<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>anti&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/anti/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/anti/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/anti//1268</id>
   <updated>2008-06-12T17:58:20Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Can we drive now? A Progressive Millennial&apos;s Lament</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/06/can-we-drive-now-a-progressive.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.199910</id>
   
   <published>2008-06-12T17:58:20Z</published>
   <updated>2008-06-12T17:58:20Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[I was reading this post on internal black political struggles over at Jack &amp; Jill ( http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/06/black-bloggers-dont-want-scraps.html&nbsp;) when I realized that the argument the author is making neednt be race or issue or subculture specific ... THIS is the mood...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>anti</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/anti/">
      <![CDATA[I was reading this post on internal black political struggles over at Jack &amp; Jill ( <a href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/06/black-bloggers-dont-want-scraps.html">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/06/black-bloggers-dont-want-scraps.html</a>&nbsp;) when I realized that the argument the author is making neednt be race or issue or subculture specific ... THIS is the mood of the country right now ... the same deep-set struggle is taking place within all our political parties and movements.... its the classic passing of the torch, but those who should be passing are giving the youngin's a kind of "from my cold dead fingers" attitude. The author really gets a lot of what I've been feeling right, only take what he says about the civil rights movement and apply it to feminism and progressivism, too (emphasis mine):
&nbsp;

<blockquote>
We demand a seat at the table. If you're going to discuss us, why don't you invite us to the discussion first?<br /><br />And it isn't a fight we asked for. Most of us just wanted to be heard. But when we learned how to use this tool, the INTERNET, as a means of not just communication, but for political activism, organizing protests and marches - making demands of the MSM that our issues get media coverage fairly and objectively, it was only a matter of time before we get called into full-scale battle.<br /><br />I just never thought the first ambush would come from the <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-blackbloggers_wittjun06,0,4953659.story">Vanguard of the Civil Rights Movement.</a> I thought being in the blogsphere would better assist the old guard in the fight, and ensure them they could trust us to keep fighting the good fight against racism, sexism, all-isms, as well as bring attention to issues within our communities that matter to US, BLACK PEOPLE.<br /><br />So, when I read that Jesse Jackson states that we bloggers are "good at serving the meal, but don't know how to farm and till the soil", I wanted to scream "If you take your hand off the plow and let us drive the mule, maybe we learn how to do that, too!"
&nbsp;
And they wonder why we who are under 50 are challenging them. ....<strong>All we're trying to do is advance the damned movement, and once again, we're being shown, through the outdated strategies of the Old Guard why we're still stuck like Chuck in the things that matter......</strong>
&nbsp;
<strong>Now, as a result of&nbsp;our successes, and others on the way, the Old Guard is whining that we're not respecting them. That we're saying they're irrelevant. I don't think I've read where we said we didn't need them anymore; I think we are urging them to rest on their laurels and show us how to carry the mantle of Civil Rights, political activism and demands for seats at the table of political and social civil discourse on a grander scale. We've never asked them to go away.<br /></strong><br />Ever see two people driving a car; I mean with both of their hands on the steering wheel? It cannot be done - that's why cars are built with ONE steering wheel and a passenger seat. Someone has to drive and others have to ride. <strong>I believe we've asked for permission to learn how to drive the car now, and just like old deacons, deaconess, old Pastors in church, they want to hang on until they physically die and kill the movement right along with them. They won't allow us to learn how to drive the car, and then they get upset when we take the keys and teach our damned selves how to put the car in gear and speed off.</strong>
&nbsp;
<strong>The Old Guard is still waging the fight for scraps from the table when the reality is, we want a seat at that table. Forget scraps.<br /></strong><br />And yet, when we see them, or the Congressional Black Caucus in the current state, they continue to engage in fights for SCRAPS.<br /><br />Getting Don Imus fired was SCRAPS. Getting Fox Network's FCC license yanked to stop them from spewing racist vitriol is MEAT ON THE BONE.<br /><br />Getting a job on Wall Street, now, is SCRAPS. Being someone like Dick Parsons or Stan O'Neal, running thangs, is MEAT.
&nbsp;
<strong>We've had scraps - we want a seat AT THE TABLE. We want the same things we thought the Old Guard wanted. Maybe we should challenge them as to what they really want versus what WE really want. Maybe because we're going about it differently, they may be scared we're going to leave them out. We're not; we will happily take them with us if they stop picking fights and battles with us and trust us to get the job done.</strong><br /></blockquote>
I have to say, I've been surprised by the level of resentment I've seen popping up in boomer plus circles against younger activists and organizations of all stripes and in all our many factions as Democrats. Perhaps part of me still wants to believe in that ideal of the revolutionary boomer and its existence somewhere in the clouded, resigned hearts and minds that have led the old school institutions for most of my lifetime .... but I thought it would be easier than this. I thought y'all would appreciate the big, bold moves being made by the younger generation right now. Our fingerprints are all over this Democratic revolution you're seeing, from Dean's 50 state strategy (remember who supported him first?) to the Obama phenomenon to the revolutionary microtargeting of elections and issues going on in places like Kos and MoveOn and on a million other smart blogs every day. 
