"Farewell to All That: An Oral History of the Bush White House,"

by Cullen Murphy and Todd S. Purdum, February 2009.

A taste:

Lawrence Wilkerson, top aide and later chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell:

We had this confluence of characters--and I use that term very carefully--that included people like Powell, Dick Cheney, Condi Rice, and so forth, which allowed one perception to be "the dream team." It allowed everybody to believe that this Sarah Palin-like president--because, let's face it, that's what he was--was going to be protected by this national-security elite, tested in the cauldrons of fire. What in effect happened was that a very astute, probably the most astute, bureaucratic entrepreneur I've ever run into in my life became the vice president of the United States.

He became vice president well before George Bush picked him. And he began to manipulate things from that point on, knowing that he was going to be able to convince this guy to pick him, knowing that he was then going to be able to wade into the vacuums that existed around George Bush--personality vacuum, character vacuum, details vacuum, experience vacuum.

"Fannie Mae's Last Stand" in the same issue, in which Bethany McLean "tells of the long, vicious war--involving most of Washington's top players--that helped propel one of the world's most successful companies off a cliff," is also no slouch in the muckraking department.

It just occurred to me while reading some of the posts on the Gaza topic that I rarely see this point brought up as far as related history lessons:

On August 14-15, 1947, a two-state "solution" was enacted with the creation of the state of Pakistan followed by one of the largest and most rapid population transfers in history, with 17.9 million people leaving their homes. Of these, only 14.5 million arrived, suggesting that 3.4 million went "missing".  More history here, including a link to Jinnah's Two Nation Theory.

How did that work out, does the world like what it got out of that deal? And how do the parties involved feel about the"other"? Do they still have terrorism problems? And do they still fight over little spits of very desirable land? How come one rarely sees discussion of this as related to Israel and Palestine? Is it an inappropriate comparison to think about? Is "solution" a useful tag word here, or does it raise unreasonable expectations?  Just sayin'....what do I know?.....