<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>asemaany&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/asemaany/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/asemaany/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/asemaany//3302</id>
   <updated>2008-06-05T21:52:20Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Pro-War War</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/06/prowar-war.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.198980</id>
   
   <published>2008-06-05T21:52:20Z</published>
   <updated>2008-06-05T21:52:20Z</updated>
   
   <summary>No one talks how Hillary got here. Remember the NAFTA story in Ohio? Harper, the conservative pro-Iraq war prime minister declassified a distorted memo of Barack Obama&apos;s adviser responding to Canadians&apos; questions regarding NAFTA. Harper put her on top in...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>asemaany</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/asemaany/">
      <![CDATA[No one talks how Hillary got here. <br /><br />Remember the NAFTA story in Ohio? Harper, the conservative pro-Iraq war prime minister declassified a distorted memo of Barack Obama's adviser responding to Canadians' questions regarding NAFTA. <br /><br />Harper put her on top in Ohio and I suspect if that happened on a push from NeoCons of US or Harper himself didn't like Obama.<br /><br />It's shameful. They may even kill him the way they killed Kennedy on the same day under the pretext of Palestine ...&nbsp;&nbsp;  <br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>US Presidential Election or American AIPAC Idol?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/06/us-presidential-election-or-am.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.198821</id>
   
   <published>2008-06-05T04:27:11Z</published>
   <updated>2008-06-05T04:27:11Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Isn't it a shame that all three candidates for the US next president have to appear in front of AIPAC and sing essentially the same song and worriedly wait to see who better pleases the Israel-Appointed judges? Isn't it...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>asemaany</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/asemaany/">
      <![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Isn't it a shame that all three candidates for the US next president have to appear in front of AIPAC and sing essentially the same song and worriedly wait to see who better pleases the Israel-Appointed judges? <br />Isn't it unpatriotic to see that a lobby has such a power that all three candidates of the United States enthusiastically appear in front of its judges and try their best to please them?<br /><br />"In their 2006 working paper <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Israel_Lobby_and_U.S._Foreign_Policy%20"><i><a>The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy</a></i></a>, University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer and Harvard University Kennedy School of Government professor Stephen Walt
accuse AIPAC of being "the most powerful and best known" component of a
larger pro-Israel lobby that, they say, distorts American foreign
policy. They write: "AIPAC's success is due to its ability to reward
legislators and congressional candidates who support its agenda, and to
punish those who challenge it. ... AIPAC makes sure that its friends
get strong financial support from the myriad pro-Israel PACs.
Those seen as hostile to Israel, on the other hand, can be sure that
AIPAC will direct campaign contributions to their political opponents.
... The bottom line is that AIPAC, which is a <i>de facto</i> agent
for a foreign government, has a stranglehold on the U.S. Congress. Open
debate about U.S. policy towards Israel does not occur there, even
though that policy has important consequences for the entire world."" (from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIPAC">wikipedia</a>)<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