&nbsp;
How long have we been hearing about how detached and disillusioned and apathetic we are? Yet when you see young people finally getting it and stepping up to the plate - dedicating their hard-earned money and time to making this country a fairer, more progressive place - y'all put them down. If only I had a dollar for every time I've been told that I don't respect the original womens movement - and thus am a traitor to my gender - because I volunteer for Barack Obama! His supporters - and the participants in the growing political grassroots on which his campaign feeds - are berated as naive koolaid drinkers and celebrity worshipers and hopeless idealists who wont stick with it for the long haul. And this from the LEFT! &nbsp;But we HAVE stuck with it. We've been doing this for a few years now, and we have ONLY managed to unseat the reigning&nbsp;order in a major political party.... first time thats happened in, what, decades? We helped orchestrate the take back of the Congress in 2006 ... and we are the ones on the ground building a true 50 state campaign for the Democratic party this year..... giving us better than even odds of sweeping into the White House with a breathtaking mandate in the form of a fat majority that can pass&nbsp;truly&nbsp;progressive legislation for a change. See, we want meat, too - not "triangulation," not the watered down nonsense the Clintons gave us.
&nbsp;
&nbsp;I thought y'all wanted health care reform. I&nbsp;thought you wanted a more progressive tax structure. I thought you wanted to advance the causes of racial equality and gender equality and equality for people of all sexual orientations. We want the same things you always did. We want to build on the foundation you laid for us. All we ask is that you clear us a space and allow us to do just what were doing. Why is that proving so difficult?
&nbsp;
/rant off ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>On Wright, Obama and a New Way Forward.</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/03/on-wright-obama-and-a-new-way.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.183927</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-17T18:43:10Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-17T18:43:10Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Americans, Democrats but not only Democrats, supporters of Clinton or Obama or none of the above.... &nbsp; ....we are facing a crossroads.&nbsp; In one direction lies a battle we have been fighting for decades upon decades, of which many of...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>anti</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/anti/">
      <![CDATA[Americans, Democrats but not only Democrats, supporters of Clinton or Obama or none of the above....
&nbsp;
....we are facing a crossroads.&nbsp; In one direction lies a battle we have been fighting for decades upon decades, of which many of us are weary, to which many of us cannot relate. In the other direction, there lies a new dynamic. And we have a choice to make.
&nbsp;
I cannot remember ever encountering a Rorschach test as instantly inflamatory and deeply telling as the&nbsp;ten second clips, aired in continuous loops on cable tv and, apparently in some peoples minds, of Reverend Jeremiah Wright this past week. Their prominent display seems to have set an entire generation of people back on its heels and into the recesses of its collective brain, where it is fighting the last war still. I feel like I'm watching a loved one suffer through some kind of PTSD flashback. Its depressing and scary. Part of me wants to settle you down and make you comfortable; part of me wants to slap you silly until you open your eyes and see what's actually there. 
&nbsp;
Its a maddening time to be a young Democrat. All I can do right now&nbsp;is to tell it to you as I see it, and hope that you listen and try to understand.
&nbsp;
This furor is about two things at its core: race and generational experience.
&nbsp;
There are some who claim its really about religion and politics - by and large those claims seem disingenous to me. Yes, what Rev. Wright said was inflammatory, but the vast majority of it has been said on numerous occasions in other forms and in different formats. The idea that 9/11 was to some extent the result of decades of military involvement overseas, especially in muslim majority nations, has been expressed by "serious" intellectuals before and frankly seems likely. Growing up I heard preachers say that America would answer for her sins more times than&nbsp;I could count - though usually the sins listed were abortion and homosexuality, not the killing of innocent civilians. Anyone who has actually been to a church or knows anything about, especially, the religious right knows that churches these days often express political views, and they aren't always mainstream ones (and its important to note that African American churches have a very long history of political involvement and mobilization - none of this should come as a surprise to anyone who is even remotely familiar with the tradition).
&nbsp;
In short, if John McCains white preacher was heard on tape speaking disdainfully about Islam or saying that America must change its leftist ways or face the judgement of the Divine, the sentiment would seem so common no one would even see fit to play the tapes&nbsp;on television, let alone manufacture a controversy over McCains connection to the man.
&nbsp;
But this isn't a white evangelical preacher pushing the views of the religious right.
