<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>ARCADIA&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/arcadia/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/arcadia/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/arcadia//2401</id>
   <updated>2008-09-17T04:16:55Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Wolf Ad Works - (Focus Group Results)</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/wolf-ad-works-focus-group-resu.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.217435</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-17T04:16:55Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-17T04:16:55Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Per Media Curves&quot;The ad which focuses on Governor Palin&apos;s record regarding the treatment of wildlife in Alaska seemed to strike a chord with voters. The recent ads from both parties have had little impact among voters. This is the first...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>ARCADIA</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/arcadia/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Per <a href="http://mediacurves.com/Politics/J7011-Anit-PalinAd-WildlifeRecord/Index.cfm">Media Curves</a><br /><br />"The ad which focuses on Governor Palin's record regarding the treatment of wildlife in Alaska seemed to strike a chord with voters. The recent ads from both parties have had little impact among voters. This is the first ad in over a month that seems to have broken through." 
<p>After watching the ad, 25% of the focus group characterized themselves as angry, including 36% of Democrats, 15% of Republicans and 26% of Independents. 16% of the group responded with "sadness" and 29% were disturbed, including 31% of Democrats, 26% of Republicans and 29% of Independents. 22% also viewed the ad with skepticism. 
<p>The ad helped Obama achieve a Political Communications Impact Score (PCIS) of 23.3, which is a metric that illustrates the change of voters' perception on each candidate. In comparison, McCain's sex education ad only received a PCIS score of 4.8 and Obama's "More of the Same" ad only ranked a 3.2. 
<p>Please <a href="http://secure.defenders.org/site/Donation2?idb=0&amp;df_id=1547&amp;1547.donation=form1&amp;s_src=6JY08WDC4F&amp;s_subsrc=6JY08WDC4F_EJI08D1web&amp;JServSessionIdr012=65hn2ot2t1.app26a">donate</a>.</p></p></p></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Obama may be Obama, but I am not</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/obama-may-be-obama-but-i-am-no.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.216660</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-14T03:02:48Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-14T03:02:48Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[My friends and I&nbsp;am aghast at the "non-violent" resistance strategy of the Obama campaign. I completely agree with Markos for calling it the "magic "new politics" bullshit" Obama needs to stop preaching to the choir. Obama has been campaigning and...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>ARCADIA</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/arcadia/">
      <![CDATA[<p>My friends and I&nbsp;am aghast at the "non-violent" resistance strategy of the Obama campaign. I completely agree with Markos for calling it the <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/13/2011/51910/943/597071">"magic "new politics" bullshit"</a></p>
<p>Obama needs to stop preaching to the choir. </p>
<p>Obama has been campaigning and in the news for over two years, 6 months with daily primary coverage. EVERYONE who can be converted by his message has already been converted. That's why all this - "Obama should run ads on the issues,&nbsp; this one is very effective" contains a fallacy. </p>
<p><strong>The people who find previous ads/approaches effective are already converted. The undecideds or weak supporters aren't convinced by it and they have been exposed to it daily for the first 6 months of this year.&nbsp; </strong></p>
<p>I was going to send a contribution to his campaign but decided instead to send it to the Defenders of Wildlife to run the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQobIUE1zTU">wolf ad</a>.&nbsp; </p>
<p>What I like about the wolf ad is that it creates a visceral response in animal lovers - who are spread across all geo-demographic groups. This will get a response from people who were not swayed earlier. </p>
<p>I am sending my $300 to finance running the ad and I got sis to kick in another $300. This will cover three viewings. In addition, I am posting it on women's forums and animal forums.</p>
<p>Obama may be Obama, but I am not.</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Great picture  of McCain and Sarah Palin</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/great-picture-of-mccain-and-sa.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.215697</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-11T05:53:42Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-11T05:53:42Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Caption this photo...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>ARCADIA</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/arcadia/">
      <![CDATA[Caption this photo<br /><br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Obama Campaign Mistakes?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/obama-campaign-mistakes.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.215180</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-10T01:35:26Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-10T01:35:26Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I am certainly not qualified to critique anyone&apos;s campaign, but I am wondering about some decisions.* In retrospect, not putting Hillary in as VP may have been a mistake. Not so much because she would have helped him win, but...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>ARCADIA</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/arcadia/">
