<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>aschrepf&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/aschrepf/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/aschrepf/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/aschrepf//3908</id>
   <updated>2008-11-22T03:43:44Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Why Bill Ayers Didn&apos;t Work</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/aschrepf/2008/11/why-bill-ayers-didnt-work.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/aschrepf//3908.245477</id>
   
   <published>2008-11-22T03:12:34Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-22T03:43:44Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Apologies if my brain lags behind the bulk of the TPM community but something has bothered me for some time.&nbsp; Why didn't Bill Ayers seriously derail Barack Obama's candidacy?&nbsp; To be clear I don't believe that the two men...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>aschrepf</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/aschrepf/">
      <![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Apologies if my brain lags behind the bulk of the TPM community but something has bothered me for some time.&nbsp; Why didn't Bill Ayers seriously derail Barack Obama's candidacy?&nbsp; To be clear I don't believe that the two men had anything close to a meaningful relationship except on the provincial issue of education in the greater Chicago area, but since when did the truth matter?&nbsp; Bill Ayers did do some really dangerous and reprehensible things and remains largely unapologetic.&nbsp; Barack Obama did know him and work with him; whether this relationship was peripheral shouldn't have mattered to the large portion of the electorate who take a brief and shallow interest in political campaigns particularly in light of the mainstream media's penchance&nbsp;for noise amplification.&nbsp; What gives?</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; After 9/11 the Bush administration launched a protracted and concerted effort to&nbsp;brand the enemies of America.&nbsp; Much of this we now know was to create a convenient umbrella definiton under which Al Qaeda, the Taliban, Saddam Hussein and a host of other unsympathetic entities would find themselves.&nbsp; It worked to a large degree.&nbsp; Many thoughtful people were persuaded to set aside the myriad cultural and religious differences between these organizations,&nbsp;and more importantly, to blur the&nbsp;serious divergence of their objectives.&nbsp; For instance at this moment many intelligence analysts would have to acknowledge&nbsp;a high level of antipathy between the Taliban leadership and the remnants of Al Qaeda stemming from the loss of&nbsp;Afghanistan.&nbsp; </p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; This refusal to&nbsp;make fine distinctions did a&nbsp;great disservice to the public and armed forces of the&nbsp;United States&nbsp;and&nbsp;gave&nbsp;rise to the popular conception of terrorism as endemic to the middle east&nbsp;and muslim societies.&nbsp; It helped us forget that a handful of years ago a young man left a crude and devastating bomb in Oklahoma City.&nbsp; It helped us forget that in our lifetime a bomb was planted in a c&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>McCain Asks Debates be Postponed</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/mccain-asks-debates-be-postpon.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.219351</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-24T19:09:31Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-24T19:09:31Z</updated>
   
   <summary> It&apos;s pretty clear where this is going.  McCain, famous for showing up and injecting himself into negotiations, is demanding a seat at the bailout table.  It&apos;s a clever, calculating move.  Obama must now respond to the McCain initiative sure...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>aschrepf</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/aschrepf/">
      	It&apos;s pretty clear where this is going.  McCain, famous for showing up and injecting himself into negotiations, is demanding a seat at the bailout table.  It&apos;s a clever, calculating move.  Obama must now respond to the McCain initiative sure to be sold as a bi-partisan, presidential gesture.  Campaign?  Debate?  Not when the country faces such a grave economic threat.  Of course, McCain sees an opportunity for political points.  Maybe he can get it called the McCain Rescue Bill.  So what&apos;s Obama to do?  Should he show up in Washington and try to get his name on the package?  I don&apos;t like this one bit.  
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>What Country Are You Living In?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/what-country-are-you-living-in.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.218290</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-20T02:25:17Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-20T02:25:17Z</updated>
   
