Setting Ourselves On Fire
Yo! Senators, Congresspersons, Mr. President! What do we democrats have to do to get your attention? We want real healthcare reform. We would prefer a single payer system, but we will settle for a system with a "public option." But we will not settle for BaucusCare, or anything that smells remotely like it.
Did you hear us? WE WILL NOT SETTLE FOR BAUCUSCARE. We will not settle for it. What do we have to do to get through to you? Set our sorry middle class asses on fire?
We the real people are sinking fast. We're losing our jobs, our businesses and our homes. We do not want to see you dicking around with half-measures that favor fat-ass insurance companies, that cost the middle class even more than we already cannot afford. I cannot fathom what world you live in that you think this will be good for us, or that we will let you get away with screwing us again. We will not.
To you Democratic congresspersons, you of the safe gerrymandered district, just think 2010. Screw us and we're coming after you. You may think we'll still support you just because the alternative is worse. We will not. We will go Green or we'll stay home. In our eyes, you will cease to exist or matter.
To you Democratic senators. Look, we already think you're a bunch of out-of-touch-with-the-common-people rich bastards. And now you're proving our assessment correct. If you let Baucus and Grassley run the show and try to sell us a watered down health care plan that favors the rich and well-connected, well screw you too. Your six-year term is isn't long enough to save you. This time we will not forget whose side you chose. Your only chance will be to run as the Republican that at heart you really are, because we Democrats will dump you.
As for you, Mr. President, when you ran for the office you now hold, your platform included healthcare reform with a public option. Please do not sign a healthcare reform bill that does not include a meaningful public option and does not save a struggling middleclass from financial ruin. If you do, I for one will not vote for you again. Last time around I worked many long hours for your campaign, and I gave your campaign more money than I could really afford.
If you let me down on healthcare, Mr. President, not only will I not vote for you again, I will send you an invoice for the time and money I spent in your behalf. I won't, however, expect to get paid, because so far your administration has only handed out money to rich bankers. (When you walk down the White House hallways, doesn't the stench of the Goldman Sachs bailout bother you just a little?)
"Senators, Congressmen, [Presidents] please heed the call, don't stand in the doorway, don't block up the hall, for he that gets hurt will be he who has stalled..."
Hey, has anybody seen my matches?
Did you hear us? WE WILL NOT SETTLE FOR BAUCUSCARE. We will not settle for it. What do we have to do to get through to you? Set our sorry middle class asses on fire?
We the real people are sinking fast. We're losing our jobs, our businesses and our homes. We do not want to see you dicking around with half-measures that favor fat-ass insurance companies, that cost the middle class even more than we already cannot afford. I cannot fathom what world you live in that you think this will be good for us, or that we will let you get away with screwing us again. We will not.
To you Democratic congresspersons, you of the safe gerrymandered district, just think 2010. Screw us and we're coming after you. You may think we'll still support you just because the alternative is worse. We will not. We will go Green or we'll stay home. In our eyes, you will cease to exist or matter.
To you Democratic senators. Look, we already think you're a bunch of out-of-touch-with-the-common-people rich bastards. And now you're proving our assessment correct. If you let Baucus and Grassley run the show and try to sell us a watered down health care plan that favors the rich and well-connected, well screw you too. Your six-year term is isn't long enough to save you. This time we will not forget whose side you chose. Your only chance will be to run as the Republican that at heart you really are, because we Democrats will dump you.
As for you, Mr. President, when you ran for the office you now hold, your platform included healthcare reform with a public option. Please do not sign a healthcare reform bill that does not include a meaningful public option and does not save a struggling middleclass from financial ruin. If you do, I for one will not vote for you again. Last time around I worked many long hours for your campaign, and I gave your campaign more money than I could really afford.
If you let me down on healthcare, Mr. President, not only will I not vote for you again, I will send you an invoice for the time and money I spent in your behalf. I won't, however, expect to get paid, because so far your administration has only handed out money to rich bankers. (When you walk down the White House hallways, doesn't the stench of the Goldman Sachs bailout bother you just a little?)
"Senators, Congressmen, [Presidents] please heed the call, don't stand in the doorway, don't block up the hall, for he that gets hurt will be he who has stalled..."
Hey, has anybody seen my matches?
Advertisement
















Flame on, Johnny! Rec'd.