&nbsp;
Its an "angry black man."
&nbsp;
And lets face it, in America, thats different.
&nbsp;
The first time I saw those tapes I was in the company of conservative baby boomers... their reaction was immediate disgust, physical even, setting in strongly before they could have possibly thought through what was being said. I suspect that they were not alone in having that kind of visceral reaction to Wright's anger, passion and choice of words. Most of the people that I have talked to who are "outraged" over this issue don't even seem to remember what the words were or meant at all; they say Wright is a racist without being able to explain why or how, they remember "God damn America" but haven't a clue about the context in which it was said. All they saw, all they remember, is that angry black face, dressed in foreign looking garb, bringing race to the forefront in a confrontational manner.
&nbsp;
The fact of the matter is that nothing you saw in those tapes is particularly uncommon in the black community. Whether we whites wish to see it or not, there is a lot of fear and paranoia and anger in that community to this day - and to some extent its understandable. That doesn't excuse all of it, and that certainly doesn't make it healthy or productive. But its there. It must be dealt with. And getting all red in the face and proclaiming "outrage" and condemning anyone who associates with it isn't going to cut it.
&nbsp;
Now for the claims of "guilt by association." 
&nbsp;
Barack Obama has been a servant of the public in an official capacity for more than 13 years. He has worked closely with our most prominent&nbsp; politicians. He has written and voted on oodles of legislation. He has given speech after speech. He has written two lengthy and particularly honest books about himself and his life.
&nbsp;
There&nbsp;has been&nbsp;no hint in any of this record or in any of these relationships that Obama himself agrees with any of his pastor's racially divisive rhetoric or shares any of his anger. In fact, Obama has made every effort publicly and privately to transcend these kinds of artificial and pointless divisions between people; his consistancy on this has been truly remarkable. 
&nbsp;
So what, exactly, are we afraid of?
&nbsp;
I get the feeling that a lot of people, baby boomers especially, are overplaying the relationship between Obama and Wright because in their minds and hearts, whether they want to admit it or not, Obama's blackness associated him with that kind of anger immediately. People of a certain age seem to have very particular frames built up&nbsp;through which to&nbsp;view people and ideas; these frames were set in the 60's when divisiveness was at a maximum. This "identity politics" way of viewing things also explains Geraldine Ferarro's statements about racism and sexism and why she was so hellbent on defending them. Both Ferarro and Wright are children of an era in which identity was everything, in which each person was supposed to fit neatly into a little box and everyone had their supreme label: the hawk or the dove, the black or the white, the man or the woman. 
&nbsp;
Many of these people WANT on some level for Obama to fit into the "black" box. And everyone knows that the "black" box is full of angry radicals like Wright. So to conflate the two is natural.
&nbsp;
But the problem is, Obama doesn't fit in&nbsp;that box. He refuses to fit in ANY box. He dares to reach out to people of all classifications - from angry black men to optimistic white youth to gay people to conservatives to anyone else who is willing - but he doesn't become them, he LISTENS to them, tries to understand them and learn from them what he can.
&nbsp;
This inability to fit into and refusal to use the 60's era system of compartmentalization is a huge reason why Obama appeals to so many in our largest and, potentially, our new "greatest" generation, the millennials. We understand what Obama is trying to do because many of us juggle people in the same way in our daily lives. We are gloriously diverse and we love it: 40% of us are ethnic minorities, we were raised on hip hop and bilingualism, more than half of us have been in interracial relationships.
&nbsp;
We haven't stopped supporting Obama, and we won't. We don't get what all this fuss is about. We have old racist uncles and sexist bosses and judgemental pastors and we know that being connected to them does not make us carbon copies of them. We genuinely don't understand why so many people seem to think that one could not seek spiritual advice from someone they disagreed with about something political. If we all vetted our friends and associates that way - distancing ourselves from anyone too different - we would be profoundly lonely. 
&nbsp;
Americans, we are at a crossroads. We are looking at a&nbsp;fine man and a fine candidate who is involved in a complicated relationship with someone who plays into an awful stereotype. We have two choices. We can view this man through the frames of the past, reduce him to a one-dimensional caricature of himself and place the two men together in a box labeled "black," whatever that entails, so that they both can be summarily dismissed. Or we can set the frames and boxes aside. We can judge this man on the content of his character, not on the color of his skin and the many generalizations that tend to flow from that. We can accept this relationship for what it is: a friendship in which there is some agreement and some disagreement, in which both parties are forever growing and changing, a friendship just like many that we all have. And then we can let Wright go back to representing Wright and take a good, hard look at our candidate, making this important decision based on what he and he alone brings to the American table.
&nbsp;
I'm ready to take a step forward. I hope you are, too.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