   <summary> The results of a recent Gallup Daily Tracking Poll illuminate a very telling difference between supporters of Barack Obama and John McCain.  73% of the Illinois Senator&apos;s supporters believe the economy is in a recession or depression.  McCain loyalists?...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>aschrepf</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/aschrepf/">
      	The results of a recent Gallup Daily Tracking Poll illuminate a very telling difference between supporters of Barack Obama and John McCain.  73% of the Illinois Senator&apos;s supporters believe the economy is in a recession or depression.  McCain loyalists?  45%.  That figure is correct, more than half of McCain&apos;s supporters do not believe we are experiencing a recession or depression event.  My initial reaction was that these people must be wealthy and insulated from the economic travails most of of face on a daily basis.  But that can&apos;t be right.  Are a quarter of Americans actually that well off?  Hell no.  That tells me that McCain has either a lot of &quot;glass half-full&quot; or &quot;brain half-empty&quot; supporters.  I&apos;m not an economist and I don&apos;t pretend to be but allow me to share my personal economic situation to explain to any McCain trollers exactly why I&apos;m supporting Obama.  I make about $15,000 a year in take home pay.  After rent and groceries, a cell phone bill, state minimum car insurance and student loans I have very little left over.  I get health insurance through my job, and my premiums are pretty high.  All the same I manage to save a little money.  If Barack Obama is elected there are two things I particularly look forward to.  The first is a comprehensive health care bill.  I know there are no guarantees but if his health care plan were implemented I could purchase a better plan than the one I have for less money.  More money for my savings account.  Second, his tax plan would allow me to save (by my calculation) an additional $1,200.  What&apos;s the point of all this?  That savings account of mine.  You see I don&apos;t particularly like my cash sitting around generating very little interest.  I would like to either invest it in the stock market or in myself and go back to school.  Am I, average Joe American, going to invest a dime if someone is elected that has supported financial de-regulation for 26 years?  Hell no.  Am I, football-watcher and cold pizza-eater, going to incur more debt in a foundering job market?  Hell no.  And that&apos;s the point.  No matter how much crap the Republicans spout about the wealthy driving our economy it is people like me and the rest of the middle class who have to be willing to spend, invest and take a few chances for our economy to rebound.  What&apos;s the number one cause of bankruptcy in America?  Health care costs.  If every man and woman in America believed that if they or a loved one got sick- really sick- they would be fully covered and cared for, how much more would they spend and invest?  Would they maybe even take a few chances? 
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Must Read From the Nation Online</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/must-read-from-the-nation-onli.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.216810</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-15T01:07:43Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-15T01:07:43Z</updated>
   
   <summary> I came across an excellent piece from The Nation today.  Check it out.  www.nation.co.ke/News/world/-/1068/469652/-/rxnf86/-/ It confirms one of the things I have long suspected- that our advantage in registration is not reflected in the current polls.  Gallup and USA...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>aschrepf</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/aschrepf/">
      <![CDATA[	I came across an excellent piece from The Nation today.  Check it out.  www.nation.co.ke/News/world/-/1068/469652/-/rxnf86/-/	It confirms one of the things I have long suspected- that our advantage in registration is not reflected in the current polls.  Gallup and USA Today are specifically listed as using roughly equal numbers of Democrats and Republicans in their polls.  This is a problem because there are currently 11 million more Democrats than Republicans registered to vote in the country.  	But it goes much deeper than that.  What exactly has led to the current state of panic in blogistan?  These very polls.  The media pursuing McCain's asinine "lipstick" story is not to blame.  Neither is his blatant skullduggery in the latest ads.  It's these polls, leading us to believe that once again the forces of darkness have enveloped our brightest hopes.  	THEY HAVE NOT.  I believe if this election were held today we would still win (with Colorado, New Mexico and New Hampshire.)  We will win if we don't fall for another massive psych-out.  Deflating us is how they win.  Don't be beaten down.  If we knock on more doors, register more voters, and make more phone calls, we will win.  Hook up with the campaign now. <br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Not Panicking, Not Shaking, Not Gonna Get Scared</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/not-panicking-not-shaking-not.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.216663</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-14T03:32:33Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-14T03:32:33Z</updated>
   