July 28, 2009 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great letter, ArtWrite. Direct speak, representing the madder-but- wiser of us who BELIEVED that a Democratic majority led by an intelligent president would guarantee Change We Can Believe In.
You have identified an interesting option in 2010 and 2012 that I, for one, had not considered: voting Green which, in these particular elections, might be winnable, if our choices come down toa fundamentalist Republican candidate (can there be any other kind?) and a Democratic candidate whose lustre might, by then, be irrevocably tarnished if he does not promote the legislation and decisions for which we elected him.
I'm curious: do you feel any differently than you did about Hillary Clinton? I'm only beginning to ask myself that question....
July 28, 2009 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the feedback. Somehow, I think Hillary wouldn't have been the one to deliver healthcare reform. The mens' club that is the Senate would have paid even less attention to her than it does Barack. The framers of the constitution gave us the senaate because they didn't trust the people. It is time for it to just go away.
July 28, 2009 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Right. If you think republicans hate Obama, you should see what they think of ANYTHING CLINTON.
I personally think Obama needs to meet with the Blue Mongrels and tell them in no uncertain terms:
"Look. Remember our convention? Remember the election? You rode MY coattails; I did not ride yours. If you are responsible for denying this country the change they voted for, I will, in the words of John McCain, 'Make you famous.' No one will doubt who is to blame for letting the country down.
"If you do not support the health care reform that our country needs, including a viable Public Option, you will cut yourself off from our party and those who support it.
"It is your choice. Side with the republicans, who will vote 'no' just because they hate Democrats. But do so at your own peril."
Would that be so hard? That is a kinda LBJ, ball-busting way of playing this game.
July 28, 2009 6:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's really good, C'Ville. Language the bastids understand.
Maybe send a copy to Rahm; he will also get it. And then maybe he can explain the need for it to Obama.
July 29, 2009 12:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yez! This is the one where Obama cashes in on his political capital. It will dwindle, it is dwindling, but if he spends it now, he may actualy get a BIG return on the investment.
July 29, 2009 12:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Senate would be fine if it weren't filled with whores like Baucus, Nelson, Snowe, Collins, Lieberman, Landrieu, etc... Nothing but whores the lot of em!
July 28, 2009 11:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
The problem is that Congress is a whorehouse and ALL the senators and representatives are whores...every last one of them, republicans and democrats alike. Is there a single one who hasn't taken money from a lobbyist? Has even ONE of them suggested that THEY be covered by whatever health care plan it is that they come up with for the rest of us? I don't think so.
July 29, 2009 2:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well said.
July 28, 2009 4:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Right on, a-write! Fight the Power! Didn't we reject the House of Lords in 1776?
The Senate is giving me pains that may require extensive health benefits to relieve. Their pre-existing condition is pomposity, compounded by lily-liveritis. Symptoms include delusions of grandeur, loss of hearing in regards to the cries of their constituents, and an inability to distinguish political foes from friends.
July 28, 2009 5:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ha, TT. Well-said.
July 28, 2009 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Senate IS THE HOUSE OF LORDS! We need to get that in our heads.
July 28, 2009 8:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Enjoyable post, artwrite.
It appears Democrats assume we won't desert them for fear the country will go down the toilet.
Well, we know what that's like. There's nothing left to lose.
July 28, 2009 9:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
The country is already down the toilet. Now that they have the chance, they're doing nothing to fix it. Do they not understand why they won in 2006 and 2008? Not so they could cower under their desks, afraid that making the wrong move--making any move--could spell the end of their careers. If I did my job like that, I would have been fired years ago. I'm done with voting for Democrats because the alternative is worse. Inertia is as bad as the wrong action.
July 28, 2009 10:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Orlando, I wish I had encouraging words, but I don't. I am truly disgusted with what is passing for leadership at the moment, The blue mogrels could be brought into the right lane, hell, I could do it [see my script above].
If we don't do this it is over.
All the elan; all the enthusiasm; all the trust. It is now or never
July 28, 2009 10:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
The only “public option” we get is humiliation.
They HAVE to change it, NOW!
If not, I'll remember how that Dylan song ends.
July 29, 2009 12:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Matt Taibbi on the prospects for the bill:
Emphasis mine. The first paragraph is crucial, if crudely phrased. If Obama and Rahm wanted this to get done, it would get done.
July 29, 2009 1:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Long term outcomes versus a short term view?
Ah come on now Gharlane ...