      <![CDATA[I am certainly not qualified to critique anyone's campaign, but I am wondering about some decisions.<br /><br />* In retrospect, not putting Hillary in as VP may have been a mistake. Not so much because she would have helped him win, but because, by not&nbsp;selecting her, he opened himself up to the&nbsp;Palin&nbsp;counter-move.&nbsp;<br /><br />*&nbsp;Closing down the 527s - I never understood this; why shut&nbsp;down your allies to make a principled point?&nbsp;<br /><br />* The Grand Tour&nbsp;was a little like a premature victory lap and when McCain's campaign made this point, it had the ring of truth.&nbsp;I wonder if that tour sucked time, resources and attention during the critical month of August.<br /><br />*&nbsp;Spending proportionally more money on the ground game than advertising. I don't really know the $s involved, but, given the shut down of the 527s, it seems an odd choice. Especially considering the wide number of&nbsp;states they choose to play in. Of course, they probably know stuff I don't know, but it seems like they are trying to win the general election with the wonderful strategy that won all those caucus states. <br /><br />Please convince me otherwise!!]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Disheartening conversation with &quot;undecided voter&quot;</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/disheartening-conversation-wit.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.215176</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-10T01:22:03Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-10T01:22:03Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I work remotely and consequently have co-workers all over - esp in the N. Carolina Research Triangle. (I am in S. FL) I was speaking today to a woman who claimed to be undecided. Figuring that I could sway her,...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>ARCADIA</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/arcadia/">
      <![CDATA[<p>I work remotely and consequently have co-workers all over - esp in the N. Carolina Research Triangle. (I am in S. FL) 
<p>I was speaking today to a woman who claimed to be undecided. Figuring that I could sway her, I started talking about the Pres. race. 
<p>I could not believe it! This woman is over 50 and works as a contractor for a large telecom co. The company is in the process of sending jobs to India and WILL NOT hire full-time workers in the US. Just contractors. Several times she has expressed concern&nbsp;about how long the co. would keep her. 
<p>Yet, she is voting McCain because of Sarah Palin!! Compared Sarah Palin to Teddy Roosevelt, whom she erroneously claimed had also been the Gov. of small state for a short time. 
<p>Says she has marked the VP debates in her calendar because she wants to see how Sarah will do. (Expects her to do well!) 
<p>I tried to explain to her Republican policies have created our current economic climate - but she saw no connection! I tried to explain that the financial interests in our country exploit social divisions to further their aims. But, she just didn't see how electing a Democrat would make any difference. <br /><br />She's relatively well-educated. </p></p></p></p></p></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>First, Hillary blamed ....</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/04/first-hillary-blamed.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.190030</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-19T05:38:07Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-19T05:38:07Z</updated>
   
   <summary>First, Hillary blamed red state democracts, but I didn&apos;t care because I am not a red state democract. Then, Hillary blamed the small state caucuses, but I didn&apos;t care because I don&apos;t live in a small state with a caucus....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>ARCADIA</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/arcadia/">
      <![CDATA[<p>First, Hillary blamed red state democracts, but I didn't care because I am not a red state democract. <br /><br />Then, Hillary blamed the small state caucuses, but I didn't care because I don't live in a small state with a caucus. <br /><br />Then, she blamed blacks block-voting for one of their own, but I didn't care, because I am not black. 
<p>Then, she blamed latte-drinkers, but I didn't care because I drink expresso. 
<p>Then, she blame MoveOn, but I didn't care because I am not a member. <br /><br />Then, Hillary blamed me, and by that time there was no one left to care. </p></p></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Race Issue May Be A Wash</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/04/race-issue-may-be-a-wash.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.187283</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-04T05:51:09Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-04T05:51:09Z</updated>
   
   <summary>At this point, I think electability arguments based on race are a wash. I can&apos;t imagine African-Americans voting for Hillary in large numbers if they feel her candidacy lacks legitimacy. Can she really carry Ohio, Pennsylvania or Michigan if African-Americans...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>ARCADIA</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/arcadia/">
      <![CDATA[At this point, I think electability arguments based on race are a wash. <strong>I can't imagine African-Americans voting for Hillary in large numbers if they feel her candidacy lacks legitimacy</strong>. <br /><br />Can she really carry Ohio, Pennsylvania or Michigan if African-Americans don't vote for her in large numbers? And forget about making Virginia blue or retrieving Florida. <br />There are no easy choices for the Democrats for calibrating the race issue. Yes, many white people won't vote for Obama because he's black - we don't need studies to tell us this. And, many African-Americans will sit out the general election if Hillary is the nominee - again, no studies needed. ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
