more "radical." Nor does he describe the Court's refusal to take up economic redistribution questions as a "tragedy." He uses the word "tragedy" to refer not to the Supreme Court, but to the civil rights movement:

One of the tragedies of the civil rights movement was that the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think, there was a tendency to lose track of the political and organizing activities on the ground that are able to bring about the coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change.

The entire Washington Post article is well worth reading, but the main point is, as usual, that the McCain camp has become expert on dishing out lie after lie about Obama, and subsequently gets the rest of us to waste a lot of time keeping the debunking machine running at full speed.

Finally, if the McCain campaign is really that concered with pointing the finger at candidates who trumpet their accomplishments about "spreading the wealth", maybe he should talk to his running mate:

A few weeks before she was nominated for Vice-President, she told a visiting journalist--Philip Gourevitch, of this magazine--that "we're set up, unlike other states in the union, where it's collectively Alaskans own the resources. So we share in the wealth when the development of these resources occurs."

This quote comes from an excellent article by Hendrik Hertzberg in the current New Yorker, "Like, Socialism", which examines the faltering McCain  campaign's final strategy, which is the attempt to hang the tag of "socialist" around Barack Obama's neck:

"This campaign in the next couple of weeks is about one thing," Todd Akin, a Republican congressman from Missouri, told a McCain rally outside St. Louis. "It's a referendum on socialism." "With all due respect," Senator George Voinovich, Republican of Ohio, said, "the man is a socialist." At an airport rally in Roswell, New Mexico, a well-known landing spot for space aliens, Governor Palin warned against Obama's tax proposals. "Friends," she said, "now is no time to experiment with socialism." And McCain, discussing those proposals, agreed that they sounded "a lot like socialism."

Good luck with that, Sen. McCain. We all recall that moment, when asked by that young woman him why her father, a doctor, should be "penalized" by being "in a huge tax bracket.":

McCain replied that "wealthy people can afford more" and that "the very wealthy, because they can afford tax lawyers and all kinds of loopholes, really don't pay nearly as much as you think they do." The exchange continued:

YOUNG WOMAN: Are we getting closer and closer to, like, socialism and stuff?. . .
MCCAIN: Here's what I really believe: That when you reach a certain level of comfort, there's nothing wrong with paying somewhat more.

So, Sen. McCain of 2008, is Sen. McCain of 2000 a "socialist", too? 

 

 

Former PA Judge Who Signed Jewish Email is Part of PA GOP Lawsuit Against ACORN


The former Pennsylvania Supreme  Court judge who signed the now disavowed McCain campign email that compared a vote for Obama to the Holocaust has apologized for providing her signature for the email.

It turns out that she is also involved in the lawsuit that the Pennsylvania GOP is bring ing against ACORN:

Sandra Schultz Newman said she regrets that she did not review the final draft more carefully before it was released.

"Some of the language was inappropriate and intemperate," Newman wrote in an e-mail statement Monday. "I apologize to anyone who was offended by this misguided e-mail."

The e-mail sent Thursday to 75,000 Jewish voters in Pennsylvania warns "Fellow Jewish Voters" of the danger of a second Holocaust due to the threats to Israel from its neighbors. It also praises Republican presidential candidate John McCain's qualifications over those of Obama, the Democratic nominee.

*****

A copy of the e-mail provided by Democratic officials says it was "Paid for by the Republican Federal Committee of PA - Victory 2008." The signatures of Schultz and two other McCain supporters were on the message.

Newman also has been involved in the state Republican Party's civil lawsuit against the community-activist group ACORN and Secretary of State Pedro Cortes, the state's top election official.

A hearing in state Commonwealth Court is scheduled for Wednesday on the suit, in which the GOP accuses ACORN of fostering voter-registration fraud. State officials say the county-run election system has built-in safeguards to prevent fraudulent ballots from being cast. Democratic leaders say the allegations are simply demagoguery.

Read the entire article here:

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/O/OBAMA_GOP_E_MAIL?SITE=OHALL2&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

McCain Thinks He Deserves a Prize


Here's an interesting spoken-word clip of McCain reading from his autobiography that someone made into a YouTube clip. It seems like the Obama folks could make a great political spot with this (minus the preachy captions, in my opinion).

McCain's voice from the audio version of his book, juxtaposed with his Saddleback forum comments.

From McCain's book Worth the Fighting For:

"I didn't decide to run for president to start a national crusade for the political reforms I believed in or to run a campaign as if it were some grand act of patriotism. In truth, I wanted to become president because it had become my ambition to be president. I was 62 years old when I made the decision, and I thought it was my one shot at the prize...

"In truth, I'd had the ambition for a long time... it had been there, in the back of my mind, for years, as if it were simply a symptom of my natural restlessness."

- John McCain

Chuck Hagel on Palin: "I Don't Think She Is Qualified to be the President of the United States"


Great new article up in the New Yorker today: "Odd Man Out: Chuck Hagel's Republican Exile", by Connie Bruck. Let's cut tho the chase:

Hagel may be the only senior Republican elected official who has publicly criticized McCain's choice of Governor Sarah Palin as his running mate. "I don't believe she's qualified to be President of the United States," Hagel told me. "The first judgment a potential President makes is who their running mate is--and I don't think John made a very good selection." He scoffed at McCain's attempts to portray her as an experienced politician. "To try to make the excuse that she looks out her window and sees Russia--and that she's commander of the Alaska National Guard." He added, "There is no question that this candidate is arguably the thinnest-résumé candidate for Vice-President in the history of America."

******

For Hagel, almost as disturbing as Palin's lack of experience is her willingness--in disparaging remarks about Joe Biden's long Senate career, for example--to belittle the notion that experience is important. "There's no question, she knows her market," Hagel said. "She knows her audience, and she's going right after them. And I'll tell you why that's dangerous. It's dangerous because you don't want to define down the standards in any institution, ever, in life. You want to always strive to define standards up. If you start defining standards down--'Well, I don't have a big education, I don't have experience'--yes, there's a point to be made that not all the smartest people come out of Yale or Harvard. But to intentionally define down in some kind of wild populism, that those things don't count in a complicated, dangerous world--that's dangerous in itself.

Will we be seeing a Hagel endorsement of Obama this week?

College Republicans Executive Director Backtracks on Claim that "B" Hoaxer was a Volunteer


On Friday, October 24, it was reported widely that "B" hoaxer Ashley Todd was a volunteer for the McCain campaign, working for the College Republicans:

Ethan Eilon, executive director of the College Republicans National Committee, told FOX News that Todd was volunteering as a field representative through his organization and that she had taken a year off from her studies at Blinn College to work on the campaign.

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/24/mccain-campaign-volunteer-admits-alleged-attack-hoax/

Ethan Eilon has now changed his story, stating that Ashley Todd was, in fact, a paid employee of the College Republicans:

Today it was confirmed by Ethan Eioln of the CRNC (College Republican National Committee)  that she was contracted to be paid $3,600 for her August to election day work.

http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/analysis/506

This of course begs the question, why did the McCain campaign and the College Republicans insist throughout the weekend that Todd was just a volunteer?

The Buzzflash story includes an interesting bit of information on the CRNC:

The CRNC separated from the Republican National Committee in 2001, becoming a Section 527 organization. But as recent experience with 527s shows, that doesn't mean that significant ties were cut. The Center for Public Integrity called it one of the most successful youth-oriented fundraisers in the country, noting the more than $10.6 million it raised in a span of two years. The CRNC is clearly a major player for the Republican National Committee, receiving $25,000 from the RNC in 2002. The Center for Public Integrity also notes that most of the money raised by the group is spent on direct mail efforts and paying field representatives such as Todd.

I find this to be important primarily because of the McCain campaign's regional communications director for Pennsylvania, Peter Feldman, who was involved with pushing the early, false aspects of the hoax story to the media, was also involved with the Jewish-smear email that was renounced over the weekend.

The hoax incident is still receiving attention in the media. Huffington Post has two entries today addressing the issue, both of which are derived in part from much of the coverage the incident received here at Talking Points Memo:

Marty Kaplan's "Move Over Willie Horton",

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marty-kaplan/move-over-willie-horton_b_138196.html

and Karen Russell's "Ashley the Liar: Another Moment in 'The Black Kid Did It' History":

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/karen-russell/ashley-the-liar-another-m_b_137876.html

 

Biden was Right: Pentagon Panel Says "Prepare for a Likely First 270-Day Crisis"


After listening to the McCain camp hammering Biden on his "the next president will be tested" comment for the past week, we find that a Pentagon panel has just issued a report saying that the next administration should be prepared to deal with a major crisis within the first 270 days of taking office. I hope the Obama campaign works this into their speeches this week.

Veteran Pentagon consultant Michael Bayer, chairman of the Defense Business Board, told his fellow panelists that the new president's inner circle should "set aside time in transition to identify the planning, gravitas and interagency process necessary to respond to a likely first-270-day crisis."