   <summary> 2 points.  That&apos;s what McCain leads by in the Gallup Daily tracking poll.  That&apos;s on the first day of the weekend too, when McCain supporters are more likely to be home than Obama supporters.  That&apos;s assuming that Gallup is...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>aschrepf</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/aschrepf/">
      	2 points.  That&apos;s what McCain leads by in the Gallup Daily tracking poll.  That&apos;s on the first day of the weekend too, when McCain supporters are more likely to be home than Obama supporters.  That&apos;s assuming that Gallup is using the right mix of cell phones and land lines and that those 2 million new registered democrats have made their way on to their calling lists.  I have my doubts, but let&apos;s go ahead and call the Gallup accurate and McCain is up 2 points.  Let&apos;s look at the electoral college maps.  If Obama holds in Pennsylvania and Michigan, then he has to win Ohio, Florida, or Colorado and New Mexico.  The RCP averages have him down slightly in Ohio and Florida and up slightly in Colorado and New Mexico.  That means, if those polls are accurate, Obama would win the election.  It hasn&apos;t been a great week for Obama and it appears he would still win the election if it were held today.  Let&apos;s talk about the press.  They are finally getting pissed off.  Why shouldn&apos;t they be?  The McCain campaign has decided that Sarah Palin is to be treated differently than every other candidate in the modern era of politics.  She can&apos;t be interviewed except by friendly figures, she can&apos;t be called out when she lies, and she is not required to demonstrate even a passing knowledge of foreign policy issues.  We are seeing something I would call a Palin bubble.  Bubbles burst.  This one will too, but we don&apos;t get to decide when.  Adoration is followed by scrutiny and the thinner the story the faster it all peters out.  Remember when the press became critical of Obama?  It took him three of four months to right the ship, and Sarah Palin doesn&apos;t have three or four months.  As soon as the debates start this election will be Obama v. McCain again.  One final thought: call and canvass.  Hook up with the official Obama campaign.  Do it tomorrow.  Follow through.  This election will be won or lost by which campaign turns out more bodies and achieves more face to face interaction.  Don&apos;t give up.  This was never going to be easy.
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Hit the Streets</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/hit-the-streets.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.216312</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-12T19:22:31Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-12T19:22:31Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Sarah Palin is not going away.  McCain is running an aggressive campaign of distraction.  No amount of livid blogging is going to change that.  Here&apos;s the good news.  Sarah Palin&apos;s effect on the race is a bubble and that...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>aschrepf</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/aschrepf/">
      	Sarah Palin is not going away.  McCain is running an aggressive campaign of distraction.  No amount of livid blogging is going to change that.  Here&apos;s the good news.  Sarah Palin&apos;s effect on the race is a bubble and that bubble is going to burst.  The press is waking up and running articles on Palin which immediately and directly contradict her lying.  They are pissed that they don&apos;t have access to her and the first leg of the Charlie Gibson interview proved that she doesn&apos;t know a goddamn thing about foreign policy.  None of that matters if we don&apos;t contact independent swing voters face to face and make our case for Senator Obama.  If you don&apos;t feel you have time to think long and hard about another four to eight years of Republican winter.  Make no mistake: canvassing in conjunction with the Obama campaign is the single most effective way to win this election.  If you live in a swing state this election hinges on you.  I&apos;m in Iowa.  We&apos;re not losing this state again.  Ohio, Florida, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Colorado- we need you.  Hit the streets.
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Go Give Fox Hell</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/go-give-fox-hell.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.214309</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-07T00:35:03Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-07T00:35:03Z</updated>
   
   <summary> I just visited the Fox News website and told them they could go straight to hell.  This flag story is absolute bullshit.  Go to the website and show your support for Sen. Obama....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>aschrepf</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/aschrepf/">
      	I just visited the Fox News website and told them they could go straight to hell.  This flag story is absolute bullshit.  Go to the website and show your support for Sen. Obama.
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Gallup and Rasmussen Only.</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/gallup-and-rasmussen-only.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.213594</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-04T21:45:12Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-04T21:45:12Z</updated>
   
   <summary> If we must, as Democrats, wring our hands and lose sleep over national polling, let&apos;s at least do it consistently.  I deeply respect this website but I am tired of logging on to find that (gasp!) Obama&apos;s lead has...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>aschrepf</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/aschrepf/">
      	If we must, as Democrats, wring our hands and lose sleep over national polling, let&apos;s at least do it consistently.  I deeply respect this website but I am tired of logging on to find that (gasp!) Obama&apos;s lead has disappeared.  The CBS poll showing a 42-42 tie uses a sample only a fraction of either the the Gallup or Rasmussen polls which show Obama maintaining his lead, day in and day out, over the last week.  The Repubs may well get a bounce from their convention, but what really matters is the state of the race in the 14 battleground states.
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Banned Books List is Fabricated, But I Want to Know!</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/banned-books-list-is-fabricate.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.213100</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-04T02:04:34Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-04T02:04:34Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; OK, I pretty much prefer to believe the worst about Sarah Palin at this point too but the list of books she wanted to ban circulating on the 'net is clearly a fabrication.&nbsp; A number of the books were...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>aschrepf</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/aschrepf/">
      <![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; OK, I pretty much prefer to believe the worst about Sarah Palin at this point too but the list of books she wanted to ban circulating on the 'net is clearly a fabrication.&nbsp; A number of the books were not published when this incident occurred.&nbsp; However, I was wondering if someone who is more computer literate than myself could whip up an online petition for us to circulate and send to the McCain campaign demanding to know what books his choice for Vice President believes should not reside in our nation's libraries.<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Palin is Sincere; And That&apos;s What&apos;s Dangerous</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/palin-is-sincere-and-thats-wha.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.213006</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-03T23:31:48Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-03T23:31:48Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I just finished watching a number of revealing youtube videos that showcase Sarah Palin speaking in a couple of different churches.&nbsp; Palin is very sincere, earnest, enthusiastic even.&nbsp; She speaks in church cadence, she invokes various prayers with little...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>aschrepf</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/aschrepf/">
      <![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I just finished watching a number of revealing youtube videos that showcase Sarah Palin speaking in a couple of different churches.&nbsp; Palin is very sincere, earnest, enthusiastic even.&nbsp; She speaks in church cadence, she invokes various prayers with little effort and connects her life story to the events of the day.&nbsp; Sarah Palin is at least as sincere as George W. Bush about her religion but unlike W., who actually never fully embraced the evangelical movement (though he could manipulate its currency well enough,) she is completely committed to a belief in pre-millenial dispensationalism, the belief that mankind passes through various periods marked by serious calamities until the end times (coming soon) and the thousand year reign of Christ.&nbsp; I am not offering a criticism of religion in general or millenialists&nbsp; specifically.&nbsp; I am stating that a sincere person who does believe these things, as Sarah Palin does, will use those beliefs to inform their decision making.&nbsp; Events in the Middle East, always in flux, will be interpreted as portents of the coming apocalypse.&nbsp; Don't take my word for it.&nbsp; Visit John Hagee's website; he and Pat Roberts have interpreted everything from Ariel Sharon's stroke to the war with Lebanon as heralding the impending era.&nbsp;&nbsp; <br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; From her pastor, who declares that Alaska will be a refuge state in the end-times, to her own description of the Iraq war as a task from God, we can see that Sarah Palin is, well, sincere.&nbsp; That's the problem.&nbsp; If anyone is interested in learning more about this topic I would recommend Gershom Gorenberg's End of Days.<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>That&apos;s Twice in Two Days: LET&apos;S CALL &apos;EM ON IT!</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/thats-twice-in-two-days-lets-c.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.212857</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-03T17:42:43Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-03T17:42:43Z</updated>
   
