« Who's Gonna Buy You That Library Now, George? | AnacherForester's Blog | Reagan-Appointed Judge Validated Warrentless Wiretaps »
Did NY Times Op-Ed Force Pentagon's Hand?
Last Sunday, The NY Times published an Op-Ed, "How to Pay for a 21st-Century Military" calling for billions of dollars in defense cuts through eliminating wasteful military programs inappropriate for 21st century warfare.
Among those programs on the Times' hit list:
The Bush administration certainly wouldn't say no to General Dynamics at this late juncture. President-elect Obama couldn't block the contract if he wanted to. Once sworn-in, President Obama will be powerfully disinclined to cut 10000+ jobs. (Especially as these are all centered in one region). Not with the state of the US economy. No way. No how.
Crossposted at:
Andrew Sullivan Is A Fraud
Among those programs on the Times' hit list:
Halt production of the Virginia class sub. Ten of these unneeded attack submarines -- modeled on the cold-war-era Seawolf, whose mission was to counter Soviet attack and nuclear launch submarines -- have already been built. The program is little more than a public works project to keep the Newport News, Va., and Groton, Conn., naval shipyards in business.Good call but it looks like it comes too late. Per Monday's Boston Globe Political Intelligence blog:
The US Navy this afternoon is expected to award a whopping $14 billion contract to General Dynamics to build eight new attack submarines, providing a stable workload for at least the next decade at the company's Electric Boat shipyard in Groton, Conn., and a key manufacturing facility on Narragansset Bay in Quonset Point, R.I., according to several knowledgeable sources.The timing of this multi-billion dollar sub deal is curious. It comes on the first business day after "How to Pay for a 21st-Century Military" is published. The Navy leaks the announcement of this $14 billion dollar contract award to General Dynamic at a time, three days before Christmas, in which it is likely to receive little scrutinity. More importantly, the contract is announced a month before Obama's inauguration.
The contract for Virginia class submarines "guarantees work on the New England waterfront at least through 2019," said a company official who asked not to be identified before the official announcement from the Department of Defense, which is expected at 5 pm.
General Dynamics employs about 10,500 people between its shipyard in Groton and hull-fabrication plant in Rhode Island.
The Bush administration certainly wouldn't say no to General Dynamics at this late juncture. President-elect Obama couldn't block the contract if he wanted to. Once sworn-in, President Obama will be powerfully disinclined to cut 10000+ jobs. (Especially as these are all centered in one region). Not with the state of the US economy. No way. No how.
Which begs this question: Did NYT's call to halt Virginia class subs construction instead have the unintended consequence of ensuring the program's continuation?
-AFCrossposted at:
Andrew Sullivan Is A Fraud
Advertisement





Did you mean to post a comment?
December 26, 2008 10:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
We were just confused. Like me from time to time you pushed the wrong button. Good post.
I doubt NYT had didly to do with it. But....
I do see a Conn connection to Sen Lierman RI has nothing to do with nothing.
Perhaps a look at campaign contributions...
Like I said. Good post.
December 27, 2008 12:57 AM | Reply | Permalink