From Kennedy (Bay of Pigs) to Johnson (Gulf of Tonkin) to Bush (9/11)," too many presidents were ill prepared for this," Bayer warns.

"For months, the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the service chiefs and the Joint Staff have been preparing for the first wartime transfer of Pentagon political authority in four decades," notes Inside Defense, which broke word of Bayer's presentation. "In addition to identifying defense policy issues for an incoming to understand, the military is also on high operational alert."

The final quote from the article appears to be a direct reference to the lack of readiness of the Bush Administration, and Donald Rumsfeld in particular:

A key goal for the next administration, according to Bayer, must be to fill civilian posts requiring Senate confirmation as soon as possible.

The incoming administration "must not wait until June" to get assistant secretaries confirmed and October for deputy assistant secretaries to be Senate confirmed, his briefing states.

"Need a very concerted, well-defined process to have top 3 tiers ready to go to Senate confirmation in first 30 days," Bayer recommends.

Read the entire Biden-validating post here:

http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/10/pentagon-panel.html

Today's McCain Campaign Smear: Obama Called for Redistribution of Wealth in 2001 Radio Interview


How is it possible that Bush/McCain regime can be so wrong, on so many things, so much of the time?

The Drudge Report has it's main headline today blaring the following: 2001 OBAMA: TRAGEDY THAT 'REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH' NOT PURSUED BY SUPREME COURT

This is based on a radio interview that Obama did in 2001 in which Obama went into extensive detail to explain why the courts should not get into that business of 'redistributing' wealth. (emphasis mine). The McCain campaign, with an assist from Drudge, is claiming the exact opposite of what Obama actually said.

Jake Tapper at http://abcnews.blogs.com/ has the best coverage of this so far:

On September 6, 2001, then-state senator Barack Obama appeared on a public radio chat show to discuss "Slavery and the Constitution." You can listen to the whole show HERE. In that show -- WBEZ-FM's "Odyssey" -- Obama discussed the role of the courts in civil rights. Today, aides say, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., will seize on some of those remarks, as hyped by Mr. Drudge.

Tapper includes a transcript of part of the interview:

Obama in that interview said, "If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement, and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples, so that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at a lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I'd be okay."

"But," Obama said, "The Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society.  And to that extent as radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical.  It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, as least as it's been interpreted, and Warren Court interpreted in the same way that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties, says what the states can't do to you, says what the federal government can't do to you, but it doesn't say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf. And that hasn't shifted."

Obama said "one of the, I think, the tragedies of the civil rights movement, was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change, and in some ways we still stuffer from that."

A caller, "Karen," asked if it's "too late for that kind of reparative work economically?"  And she asked if that work should be done through the courts or through legislation.

"Maybe I'm showing my bias here as a legislator as well as a law professor," Obama said. "I'm not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts. The institution just isn't structured that way."

There will be a coordinated effort of the part of McCain, Drudge Report, Fox News, and other conservative blogs to twist Obama's words.

Bill Burton of the Obama Campaign has responded:

"In this interview back in 2001, Obama was talking about the civil rights movement - and the kind of work that has to be done on the ground to make sure that everyone can live out the promise of equality," Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton says. "Make no mistake, this has nothing to do with Obama's economic plan or his plan to give the middle class a tax cut. It's just another distraction from an increasingly desperate McCain campaign."

Burton continues: "In the interview, Obama went into extensive detail to explain why the courts should not get into that business of 'redistributing' wealth. Obama's point - and what he called a tragedy - was that legal victories in the Civil Rights led too many people to rely on the courts to change society for the better. That view is shared by conservative judges and legal scholars across the country.

"As Obama has said before and written about, he believes that change comes from the bottom up - not from the corridors of Washington," Burton says. "He worked in struggling communities to improve the economic situation of people on the South Side of Chicago, who lost their jobs when the steel plants closed. And he's worked as a legislator to provide tax relief and health care to middle-class families. And so Obama's point was simply that if we want to improve economic conditions for people in this country, we should do so by bringing people together at the community level and getting everyone involved in our democratic process."

With eight days left, the McCain smear machine is going full-throttle, and there is nothing they won't lie about to try to save their campaign. Appalling and pathetic.

 

« October 19, 2008 - October 25, 2008 | Home | November 2, 2008 - November 8, 2008 »

astral66

user-pic

Following: 55
Followers: 57

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address