Nice job Al, not that I understood much of your technical explanation.
I really like the TPMDC feature and the work the crew of reporters and bloggers are doing.
I like this Al, I like TPMDC also.
And I like the ability, as I have written before, to communicate back and forth. We were just in the chat room last week praising you.
Great work, Al...I didn't understand a word you said, but I'm sure its impressive! ;-)
Now if only you could get my #$%^&*&^%$ dashboard to work more than just sporadically! (although I'm grateful that it did work for a short time on 2 separate occasions!)
did you get my email responding to this?
I did Al, and I've responded...Still can't access my dashboard, but I appreciate your attention to trying to get me there!
Yeah. That was enlightening. Maybe next time you could do a Grey's Anatomy type of explanation (with pictures).
Can I make a suggestion? Under the Muckraker section, the most hideous picture often stays there days at a time (Maddov's Cheshire cat smirk must have been up for at least a week). I would ask that you consider our retinas, and replace the offending pics with something like maggots eating a rotting corpse. You know -- something easier to stomach! Or maybe just rotate more often.
A non-technical preface or side comment might help there.
Speaking of website stuff... since my email seems to have vanished into the ozone, here's something I sent it a little while ago:
Website improvement request
Make that plural.
First, I am generally pleased with TPM, and started my first ever blog here on New Years Day.
1) I suggest you start a section or blog for site comments, complaints, bugs, and meta-discussion. I've seen individuals post such in their personal blogs. Having a centralized "Site Feedback" or "Help Forum" blog or section might be valuable.
2) Can you reduce the overhead of your pages? I'm running a 1.8GHz processor with plenty of memory and hard disk space under XP and browsing with Firefox. While slowdowns are not nearly as bad as they were in late 2008 there remain inexplicable delays in opening many pages. I suspect slow javascript as one factor. I also notice that many ads take a long time for URL DNS resolution ("looking for...") like 5-10 seconds (could be my ISP DNS is slow?) and otherwise slow down pages ("Waiting for ..."). You could put all ads at the end of the HTML so that if they are slow at least the main content is available right away.
3) Move the personal access buttons (edit, your blog, blog now...) to be near the "Log In" button. I need to view pages at a siize such that when I click Log In, the useful access buttons are slightly off screen. "Your blog" and "blog now" are the most used buttons (in that order for me). If they were on the left of the row, that would help, if moving them next to the Log In button won't work.
4) Log In is sometimes erratic. Should I stay logged in as long as the browser is open (one or more tabs or windows)? It seems I often have to Sign In again in order to leave a comment, but sometimes the site already knows.
5) After commenting, there is a "return to original entry" link. This is sorta handy. It would be very nice to be able to 'return to comment', with the link being either the permalink for the comment being replied to, or the new comment just submitted. In longer threads, it's a real pain to find where I was when I commented and continue reading comments from there. The Back button doesn't help because the text entry box shows up at the bottom of the thread, not right at the target comment location.
5a) Return to entry seems to be automatic when replying to Cafe articles. Is there a reason it's not auto for personal blog comments (see5 above)?
Again, thanks for running the site. I hope you can implement some or all of these suggestions soon.
Al, you rock! Thanks for the improvements and checking in. Do you have an estimated launch date for the electroshock function? I've been really looking forward to that one!
Did you see the Simpson's episode where they zapped each other during a therapy session? It would be a fun feature!
Nice job Al, not that I understood much of your technical explanation.
I really like the TPMDC feature and the work the crew of reporters and bloggers are doing.
January 26, 2009 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like this Al, I like TPMDC also.
And I like the ability, as I have written before, to communicate back and forth. We were just in the chat room last week praising you.
January 26, 2009 6:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great work, Al...I didn't understand a word you said, but I'm sure its impressive! ;-)
Now if only you could get my #$%^&*&^%$ dashboard to work more than just sporadically! (although I'm grateful that it did work for a short time on 2 separate occasions!)
January 26, 2009 6:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
did you get my email responding to this?
January 26, 2009 7:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
I did Al, and I've responded...Still can't access my dashboard, but I appreciate your attention to trying to get me there!
January 27, 2009 1:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah. That was enlightening. Maybe next time you could do a Grey's Anatomy type of explanation (with pictures).
Can I make a suggestion? Under the Muckraker section, the most hideous picture often stays there days at a time (Maddov's Cheshire cat smirk must have been up for at least a week). I would ask that you consider our retinas, and replace the offending pics with something like maggots eating a rotting corpse. You know -- something easier to stomach! Or maybe just rotate more often.
January 26, 2009 8:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
A non-technical preface or side comment might help there.
Speaking of website stuff... since my email seems to have vanished into the ozone, here's something I sent it a little while ago:
Website improvement request
Make that plural.
First, I am generally pleased with TPM, and started my first ever blog here on New Years Day.
1) I suggest you start a section or blog for site comments, complaints, bugs, and meta-discussion. I've seen individuals post such in their personal blogs. Having a centralized "Site Feedback" or "Help Forum" blog or section might be valuable.
2) Can you reduce the overhead of your pages? I'm running a 1.8GHz processor with plenty of memory and hard disk space under XP and browsing with Firefox. While slowdowns are not nearly as bad as they were in late 2008 there remain inexplicable delays in opening many pages. I suspect slow javascript as one factor. I also notice that many ads take a long time for URL DNS resolution ("looking for...") like 5-10 seconds (could be my ISP DNS is slow?) and otherwise slow down pages ("Waiting for ..."). You could put all ads at the end of the HTML so that if they are slow at least the main content is available right away.
3) Move the personal access buttons (edit, your blog, blog now...) to be near the "Log In" button. I need to view pages at a siize such that when I click Log In, the useful access buttons are slightly off screen. "Your blog" and "blog now" are the most used buttons (in that order for me). If they were on the left of the row, that would help, if moving them next to the Log In button won't work.
4) Log In is sometimes erratic. Should I stay logged in as long as the browser is open (one or more tabs or windows)? It seems I often have to Sign In again in order to leave a comment, but sometimes the site already knows.
5) After commenting, there is a "return to original entry" link. This is sorta handy. It would be very nice to be able to 'return to comment', with the link being either the permalink for the comment being replied to, or the new comment just submitted. In longer threads, it's a real pain to find where I was when I commented and continue reading comments from there. The Back button doesn't help because the text entry box shows up at the bottom of the thread, not right at the target comment location.
5a) Return to entry seems to be automatic when replying to Cafe articles. Is there a reason it's not auto for personal blog comments (see5 above)?
Again, thanks for running the site. I hope you can implement some or all of these suggestions soon.
January 26, 2009 8:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Al, you rock! Thanks for the improvements and checking in. Do you have an estimated launch date for the electroshock function? I've been really looking forward to that one!
January 26, 2009 11:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did you see the Simpson's episode where they zapped each other during a therapy session? It would be a fun feature!
January 27, 2009 1:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Zap!
January 27, 2009 7:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Zap, back! Twice!
January 27, 2009 5:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
That was funny! Electroshock....hahahahahahaha.
January 27, 2009 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
test comment
February 2, 2009 3:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
test
February 20, 2009 4:48 PM | Reply | Permalink