   <summary> I just finished watching an interview with Michelle Bachman, representative from Minnesota.  She stated unambiguously that Palin was &quot;for earmarks&quot; as the Mayor of Wasilla but that as Governor her position has &quot;evolved.&quot;  The &quot;corruption&quot; associated with earmarks made...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>aschrepf</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/aschrepf/">
      <![CDATA[		I just finished watching an interview with Michelle Bachman, representative from Minnesota.  She stated unambiguously that Palin was "for earmarks" as the Mayor of Wasilla but that as Governor her position has "evolved."  The "corruption" associated with earmarks made her see the light.  Yesterday I posted about Gary Bauer arguing that the 400 million dollar "Bridge to Nowhere" was a necessary, worthwhile project and that the only problem was that the federal government was asked to pay for it.  Palin, of course, thought it was a necessary, worthwhile project as long and only as long as the federal government was willing to pay for it- she cancelled construction when Alaska's portion of the bill rose from 160 to 329 million dollars and she kept the earmarked money.  So publicly disavowing her actions as Mayor and Governor now means contradicting McCain surrogates with on record.  I've got an idea for a commercial.(Ominous music.)At a time when incomes were dropping and unemployment was rising...Sarah Palin hired a lobbying firm to secure 27 million dollars for her tiny town of 7000...As Governor of Alaska she supported the Bridge to Nowhere and accepted 300 million federal tax dollars for it on behalf of her state...Is this the economic change you've been looking for?<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Republican Island</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/republican-island.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.212765</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-03T15:03:41Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-03T15:03:41Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Day 2 of the Republican National Convention has come and gone.  We had a spirited performance from Fred Thompson, a man who earned a reputation during the primary season for being a tremendously lazy campaigner (&quot;can I have a...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>aschrepf</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/aschrepf/">
      <![CDATA[		Day 2 of the Republican National Convention has come and gone.  We had a spirited performance from Fred Thompson, a man who earned a reputation during the primary season for being a tremendously lazy campaigner ("can I have a round of applause?").  We had Joseph Lieberman sounding a little like Kermit the Frog on valium.  We had W. appearing via satellite, a moment which reminded me of the ending of "The Cask of Amontillado."  Above all we had Republicans.  Republicans basking in their Republicaness, wallowing in their party identification like neutered cats sun-bathing on the windowsill.  	It was a glorious night to be a Republican.  We were reminded, lest we had forgotten, that John McCain endured countless hardships as a POW.  We were reminded, in case we had just emerged from a cave or a coma, that abortion is wrong.  We were reminded, in case we had only now been gifted with the faculties of language, that John McCain is a maverick.  We were told sternly that the media is against us and has crassly desired to ask questions of our new standard bearer.  We cannot allow this, she must remain in the Crystal Fortress until she can robotically repeat our talking points.  	All of which begs the question: What if you are not a Republican?<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>It&apos;s The Economy Again, Stupid</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/its-the-economy-again-stupid.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.212654</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-03T02:53:11Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-03T02:53:11Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; We are now fully half way through the Republican Convention and I've noticed something encouraging.&nbsp; The emphasis on the economy has been almost non-existent.&nbsp; Night #1 was an homage to McCain play-acting as President in the gulf coast region...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>aschrepf</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/aschrepf/">
      <![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; We are now fully half way through the Republican Convention and I've noticed something encouraging.&nbsp; The emphasis on the economy has been almost non-existent.&nbsp; Night #1 was an homage to McCain play-acting as President in the gulf coast region and tonight's emphasis has been on McCain's biography.&nbsp; Tomorrow is slated to be our introduction to Sarah Palin so I have to wonder aloud, "If I were an independent swing voter concerned about the economy what have I heard from the Republicans to reassure me?"&nbsp; So far very little.&nbsp; McCain is either going to speak at length in his address about the economy or the Republicans are going to walk out of their convention without a strong case on issue #1.<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Gary Bauer Sticks His Neck Out</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/gary-bauer-sticks-his-neck-out.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.212448</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-02T16:41:10Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-02T16:41:10Z</updated>
   
   <summary> I just saw an interview on MSNBC with Gary Bauer in which he claimed that the &quot;bridge to nowhere&quot; was an important necessary project and that the problem was that it should not have been funded by federal government.  Now...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>aschrepf</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/aschrepf/">
      	I just saw an interview on MSNBC with Gary Bauer in which he claimed that the &quot;bridge to nowhere&quot; was an important necessary project and that the problem was that it should not have been funded by federal government.  Now Palin was, or course, for this project and only cancelled construction when Alaska was asked to foot the bill, but I think the more important thing is that a McCain surrogate has just very publicly endorsed this ludicrous enterprise.  Add in the fact that Palin used a lobbying firm to secure 27 million federal dollars for her tiny town- that&apos;s a whopping $3,000+ per resident, and I think we&apos;ve got a story we should really make them own.
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>MSM: What&apos;s Happening Isn&apos;t Happening</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/msm-whats-happening-isnt-happe.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.212276</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-02T01:50:04Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-02T01:50:04Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; If you regularly visit sites like realclearpolitics as I do you may have noticed a few articles, and one particularly obnoxious piece by Jennifer Rubin, arguing that Obama has seen no convention bounce- that he's been Palinized.&nbsp; The problem...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>aschrepf</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/aschrepf/">
      <![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; If you regularly visit sites like realclearpolitics as I do you may have noticed a few articles, and one particularly obnoxious piece by Jennifer Rubin, arguing that Obama has seen no convention bounce- that he's been Palinized.&nbsp; The problem with this assertion is that it is demonstrably false and requires that we believe CNN's Sunday poll, which showed Obama leading by 1 point, and no others.&nbsp; Gallup currently has Obama up 6 points and had him down 1 point entering the convention.&nbsp; Rassmussen, which consistently polls Obama lower than Gallup, shows him up 3 points and had him down 2 points entering the convention.&nbsp; Two more weekly polls posting today show Obama up 7 and 8 points respectively.&nbsp; So by all accounts except one Obama is enjoying a healthy post-convention bounce.&nbsp; I have seen no numerical evidence that Palin is helping McCain except in terms of campaign contributions.<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The fact that this is a competitive race is manifest on the electoral maps- we have got to take Colorado to prevent another Ohio/Florida showdown- but to deny something readily apparent is to once again shortchange the Senator from Illinois.  <br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