Wouldn't it be easier to just dump the whole screwed up mess on the slender shoulders of Harry "is a F@¢king tool" Reid?
You know, kind of like back during the Big Three bridge loan dealio in December 2008...
Remember that? Wow! We could have dumped all kinds of cash in the automakers laps for a short term gain on a problem that has long term consequences... Eh?
Now Ford is cruising along on it's own devices. Chrysler and GM both went into the Chapter 11 reorganization blender where they both belonged.
GM separated themselves from and dumped their biggest loser GMAC into a bank holding company and the car division is now heading in the reorganized direction to do what it's suppose to do, make goddamn automobiles.
Chrysler? Well, Daimler had their go at it and dumped 'em off on Cerberus Capital Management who then sold off to the UAW. So Now, the UAW retiree health care trust fund (Volunteer Employee Benefit Association) (67.69%), Fiat (20%), and WE the taxpayers (9.85%) equity stake for financing the deal with $6.6 billion for financing, and Canada (2.46%), are holding the bag. But "New Chrysler" is still alive and breathing, if ever so slightly as an American majority held company.
Yup! Things sure went in a totally different direction than anyone could ever have dreamed they would back there in December 2008 when it was all so easy to blame the old staid Senator Harry "is a F@¢king tool" Reid.
So -- What does this have to do with the current health reform situation?
Don't ever count the chickens till they hatch (ask Bwak). The long term haul on health reform is but in the 5th or 6th inning of a ball game that will undoubtedly go into extra innings.
And remember this, there were a boatload of people who didn't give Obama and his team a snowball's chance in hell of pulling off the election. But he proved those naysayers wrong.
In closing: Critical mass time is so exciting in the battle of political wills... But don't get sidetracked into why we are where we are at, at the moment. There is too much work to be done on how we wish to proceed to where we wish to be.
And I truly believe and appreciate that artwrite has presented exactly what needs to be done to get us where we wish to be.
Just saying ... Ya' know...
~OGD~
July 29, 2009 3:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
I still don't understand why liberals are so in love with a nationalized health care system. Is it just for the power that you think you will gain? Do you REALLY think it will benefit everyone? Have you ever looked into the issues with the Canadian or UK system, where people die waiting for treatment? Wait times in Canada for angioplasty can be several months, for an MRI over a year. Is that what we want? DO you want the government to tell you who your doctor will be, what treatments you can have, what specialists you can see? ALL that is in the current plan being debated. Did you see Obama tell the woman that her mother might be too old to justify spending for a pacemaker, that maybe she should just be given pain meds? Is that what we want, health care rationed and access denied by some bureaucrat who says we're too old to matter? Currently 85% of the country has private health insurance. Why is it a crises that 15% are not covered, so we must screw over the 85% who are?
July 29, 2009 8:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
More people die here, you unclever bull dog. Our outcomes are WORSE, not BETTER! Our system is broken, and those in Canada and the UK is NOT broken. First of all, they have universal coverage, and if problems arise, they fix them. In Canada the addressed the long waiting times for certain procedures, and shortened most of them. It is true that some still have to wait for a knee replacement surgery. Who could get that surgery here at all if they are among the 50 million who don't have insurance at all?
Universal health care as a Power Play? What a dumb accusation. And for the millionth time, anyone who has insurance can keep it. Why do you republicans hate America?
July 29, 2009 9:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Insurance companies already determine what doctor you can see* and what treatments you can receive**
* Doctors must be contracted with the insurance company in order to bill them for services. The insurance company determines the reimbursement rates for the doctor (same in pharmacy). The doctor must accept those rates (and is NOT allowed to charge the patient the difference). If YOUR doctor doesn't agree to the pitiful payments, then he/she won't contract with the insurance company. Then your insurance will tell you: "That doctor is not covered." You are free to pay out of your own pocket to see your own doctor... but you'll pay through the nose.
** Also... your insurance determines what treatments you can and can't have already. They will deny coverage in order to maximize their profits. Expensive procedures/treatments are denied in favor of less expensive (and less effective)procedures/treatments.
Insurance companies already limit your access to medication. In pharmacy I see scripts every day that are "Denied: Non-Formulary Drug". You're free to pay for it out of pocket, but you'll pay through the nose.
So don't tell me the Gov't program would be any different than what we already have... It would be very similar... only WAY MORE people would have access... and that's the whole idea.
July 29, 2009 10:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Kudos! Well done! :-)
July 29, 2009 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink